<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/feeds/latestarticles/journal?journal=bmcmusculoskeletdisord&amp;quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders - Latest Articles</title>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcmusculoskeletdisord/</link>
        <description>The latest research articles published by BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders</description>
        <dc:date>2009-12-17T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/10/159" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/10/158" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/10/157" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/10/156" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/10/155" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/10/154" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/10/153" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/10/152" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/10/151" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/10/150" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
        <extra:info rdf:parseType="Literal">
            <html:div style="font:14px Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                <html:span style="font-weight:bold">
                    This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central
                </html:span>
                <html:br />
                <html:span style="font-size: 12px;">
                    It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit
                    <html:br />
                    <html:a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/" style="color:#3333CC; font-size:12px;">
                        http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/
                    </html:a>
                    <html:br />
                </html:span>
            </html:div>
        </extra:info>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/10/159">
        <title>Increased hallux angle in children and its association with insufficient length of footwear: A community based cross-sectional study</title>
        <description>Background:
Wearing shoes of insufficient length during childhood has often been cited as leading to deformities of the foot, particularly to the development of hallux valgus disorders. Until now, these assumptions have not been confirmed through scientific research. This study aims to investigate whether this association can be statistically proven and if children who wear shoes of insufficient length actually do have a higher risk of a more pronounced lateral deviation of the hallux.
Methods:
858 pre-school children were included in the study. The study sample was stratified by sex, urban/rural areas and Austrian province. The hallux angle and the length of the feet were recorded. The inside length of the children&apos;s footwear (indoor shoes worn in pre-school and outdoor shoes) were assessed. Personal data and different anthropometric measurements were taken. The risk of hallux valgus deviation was statistically tested by a stepwise logistic regression analysis and the relative risk (odds ratio) for a hallux angle [greater than or equal to] 4 degrees was calculated.
Results:
Exact examinations of the hallux angle could be conducted on a total of 1,579 individual feet.  Only 23.9% out of 1,579 feet presented a straight position of the great toe. The others were characterized by lateral deviations (valgus position) at different degrees, equalling 10 degrees or greater in 14.2% of the children&apos;s feet.88.8% of 808 children examined wore indoor footwear that was of insufficient length, and 69.4% of 812 children wore outdoor shoes that were too short. A significant relationship was observed between the lengthwise fit of the shoes and the hallux angle: the shorter the shoe, the higher the value of the hallux angle. The relative risk (odds ratio) of a lateral hallux deviation of [greater than or equal to] 4 degrees in children wearing shoes of insufficient length was significantly increased.
Conclusions:
There is a significant relationship between the hallux angle in children and footwear that is too short in length. The fact that the majority of the children examined were wearing shoes of insufficient length makes the issue particularly significant. Our results emphasize the importance of ensuring that children&apos;s footwear fits properly.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/10/159</link>
                <dc:creator>Christian Klein</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Elisabeth Groll-Knapp</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Michael Kundi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Wieland Kinz</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2009, 10:159</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-12-17T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2474-10-159</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2474</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>10</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>159</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-12-17T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/10/158">
        <title>
Use of autologous bone graft in anterior cervical decompression: morbidity &amp; quality of life analysis
</title>
        <description>Background:
Autologous iliac crest graft has long been the gold standard graft material used in cervical fusion. However its harvest has significant associated morbidity, including protracted postoperative pain scores at the harvest site. Thus its continued practice warrants scrutiny, particularly now that alternatives are available. Our aims were to assess incidence and nature of complications associated with iliac crest harvest when performed in the setting of Anterior Cervical Decompression (ACD). Also, to perform a comparative analysis of patient satisfaction and quality of life scores after ACD surgeries, when performed with and without iliac graft harvest.
Methods:
All patients who underwent consecutive ACD procedures, with and without the use of autologous iliac crest graft, over a 48 month period were included (n=53). Patients were assessed clinically at a minimum of 12 months postoperatively and administered 2 validated quality of life questionnaires: the SF-36 and Cervical Spine Outcomes Questionnaires (Response rate 96%). Primary composite endpoints included incidence of bone graft donor site morbidity, pain scores, operative duration, and quality of life scores.
Results:
Patients who underwent iliac graft harvest experienced significant peri-operative donor site specific morbidity, including a high incidence of pain at the iliac crest (90%), iliac wound infection (7%), a jejunal perforation, and longer operative duration (285 minutes vs. 238 minutes, p=0.026). Longer term follow-up demonstrated protracted postoperative pain at the harvest site and significantly lower mental health scores on both quality of life instruments, for those patients who underwent autologous graft harvest
Conclusion:
ACD with iliac crest graft harvest is associated with significant iliac crest donor site morbidity and lower quality of life at greater than 12 months post operatively. This is now avoidable by using alternatives to autologous bone without compromising clinical or technical outcome.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/10/158</link>
                <dc:creator>Helen Heneghan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>John McCabe</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2009, 10:158</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-12-16T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2474-10-158</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2474</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>10</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>158</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-12-16T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/10/157">
        <title>The relationship between chronic type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation and cervical spine pain</title>
        <description>Background:
This study was aimed at evaluating whether or not  patients with chronic type III acromioclavicular dislocation develop cervical spine pain and degenerative changes more frequently than normal subjects.
Methods:
The cervical spine of 34 patients with chronic type III AC dislocation was radiographically evaluated. Osteophytosis presence was registered and the narrowing of the intervertebral disc and cervical lordosis were evaluated. Subjective cervical symptoms were investigated using the Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire (NPQ). One-hundred healthy volunteers were recruited as a control group.
Results:
The rate and distribution of osteophytosis and narrowed intervertebral disc were similar in both of the groups. Patients with chronic AC dislocation had a lower value of cervical lordosis. NPQ score was 17.3% in patients with AC separation (100%= the worst result) and 2.2% in the control group (p&lt;0.05). An inverse significant nonparametric correlation was found between the NPQ value and the lordosis degree in the AC dislocation group (p=0.001) wheras results were not correlated (p=0.27) in the control group.
Conclusions:
Our study shows that chronic type III AC dislocation does not interfere with osteophytes formation or intervertebral disc narrowing, but that it may predispose cervical hypolordosis. The higher average NPQ values were observed in patients with chronic AC dislocation, especially in those that developed cervical hypolordosis.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/10/157</link>
                <dc:creator>Stefano Gumina</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Stefano Carbone</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Valerio Arceri</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Alessandro Rita</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Anna Vestri</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Franco Postacchini</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2009, 10:157</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-12-16T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2474-10-157</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2474</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>10</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>157</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-12-16T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/10/156">
        <title>Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for the management of tennis elbow: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial (ISRCTN 87141084)</title>
        <description>Background:
Tennis elbow is a common and often extremely painful musculoskeletal condition, which has considerable impact on individuals as well as economic implications for healthcare utilization and absence from work. Many management strategies have been studied in clinical trials. Whilst corticosteroid injections offer short term pain relief, this treatment is unpleasant and is used with caution due to an associated high risk of pain recurrence in the long term. Systematic reviews conclude that there is no clear and effective treatment for symptoms of pain in the first 6 weeks of the condition. There is a clear need for an intervention that is acceptable to patients and provides them with effective short-term pain relief without increasing the risk of recurrence. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is an inexpensive, non-invasive, non-pharmacological form of analgesia that is commonly used in the treatment of pain. TENS has very few contraindications and is simple to apply. It also benefits from being patient controlled, thereby promoting self-management. This study aims to assess the effectiveness, in terms of pain relief, and cost-effectiveness of a self-management package of treatment that includes TENS.
Methods:
The design of the study will be a two-group pragmatic randomized clinical trial. 240 participants aged 18 years and over with tennis elbow will be recruited from 20-30 GP practices in Staffordshire, UK. Participants are to be randomized on a 1:1 basis to receive either primary care management (standard GP consultation, medication, advice and education) or primary care management with the addition of TENS, over 6 weeks. Our primary outcome measure is average intensity of elbow pain in the past 24 hours (0-10 point numerical rating scale) at 6 weeks. Secondary outcomes include pain and limitation of function, global assessment of change, days of sick leave, illness perceptions, and overall health status. A cost-effectiveness analysis will also be performed. Patient adherence and satisfaction data will be collected at 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months by postal questionnaire. A diary will also be completed for the first 2 weeks of treatment. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness analyses will be carried out using an intention-to-treat approach as the primary analysis.DiscussionThis paper presents detail on the rationale, design, methods and operational aspects of the trial.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/10/156</link>
                <dc:creator>Linda Chesterton</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Danielle van der Windt</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Julius Sim</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Martyn Lewis</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Christian Mallen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Elizabeth Mason</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Cathrine Warlow</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kanchan Vahora</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Elaine Hay</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2009, 10:156</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-12-11T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2474-10-156</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2474</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>10</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>156</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-12-11T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/10/155">
        <title>Predictive factors of adherence to frequency and duration components in home exercise programs for neck and low back pain: an observational study.</title>
        <description>Background:
Evidence suggests that to facilitate physical activity sedentary people may adhere to one component of exercise prescriptions (intensity, duration or frequency) without adhering to other components. Some experts have provided evidence for determinants of adherence to different components among healthy people. However, our understanding remains scarce in this area for patients with neck or low back pain. The aims of this study are to determine whether patients with neck or low back pain have different rates of adherence to exercise components of frequency per week and duration per session when prescribed with a home exercise program, and to identify if adherence to both exercise components have distinct predictive factors.
Methods:
A cohort of one hundred eighty-four patients with chronic neck or low back pain who attended physiotherapy in eight primary care centers were studied prospectively one month after intervention. The study had three measurement periods: at baseline (measuring characteristics of patients and pain), at the end of physiotherapy intervention (measuring characteristics of the home exercise program) and a month later (measuring professional behaviors during clinical encounters, environmental factors and self-efficacy, and adherence behavior).
Results:
Adherence to duration per session (70.9% +/-7.1) was more probable than adherence to frequency per week (60.7%+/-7.0). Self-efficacy was a relevant factor for both exercise components (p&lt;0.05). The total number of exercises prescribed was predictive of frequency adherence (p&lt;0.05). Professional behaviors have a distinct influence on exercise components. Frequency adherence is more probable if patients received clarification of their doubts (adjusted OR: 4.1; p&lt;0.05), and duration adherence is more probable if they are supervised during the learning of exercises (adjusted OR: 3.3; p&lt;0.05).
Conclusion:
We have shown in a clinic-based study that adherence to exercise prescription frequency and duration components have distinct levels and predictive factors. We recommend additional study, and advise that differential attention be given in clinical practice to each exercise component for improving adherence.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/10/155</link>
                <dc:creator>Francesc Medina-Mirapeix</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Pilar Escolar-Reina</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Juan Gascon-Canovas</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Joaquina Montilla-Herrador</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Francisco Jimeno-Serrano</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sean Collins</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2009, 10:155</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-12-09T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2474-10-155</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2474</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>10</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>155</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-12-09T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/10/154">
        <title>Association between knee alignment and knee pain in patients surgically treated for medial knee osteoarthritis 
by high tibial osteotomy
A one year follow-up study
</title>
        <description>Background:
The association between knee alignment and knee pain in knee osteoarthritis (OA) is unclear. High tibial osteotomy, a treatment option in knee OA, alters load from the affected to the unaffected compartment of the knee by correcting malalignment. This surgical procedure thus offers the possibility to study the cross-sectional and longitudinal association of alignment to pain. The aims were to study 1) the preoperative association of knee alignment to preoperative knee pain and 2) the association of change in knee alignment with surgery to change in knee pain over time in patients operated on for knee OA by high tibial osteotomy.
Methods:
182 patients (68% men) mean age 53 years (34 - 69) with varus alignment having tibial osteotomy by the hemicallotasis technique for medial knee OA were consecutively included. Knee alignment was assessed by the Hip-Knee-Ankle (HKA) angle from radiographs including the hip and ankle joints. Knee pain was measured by the subscale pain (0 - 100, worst to best scale) of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) preoperatively and at one year follow-up. To estimate the association between knee alignment and knee pain multivariate regression analyses were used.
Results:
Mean preoperative varus alignment was 170 degrees (153 - 178) and mean preoperative KOOS pain was 42 points (3 - 86). There was no association between preoperative varus alignment and preoperative KOOS pain, crude analysis 0.02 points (95% CI -0.6 - 0.7) change in pain with every degree of HKA angle, adjusted analysis 0.3 points (95% CI -1.3 - 0.6).The mean postoperative knee alignment was 184 degrees (171 - 185). The mean change in knee alignment was 13 degrees (0 - 30). The mean change in KOOS pain was 32 (-16 - 83). Neither was there any association between change in knee alignment and change in KOOS pain over time, crude analysis 0.3 point (95 % CI -0.6 - 1.2), adjusted analysis 0.4 points (95% CI 0.6 - 1.4).
Conclusions:
We found no association between knee alignment and knee pain in patients with knee OA indicating that alignment and pain are separate entities, and that the degree of preoperative malalignment is not a predictor of knee pain after surgery.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/10/154</link>
                <dc:creator>Annette W-Dahl</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Soren Toksvig-Larsen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ewa Roos</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2009, 10:154</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-12-08T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2474-10-154</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2474</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>10</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>154</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-12-08T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/10/153">
        <title>Help-seeking behaviour among people living with chronic hip or knee pain in the community</title>
        <description>Background:
A large proportion of people living with hip or knee pain do not consult health care professionals. Pain severity is often believed to be the main reason for help seeking in this population; however the evidence for this is contradictory. This study explores the importance of several potential risk factors on help seeking across different practitioner groups, among adults living with chronic hip or knee pain in a large community sample.
Methods:
Health care utilization, defined as having seen a family doctor (GP) during the past 12 months; or an allied health professional (AHP) or alternative therapist during the past 3 months, was assessed in a community based sample aged 35 or over and reporting pain in hip or knee. Adjusted odds ratios were determined for social deprivation, rurality, pain severity, mobility, anxiety/depression, co-morbidities, and body mass index.
Results:
Of 1119 persons reporting hip or knee pain, 52% had pain in both sites.Twenty-five percent of them had seen a doctor only, 3% an AHP only, and 4% an alternative therapist only. Thirteen percent had seen more than one category of health care professionals, and 55% had not seen any health care professional. In the multivariate model, factors associated with consulting a GP were mobility problems (OR 2.62 (1.64-4.17)), urban living (OR 2.40 (1.14-5.04) and pain severity (1.28 (1.13-1.44)). There was also some evidence that obesity was associated with increased consultation (OR 1.72 (1.00-2.93)). Factors were similar for consultation with a combination of several health care professionals. In contrast, seeing an alternative therapist was negatively associated with pain severity, anxiety and mobility problems (adjusting for age and sex).
Conclusion:
Disability appears to be a more important determinant of help-seeking than pain severity or anxiety and depression, for adults with chronic pain in hip or knee. The determinants of seeking help from alternative practitioners are different from determinants of consulting GPs, AHPs or a combination of different health care providers.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/10/153</link>
                <dc:creator>Carina Thorstensson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Rachael Gooberman-Hill</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Joy Adamson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Susan Williams</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Paul Dieppe</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2009, 10:153</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-12-07T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2474-10-153</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2474</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>10</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>153</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-12-07T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/10/152">
        <title>Physiotherapy alone or in combination with corticosteroid injection for acute lateral epicondylitis in general practice: A protocol for a randomised, placebo-controlled study.</title>
        <description>Background:
Lateral epicondylitis is a painful condition responsible for loss of function and sick leave for long periods of time. In many countries, the treatment guidelines recommend a wait-and-see policy, reflecting that no conclusions on the best treatment can be drawn from the available research, published studies and meta-analyses.Methods/DesignRandomized double blind controlled clinical trial in a primary care setting. While earlier trials have either compared corticosteroid injections to physical therapy or to naproxen orally, we will compare the clinical effect of physiotherapy alone or physiotherapy combined with corticosteroid injection in the initial treatment of acute tennis elbow. Patients seeing their general practitioner with lateral elbow pain of recent onset will be randomised to one of three interventions: 1: physiotherapy, corticosteroid injection and naproxen or 2: physiotherapy, placebo injection and naproxen or 3: wait and see treatment with naproxen alone. Treatment and assessments are done by two different doctors, and the contents of the injection is unknown to both the treating doctor and patient. The primary outcome measure is the patient&apos;s evaluation of improvement after 6, 12, 26 and 52 weeks. Secondary outcome measures are pain, function and severity of main complaint, pain-free grip strength, maximal grip strength, pressure-pain threshold, the patient&apos;s satisfaction with the treatment and duration of sick leave.
Conclusion:
This article describes a randomized, double blind, controlled clinical trial with a one year follow up to investigate the effects of adding steroid injections to physiotherapy in acute lateral epicondylitis.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00826462</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/10/152</link>
                <dc:creator>Morten Olaussen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Oystein Holmedal</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Morten Lindbaek</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Soren Brage</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2009, 10:152</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-12-04T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2474-10-152</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2474</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>10</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>152</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-12-04T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/10/151">
        <title>Ultrasound evidence of altered lumbar connective tissue structure in human subjects with chronic low back pain</title>
        <description>Background:
Although the connective tissues forming the fascial planes of the back have been hypothesized to play a role in the pathogenesis of chronic LBP, there have been no previous studies quantitatively evaluating connective tissue structure in this condition. The goal of this study was to perform an ultrasound-based comparison of perimuscular connective tissue structure in the lumbar region in a group of human subjects with chronic or recurrent low back pain (LBP) for more than 12 months, compared with a group of subjects without LBP.
Methods:
In each of 107 human subjects (60 with LBP and 47 without LBP), parasagittal ultrasound images were acquired bilaterally centered on a point 2 cm lateral to the midpoint of the L2-3 interspinous ligament. The outcome measures based on these images were subcutaneous and perimuscular connective tissue thickness and echogenicity measured by ultrasound.
Results:
There were no significant differences in age, sex, body mass index (BMI) or activity levels between LBP and No-LBP groups.  Perimuscular thickness and echogenicity were not correlated with age but were positively correlated with BMI.  The LBP group had ~25% greater perimuscular thickness and echogenicity compared with the No-LBP group (ANCOVA adjusted for BMI, p&lt;0.01 and p&lt;0.001 respectively).
Conclusion:
This is the first report of abnormal connective tissue structure in the lumbar region in a group of subjects with chronic or recurrent LBP.  This finding was not attributable to differences in age, sex, BMI or activity level between groups.  Possible causes include genetic factors, abnormal movement patterns and chronic inflammation.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/10/151</link>
                <dc:creator>Helene Langevin</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Debbie Stevens-Tuttle</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>James Fox</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Gary Badger</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nicole Bouffard</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Martin Krag</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Junru Wu</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sharon Henry</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2009, 10:151</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-12-03T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2474-10-151</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2474</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>10</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>151</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-12-03T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/10/150">
        <title>Satisfaction with care after total hip or knee replacement predicts self-perceived health status after surgery</title>
        <description>Background:
Inpatient satisfaction with care is a standard indicator of the quality of care delivered during hospitalization. Total hip and knee replacement (THR/TKR) for osteoarthritis (OA) are among the most successful orthopaedic interventions having a positive impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The aim was to evaluate the effect of satisfaction shortly after hospital discharge on 1-month, 6-month and 1-year Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form (SF-36) scores for OA patients after THR and TKR, controlling for patient characteristics, clinical presentation and preoperative SF-36 scores.
Methods:
A multicenter prospective cohort study recruited 231 patients with OA scheduled to receive THR or TKR. Satisfaction was assessed by the Patients Judgment of Hospital Quality (PJHQ) questionnaire and HRQoL by the SF-36 questionnaire. Linear models for repeated measures assessed the relation between satisfaction (scores were dichotomized) and postoperative SF-36 scores.
Results:
Of 231 participants, 189 were followed up 12 months after discharge (mean age 69 SD = 8; 42.6% male). The mean length of hospital stay was 13.5 (SD = 4) days. After adjustment for preoperative SF-36 scores, sociodemographic and clinical patient characteristics, satisfied patients (PJHQ score &gt; 70) had higher SF-36 scores 1 year after surgery than did less-satisfied patients. Admission, medical care, and nursing and daily care scores mainly predicted bodily pain, mental health, social functioning, vitality and general health scores of the SF-36.
Conclusion:
Besides being a quality-of-care indicator, immediate postoperative patient satisfaction with care may bring a new insight into clinical practice, as a predictor of self-perceived health status after surgery.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/10/150</link>
                <dc:creator>Cedric Baumann</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Anne-Christine Rat</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Georges Osnowycz</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Didier Mainard</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Christian Cuny</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Francis Guillemin</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2009, 10:150</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-12-03T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2474-10-150</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2474</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>10</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>150</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-12-03T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
