<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/feeds/mostaccessed/journal?journal=bmcneurol&amp;quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>BMC Neurology - Most accessed articles</title>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcneurol/</link>
        <description>The most accessed research articles published by BMC Neurology</description>
        <dc:date>2009-11-06T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2377/9/35" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2377/9/57" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2377/9/56" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2377/9/50" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2377/9/53" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2377/9/42" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2377/9/51" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2377/9/55" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2377/9/54" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2377/9/34" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
        <extra:info rdf:parseType="Literal">
            <html:div style="font:14px Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                <html:span style="font-weight:bold">
                    This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central
                </html:span>
                <html:br />
                <html:span style="font-size: 12px;">
                    It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit
                    <html:br />
                    <html:a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/" style="color:#3333CC; font-size:12px;">
                        http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/
                    </html:a>
                    <html:br />
                </html:span>
            </html:div>
        </extra:info>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2377/9/35">
        <title>Diagnostic accuracy of the vegetative and minimally conscious state: Clinical consensus versus standardized neurobehavioral assessment</title>
        <description>Background:
Previously published studies have reported that up to 43% of patients with disorders of consciousness are erroneously assigned a diagnosis of vegetative state (VS). However, no recent studies have investigated the accuracy of this grave clinical diagnosis. In this study, we compared consensus-based diagnoses of VS and MCS to those based on a well-established standardized neurobehavioral rating scale, the JFK Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R).
Methods:
We prospectively followed 103 patients (55 &#177; 19 years) with mixed etiologies and compared the clinical consensus diagnosis provided by the physician on the basis of the medical staff&apos;s daily observations to diagnoses derived from CRS-R assessments performed by research staff. All patients were assigned a diagnosis of &apos;VS&apos;, &apos;MCS&apos; or &apos;uncertain diagnosis.&apos;
Results:
Of the 44 patients diagnosed with VS based on the clinical consensus of the medical team, 18 (41%) were found to be in MCS following standardized assessment with the CRS-R. In the 41 patients with a consensus diagnosis of MCS, 4 (10%) had emerged from MCS, according to the CRS-R. We also found that the majority of patients assigned an uncertain diagnosis by clinical consensus (89%) were in MCS based on CRS-R findings.
Conclusion:
Despite the importance of diagnostic accuracy, the rate of misdiagnosis of VS has not substantially changed in the past 15 years. Standardized neurobehavioral assessment is a more sensitive means of establishing differential diagnosis in patients with disorders of consciousness when compared to diagnoses determined by clinical consensus.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2377/9/35</link>
                <dc:creator>Caroline Schnakers</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Audrey Vanhaudenhuyse</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Joseph Giacino</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Manfredi Ventura</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Melanie Boly</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Steve Majerus</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Gustave Moonen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Steven Laureys</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Neurology 2009, 9:35</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-07-21T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2377-9-35</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Neurology</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2377</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>35</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-07-21T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2377/9/57">
        <title>Comparing unilateral and bilateral upper limb training: The ULTRA-stroke program design</title>
        <description>Background:
About 80% of all stroke survivors have an upper limb paresis immediately after stroke, only about a third of whom (30 to 40%) regain some dexterity within six months following conventional treatment programs. Of late, however, two recently developed interventions - constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) and bilateral arm training with rhythmic auditory cueing (BATRAC) - have shown promising results in the treatment of upper limb paresis in chronic stroke patients. The ULTRA-stroke (acronym for Upper Limb TRaining After stroke) program was conceived to assess the effectiveness of these interventions in subacute stroke patients and to examine how the observed changes in sensori-motor functioning relate to changes in stroke recovery mechanisms associated with peripheral stiffness, interlimb interactions, and cortical inter- and intrahemispheric networks. The present paper describes the design of this single-blinded randomized clinical trial (RCT), which has recently started and will take several years to complete.Methods/DesignSixty patients with a first ever stroke will be recruited. Patients will be stratified in terms of their remaining motor ability at the distal part of the arm (i.e., wrist and finger movements) and randomized over three intervention groups receiving modified CIMT, modified BATRAC, or an equally intensive (i.e., dose-matched) conventional treatment program for 6 weeks. Primary outcome variable is the score on the Action Research Arm test (ARAT), which will be assessed before, directly after, and 6 weeks after the intervention. During those test sessions all patients will also undergo measurements aimed at investigating the associated recovery mechanisms using haptic robots and magneto-encephalography (MEG).DiscussionULTRA-stroke is a 3-year translational research program which aims (1) to assess the relative effectiveness of the three interventions, on a group level but also as a function of patient characteristics, and (2) to delineate the functional and neurophysiological changes that are induced by those interventions.The outcome on the ARAT together with information about changes in the associated mechanisms will provide a better understanding of how specific therapies influence neurobiological changes, and which post-stroke conditions lend themselves to specific treatments.Trial RegistrationThe ULTRA-stroke program is registered at the Netherlands Trial Register (NTR, http://www.trialregister.nl, number NTR1665).</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2377/9/57</link>
                <dc:creator>A. (Lex) van Delden</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>C. (Lieke) Peper</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jaap Harlaar</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Andreas Daffertshofer</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nienke Zijp</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kirsten Nienhuys</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Peter Koppe</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Gert Kwakkel</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Peter Beek</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Neurology 2009, 9:57</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-11-06T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2377-9-57</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Neurology</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2377</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>57</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-11-06T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2377/9/56">
        <title>Patient with neuromyelitis optica and inflammatory demyelinating lesions comprising whole spinal cord from C2 level till conus: case report</title>
        <description>Background:
Neuromyelitis optica (NMO) is an idiopathic, severe, inflammatory demyelinating disease of the central nervous system, that causes severe optic neuritis and myelitis attacks. Early discrimination between multiple sclerosis (MS) and NMO is important, as optimum treatment for both diseases may differ considerably.Case PresentationWe report a case of a patient who initially presented as longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis (LETM), having spastic upper extremities diparesis and spastic paraplegia, C2/C3 sensory level and urinary incontinence, as well as extensive inflammatory spinal cord lesions from C2 level to conus. After 5 months the patient had another attack of transverse myelitis, had electrophysiological findings consistent with optic neuritis, was seropositive for NMO-IgG (aquaporin-4 IgG) and thus fulfilled NMO diagnostic criteria. Following treatment of disease attacks with pulse corticosteroid therapy and intravenous immunoglobulins, we included oral azathioprine in a combination with oral prednisone in the therapy. Since there was no significant clinical improvement, we decided to use cyclophosphamide therapy, which resulted in good clinical improvement and gradual decrease of cord swelling.
Conclusion:
In this NMO case report we wanted to emphasize the extensiveness of inflammatory spinal cord changes in our patient, from C2 level to conus. In the conclusion it is important to say that accurate, early diagnosis and distinction from MS is critical to facilitate initiation of immunosuppressive therapy for attack prevention.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2377/9/56</link>
                <dc:creator>Zeljka Petelin Gadze</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sanja Hajnsek</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Silvio Basic</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Davor Sporis</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Goran Pavlisa</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sibila Nankovic</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Neurology 2009, 9:56</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-10-23T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2377-9-56</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Neurology</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2377</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>56</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-10-23T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2377/9/50">
        <title>Upper limbs dysmetria caused by cervical spinal cord injury: a case report</title>
        <description>Background:
Upper limbs dysmetria caused by spinal cord injury is very rare. We will discuss the associated mechanism in our articles.Case presentationA 51-year-old male had sudden onset of weakness, dysmetria over bilateral upper limbs and ataxia after he fell accidentally. Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed no specific findings. C-spine MRI revealed C1 myelopathy and C4-6 spinal cord compression by bulged disc. The symptoms subsided after surgical intervention.
Conclusion:
Sudden onset of upper limbs dysmetria is a sign of dysfunction in cerebellum and its associated pathway. However, lesion in spinal cord can also cause cerebellar signs such as dysmetria.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2377/9/50</link>
                <dc:creator>Hsun-Chang Lin</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Chun-Hung Chen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Gim-Thean Khor</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Poyin Huang</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Neurology 2009, 9:50</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-09-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2377-9-50</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Neurology</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2377</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>50</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-09-24T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2377/9/53">
        <title>Systematic review of pharmacological treatments in fragile X syndrome</title>
        <description>Background:
Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is considered the most common cause of inherited mental retardation. Affected people have mental impairment that can include Attention Deficit and/or Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), autism disorder, and speech and behavioural disorders. Several pharmacological interventions have been proposed to treat those impairments.
Methods:
Systematic review of the literature and summary of the evidence from clinical controlled trials that compared at least one pharmacological treatment with placebo or other treatment in individuals with diagnosis of FXS syndrome and assessed the efficacy and/or safety of the treatments. Studies were identified by a search of PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Databases using the terms fragile X and treatment. Risk of bias of the studies was assessed by using the Cochrane Collaboration criteria.
Results:
The search identified 276 potential articles and 14 studies satisfied inclusion criteria. Of these, 10 studies on folic acid (9 with crossover design, only 1 of them with good methodological quality and low risk of bias) did not find in general significant improvements. A small sample size trial assessed dextroamphetamine and methylphenidate in patients with an additional diagnosis of ADHD and found some improvements in those taking methylphenidate, but the length of follow-up was too short. Two studies on L-acetylcarnitine, showed positive effects and no side effects in patients with an additional diagnosis of ADHD. Finally, one study on patients with an additional diagnosis of autism assessed ampakine compound CX516 and found no significant differences between treatment and placebo. Regarding safety, none of the studies that assessed that area found relevant side effects, but the number of patients included was too small to detect side effects with low incidence.
Conclusion:
Currently there is no robust evidence to support recommendations on pharmacological treatments in patients with FXS in general or in those with an additional diagnosis of ADHD or autism.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2377/9/53</link>
                <dc:creator>Jose-Ramon Rueda</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Javier Ballesteros</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Maria-Isabel Tejada</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Neurology 2009, 9:53</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-10-13T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2377-9-53</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Neurology</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2377</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>53</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-10-13T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2377/9/42">
        <title>Can cognitive enhancers reduce the risk of falls in older people with Mild Cognitive Impairment? A protocol for a randomised controlled double blind trial</title>
        <description>Background:
Older adults with cognitive problems have a higher risk of falls, at least twice that of cognitively normal older adults. The consequences of falls in this population are very serious: fallers with cognitive problems suffer more injuries due to falls and are approximately five times more likely to be admitted to institutional care. Although the mechanisms of increased fall risk in cognitively impaired people are not completely understood, it is known that impaired cognitive abilities can reduce attentional resource allocation while walking. Since cognitive enhancers, such as cholinesterase inhibitors, improve attention and executive function, we hypothesise that cognitive enhancers may reduce fall risk in elderly people in the early stages of cognitive decline by improving their gait and balance performance due to an enhancement in attention and executive function.Method/DesignDouble blinded randomized controlled trial with 6 months follow-up in 140 older individuals with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI). Participants will be randomized to the intervention group, receiving donepezil, and to the control group, receiving placebo. A block randomization by four and stratification based on fall history will be performed. Primary outcomes are improvements in gait velocity and reduction in gait variability. Secondary outcomes are changes in the balance confidence, balance sway, attention, executive function, and number of falls.DiscussionBy characterizing and understanding the effects of cognitive enhancers on fall risk in older adults with cognitive impairments, we will be able to pave the way for a new approach to fall prevention in this population. This RCT study will provide, for the first time, information regarding the effect of a medication designed to augment cognitive functioning have on the risk of falls in older adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment. We expect a significant reduction in the risk of falls in this vulnerable population as a function of the reduced gait variability achieved by treatment with cognitive enhancers. This study may contribute to a new approach to prevent and treat fall risk in seniors in early stages of dementia.Trial RegistrationThe protocol for this study is registered with the Clinical Trials Registry, identifier number: NCT00934531 http://www.clinicaltrials.gov</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2377/9/42</link>
                <dc:creator>Manuel Montero-Odasso</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jennie Wells</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Michael Borrie</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mark Speechley</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Neurology 2009, 9:42</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-08-12T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2377-9-42</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Neurology</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2377</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>42</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-08-12T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2377/9/51">
        <title>Oxidative stress and S-100B protein in children with bacterial meningitis</title>
        <description>Background:
Bacterial meningitis is often associated with cerebral compromise which may be responsible for neurological sequelae in nearly half of the survivors. Little is known about the mechanisms of CNS involvement in bacterial meningitis. Several studies have provided substantial evidence for the key role of nitric oxide (NO) and reactive oxygen species in the complex pathophysiology of bacterial meningitis.
Methods:
In the present study, serum and CSF levels of NO, lipid peroxide (LPO) (mediators for oxidative stress and lipid peroxidation); total thiol, superoxide dismutase (SOD) (antioxidant mediators) and S-100B protein (mediator of astrocytes activation and injury), were investigated in children with bacterial meningitis (n = 40). Albumin ratio (CSF/serum) is a marker of blood-CSF barriers integrity, while mediator index (mediator ratio/albumin ratio) is indicative of intrathecal synthesis.
Results:
Compared to normal children (n = 20), patients had lower serum albumin but higher NO, LPO, total thiol, SOD and S-100B. The ratios and indices of NO and LPO indicate blood-CSF barriers dysfunction, while the ratio of S-100B indicates intrathecal synthesis. Changes were marked among patients with positive culture and those with neurological complications. Positive correlation was found between NO index with CSF WBCs (r = 0.319, p &lt; 0.05); CSF-LPO with CSF-protein (r = 0.423, p &lt; 0.01); total thiol with LPO indices (r = 0.725, p &lt; 0.0001); S-100B and Pediatric Glasow Coma Scores (0.608, p &lt; 0.0001); CSF-LPO with CSF-S-100B (r = 0.482, p &lt; 0.002); serum-total thiol with serum S-100B (r = 0.423, p &lt; 0.01).
Conclusion:
This study suggests that loss of integrity of brain-CSF barriers, oxidative stress and S-100B may contribute to the severity and neurological complications of bacterial meningitis.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2377/9/51</link>
                <dc:creator>Sherifa Hamed</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Enas Hamed</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Madeha Zakhary</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Neurology 2009, 9:51</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-10-08T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2377-9-51</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Neurology</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2377</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>51</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-10-08T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2377/9/55">
        <title>Prevalence of dementia and major dementia
subtypes in Spanish populations: A reanalysis of dementia prevalence surveys, 1990-2008.
</title>
        <description>Background:
This study describes the prevalence of dementia and major dementia subtypes in Spanish elderly.
Methods:
We identified screening surveys, both published and unpublished, in Spanish populations, which fulfilled specific quality criteria and targeted prevalence of dementia in populations aged 70 years and above. Surveys covering 13 geographically different populations were selected (prevalence period: 1990-2008). Authors of original surveys provided methodological details of their studies through a systematic questionnaire and also raw age-specific data. Prevalence data were compared using direct adjustment and logistic regression.
Results:
The reanalyzed study population (aged 70 year and above) was composed of Central and North-Eastern Spanish sub-populations obtained from 9 surveys and totaled 12,232 persons and 1,194 cases of dementia (707 of Alzheimer&apos;s disease, 238 of vascular dementia). Results showed high variation in age- and sex-specific prevalence across studies. The reanalyzed prevalence of dementia was significantly higher in women; increased with age, particularly for Alzheimer&apos;s disease; and displayed a significant geographical variation among men. Prevalence was lowest in surveys reporting participation below 85%, studies referred to urban-mixed populations and populations diagnosed by psychiatrists.
Conclusion:
Prevalence of dementia and Alzheimer&apos;s disease in Central and North-Eastern Spain is higher in females, increases with age, and displays considerable geographic variation that may be method-related. People suffering from dementia and Alzheimer&apos;s disease in Spain may approach 600,000 and 400,000 respectively. However, existing studies may not be completely appropriate to infer prevalence of dementia and its subtypes in Spain until surveys in Southern Spain are conducted.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2377/9/55</link>
                <dc:creator>Jesus de Pedro-Cuesta</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Javier Virues-Ortega</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Saturio Vega</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Manuel Seijo-Martinez</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Pedro Saz</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Fernanda Rodriguez</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Angel Rodriguez-Laso</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ramon Rene</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Susana Perez de las Heras</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Raimundo Mateos</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Pablo Martinez-Martin</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jose Maria Manubens</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ignacio Mahillo-Fernandez</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Secundino Lopez-Pousa</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Antonio Lobo</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jordi Llinas-Regla</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jordi Gascon</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Francisco Jose Garcia</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Manuel Fernandez-Martinez</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Raquel Boix</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Felix Bermejo-Pareja</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Alberto Bergareche</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Julian Benito</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ana de Arce</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jose Luis del Barrio</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Neurology 2009, 9:55</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-10-19T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2377-9-55</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Neurology</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2377</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>55</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-10-19T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2377/9/54">
        <title>Neutralizing antibodies explain the poor clinical response to Interferon beta in a small proportion of patients with Multiple Sclerosis: a retrospective study</title>
        <description>Background:
Neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) against Interferon beta (IFN&#946;) are reported to be associated with poor clinical response to therapy in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. We aimed to quantify the contribution of NAbs to the sub-optimal response of IFN&#946; treatment.
Methods:
We studied the prevalence of NAbs in MS patients grouped according to their clinical response to IFN&#946; during the treatment period. Patients were classified as: group A, developing &#8805; 1 relapse after the first 6 months of therapy; group B, exhibiting confirmed disability progression after the first 6 months of therapy, with or without superimposed relapses; group C, presenting a stable disease course during therapy. A cytopathic effect assay tested the presence of NAbs in a cohort of ambulatory MS patients treated with one of the available IFN&#946; formulations for at least one year. NAbs positivity was defined as NAbs titre &#8805; 20 TRU.
Results:
Seventeen patients (12.1%) were NAbs positive. NAbs positivity correlated with poorer clinical response (p &lt; 0.04). As expected, the prevalence of NAbs was significantly lower in Group C (2.1%) than in Group A (17.0%) and Group B (17.0%). However, in the groups of patients with a poor clinical response (A, B), NAbs positivity was found only in a small proportion of patients.
Conclusion:
The majority of patients with poor clinical response are NAbs negative suggesting that NAbs explains only partially the sub-optimal response to IFN&#946;.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2377/9/54</link>
                <dc:creator>Emilia Sbardella</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Valentina Tomassini</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Claudio Gasperini</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Francesca Bellomi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Luca Ausili Cefaro</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Vincenzo Brescia Morra</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Guido Antonelli</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Carlo Pozzilli</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Neurology 2009, 9:54</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-10-13T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2377-9-54</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Neurology</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2377</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>54</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-10-13T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2377/9/34">
        <title>Getting the balance right: A randomised controlled trial of physiotherapy and exercise interventions for ambulatory people with multiple sclerosis</title>
        <description>BackgroundPeople with Multiple Sclerosis have a life long need for physiotherapy and exercise interventions due to the progressive nature of the disease and their greater risk of the complications of inactivity. The Multiple Sclerosis Society of Ireland run physiotherapy, yoga and exercise classes for their members, however there is little evidence to suggest which form of physical activity optimises outcome for people with the many and varied impairments associated with MS.Methods and designThis is a multi-centre, single blind, block randomised, controlled trial. Participants will be recruited via the ten regional offices of MS Ireland. Telephone screening will establish eligibility and stratification according to the mobility section of the Guys Neurological Disability Scale. Once a block of people of the same strand in the same geographical region have given consent, participants will be randomised. Strand A will concern individuals with MS who walk independently or use one stick to walk outside. Participants will be randomised to yoga, physiotherapy led exercise class, fitness instructor led exercise class or to a control group who don&apos;t change their exercise habits.Strand B will concern individuals with MS who walk with bilateral support or a rollator, they may use a wheelchair for longer distance outdoors. Participants will be randomised to 1:1 Physiotherapist led intervention, group intervention led by Physiotherapist, group yoga intervention or a control group who don&apos;t change their exercise habits. Participants will be assessed by physiotherapist who is blind to the group allocation at week 1, week 12 (following 10 weeks intervention or control), and at 12 week follow up. The primary outcome measure for both strands is the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale. Secondary outcomes are Modified Fatigue Impact Scale, 6 Minute Walk test, and muscle strength measured with hand held dynamometry. Strand B will also use Berg Balance Test and the Modified Ashworth Scale. Confounding variables such as sensation, coordination, proprioception, range of motion and other impairments will be recorded at initial assessment.DiscussionData analysis will analyse change in each group, and the differences between groups. Sub group analysis may be performed if sufficient numbers are recruited.Trial registrationISRCTN77610415</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2377/9/34</link>
                <dc:creator>Susan Coote</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Maria Garrett</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Neasa Hogan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Aidan Larkin</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jean Saunders</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Neurology 2009, 9:34</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-07-16T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2377-9-34</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Neurology</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2377</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>34</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-07-16T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
