<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/feeds/mostaccessed/journal?journal=bmcpregnancychildbirth&amp;quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth - Most accessed articles</title>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcpregnancychildbirth/</link>
        <description>The most accessed research articles published by BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth</description>
        <dc:date>2009-11-17T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/9/51" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/5/9" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/9/48" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/6/18" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/9/50" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/9/32" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/9/53" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/9/8" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/9/54" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/9/47" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
        <extra:info rdf:parseType="Literal">
            <html:div style="font:14px Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                <html:span style="font-weight:bold">
                    This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central
                </html:span>
                <html:br />
                <html:span style="font-size: 12px;">
                    It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit
                    <html:br />
                    <html:a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/" style="color:#3333CC; font-size:12px;">
                        http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/
                    </html:a>
                    <html:br />
                </html:span>
            </html:div>
        </extra:info>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/9/51">
        <title>Maternal morbidity in the first year after childbirth in Mombasa Kenya; a needs assessment</title>
        <description>Background:
In sub-Saharan Africa, few services specifically address the needs of women in the first year after childbirth. By assessing the health status of women in this period, key interventions to improve maternal health could be identified. There is an underutilised opportunity to include these interventions within the package of services provided for woman-child pairs attending child-health clinics.
Methods:
This needs assessment entailed a cross-sectional survey with 500 women attending a child-health clinic at the provincial hospital in Mombasa, Kenya. A structured questionnaire, clinical examination, and collection of blood, urine, cervical swabs and Pap smear were done. Women&apos;s health care needs were compared between the early (four weeks to two months after childbirth), middle (two to six months) and late periods (six to twelve months) since childbirth.
Results:
More than one third of women had an unmet need for contraception (39%, 187/475). Compared with other time intervals, women in the late period had more general health symptoms such as abdominal pain, fever and depression, but fewer urinary or breast problems. Over 50% of women in each period had anaemia (Hb &lt;11 g/l; 265/489), with even higher levels of anaemia in those who had a caesarean section or had not received iron supplementation during pregnancy. Bacterial vaginosis was present in 32% (141/447) of women, while 1% (5/495) had syphilis, 8% (35/454) Trichomonas vaginalis and 11% (54/496) HIV infection.
Conclusion:
Throughout the first year after childbirth, women had high levels of morbidity. Interface with health workers at child health clinics should be used for treatment of anaemia, screening and treatment of reproductive tract infections, and provision of family planning counselling and contraception. Providing these services during visits to child health clinics, which have high coverage both early and late in the year after childbirth, could make an important contribution towards improving women&apos;s health.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/9/51</link>
                <dc:creator>Matthew Chersich</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nicole Kley</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Stanley Luchters</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Carol Njeru</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Elodie Yard</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mary Othigo</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Marleen Temmerman</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2009, 9:51</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-11-05T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2393-9-51</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2393</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>51</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-11-05T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/5/9">
        <title>Incidence of stillbirth and perinatal mortality and their associated factors among women delivering at Harare Maternity Hospital, Zimbabwe: a cross-sectional retrospective analysis</title>
        <description>Background:
Death of an infant in utero or at birth has always been a devastating experience for the mother and of concern in clinical practice. Infant mortality remains a challenge in the care of pregnant women worldwide, but particularly for developing countries and the need to understand contributory factors is crucial for addressing appropriate perinatal health.
Methods:
Using information available in obstetric records for all deliveries (17,072 births) at Harare Maternity Hospital, Zimbabwe, we conducted a cross-sectional retrospective analysis of a one-year data, (1997&#8211;1998) to assess demographic and obstetric risk factors for stillbirth and early neonatal death. We estimated risk of stillbirth and early neonatal death for each potential risk factor.
Results:
The annual frequency of stillbirth was 56 per 1,000 total births. Women delivering stillbirths and early neonatal deaths were less likely to receive prenatal care (adjusted relative risk [RR] = 2.54; 95% confidence intervals [CI] 2.19&#8211;2.94 and RR = 2.52; 95% CI 1.63&#8211;3.91), which for combined stillbirths and early neonatal deaths increased with increasing gestational age (Hazard Ratio [HR] = 3.98, HR = 7.49 at 28 and 40 weeks of gestation, respectively). Rural residence was associated with risk of infant dying in utero, (RR = 1.33; 95% CI 1.12&#8211;1.59), and the risk of death increased with increasing gestational age (HR = 1.04, HR = 1.69, at 28 and 40 weeks of gestation, respectively). Older maternal age was associated with risk of death (HR = 1.50; 95% CI 1.21&#8211;1.84). Stillbirths were less likely to be delivered by Cesarean section (RR = 0.64; 95% CI 0.51&#8211;0.79), but more likely to be delivered as breech (RR = 4.65; 95% CI 3.88&#8211;5.57, as were early neonatal deaths (RR = 3.38; 95% CI 1.64&#8211;6.96).
Conclusion:
The frequency of stillbirth, especially macerated, is high, 27 per 1000 total births. Early prenatal care could help reduce perinatal death linking the woman to the health care system, increasing the probability that she would seek timely emergency care that would reduce the likelihood of death of her infant in utero. Improved quality of obstetric care during labor and delivery may help reduce the number of fresh stillbirths and early neonatal deaths.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/5/9</link>
                <dc:creator>Shingairai Feresu</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sioban Harlow</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kathy Welch</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Brenda Gillespie</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2005, 5:9</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2005-05-05T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2393-5-9</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2393</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>9</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2005-05-05T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/9/48">
        <title>Treatment of retained placenta with misoprostol: a randomised controlled trial in a low-resource setting (Tanzania)</title>
        <description>Background:
Retained placenta is one of the common causes of maternal mortality in developing countries where access to appropriate obstetrical care is limited. Current treatment of retained placenta is manual removal of the placenta under anaesthesia, which can only take place in larger health care facilities. Medical treatment of retained placenta with prostaglandins E1 (misoprostol) could be cost-effective and easy-to-use and could be a life-saving option in many low-resource settings. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of sublingually administered misoprostol in women with retained placenta in a low resource setting.
Methods:
Design: Multicentered randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, to be conducted in 5 hospitals in Tanzania, Africa.Inclusion criteria: Women with retained placenta, at a gestational age of 28 weeks or more and blood loss less than 750 ml, 30 minutes after delivery of the newborn despite active management of third stage of labour.Trial Entry &amp; Randomisation &amp; Study Medication: After obtaining informed consent, eligible women will be allocated randomly to the treatment groups using numbered envelopes that will be randomized in variable blocks containing identical capsules with either 800 microgram of misoprostol or placebo. The drugs will be given sublingually. The women, maternal care providers and researchers will be blinded to treatment allocation.Sample Size: 117 women, to show a 40% reduction in manual removals of the placenta (p = 0.05, 80% power). The randomization will be misoprostol: placebo = 2:1Primary Study Outcome: Expulsion of the placenta without manual removal. Secondary outcome is the number of blood transfusions.DiscussionThis is a protocol for a randomized trial in a low resource setting to assess if medical treatment of women with retained placenta with misoprostol reduces the incidence of manual removal of the placenta.Clinical Trial RegistrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN16104753</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/9/48</link>
                <dc:creator>Heleen van Beekhuizen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Andrea Pembe</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Heiner Fauteck</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Fred Lotgering</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2009, 9:48</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-10-23T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2393-9-48</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2393</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>48</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-10-23T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/6/18">
        <title>Pregnancy outcome following gestational exposure to azithromycin</title>
        <description>Background:
Azithromycin is an azalide antibiotic with an extensive range of indications and has become a common treatment option due to its convenient dosing regimen and therapeutic advantages. Human studies addressing gestational use of azithromycin have primarily focused on antibiotic efficacy rather than fetal safety. Our primary objective was to evaluate the possibility of teratogenic risk following gestational exposure to azithromycin.
Methods:
There were 3 groups of pregnant women enrolled in our study: 1) women who took azithromycin. 2) women exposed to non-teratogenic antibiotics for similar indications, and 3) women exposed to non-teratogenic agents. They were matched for gestational age at time of call, maternal age, cigarette and alcohol consumption. Rates of major malformations and other endpoints of interest were compared among the three groups.
Results:
Pregnancy outcome of 123 women in each group was ascertained. There were no statistically significant differences among the three groups in the rates of major malformations; 3.4% (exposed) versus 2.3% (disease matched) and 3.4% (non teratogen) or any other endpoints that were examined. In the azithromycin group, 88 (71.6%) women took the drug during the first trimester
Conclusion:
Results suggest that gestational exposure to azithromycin is not associated with an increase in the rate of major malformations above the baseline of 1&#8211;3%. Our data adds to previous research showing that macrolide antibiotics, as a group, are generally safe in pregnancy and provides an evidence-based option for health professionals caring for populations with chlamydia.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/6/18</link>
                <dc:creator>Moumita Sarkar</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Cindy Woodland</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Gideon Koren</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Adrienne Einarson</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2006, 6:18</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2006-05-30T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2393-6-18</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2393</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>6</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>18</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2006-05-30T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/9/50">
        <title>Developing and pre-testing a decision board to facilitate informed choice about delivery approach in uncomplicated pregnancy</title>
        <description>Background:
The rate of caesarean sections is increasing worldwide, yet medical literature informing women with uncomplicated pregnancies about relative risks and benefits of elective caesarean section (CS) compared with vaginal delivery (VD) remains scarce. A decision board may address this gap, providing systematic evidence-based information so that patients can more fully understand their treatment options. The objective of our study was to design and pre-test a decision board to guide clinical discussions and enhance informed decision-making related to delivery approach (CS or VD) in uncomplicated pregnancy.
Methods:
Development of the decision board involved two preliminary studies to determine women&apos;s preferred mode of risk presentation and a systematic literature review for the most comprehensive presentation of medical risks at the time (VD and CS). Forty women were recruited to pre-test the tool. Eligible subjects were of childbearing age (18-40 years) but were not pregnant in order to avoid raising the expectation among pregnant women that CS was a universally available birth option. Women selected their preferred delivery approach and completed the Decisional Conflict Scale to measure decisional uncertainty before and after reviewing the decision board. They also answered open-ended questions reflecting what they had learned, whether or not the information had helped them to choose between birth methods, and additional information that should be included. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse sample characteristics and women&apos;s choice of delivery approach pre/post decision board. Change in decisional conflict was measured using Wilcoxon&apos;s sign rank test for each of the three subscales.
Results:
The majority of women reported that they had learned something new (n = 37, 92%) and that the tool had helped them make a hypothetical choice between delivery approaches (n = 34, 85%). Women wanted more information about neonatal risks and personal experiences. Decisional uncertainty decreased (p &lt; 0.001) and perceived effectiveness of decisions increased (p &lt; 0.001) post-intervention.
Conclusion:
Non-pregnant women of childbearing age were positive about the decision board and stated their hypothetical delivery choices were informed by risk presentation, but wanted additional information about benefits and experiences. This study represents a preliminary but integral step towards ensuring women considering delivery approaches in uncomplicated pregnancies are fully informed.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/9/50</link>
                <dc:creator>Jill Milne</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Amiram Gafni</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Diane Lu</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Stephen Wood</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Reg Sauve</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sue Ross</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2009, 9:50</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-10-30T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2393-9-50</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2393</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>50</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-10-30T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/9/32">
        <title>Reduction of late stillbirth with the introduction of fetal movement information and guidelines - a clinical quality improvement</title>
        <description>Background:
Women experiencing decreased fetal movements (DFM) are at increased risk of adverse outcomes, including stillbirth. Fourteen delivery units in Norway registered all cases of DFM in a population-based quality assessment. We found that information to women and management of DFM varied significantly between hospitals. We intended to examine two cohorts of women with DFM before and during two consensus-based interventions aiming to improve care through: 1) written information to women about fetal activity and DFM, including an invitation to monitor fetal movements, 2) guidelines for management of DFM for health-care professionals.
Methods:
All singleton third trimester pregnancies presenting with a perception of DFM were registered, and outcomes collected independently at all 14 hospitals. The quality assessment period included April 2005 through October 2005, and the two interventions were implemented from November 2005 through March 2007. The baseline versus intervention cohorts included: 19,407 versus 46,143 births and 1215 versus 3038 women with DFM, respectively.
Results:
Reports of DFM did not increase during the intervention. The stillbirth rate among women with DFM fell during the intervention: 4.2% vs. 2.4%, (OR 0.51 95% CI 0.32&#8211;0.81), and 3.0/1000 versus 2.0/1000 in the overall study population (OR 0.67 95% CI 0.48&#8211;0.93). There was no increase in the rates of preterm births, fetal growth restriction, transfers to neonatal care or severe neonatal depression among women with DFM during the intervention. The use of ultrasound in management increased, while additional follow up visits and admissions for induction were reduced.
Conclusion:
Improved management of DFM and uniform information to women is associated with fewer stillbirths.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/9/32</link>
                <dc:creator>Julie Victoria Holm Tveit</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Eli Saastad</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Babill Stray-Pedersen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Per Bordahl</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Vicki Flenady</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ruth Fretts</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>J. Frederik Froen</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2009, 9:32</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-07-22T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2393-9-32</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2393</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>32</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-07-22T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/9/53">
        <title>Surprisingly low compliance to local guidelines for risk factor based screening for gestational diabetes mellitus - A population-based study.</title>
        <description>Background:
Screening for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is routine during pregnancy in many countries in the world. The screening programs are either based on general screening offered to all pregnant women or risk factor based screening stipulated in local clinical guidelines. The aims of this study were to investigate: 1) the compliance with local guidelines of screening for GDM and 2) the outcomes of pregnancy and birth in relation to risk factors of GDM and whether or not exposed to oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT).
Methods:
This study design was a population-based retrospective cross-sectional study of 822 women. A combination of questionnaire data and data collected from medical records was applied. Compliance to the local guidelines of risk factor based screening for GDM was examined and a comparison of outcomes of pregnancy and delivery in relation to risk factor groups for GDM was performed.
Results:
Of the 822 participants, 257 (31.3%) women fulfilled at least one criterion for being exposed to screening for GDM according to the local clinical guidelines. However, only 79 (30.7%) of these women were actually exposed to OGTT and of those correctly exposed for screening, seven women were diagnosed with GDM. Women developing risk factors for GDM during pregnancy had a substantially increased risk of giving birth to an infant with macrosomia.
Conclusion:
Surprisingly low compliance with the local clinical guidelines for screening for GDM during pregnancy was found. Furthermore, the prevalence of the risk factors of GDM in our study was almost doubled compared to previous Swedish studies. Pregnant women developing risk factors of GDM during pregnancy were found to be at substantially increased risk of giving birth to an infant with macrosomia. There is a need of actions improving compliance to the local guidelines.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/9/53</link>
                <dc:creator>Margareta Persson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Anna Winkvist</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ingrid Mogren</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2009, 9:53</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-11-16T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2393-9-53</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2393</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>53</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-11-16T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/9/8">
        <title>The HELLP syndrome: clinical issues and management. A Review</title>
        <description>Background:
The HELLP syndrome is a serious complication in pregnancy characterized by haemolysis, elevated liver enzymes and low platelet count occurring in 0.5 to 0.9% of all pregnancies and in 10&#8211;20% of cases with severe preeclampsia. The present review highlights occurrence, diagnosis, complications, surveillance, corticosteroid treatment, mode of delivery and risk of recurrence.
Methods:
Clinical reports and reviews published between 2000 and 2008 were screened using Pub Med and Cochrane databases.Results and conclusionAbout 70% of the cases develop before delivery, the majority between the 27th and 37th gestational weeks; the remainder within 48 hours after delivery. The HELLP syndrome may be complete or incomplete. In the Tennessee Classification System diagnostic criteria for HELLP are haemolysis with increased LDH (&gt; 600 U/L), AST (&#8805; 70 U/L), and platelets &lt; 100&#183;109/L. The Mississippi Triple-class HELLP System further classifies the disorder by the nadir platelet counts. The syndrome is a progressive condition and serious complications are frequent. Conservative treatment (&#8805; 48 hours) is controversial but may be considered in selected cases &lt; 34 weeks&apos; gestation. Delivery is indicated if the HELLP syndrome occurs after the 34th gestational week or the foetal and/or maternal conditions deteriorate. Vaginal delivery is preferable. If the cervix is unfavourable, it is reasonable to induce cervical ripening and then labour. In gestational ages between 24 and 34 weeks most authors prefer a single course of corticosteroid therapy for foetal lung maturation, either 2 doses of 12 mg betamethasone 24 hours apart or 6 mg or dexamethasone 12 hours apart before delivery. Standard corticosteroid treatment is, however, of uncertain clinical value in the maternal HELLP syndrome. High-dose treatment and repeated doses should be avoided for fear of long-term adverse effects on the foetal brain. Before 34 weeks&apos; gestation, delivery should be performed if the maternal condition worsens or signs of intrauterine foetal distress occur. Blood pressure should be kept below 155/105 mmHg. Close surveillance of the mother should be continued for at least 48 hours after delivery.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/9/8</link>
                <dc:creator>Kjell Haram</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Einar Svendsen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ulrich Abildgaard</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2009, 9:8</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-02-26T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2393-9-8</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2393</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>8</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-02-26T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/9/54">
        <title>Newborn care practices among slum dwellers in Dhaka, Bangladesh: a quantitative and qualitative exploratory study</title>
        <description>Background:
Urbanization is occurring at a rapid pace, especially in low-income countries. Dhaka, Bangladesh, is estimated to grow to 50 million by 2015, with 21 million living in urban slums. Although health services are available, neonatal mortality is higher in slum areas than in urban non-slum areas. The Manoshi program works to improve maternal, newborn, and child health in urban slums in Bangladesh. This paper describes newborn care practices in urban slums in Dhaka and provides program recommendations.
Methods:
A quantitative baseline survey was conducted in six urban slum areas to measure newborn care practices among recently delivered women (n = 1,256). Thirty-six in-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted to explore newborn care practices among currently pregnant women (n = 18) and women who had at least one delivery (n = 18).
Results:
In the baseline survey, the majority of women gave birth at home (84%). Most women reported having knowledge about drying the baby (64%), wrapping the baby after birth (59%), and cord care (46%). In the in-depth interviews, almost all women reported using sterilized instruments to cut the cord. Babies are typically bathed soon after birth to purify them from the birth process. There was extensive care given to the umbilical cord including massage and/or applying substances, as well as a variety of practices to keep the baby warm. Exclusive breastfeeding was rare; most women reported first giving their babies sweet water, honey and/or other foods.
Conclusion:
These reported newborn care practices are similar to those in rural areas of Bangladesh and to urban and rural areas in the South Asia region. There are several program implications. Educational messages to promote providing newborn care immediately after birth, using sterile thread, delaying bathing, and ensuring dry cord care and exclusive breastfeeding are needed. Programs in urban slum areas should also consider interventions to improve social support for women, especially first time mothers. These interventions may improve newborn survival and help achieve MDG4.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/9/54</link>
                <dc:creator>Allisyn Moran</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nuzhat Choudhury</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nazib Uz Zaman Khan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Zunaid Ahsan Karar</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Tasnuva Wahed</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sabina Rashid</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>M.  Ashraful Alam</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2009, 9:54</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-11-17T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2393-9-54</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2393</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>54</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-11-17T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/9/47">
        <title>A case study evaluation of implementation of a care pathway to support normal birth in one English birth centre: anticipated benefits and unintended consequences </title>
        <description>Background:
The policy drive for the UK National Health Service (NHS) has focused on the need for high quality services informed by evidence of best practice. The introduction of care pathways and protocols to standardise care and support implementation of evidence into practice has taken place across the NHS with limited evaluation of their impact. A multi-site case study evaluation was undertaken to assess the impact of use of care pathways and protocols on clinicians, service users and service delivery. One of the five sites was a midwifery-led Birth Centre, where an adapted version of the All Wales Clinical Pathway for Normal Birth had been implemented.
Methods:
The overarching framework was realistic evaluation. A case study design enabled the capture of data on use of the pathway in the clinical setting, use of multiple methods of data collection and opportunity to study and understand the experiences of clinicians and service users whose care was informed by the pathway. Women attending the Birth Centre were recruited at their 36 week antenatal visit. Episodes of care during labour were observed, following which the woman and the midwife who cared for her were interviewed about use of the pathway. Interviews were also held with other key stakeholders from the study site. Qualitative data were content analysed.
Results:
Observations were undertaken of four women during labour. Eighteen interviews were conducted with clinicians and women, including the women whose care was observed and the midwives who cared for them, senior midwifery managers and obstetricians. The implementation of the pathway resulted in a number of anticipated benefits, including increased midwifery confidence in skills to support normal birth and promotion of team working. There were also unintended consequences, including concerns about a lack of documentation of labour care and negative impact on working relationships with obstetric and other midwifery colleagues. Women were unaware their care was informed by a care pathway.
Conclusion:
Care pathways are complex interventions which generate a number of consequences for practice. Those considering introduction of pathways need to ensure all relevant stakeholders are engaged with this and develop robust evaluation strategies to accompany implementation.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/9/47</link>
                <dc:creator>Debra Bick</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jo Rycroft-Malone</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Marina Fontenla</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2009, 9:47</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-10-05T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2393-9-47</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2393</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>47</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-10-05T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
