<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/feeds/latestarticles/journal?journal=bmcvetres&amp;quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>BMC Veterinary Research - Latest Articles</title>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcvetres/</link>
        <description>The latest research articles published by BMC Veterinary Research</description>
        <dc:date>2009-10-13T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1746-6148/5/39" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1746-6148/5/38" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1746-6148/5/37" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1746-6148/5/36" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1746-6148/5/35" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1746-6148/5/34" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1746-6148/5/33" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1746-6148/5/32" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1746-6148/5/31" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1746-6148/5/30" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
        <extra:info rdf:parseType="Literal">
            <html:div style="font:14px Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                <html:span style="font-weight:bold">
                    This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central
                </html:span>
                <html:br />
                <html:span style="font-size: 12px;">
                    It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit
                    <html:br />
                    <html:a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/" style="color:#3333CC; font-size:12px;">
                        http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/
                    </html:a>
                    <html:br />
                </html:span>
            </html:div>
        </extra:info>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1746-6148/5/39">
        <title>Animal tumour registry of two provinces in northern Italy: incidence of spontaneous tumours in dogs and cats </title>
        <description>Background:
Cancer is a major cause of death in domestic animals. Furthermore, many forms of pet neoplasm resemble that of their human counterparts in biologic behaviour, pathologic expression, and recognised risk factors.In April 2005, a pilot project was activated so as to establish a dog and cat tumour registry living in the Venice and Vicenza provinces (Veneto Region, north-eastern Italy), with the aim of estimating the incidence of spontaneous tumours.
Results:
Through a telephone survey, the estimates of canine and feline populations of the catchment area turned out to be of 296,318 (CI +/- 30,201) and 214,683 (CI +/- 21,755) subjects, respectively. During the first three years, overall 2,509 canine and 494 feline cases of neoplasia were diagnosed. In dogs, the estimated annual incidence rate (IR) per 100,000 dogs for all tumours was 282 in all the catchment area, whereas in cats the IR was much lower (IR = 77). Malignant and benign tumours were equally distributed in male and female dogs, whereas cats had a 4.6-fold higher incidence of malignant tumours than benign. In both dogs and cats, purebreds had an almost 2-fold higher incidence of malignant tumours than mixed breeds. Tumour incidence increased with age in both dog and cat populations.
Conclusion:
This study has provided estimates of incidence of spontaneous neoplasm in companion animals. Further attempts will be made to increase the accuracy in the population size assessment and to ascertain the real gap with the official regional canine demographic registry. Veterinary practitioners may also benefit from the tumour registry insofar they may obtain data for specific breeds, age groups or geographical areas.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1746-6148/5/39</link>
                <dc:creator>Marta Vascellari</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Elisa Baioni</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Giuseppe Ru</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Antonio Carminato</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Franco Mutinelli</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Veterinary Research 2009, 5:39</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-10-13T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-6148-5-39</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Veterinary Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1746-6148</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>39</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-10-13T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1746-6148/5/38">
        <title>The evaluation of exposure risks for natural transmission of scrapie within an infected flock</title>
        <description>Background:
Although the epidemiology of scrapie has been broadly understood for many years, attempts to introduce voluntary or compulsory controls to eradicate the disease have frequently failed. Lack of precision in defining the risk factors on farm has been one of the challenges to designing control strategies. This study attempted to define which parts of the annual flock management cycle represented the greatest risk of infection to naive lambs exposed to the farm environment at different times.
Results:
In VRQ/VRQ lambs exposed to infected sheep at pasture or during lambing, and exposed to the buildings in which lambing took place, the attack rate was high and survival times were short. Where exposure was to pasture alone the number of sheep affected in each experimental group was reduced, and survival times were longer and related to length of exposure.
Conclusion:
At the flock level, eradication and control strategies for scrapie must take into account the need to decontaminate buildings used for lambing, and to reduce (or prevent) the exposure of lambs to infected sheep, especially in the later stages of incubation, and at lambing. The potential for environmental contamination from pasture should also be considered. Genotype selection may still prove to be the only viable tool to prevent infection from contaminated pasture, reduce environmental contamination and limit direct transmission from sheep to sheep.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1746-6148/5/38</link>
                <dc:creator>Glenda Dexter</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sue Tongue</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Lindsay Heasman</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Susan Bellworthy</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Andrew Davis</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>S Moore</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Marion Simmons</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>A Sayers</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hugh Simmons</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Danny Matthews</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Veterinary Research 2009, 5:38</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-10-09T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-6148-5-38</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Veterinary Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1746-6148</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>38</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-10-09T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1746-6148/5/37">
        <title>Giardia duodenalis in feedlot cattle from the central and western United States. </title>
        <description>Background:
Giardia duodenalis is a ubiquitous protozoan parasite that has emerged as a significant opportunistic human pathogen. G. duodenalis may have a deleterious effect on animal growth and performance, therefore its potential as a production limiting organism should not be discounted. We therefore undertook this study to determine management and environmental factors in feedlots that influence the prevalence and environmental load of G. duodenalis cysts in fecal material deposited by feedlot cattle in the central and western United States.
Results:
Twenty two feedlots from 7 states were included in the study, and up to 240 fecal samples were collected from pen floors of up to 6 pens per feedlot. Giardia duodenalis cysts were identified and counted using direct immunofluorescent microscopy. The estimated overall point prevalence of G. duodenalis was 19.1%, representing feedlots from a wide range of climates and management systems. Pen-level prevalence varied from 0 to 63.3%, with pen-level shedding estimates ranging from 0 to 261,000 cysts/g feces. Higher environmental temperatures, increased animal density, and increased time in the feedlot were associated with a lower prevalence of G. duodenalis. Removing manure before placing a new group of cattle in a pen was associated with a decreased prevalence of G. duodenalis in fecal pats. Using coccidiostats as a feed additive was associated with a higher prevalence of Giardia.
Conclusion:
Management practices could be employed that would limit the probability that feedlot cattle shed G. duodenalis in their feces and therefore potentially limit contamination of their environment.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1746-6148/5/37</link>
                <dc:creator>Bruce Hoar</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Robert Paul</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jennifer Siembieda</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Maria das Gracas Pereira</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Edward Atwill</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Veterinary Research 2009, 5:37</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-10-02T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-6148-5-37</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Veterinary Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1746-6148</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>37</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-10-02T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1746-6148/5/36">
        <title>Temporal patterns of inflammatory gene expression in local tissues after banding or burdizzo castration in cattle </title>
        <description>Background:
Castration of male cattle has been shown to elicit inflammatory reactions and acute inflammation is initiated and sustained by the participation of cytokines.
Methods:
Sixty continental &#215; beef bulls (Mean age 12 &#177; (s.e.) 0.2 months; Mean weight 341 &#177; (s.e.) 3.0 kg) were blocked by weight and randomly assigned to one of three treatments (n = 20 animals per treatment): 1) untreated control (Con); 2) banding castration at 0 min (Band); 3) Burdizzo castration at 0 min (Burd). Samples of the testis, epididymis and scrotal skin were collected surgically from 5 animals from each group at 12 h, 24 h, 7 d, and 14 d post-treatment, and analysed using real-time PCR. A repeated measurement analysis (Proc GLM) was performed using SAS. If there was no treatment and time interaction, main effects of treatment by time were tested by ANOVA.
Results:
Electrophoresis data showed that by 7 d post-castration RNA isolated from all the testicle samples of the Burd castrated animals, the epididymis and middle scrotum samples from Band castrates were degraded. Transitory effects were observed in the gene expression of IFN-&#947;, IL-6, IL-8 and TNF-&#945; at 12 h and 24 h post treatment. Burd castrates had greater (P &lt; 0.05) testicular IFN-&#947; mRNA levels compared with Band and Con animals, but lower (P &lt; 0.05) testicular TNF-&#945; mRNA levels compared with Con animals. Band castrates had greater (P &lt; 0.05) testicular IL-6 mRNA levels than Burd castrates at 12 h post-castration. Burd castrates had greater (P &lt; 0.05) testicular IL-8 mRNA levels than Band and Con animals at 24 h post-castration. In the epididymis, Burd castrates had greater (P &lt; 0.05) IL-6 mRNA (both at 12 h and 24 h post treatment) and IL-8 mRNA (12 h post treatment) levels compared with Band and Con animals; Burd castrates had greater (P = 0.049) IL-10 mRNA levels than Band castrates at 12 h post-castration.
Conclusion:
Banding castration caused more inflammatory associated gene expression changes to the epididymis and scrotum than burdizzo. Burdizzo caused more severe acute inflammatory responses, in terms of pro-inflammatory cytokine gene expression, in the testis and epididymis than banding.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1746-6148/5/36</link>
                <dc:creator>Wanyong Pang</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Bernadette Earley</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Torres Sweeney</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Vivian Gath</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mark Crowe</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Veterinary Research 2009, 5:36</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-09-23T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-6148-5-36</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Veterinary Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1746-6148</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>36</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-09-23T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1746-6148/5/35">
        <title>Transmissibility studies of vacuolar changes in the rostral colliculus of pigs</title>
        <description>Background:
Histopathological examinations of brains from healthy pigs have revealed localised vacuolar changes, predominantly in the rostral colliculus, that are similar to the neuropil vacuolation featured in the transmissible spongiform encephalopathies and have been described in pigs challenged parenterally with the agent causing bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE). Feedstuff containing BSE-contaminated meat and bone meal (MBM) may have been fed to pigs prior to the ban of mammalian MBM in feed of farmed livestock in the United Kingdom in 1996, but there is no evidence of the natural occurrence of a transmissible spongiform encephalopathy (TSE) in the domestic pig. Furthermore, experimental transmission of BSE to pigs by the oral route has been unsuccessful. A study was conducted to investigate whether the localised vacuolar changes in the porcine brain were associated with a transmissible aetiology and therefore biologically significant. Two groups of ten pigs were inoculated parenterally with vacuolated rostral colliculus from healthy pigs either born before 1996 or born after 1996. Controls included ten pigs similarly inoculated with rostral colliculus from New Zealand-derived pigs and nine pigs inoculated with a bovine BSE brain homogenate.
Results:
None of the pigs inoculated with rostral colliculus developed a TSE-like neurological disease up to five years post inoculation when the study was terminated, and disease-associated prion protein, PrPd, was not detected in the brains of these pigs. By contrast, eight of nine BSE-inoculated pigs developed neurological signs, two of which had detectable PrPd by postmortem tests. No significant histopathological changes were detected to account for the clinical signs in the PrPd-negative, BSE-inoculated pigs.
Conclusion:
The findings in this study suggest that vacuolation in the porcine rostral colliculus is not caused by a transmissible agent and is probably a clinically insignificant change. The presence of neurological signs in pigs inoculated with BSE without detectable PrPd raises the possibility that the BSE agent may produce a prion disease in pigs that remains undetected by the current postmortem tests.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1746-6148/5/35</link>
                <dc:creator>Timm Konold</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>John Spiropoulos</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Melanie Chaplin</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Leigh Thorne</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Yvonne Spencer</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Gerald Wells</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Steve Hawkins</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Veterinary Research 2009, 5:35</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-09-18T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-6148-5-35</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Veterinary Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1746-6148</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>35</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-09-18T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1746-6148/5/34">
        <title>Time trends in exposure of cattle to bovine spongiform encephalopathy and cohort effect in France and Italy: value of the classical Age-Period-Cohort approach</title>
        <description>Background:
The Age-Period-Cohort (APC) analysis is routinely used for time trend analysis of cancer incidence or mortality rates, but in veterinary epidemiology, there are still only a few examples of this application. APC models were recently used to model the French epidemic assuming that the time trend for BSE was mainly due to a cohort effect in relation to the control measures that may have modified the BSE exposure of cohorts over time. We used a categorical APC analysis which did not require any functional form for the effect of the variables, and examined second differences to estimate the variation of the BSE trend. We also reanalysed the French epidemic and performed a simultaneous analysis of Italian data using more appropriate birth cohort categories for comparison.
Results:
We used data from the exhaustive surveillance carried out in France and Italy between 2001 and 2007, and comparatively described the trend of the epidemic in both countries. At the end, the shape and irregularities of the trends were discussed in light of the main control measures adopted to control the disease. In Italy a decrease in the epidemic became apparent from 1996, following the application of rendering standards for the processing of specific risk material (SRM). For the French epidemic, the pattern of second differences in the birth cohorts confirmed the beginning of the decrease from 1995, just after the implementation of the meat and bone meal (MBM) ban for all ruminants (1994).
Conclusion:
The APC analysis proved to be highly suitable for the study of the trend in BSE epidemics and was helpful in understanding the effects of management and control of the disease. Additionally, such an approach may help in the implementation of changes in BSE regulations.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1746-6148/5/34</link>
                <dc:creator>Carole Sala</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Giuseppe Ru</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Veterinary Research 2009, 5:34</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-09-18T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-6148-5-34</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Veterinary Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1746-6148</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>34</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-09-18T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1746-6148/5/33">
        <title>Classical sheep scrapie in Great Britain: spatial analysis and identification of environmental and farm-related risk factors </title>
        <description>Background:
Previous studies suggest that the spatial distribution of classical sheep scrapie in Great Britain is uneven and that certain flock characteristics may be associated with occurrence of the disease. However, the existence of areas of high and low disease-risk may also result from differences in the spatial distribution of environmental characteristics. In this study we explored the spatial pattern of classical scrapie in Great Britain between 2002 and 2005 and investigated the association between disease occurrence and various environmental and farm-related risk factors.
Results:
Exploratory spatial analysis: South Wales was found to have a higher density of scrapie-positive farms than the rest of Great Britain. In addition, a small cluster of high-risk farms was identified in the center of this region in which clustering of scrapie-positive farms occurred up to a distance of approximately 40 km.Spatial modelling: A mixed-effects regression model identified flock-size and soil drainage to be significantly associated with the occurrence of scrapie in England and Wales (area under the curve (AUC) 0.71 &#177; 0.01, 95% CI 0.68 - 0.74). The predictive risk map based on the estimated association between these factors and disease occurrence showed most of Wales to be at risk of being confirmed positive for scrapie with areas of highest risk in central and south Wales. In England, areas with the highest risk occurred mainly in the north and the midlands.
Conclusion:
The observed distribution of scrapie in Great Britain exhibited a definite spatial pattern with south Wales identified as an area of high occurrence. In addition both flock (flock size) and environmental variables (soil drainage) were found to be significantly associated with the occurrence of the disease. However, the model&apos;s AUC indicated unexplained variation remaining in the model and the source of this variation may lie in farm-level characteristics rather than spatially-varying ones such as environmental factors.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1746-6148/5/33</link>
                <dc:creator>Kim Stevens</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Victor Del Rio Vilas</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Javier Guitian</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Veterinary Research 2009, 5:33</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-09-08T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-6148-5-33</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Veterinary Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1746-6148</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>33</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-09-08T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1746-6148/5/32">
        <title>Prevalence-dependent use of serological tests for diagnosing glanders in horses</title>
        <description>Background:
The internationally mandatory complement fixation test (CFT) for testing of equine sera for the absence of glanders has repeatedly led to discrepant results. Not only do &quot;false positive&quot; sera pose a problem for the diagnostician and the animal health authorities but they can also result in significant financial losses for the animal owners.Due to the very low prevalence of glanders in the horse population it is of major importance to use tests with a high specificity to overcome unreliable predictive values. We have compared formalin-fixed B. mallei whole cell antigen and a well characterised mouse monoclonal antibody with regard to their specificity and sensitivity for glanders serodiagnosis using CFT, an indirect (i) and a competitive (c) ELISA platform.
Results:
Our results show that the CFT is still a very reliable technique in horse populations with very low glanders prevalence. The cELISA has a high sensitivity and specificity comparable to that of the CFT. The cELISA offers the possibility for automatisation, can be applied to non-complement fixing sera and used for various host species.
Conclusion:
The CFT is still the method of choice for testing horses for the absence of glanders.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1746-6148/5/32</link>
                <dc:creator>Lisa Sprague</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Reena Zachariah</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Heinrich Neubauer</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Renate Wernery</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Maria Joseph</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Holger Scholz</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ulrich Wernery</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Veterinary Research 2009, 5:32</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-09-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-6148-5-32</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Veterinary Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1746-6148</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>32</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1746-6148/5/31">
        <title>A cross sectional study of prevalence, risk factors, population attributable fractions and pathology for foot and limb lesions in preweaning piglets on commercial farms in England</title>
        <description>Background:
In a cross sectional study of 88 indoor and outdoor English pig farms, the prevalence of foot and limb lesions in 2843 preweaning piglets aged 1&#8211;4 weeks from 304 litters was recorded. The environmental risks for the prevalence of lesions and population attributable fractions were calculated. The risks for lesions in piglets were compared with those for limb and body lesions in their mothers. A small number of piglets with each type of lesion were examined post mortem to elucidate the pathology of the clinical lesions observed.
Results:
The prevalence of sole bruising, sole erosion, skin abrasion and swollen joints or claws in 2843 piglets was 49.4% (1404), 15.5% (441), 43.6% (1240) and 4.7% (143) respectively. The prevalence of all foot and limb lesions was higher in indoor housed piglets than in outdoor housed piglets. The prevalence of sole bruising (OR 0.3) and skin abrasion (OR 0.6) decreased with each week of age from 1&#8211;4 weeks, but there was no significant association between piglet age and the prevalence of sole erosion or swollen joints and claws. There was an increased prevalence of sole bruising (OR 3.0) and swollen joints or claws (OR 3.0) and a decreased prevalence of skin abrasion (OR 0.3, piglets &#8804; 1-week old), in piglets housed on slatted floors, compared with those on solid concrete floors with bedding. There was an increased risk of sole erosion associated with piglets housed on partly slatted floors with no bedding (OR 2.4) and partly slatted floors with small amounts of bedding (OR 2.9) compared with piglets housed on solid concrete floors with bedding in all areas of the pen. Post mortem examination of feet with lesions indicated that internal pathological changes were frequently more severe than the degree of external damage suggested.
Conclusion:
Piglets housed outdoors had a very low prevalence of foot and limb injuries. Indoors, no one floor type was ideal to minimise all piglet foot and limb injuries and the flooring requirements of sows differed from those of piglets.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1746-6148/5/31</link>
                <dc:creator>Amy KilBride</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Claire Gillman</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Pete Ossent</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Laura Green</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Veterinary Research 2009, 5:31</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-08-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-6148-5-31</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Veterinary Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1746-6148</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>31</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-08-24T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1746-6148/5/30">
        <title>A cross sectional study of prevalence, risk factors and population attributable fractions for limb and body lesions in lactating sows on commercial farms in England</title>
        <description>Background:
Lesions on sows&apos; limbs and bodies are an abnormality that might impact on their welfare. The prevalence of and risks for limb and body lesions on lactating sows on commercial English pig farms were investigated using direct observation of the sows and their housing.
Results:
The prevalence of lesions on the limbs and body were 93% (260/279) and 20% (57/288) respectively. The prevalence of limb and body lesions was significantly lower in outdoor-housed sows compared with indoor-housed sows. Indoor-housed sows had an increased risk of wounds (OR 6.8), calluses (OR 8.8) and capped hock (OR 3.8) on their limbs when housed on fully slatted floors compared with solid concrete floors. In addition, there was an increased risk of bursitis (OR 2.7), capped hock (OR 2.3) and shoulder lesions (OR 4.8) in sows that were unwilling to rise to their feet. There was a decreased risk of shoulder lesions (OR 0.3) and lesions elsewhere on the body (OR 0.2) in sows with more than 20 cm between their tail and the back of the crate compared with sows with less than 10 cm.
Conclusion:
The sample of outdoor housed sows in this study had the lowest prevalence of limb and body lesions. In lactating sows housed indoors there was a general trend for an increased risk of limb and body lesions in sows housed on slatted floors compared with those housed on solid concrete floors with bedding. Sows that were less responsive to human presence and sows that had the least space to move within their crates had an additional increased risk of lesions.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1746-6148/5/30</link>
                <dc:creator>Amy KilBride</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Claire Gillman</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Laura Green</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Veterinary Research 2009, 5:30</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-08-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-6148-5-30</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Veterinary Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1746-6148</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>30</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-08-24T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
