<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/feeds/mostaccessed/journal?journal=bmcmusculoskeletdisord&amp;quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders - Most accessed articles</title>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcmusculoskeletdisord/</link>
        <description>The most accessed research articles published by BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders</description>
        <dc:date>2009-11-13T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/10/130" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/10/136" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/10/139" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/10/135" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/10/37" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/10/131" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/10/117" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/10/98" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/10/133" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/10/138" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
        <extra:info rdf:parseType="Literal">
            <html:div style="font:14px Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                <html:span style="font-weight:bold">
                    This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central
                </html:span>
                <html:br />
                <html:span style="font-size: 12px;">
                    It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit
                    <html:br />
                    <html:a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/" style="color:#3333CC; font-size:12px;">
                        http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/
                    </html:a>
                    <html:br />
                </html:span>
            </html:div>
        </extra:info>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/10/130">
        <title>Acupuncture for pain and osteoarthritis of the knee:
a pilot study for an open parallel-arm randomised controlled trial
</title>
        <description>Background:
There is some evidence that acupuncture for pain and osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee is more than a placebo, and short term clinical benefits have been observed when acupuncture is compared to usual care. However there is insufficient evidence on whether clinical benefits of acupuncture are sustained over the longer term. In this study our key objectives are to inform the design parameters for a fully powered pragmatic randomised controlled trial. These objectives include establishing potential recruitment rates, appropriate validated outcome measures, attendance levels for acupuncture treatment, loss to follow up and the sample size for a full scale trial.
Methods:
Potential participants aged over 50 with pain and osteoarthritis of the knee were identified from a GP database. Eligible patients were randomised to either &apos;acupuncture plus usual care&apos; and &apos;usual care&apos; alone, with allocation appropriately concealed. Acupuncture consisted of up to 10 sessions usually weekly. Outcome measures included Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) index with the sample size for a full scale trial determined from the variance.
Results:
From the GP database of 15,927 patients, 335 potential trial participants were identified and invited to participate. After screening responses, 78 (23%) were identified as eligible and 30 patients who responded most promptly were randomised to &apos;acupuncture plus usual care&apos; (15 patients) and &apos;usual care&apos; alone (15 patients). Attendance for acupuncture appointments was high at 90% of the maximum. Although the trial was not powered to detect significant changes in outcome, the WOMAC pain index showed a statistically significant reduction at 3 months in the acupuncture group compared to usual care. This was not sustained at 12 months. The sample size for a fully powered two-arm trial was estimated to be 350.
Conclusion:
This pilot study provided the evidence that a fully powered study to explore the longer term impact of acupuncture would be worthwhile, and relevant design features for such a trial were determined.Trial registration numberISRCTN25134802.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/10/130</link>
                <dc:creator>Harriet Lansdown</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Katie Howard</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Stephen Brealey</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hugh MacPherson</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2009, 10:130</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-10-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2474-10-130</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2474</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>10</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>130</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-10-24T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/10/136">
        <title>Does physical activity change predict functional recovery in low back pain? Protocol for a prospective cohort study 

</title>
        <description>Background:
Activity advice and prescription are commonly used in the management of low back pain (LBP). Although there is evidence for advising patients with LBP to remain active, facilitating both recovery and return to work, to date no research has assessed whether objective measurements of free living physical activity (PA) can predict outcome, recovery and course of LBP.
Methods:
An observational longitudinal study will investigate PA levels in a cohort of community-dwelling working age adults with acute and sub-acute LBP. Each participant&apos;s PA level, functional status, mood, fear avoidance behaviours, and levels of pain, psychological distress and occupational activity will be measured on three occasions during for 1 week periods at baseline, 3 months, and 1 year. Physical activity levels will be measured by self report, RT3 triaxial accelerometer, and activity recall questionnaires. The primary outcome measure of functional recovery will be the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ). Free living PA levels and changes in functional status will be quantified in order to look at predictive relationships between levels and changes in free living PA and functional recovery in a LBP population.DiscussionThis research will investigate levels and changes in activity levels of an acute LBP cohort and the predictive relationship to LBP recovery. The results will assess whether occupational, psychological and behavioural factors affect the relationship between free living PA and LBP recovery. Results from this research will help to determine the strength of evidence supporting international guidelines that recommend restoration of normal activity in managing LBP.Trial registration[Clinical Trial Registration Number, ACTRN12609000282280]</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/10/136</link>
                <dc:creator>Paul Hendrick</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Stephan Milosavljevic</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Melanie Bell</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Leigh Hale</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Deirdre Hurley</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Suzanne McDonough</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Markus Melloh</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>David Baxter</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2009, 10:136</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-11-06T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2474-10-136</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2474</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>10</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>136</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-11-06T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/10/139">
        <title>Expectations, perceptions, and physiotherapy predict prolonged sick leave in subacute low back pain   </title>
        <description>Background:
Brief intervention programs for subacute low back pain (LBP) result in significant reduction of sick leave compared to treatment as usual. Although effective, a substantial proportion of the patients do not return to work. This study investigates predictors of return to work in LBP patients participating in a randomized controlled trial comparing a brief intervention program (BI) with BI and physical exercise.
Methods:
Predictors for not returning to work was examined in 246 patients sick listed 8-12 weeks for low back pain. The patients had participated in a randomized controlled trial, with BI (n = 122) and BI + physical exercise (n = 124). There were no significant differences between the two intervention groups on return to work. The groups were therefore merged in the analyses of predictors. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors for non return to work at 3, 12, and 24 months of follow-up.
Results:
At 3 months of follow-up, the strongest predictors for not returning to work were pain intensity while resting (OR = 5.6; CI = 1.7-19), the perception of constant back strain when working (OR = 4.1; CI = 1.5-12), negative expectations for return to work (OR = 4.2; CI = 1.7-10), and having been to a physiotherapist prior to participation in the trial (OR = 3.3; CI = 1.3-8.3). At 12 months, perceived reduced ability to walk far due to the complaints (OR = 2.6; CI = 1.3-5.4), pain during activities (OR = 2.4; CI = 1.1-5.1), and having been to a physiotherapist prior to participation in the trial (OR = 2.1; CI = 1.1-4.3) were the strongest predictors for non return to work. At 24 months age below 41 years (OR = 2.9; CI = 1.4-6.0) was the only significant predictor for non return to work.
Conclusion:
It appears that return to work is highly dependant on individual and cognitive factors. Patients not returning to work after the interventions were characterized by negative expectations, perceptions about pain and disability, and previous physiotherapy treatment. This is the first study reporting that previous treatment by physiotherapists is a risk factor for long-term sick leave. This has not been reported before and is an interesting finding that deserves more scrutiny.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/10/139</link>
                <dc:creator>Silje Reme</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Eli Hagen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hege Eriksen</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2009, 10:139</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-11-13T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2474-10-139</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2474</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>10</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>139</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-11-13T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/10/135">
        <title>Health-related quality of life after vertebral or hip fracture: a seven-year follow-up study</title>
        <description>Background:
The negative impact of vertebral and hip low-energy fractures on health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) has been demonstrated previously, but few prospective long-term follow-up studies have been conducted. This study aims to (i) investigate the changes and long-term impact of vertebral or hip fracture and between fracture groups on HRQOL in postmenopausal women prospectively between two and seven years after the inclusion fracture, (ii) compare HRQOL results between fracture and reference groups and (iii) study the relationship between HRQOL and physical performance, spinal deformity index and bone mineral density at seven-year follow-up.
Methods:
Ninety-one women examined two years after a low-energy vertebral or hip fracture were invited to a new examination seven years after the diagnosis. HRQOL was examined using the SF-36 questionnaire and was compared with an age and sex-matched reference group. Physical function was assessed using tests and questionnaires. Bone mineral density was measured. Radiographs of the spine were evaluated using the visual semiquantitative technique. A longitudinal and cross-sectional design was used in this study. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, Student&apos;s t-tests, ANCOVA, and partial correlation.
Results:
Sixty-seven women participated. In the 42 women (mean age 75.8, SD 4.7) with vertebral fracture as inclusion fracture, bodily pain had deteriorated between two and seven years and might be explained by new fracture. Remaining pronounced reduction of HRQOL was seen in all domains except general health and mental health at seven-year follow-up in women with vertebral fractures compared to the reference group (p &lt; 0.05). All 25 women (mean age 75.0, SD 4.7) with hip fracture as inclusion fracture had no significant changes in HRQOL between two and seven years and did not differ from the reference group regarding HRQOL after seven years. The vertebral group had significantly lower values for bodily pain, vitality, role-emotional function and mental health compared to the hip group. HRQOL showed a positive relationship between physical activity, static balance and handgrip strength.
Conclusion:
The long-term reduction of HRQOL in women with vertebral fracture emerged clearly in this study. The relationships between HRQOL and physical performance in women with vertebral and hip fracture raise questions for more research.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/10/135</link>
                <dc:creator>Inger Hallberg</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Margareta Bachrach-Lindstrom</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Staffan Hammerby</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Goran Toss</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Anna-Christina Ek</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2009, 10:135</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-11-03T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2474-10-135</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2474</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>10</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>135</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-11-03T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/10/37">
        <title>The effect of warm-up, static stretching and dynamic stretching on hamstring flexibility in previously injured subjects</title>
        <description>Background:
Warm-up and stretching are suggested to increase hamstring flexibility and reduce the risk of injury. This study examined the short-term effects of warm-up, static stretching and dynamic stretching on hamstring flexibility in individuals with previous hamstring injury and uninjured controls.
Methods:
A randomised crossover study design, over 2 separate days. Hamstring flexibility was assessed using passive knee extension range of motion (PKE ROM). 18 previously injured individuals and 18 uninjured controls participated. On both days, four measurements of PKE ROM were recorded: (1) at baseline; (2) after warm-up; (3) after stretch (static or dynamic) and (4) after a 15-minute rest. Participants carried out both static and dynamic stretches, but on different days. Data were analysed using Anova.
Results:
Across both groups, there was a significant main effect for time (p &lt; 0.001). PKE ROM significantly increased with warm-up (p &lt; 0.001). From warm-up, PKE ROM further increased with static stretching (p = 0.04) but significantly decreased after dynamic stretching (p = 0.013). The increased flexibility after warm-up and static stretching reduced significantly (p &lt; 0.001) after 15 minutes of rest, but remained significantly greater than at baseline (p &lt; 0.001). Between groups, there was no main effect for group (p = 0.462), with no difference in mean PKE ROM values at any individual stage of the protocol (p &gt; 0.05). Using ANCOVA to adjust for the non-significant (p = 0.141) baseline difference between groups, the previously injured group demonstrated a greater response to warm-up and static stretching, however this was not statistically significant (p = 0.05).
Conclusion:
Warm-up significantly increased hamstring flexibility. Static stretching also increased hamstring flexibility, whereas dynamic did not, in agreement with previous findings on uninjured controls. The effect of warm-up and static stretching on flexibility was greater in those with reduced flexibility post-injury, but this did not reach statistical significance. Further prospective research is required to validate the hypothesis that increased flexibility improves outcomes.Trial RegistrationACTRN12608000638336</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/10/37</link>
                <dc:creator>Kieran O'Sullivan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Elaine Murray</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>David Sainsbury</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2009, 10:37</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-04-16T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2474-10-37</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2474</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>10</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>37</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-04-16T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/10/131">
        <title>Randomised controlled trial of local corticosteroid injections for de Quervain&apos;s tenosynovitis in general practice </title>
        <description>Background:
De Quervain&apos;s tenosynovitis is a stenosing tenosynovitis of the first dorsal compartment of the wrist and leads to wrist pain and to impaired function of the wrist and hand. It can be treated by splinting, local corticosteroid injection and operation. In this study effectiveness of local corticosteroid injections for de Quervain&apos;s tenosynovitis provided by general practitioners was assessed.
Methods:
Participants with de Quervain&apos;s tenosynovitis were recruited by general practitioners. Short-term outcomes (one week after injections) were assessed in a randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Long-term effectiveness was evaluated in an open prospective cohort-study of steroid responders during a follow-up period of 12 months. Participants were randomised to one or two local injections of 1 ml of triamcinolonacetonide (TCA) or 1 ml of NaCl 0.9% (placebo). Non-responders to NaCl were treated with additional TCA injections. Main outcomes were immediate treatment response, severity of pain, improvement as perceived by participant and functional disability using sub items hand and finger function of the Dutch Arthritis Impact Measurement Scale (Dutch AIMS-2-HFF).
Results:
11 general practitioners included 21 wrists in 21 patients. The TCA-group had better results for short-term outcomes treatment response (78% vs. 25%; p = 0.015), perceived improvement (78% vs. 33%; p = 0.047) and severity of pain (4.27 vs. 1.33; p = 0.031) but not for the Dutch-AIMS-HFF (2.71 vs. 1.92; p = 0.112). Absolute risk reduction for the main outcome short-term treatment response was 0.55 (95% CI: 0.34, 0.76) with a number needed to treat of 2 (95% CI: 1, 3). In the cohort of steroid responders (n = 12) the beneficial effects of steroid injections were sustained during the follow-up of 12 months regarding severity of pain (p = 0.67) and scores of Dutch AIMS-2-HFF (p = 0.36), but not for patient perceived improvement (p = 0.02). No adverse events were observed during the 12 months of follow-up.
Conclusion:
One or two local injections of 1 ml triamcinolonacetonide 10 mg/ml provided by general practitioners leads to improvement in the short term in participants with de Quervain&apos;s tenosynovitis when compared to placebo. The short-term beneficial effects of steroid injections for symptoms were maintained during the follow-up after 12 months.Trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN53171398</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/10/131</link>
                <dc:creator>Cyriac Peters-Veluthamaningal</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jan Winters</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Klaas Groenier</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Betty Meyboom-de Jong</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2009, 10:131</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-10-27T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2474-10-131</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2474</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>10</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>131</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-10-27T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/10/117">
        <title>The predictive effect of fear-avoidance beliefs on low back pain among newly qualified health care workers with and without previous low back pain: a prospective cohort study

</title>
        <description>Background:
Health care workers have a high prevalence of low back pain (LBP). Although physical exposures in the working environment are linked to an increased risk of LBP, it has been suggested that individual coping strategies, for example fear-avoidance beliefs, could also be important in the development and maintenance of LBP. Accordingly, the main objective of this study was to examine (1) the association between physical work load and LBP, (2) the predictive effect of fear-avoidance beliefs on the development of LBP, and (3) the moderating effect of fear-avoidance beliefs on the association between physical work load and LBP among cases with and without previous LBP.
Methods:
A questionnaire survey among 5696 newly qualified health care workers who completed a baseline questionnaire shortly before completing their education and a follow-up questionnaire 12 months later. Participants were selected on the following criteria: (a) being female, (b) working in the health care sector (n = 2677). Multinomial logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the effect of physical work load and fear-avoidance beliefs on the severity of LBP.
Results:
For those with previous LBP, physical work load has an importance, but not among those without previous LBP. In relation to fear-avoidance beliefs, there is a positive relation between it and LBP of than 30 days in both groups, i.e. those without and with previous LBP. No moderating effect of fear-avoidance beliefs on the association between physical work load and LBP was found among cases with and without LBP.
Conclusion:
Both physical work load and fear-avoidance beliefs matters in those with previous LBP. Only fear-avoidance beliefs matters in those without previous LBP. The study did not find a moderating effect of fear-avoidance beliefs on the association between physical work load and LBP.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/10/117</link>
                <dc:creator>Jette Nygaard Jensen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Karen Albertsen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Vilhelm Borg</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kirsten Nabe-Nielsen</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2009, 10:117</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-09-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2474-10-117</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2474</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>10</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>117</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-09-24T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/10/98">
        <title>Effectiveness of physiotherapy exercise following hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis: a systematic review of clinical trials.</title>
        <description>Background:
Physiotherapy has long been a routine component of patient rehabilitation following hip joint replacement. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the effectiveness of physiotherapy exercise after discharge from hospital on function, walking, range of motion, quality of life and muscle strength, for osteoarthritic patients following elective primary total hip arthroplasty.
Methods:
Design: Systematic review, using the Cochrane Collaboration Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and the Quorom Statement.Database searches: AMED, CINAHL, EMBASE, KingsFund, MEDLINE, Cochrane library (Cochrane reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, DARE), PEDro, The Department of Health National Research Register. Handsearches: Physiotherapy, Physical Therapy, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (Britain) Conference Proceedings. No language restrictions were applied.Selection: Trials comparing physiotherapy exercise versus usual/standard care, or comparing two types of relevant exercise physiotherapy, following discharge from hospital after elective primary total hip replacement for osteoarthritis were reviewed.Outcomes: Functional activities of daily living, walking, quality of life, muscle strength and range of hip joint motion. Trial quality was extensively evaluated. Narrative synthesis plus meta-analytic summaries were performed to summarise the data.
Results:
8 trials were identified. Trial quality was mixed. Generally poor trial quality, quantity and diversity prevented explanatory meta-analyses. The results were synthesised and meta-analytic summaries were used where possible to provide a formal summary of results. Results indicate that physiotherapy exercise after discharge following total hip replacement has the potential to benefit patients.
Conclusion:
Insufficient evidence exists to establish the effectiveness of physiotherapy exercise following primary hip replacement for osteoarthritis. Further well designed trials are required to determine the value of post discharge exercise following this increasingly common surgical procedure.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/10/98</link>
                <dc:creator>Catherine Minns Lowe</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Karen Barker</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Michael Dewey</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Catherine Sackley</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2009, 10:98</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-08-04T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2474-10-98</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2474</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>10</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>98</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-08-04T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/10/133">
        <title>Empirical evaluation of the inter-relationship of articular elements involved in the pathoanatomy of knee osteoarthritis using Magnetic Resonance Imaging</title>
        <description>Background:
In this cross-sectional study, we conducted a comprehensive assessment of all articular elements that could be measured using knee MRI. We assessed the association of pathological change in multiple articular structures involved in the pathoanatomy of osteoarthritis.
Methods:
Knee MRI scans from patients over 45 years old were assessed using a semi-quantitative knee MRI assessment form. The form included six distinct elements: cartilage, bone marrow lesions, osteophytes, subchondral sclerosis, joint effusion and synovitis. Each type of pathology was graded using an ordinal scale with a value of zero indicating no pathology and higher values indicating increasingly severe levels of pathology. The principal dependent variable for comparison was the mean cartilage disease score (CDS), which captured the aggregate extent of involvement of articular cartilage. The distribution of CDS was compared to the individual and cumulative distributions of each articular element using the Chi-squared test. The correlations between pathological change in the various articular structures were assessed in a Spearman correlation table.
Results:
Data from 140 patients were available for review. The cohort had a median age of 61 years (range 45-89) and was 61% female. The cohort included a wide spectrum of OA severity. Our analysis showed a statistically significant trend towards pathological change involving more articular elements as CDS worsened (p-value for trend &lt; 0.0001). Comparison of CDS to change in the severity of pathology of individual articular elements showed statistically significant trends towards more severe pathology as CDS worsened for osteophytes (p-value for trend &lt; 0.0001), bone marrow lesions (p = 0.0003), and subchondral sclerosis (p = 0.009), but not joint effusion or synovitis. There was a moderate correlation between cartilage damage, osteophytes and BMLs as well as a moderate correlation between joint effusion and synovitis. However, cartilage damage and osteophytes were only weakly associated with synovitis or joint effusion.
Conclusion:
Our results support an inter-relationship of multiple articular elements in the pathoanatomy of knee OA. Prospective studies of OA pathogenesis in humans are needed to correlate these findings to clinically relevant outcomes such as pain and function.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/10/133</link>
                <dc:creator>Dennis Meredith</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Elena Losina</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Gesa Neumann</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hiroshi Yoshioka</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Philipp Lang</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jeffrey Katz</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2009, 10:133</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-10-29T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2474-10-133</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2474</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>10</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>133</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-10-29T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/10/138">
        <title>Time-course of exercise and its association with 12-month bone changes</title>
        <description>Background:
Exercise has been shown to have positive effects on bone density and strength. However, knowledge of the time-course of exercise and bone changes is scarce due to lack of methods to quantify and qualify daily physical activity in long-term. The aim was to evaluate the association between exercise intensity at 3, 6 and 12 month intervals and 12-month changes in upper femur areal bone mineral density (aBMD) and mid-femur geometry in healthy premenopausal women.
Methods:
Physical activity was continuously assessed with a waist-worn accelerometer in 35 healthy women (35-40 years) participating in progressive high-impact training. To describe exercise intensity, individual average daily numbers of impacts were calculated at five acceleration levels (range 0.3-9.2g) during time intervals of 0-3, 0-6, and 0-12 months. Proximal femur aBMD was measured with dual x-ray absorptiometry and mid-femur geometry was evaluated with quantitative computed tomography at the baseline and after 12 months. Physical activity data were correlated with yearly changes in bone density and geometry, and adjusted for confounding factors and impacts at later months of the trial using multivariate analysis.
Results:
Femoral neck aBMD changes were significantly correlated with 6 and 12 months&apos; impact activity at high intensity levels (&gt;3.9g, r being up to 0.42). Trochanteric aBMD changes were associated even with first three months of exercise exceeding 1.1g (r=0.39-0.59, p&lt;0.05). Similarly, mid-femoral cortical bone geometry changes were related to even first three months&apos; activity (r=0.38-0.52, p&lt;0.05). In multivariate analysis, 0-3 months&apos; activity did not correlate with bone change at any site after adjusting for impacts at later months. Instead, 0-6 months&apos; impacts were significant correlates of 12-month changes in femoral neck and trochanter aBMD, mid-femur bone circumference and cortical bone attenuation even after adjustment. No significant correlations were found at the proximal or distal tibia.
Conclusions:
The number of high acceleration impacts during 6 months of training was positively associated with 12-month bone changes at the femoral neck, trochanter and mid-femur. These results can be utilized when designing feasible training programs to prevent bone loss in premenopausal women.Trial registrationClinical trials.gov NCT00697957</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/10/138</link>
                <dc:creator>Riikka Ahola</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Raija Korpelainen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Aki Vainionpaa</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Juhani Leppaluoto</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Timo Jamsa</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2009, 10:138</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-11-12T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2474-10-138</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2474</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>10</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>138</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-11-12T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
