<?xml version = '1.0' encoding = 'UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss/styledrssBMC.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:extra="http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/schemas/extra/" xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/">
	<channel rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/rss">
		<extra:info rdf:parseType="Literal">
			<html:div xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" style="font:14px Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">
				<html:span style="font-weight:bold">This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central</html:span>
				<html:br/>
				<html:span style="font-size: 12px;">It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit <html:br/><html:a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/" style="color:#3333CC; font-size:12px;">http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/</html:a><html:br/>
				</html:span>
			</html:div>
		</extra:info>
		<title>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth - Latest articles</title>
		<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcpregnancychildbirth/</link>
		<description>The latest articles from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth (ISSN 1471-2393) published by 
				
				BioMed Central
		</description>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/8/29"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/8/28"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/8/27"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/8/26"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/8/25"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/8/24"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/8/23"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/8/22"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/8/21"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/8/20"/>			    
            
            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
    </channel>  
    
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/8/29">
            
            <title>Postpartum consultation: Occurrence, requirements and expectations 








</title>
			<description>Background:
As a matter of routine, midwives in Sweden have spoken with women about their experiences of labour in a so-called 'postpartum consultation'. However, the possibility of offering women this kind of consultation today is reduced due to shortage of both time and resources. The aim of this study was to explore the occurrence, women's requirements of, and experiences of a postpartum consultation, and to identify expectations from women who wanted but did not have a consultation with the midwife assisting during labour. 
Methods:
All Swedish speaking women who gave birth to a live born child at a University Hospital in western Sweden were consecutively included for a phone interview over a three-week period. An additional phone interview was conducted with the women who did not have a postpartum consultation, but who wanted to talk with the midwife assisting during labour. Data from the interviews were analysed using qualitative content analysis. 
Results:
Of the 150 interviewed women, 56 % (n=84) had a postpartum consultation of which 61.9 % (n=52) had this with the midwife assisting during labour. Twenty of the 28 women who did not have a consultation with anyone still desired to talk with the midwife assisting during labour. Of these, 19 were interviewed. The content the women wanted to talk about was summarized in four categories: to understand the course of events during labour; to put into words, feelings about undignified management; to describe own behaviour and feelings, and to describe own fear. 
Conclusions:
The survey shows that the frequency of postpartum consultation is decreasing, that the majority of women who give birth today still require it, but only about half of them receive it. It is crucial to develop a plan for these consultations that meets both the women's needs and the organization within current maternity care.  </description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/8/29</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Ingrid Carlgren and Marie Berg</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2008, 8:29</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-07-23</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2393-8-29</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1471-2393</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>29</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-23</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/8/28">
            
            <title>Criteria for clinical audit of women friendly care and providers' perception in Malawi</title>
			<description>Background:
There are two dimensions of quality of maternity care, namely quality of health outcomes and quality as perceived by clients. The feasibility of using clinical audit to assess and improve the quality of maternity care as perceived by women was studied in Malawi. 
We sought to (a) establish standards for women friendly care and (b) explore attitudinal barriers which could impede the proper implementation of clinical audit.  
Methods:
We used evidence from Malawi national guidelines and World Health Organisation manuals to establish local standards for women friendly care in three districts. We equally conducted a survey of health care providers to explore their attitudes towards criterion based audit. 
Results:
The standards addressed different aspects of care given to women in maternity units, namely (i) reception, (ii) attitudes towards women, (iii) respect for culture, (iv) respect for women, (v) waiting time, (vi) enabling environment, (vii) provision of information, (viii) individualised care, (ix) provision of skilled attendance at birth and emergency obstetric care, (x) confidentiality, and (xi) proper management of patient information. The health providers in Malawi generally held a favourable attitude towards clinical audit: 100.0% (54/54) agreed that criterion based audit will improve the quality of care and 92.6% believed that clinical audit is a good educational tool. However, there are concerns that criterion based audit would create a feeling of blame among providers (35.2%), and that managers would use clinical audit to identify and punish providers who fail to meet standards (27.8%). 
Conclusions:
Developing standards of maternity care that are acceptable to, and valued by, women requires consideration of both the research evidence and cultural values. Clinical audit is acceptable to health professionals in Malawi although there are concerns about its negative implications to the providers. </description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/8/28</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Eugene J Kongnyuy and Nynke van den Broek</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2008, 8:28</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-07-22</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2393-8-28</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1471-2393</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>28</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-22</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/8/27">
            
            <title>The early postnatal period: exploring women's views, expectations and experiences of care using focus groups in Victoria, Australia</title>
			<description>Background:
There is growing evidence from Australia and overseas that the care provided in hospital in the early postnatal period is less than ideal for both women and care providers. Many health services face increasing pressure on hospital beds and have limited physical space available to care for mothers and their babies. We aimed to gain a more in-depth understanding of women's views, expectations and experiences of early postnatal care.  
Methods:
We conducted focus groups in rural and metropolitan Victoria, Australia in 2006. Fifty-two people participated in eight focus groups and four interviews.  Participants included eight pregnant women, of whom seven were pregnant with their first baby; 42 women who were in the postpartum period (some up to twelve months after the birth of their baby); and two partners. All participants were fluent in English. Focus group guides were developed specifically for the study and explored participants' experiences and/or expectations of early postnatal care in hospital and at home, with an emphasis on length of hospital stay, professional and social support, continuity of care, and rest. Discussions were audio-taped and transcribed verbatim. A thematic network was constructed to describe and connect categories with emerging basic, organizing, and global themes.
Results:
Global themes that emerged were: anxiety and/or fear; and the transition to motherhood and parenting. The needs of first time mothers were considered to be different to the needs of women who had already experienced motherhood. The women in this study were generally concerned about the safety of their new baby, and lacked confidence in themselves as new mothers regarding their ability to care for their baby. There was a consistent view that the physical presence and availability of professional support helped alleviate these concerns, and this was especially the case for women having a first baby. 
Conclusions:
Women have anxieties and fears around early parenting and their changing role, and may consider that the physical availability of professional care providers will help during this time. Care providers should be cognisant of these potential issues. It is crucial that women's concerns and needs be considered when service delivery changes are planned. If anxiety around new parenting is a predominant view then care providers need to recognise this and ensure care is individualised to address each woman's/families particular concerns. </description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/8/27</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Della A Forster, Helen L McLachlan, Jo Rayner, Jane Yelland, Lisa Gold and Sharon Rayner</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2008, 8:27</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-07-22</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2393-8-27</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1471-2393</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>27</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-22</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/8/26">
            
            <title>Factors associated with lack of postnatal care among Palestinian women: A cross-sectional study of three clinics in the West Bank</title>
			<description>Background:
Only about one-third of women in Palestine (West Bank and Gaza) obtain postpartum care. Therefore, the goal of this study was to assess factors associated with lack of postnatal care, women's reasons for not obtaining postnatal care, and their attitudes towards its importance.
Methods:
In early 2006, a cross-sectional survey was conducted at three clinics run by the Ministry of Health providing Mother and Child Health Care in West Bank, Palestine. A total of 264 postpartum women attending the clinics were interviewed face-to-face, using a structured questionnaire. 
Results:
Although the majority of women considered postnatal care necessary (66.1%), only 36.6% of women obtained postnatal care. The most frequent reason for not obtaining postnatal care was that women did not feel sick and therefore did not need postnatal care (85%), followed by not having been told by their doctor to come back for postnatal care (15.5%). Based on a multivariable analysis, use of postnatal care was higher among women who had experienced problems during their delivery, had a cesarean section, or had an instrumental vaginal delivery than among women who had a spontaneous vaginal delivery. Use of postnatal care was also higher among women who delivered in a private hospital as compared to those who delivered in a public hospital. In addition, we found regional differences.
Conclusions:
The higher use of postnatal care among high-risk women is appropriate, but some clinically dangerous conditions can also occur in low-risk women. Future efforts should therefore focus on providing postnatal care to a larger number of low-risk women.  </description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/8/26</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Enas Dhaher, Rafael T Mikolajczyk, Annette E Maxwell and Alexander Kraemer</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2008, 8:26</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-07-18</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2393-8-26</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1471-2393</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>26</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-18</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/8/25">
            
            <title>Fetal size in the second trimester is associated with the duration of pregnancy, small fetuses having longer pregnancies. 
</title>
			<description>Background:
Conventionally, the pregnancy duration is accepted to be 280-282 days.  Fetuses determined by ultrasound biometry to be small in early pregnancy, have an increased risk of premature birth.  We speculate that the higher rate of preterm delivery in such small fetuses represents a pathological outcome not applicable to physiological pregnancies.  Here we test the hypothesis that in low-risk pregnancies fetal growth (expressed by fetal size in the second trimester) is itself a determinant for pregnancy duration with the slower growing fetuses having a longer pregnancy.
Methods:
We analysed duration of gestation data for 541 women who had a spontaneous delivery having previously been recruited to a cross-sectional study of 650 low-risk pregnancies. All had a regular menses and a known date of their last menstrual period (LMP). Subjects were examined using ultrasound to determine fetal head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC) and femur length (FL) at 10-24 weeks of gestation.  Length of the pregnancy was calculated from LMP, and birth weights were noted.  The effect of fetal size at 10-24 weeks of gestation on pregnancy duration was assessed also when adjusting for the difference between LMP and ultrasound based fetal age.
Results:
Small fetuses (z-score -2.5) at second trimester ultrasound scan had lower birth weights (p&lt;0.0001) and longer duration of pregnancy (p&lt;0.0001) than large fetuses (z-score +2.5): 289.6 days (95%CI 288.0 to 291.1) vs. 276.1 (95%CI 273.6 to 278.4) for HC, 289.0 days (95%CI 287.4 to 290.6) vs. 276.9 days (95%CI 274.4 to 279.2) for AC and 288.3 vs. 277.9 days (95%CI 275.6 to 280.1) for FL.  Controlling for the difference between LMP and ultrasound dating (using HC measurement), the effect of fetal size on pregnancy length was reduced to half but was still present for AC and FL (comparing z-score -2.5 with +2.5, 286.6 vs. 280.2 days, p=0.004, and 286.0 vs. 280.9, p=0.008, respectively).  
Conclusions:
Fetal size in the second trimester is a determinant of birth weight and pregnancy duration, small fetuses having lower birth weights and longer pregnancies (up to 13 days compared with large fetuses).  Our results support a concept of individually assigned pregnancy duration according to growth rates rather than imposing a standard of 280-282 days on all pregnancies.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/8/25</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Synnove L Johnsen, Tom Wilsgaard, Svein Rasmussen, Mark A Hanson, Keith M Godfrey and Torvid Kiserud</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2008, 8:25</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-07-16</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2393-8-25</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1471-2393</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>25</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-16</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/8/24">
            
            <title>Drug-prescribing patterns during pregnancy in the tertiary care hospitals of Pakistan: a cross sectional study</title>
			<description>Background:
The rationale for use of drugs during pregnancy requires a careful assessment as in addition to the mother, the health and life of her unborn child is also at stake. Information on the use of drugs during pregnancy is not available in Pakistan. The aim of this study was to evaluate the patterns of drug prescriptions to pregnant women in tertiary care hospitals of Pakistan.
Methods:
This was a cross-sectional study conducted at five tertiary care hospitals of Pakistan. Copies of outpatient medicinal prescriptions given to pregnant patients attending the antenatal clinics were collected. The drugs were classified according to the pharmacological class and their teratogenic potential.
Results:
All the pregnant women attending the antenatal clinics received a prescription containing at least one drug. A total of 3769 distinct prescriptions given to different women were collected. Majority of the women who received the prescriptions belonged to third trimester (55.4%) followed by second (33.6%) and first trimester (11.0%). On an average, each prescription contained 1.66.0.14 drugs. The obstetricians at Civil Hospital, Karachi and Chandka Medical College Hospital, Larkana showed a tendency of prescribing lesser number of drugs compared to those in other hospitals. Anti-anemic drugs including iron preparations and vitamin and mineral supplements (79.4%) were the most frequently prescribed drugs followed by analgesics (6.2%) and anti-bacterials (2.2%). 739 women (19.6%) received prescriptions containing drugs other than vitamin or mineral supplements. Only 1275 (21.6%) of all the prescribed drugs (n=6100) were outside this vitamin/mineral supplement class. Out of these 1275 drugs, 29 (2.3%) drugs were prescribed which are considered to be teratogenic. Misoprostol was the most frequently prescribed (n=6) among the teratogenic drugs followed by carbimazole (n=5) and methotrexate (n=5). Twenty nine pregnant women (0.8% of all the women studied) were prescribed these teratogenic drugs.
Conclusions:
Less than one percent of the pregnant women attending tertiary care hospitals in Pakistan are prescribed teratogenic drugs. The prescribing practices of Pakistani physicians are similar to those in western countries.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/8/24</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Dileep K Rohra, Nirmal Das, Syed I Azam, Nazir A Solangi, Zahida Memon, Abdul M Shaikh and Nusrat H Khan</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2008, 8:24</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-07-15</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2393-8-24</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1471-2393</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>24</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-15</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/8/23">
            
            <title>Use of real time continuous glucose monitoring and intravenous insulin in type 1 diabetic mothers to prevent respiratory distress and hypoglycaemia in infants</title>
			<description>Background:
Pregnancy in Type 1 diabetic patients is a precarious condition, both for mother and fetus with increased the risk of prematurity and, immediately after delivery with risk of respiratory distress syndrome and hypoglycaemia in newborns. A strict control and monitoring of diabetes throughout pregnancy is important in reducing the impact of the disease on the fetus and newborn. In recent years many new technologies have been introduced to ameliorate diabetes monitoring, where the last is the Real-time Continuous Glucose Monitoring System (RT-CGMS).
Methods:
In the last three years, 72 h continuous glucose monitoring system (RT-CGMS) (Medtronic, CA) was performed in 18 pregnant women with Type 1 diabetes in two moments of pregnancy: during treatment with betamethasone to prevent respiratory distress and during delivery. In both cases insulin was administered intravenous and the dose was changed on the basis of glycaemia.
Results:
The results present the use of this new technique during two topics moments of pregnancy of type 1 diabetes patients when is very important intensively to monitor diabetes and to obtain the well being of the fetus. No infant experimented hypoglycaemia or respiratory distress syndrome at the moment and in the first hours after the birth.
Conclusion:
We wish to stress the importance reducing glycaemia during administration of betamethasone and during labor. It is conceivable that the scarce attention paid to monitoring glucose levels in diabetic mothers during labor in gynaecological world may be due to the difficulty in glucose monitoring with the devices until now available. Hopefully, our anecdotal account may prompt improvements with RT-CGMS, and may lead to a better approach to the problem, thereby changing the prognosis of infants born to diabetic mothers.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/8/23</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Dario Iafusco, Fabrizio Stoppoloni, Gennaro Salvia, Gilberto Vernetti, Patrizia Passaro, Goran Petrovski and Francesco Prisco</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2008, 8:23</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-07-01</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2393-8-23</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1471-2393</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>23</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/8/22">
            
            <title>The design, implementation and acceptability of an integrated intervention to address multiple behavioral and psychosocial risk factors among pregnant African American women</title>
			<description>Background:
African American women are at increased risk for poor pregnancy outcomes compared to other racial-ethnic groups. Single or multiple psychosocial and behavioral factors may contribute to this risk. Most interventions focus on singular risks. This paper describes the design, implementation, challenges faced, and acceptability of a behavioral counseling intervention for low income, pregnant African American women which integrated multiple targeted risks into a multi-component format.
Methods:
Six academic institutions in Washington, DC collaborated in the development of a community-wide, primary care research study, DC-HOPE, to improve pregnancy outcomes. Cigarette smoking, environmental tobacco smoke exposure, depression and intimate partner violence were the four risks targeted because of their adverse impact on pregnancy. Evidence-based models for addressing each risk were adapted and integrated into a multiple risk behavior intervention format. Pregnant women attending six urban prenatal clinics were screened for eligibility and risks and randomized to intervention or usual care. The 10-session intervention was delivered in conjunction with prenatal and postpartum care visits. Descriptive statistics on risk factor distributions, intervention attendance and length (i.e., with &lt; 4 sessions considered minimal adherence) for all enrolled women (n = 1,044), and perceptions of study participation from a sub-sample of those enrolled (n = 152) are reported.
Results:
Forty-eight percent of women screened were eligible based on presence of targeted risks, 76% of those eligible were enrolled, and 79% of those enrolled were retained postpartum. Most women reported a single risk factor (61%); 39% had multiple risks. Eighty-four percent of intervention women attended at least one session (60% attended &#8805; 4 sessions) without disruption of clinic scheduling. Specific risk factor content was delivered as prescribed in 80% or more of the sessions; 78% of sessions were fully completed (where all required risk content was covered). Ninety-three percent of the subsample of intervention women had a positive view of their relationship with their counselor. Most intervention women found the session content helpful. Implementation challenges of addressing multiple risk behaviors are discussed.
Conclusion:
While implementation adjustments and flexibility are necessary, multiple risk behavioral interventions can be implemented in a prenatal care setting without significant disruption of services, and with a majority of referred African American women participating in and expressing satisfaction with treatment sessions.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/8/22</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Kathy S Katz, Susan M Blake, Renee A Milligan, Phyllis W Sharps, Davene B White, Margaret F Rodan, Maryann Rossi and Kennan B Murray</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2008, 8:22</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-06-25</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2393-8-22</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1471-2393</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>22</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-25</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/8/21">
            
            <title>Acceptability of evidence-based neonatal care practices in rural Uganda &#8211; implications for programming</title>
			<description>Background:
Although evidence-based interventions to reach the Millennium Development Goals for Maternal and Neonatal mortality reduction exist, they have not yet been operationalised and scaled up in Sub-Saharan African cultural and health systems. A key concern is whether these internationally recommended practices are acceptable and will be demanded by the target community. We explored the acceptability of these interventions in two rural districts of Uganda.
Methods:
We conducted 10 focus group discussions consisting of mothers, fathers, grand parents and child minders (older children who take care of other children). We also did 10 key informant interviews with health workers and traditional birth attendants.
Results:
Most maternal and newborn recommended practices are acceptable to both the community and to health service providers. However, health system and community barriers were prevalent and will need to be overcome for better neonatal outcomes. Pregnant women did not comprehend the importance of attending antenatal care early or more than once unless they felt ill. Women prefer to deliver in health facilities but most do not do so because they cannot afford the cost of drugs and supplies which are demanded in a situation of poverty and limited male support. Postnatal care is non-existent. For the newborn, delayed bathing and putting nothing on the umbilical cord were neither acceptable to parents nor to health providers, requiring negotiation of alternative practices.
Conclusion:
The recommended maternal-newborn practices are generally acceptable to the community and health service providers, but often are not practiced due to health systems and community barriers. Communities associate the need for antenatal care attendance with feeling ill, and postnatal care is non-existent in this region. Health promotion programs to improve newborn care must prioritize postnatal care, and take into account the local socio-cultural situation and health systems barriers including the financial burden. Male involvement and promotion of waiting shelters at selected health units should be considered in order to increase access to supervised deliveries. Scale-up of the evidence based practices for maternal-neonatal health in Sub-Saharan Africa should follow rapid appraisal and adaptation of intervention packages to address the local health system and socio-cultural situation.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/8/21</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Peter Waiswa, Margaret Kemigisa, Juliet Kiguli, Sarah Naikoba, George W Pariyo and Stefan Peterson</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2008, 8:21</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-06-21</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2393-8-21</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1471-2393</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>21</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-21</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/8/20">
            
            <title>Developing evidence-based maternity care in Iran: a quality improvement study</title>
			<description>Background:
Current Iranian perinatal statistics indicate that maternity care continues to need improvement. In response, we implemented a multi-faceted intervention to improve the quality of maternity care at an Iranian Social Security Hospital. Using a before-and-after design our aim was to improve the uptake of selected evidence based practices and more closely attend to identified women's needs and preferences.
Methods:
The major steps of the study were to (1) identify women's needs, values and preferences via interviews, (2) select through a process of professional consensus the top evidence-based clinical recommendations requiring local implementation (3) redesign care based on the selected evidence-based recommendations and women's views, and (4) implement the new care model. We measured the impact of the new care model on maternal satisfaction and caesarean birth rates utilising maternal surveys and medical record audit before and after implementation of the new care model.
Results:
Twenty women's needs and requirements as well as ten evidence-based clinical recommendations were selected as a basis for improving care. Following the introduction of the new model of care, women's satisfaction levels improved significantly on 16 of 20 items (p &lt; 0.0001) compared with baseline. Seventy-eight percent of studied women experienced care consistent with the new model and fewer women had a caesarean birth (30% compared with 42% previously).
Conclusion:
The introduction of a quality improvement care model improved compliance with evidence-based guidelines and was associated with an improvement in women's satisfaction levels and a reduction in rates of caesarean birth.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/8/20</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Siamak Aghlmand, Feizollah Akbari, Aboulfath Lameei, Kazem Mohammad, Rhonda Small and Mohammad Arab</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2008, 8:20</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-06-13</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2393-8-20</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1471-2393</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>20</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-13</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
		
    <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
         <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction"/>
         <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution"/>
         <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks"/>
	</cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
