<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/feeds/latestarticles/journal?journal=bmcemergmed&amp;quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>BMC Emergency Medicine - Latest Articles</title>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcemergmed/</link>
        <description>The latest research articles published by BMC Emergency Medicine</description>
        <dc:date>2009-10-21T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-227X/9/21" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-227X/9/20" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-227X/9/19" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-227X/9/18" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-227X/9/17" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-227X/9/16" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-227X/9/15" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-227X/9/14" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-227X/9/13" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-227X/9/12" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
        <extra:info rdf:parseType="Literal">
            <html:div style="font:14px Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                <html:span style="font-weight:bold">
                    This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central
                </html:span>
                <html:br />
                <html:span style="font-size: 12px;">
                    It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit
                    <html:br />
                    <html:a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/" style="color:#3333CC; font-size:12px;">
                        http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/
                    </html:a>
                    <html:br />
                </html:span>
            </html:div>
        </extra:info>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-227X/9/21">
        <title>Evaluation of an algorithm for estimating a patient&apos;s life threat risk from an ambulance call</title>
        <description>Background:
Utilizing a computer algorithm, information from calls to an ambulance service was used to calculate the risk of patients being in a life-threatening condition (life threat risk), at the time of the call. If the estimated life threat risk was higher than 10%, the probability that a patient faced a risk of dying was recognized as very high and categorized as category A+. The present study aimed to review the accuracy of the algorithm.
Methods:
Data collected for six months from the Yokohama new emergency system was used. In the system, emergency call workers interviewed ambulance callers to obtain information necessary to assess triage, which included consciousness level, breathing status, walking ability, position, and complexion. An emergency patient&apos;s life threat risk was then estimated by a computer algorithm applying logistic models. This study compared the estimated life threat risk occurring at the time of the emergency call to the patients&apos; state or severity of condition, i.e. death confirmed at the scene by ambulance crews, resulted in death at emergency departments, life-threatening condition with occurrence of cardiac and/or pulmonary arrest (CPA), life-threatening condition without CPA, serious but not life-threatening condition, moderate condition, and mild condition. The sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and likelihood ratios of the algorithm for categorizing A+ were calculated.
Results:
The number of emergency dispatches over the six months was 73,992. Triage assessment was conducted for 68,692 of these calls. The study targets account for 88.8% of patients who were involved in triage calls. There were 2,349 cases where the patient had died or had suffered CPA. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio of the algorithm at predicting cases that would result in a death or CPA were 80.2% (95% confidence interval: 78.6% - 81.8%), 96.0% (95.8% - 96.1%), 42.6% (41.1% - 44.0%), 99.2% (99.2% - 99.3%), 19.9 (18.8 - 21.1), and 0.21 (0.19 - 0.22), respectively.
Conclusion:
A patient&apos;s life threat risk was quantitatively assessed at the moment of the emergency call with a moderate level of accuracy.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-227X/9/21</link>
                <dc:creator>Kenji Ohshige</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Chihiro Kawakami</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Shunsaku Mizushima</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Yoshihiro Moriwaki</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Noriyuki Suzuki</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Emergency Medicine 2009, 9:21</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-10-21T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-227X-9-21</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Emergency Medicine</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-227X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>21</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-10-21T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-227X/9/20">
        <title>Paramedic assessment of pain in the cognitively impaired adult patient</title>
        <description>Background:
Paramedics are often a first point of contact for people experiencing pain in the community. Wherever possible the patient&apos;s self report of pain should be sought to guide the assessment and management of this complaint. Communication difficulty or disability such as cognitive impairment associated with dementia may limit the patient&apos;s ability to report their pain experience, and this has the potential to affect the quality of care. The primary objective of this study was to systematically locate evidence relating to the use of pain assessment tools that have been validated for use with cognitively impaired adults and to identify those that have been recommended for use by paramedics.
Methods:
A systematic search of health databases for evidence relating to the use of pain assessment tools that have been validated for use with cognitively impaired adults was undertaken using specific search criteria. An extended search included position statements and clinical practice guidelines developed by health agencies to identify evidence-based recommendations regarding pain assessment in older adults.
Results:
Two systematic reviews met study inclusion criteria. Weaknesses in tools evaluated by these studies limited their application in assessing pain in the population of interest. Only one tool was designed to assess pain in acute care settings. No tools were located that are designed for paramedic use.
Conclusion:
The reviews of pain assessment tools found that the majority were developed to assess chronic pain in aged care, hospital or hospice settings. An analysis of the characteristics of these pain assessment tools identified attributes that may limit their use in paramedic practice. One tool - the Abbey Pain Scale - may have application in paramedic assessment of pain, but clinical evaluation is required to validate this tool in the paramedic practice setting. Further research is recommended to evaluate the Abbey Pain Scale and to evaluate the effectiveness of paramedic pain management practice in older adults to ensure that the care of all patients is unaffected by age or disability.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-227X/9/20</link>
                <dc:creator>Bill Lord</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Emergency Medicine 2009, 9:20</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-10-06T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-227X-9-20</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Emergency Medicine</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-227X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>20</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-10-06T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-227X/9/19">
        <title>Comparison of balance assessment modalities in emergency department elders: a pilot cross-sectional observational study </title>
        <description>Background:
More than one-third of US adults 65 and over fall every year. These falls may cause serious injury including substantial long-term morbidity (due declines in activities of daily living) and death. The emergency department (ED) visit represents an opportunity for identifying high risk elders and potentially instituting falls-related interventions. The unique characteristic of the ED environment and patient population necessitate that risk-assessment modalities be validated in this specific setting. In order to better identify elders at risk of falls, we examined the relationship between patient-provided history of falling and two testing modalities (a balance plate system and the timed up-and-go [TUG] test) in elder emergency department (ED) patients.
Methods:
We conducted a cross-sectional observational study of patients &#8805; 60 years old being discharged from the ED. Patient history of falls in the past week, month, 6 months, and year was obtained. Balance plate center of pressure excursion (COP) measurements and TUG testing times were recorded. COP was recorded under four conditions: normal stability eyes open (NSEO) and closed (NSEC), and perturbed stability eyes open and closed. Correlation between TUG and COP scores was measured. Univariate logistic regression was used to identify the relationship between patient-provided falls history and the two testing modalities. Proportions, likelihood ratios, and receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curves for prediction of previous falls were reported.
Results:
Fifty-three subjects were enrolled, 11% had fallen in the previous week and 42% in the previous year. There was no correlation between TUG and any balance plate measurements. In logistic regression, neither testing modality was associated with prior history of falls (p &gt; 0.05 for all time periods). Balance plate NSEO and NSEC testing cutoffs could be identified which were 83% sensitive and had a negative likelihood ratio (LR-) of 0.3 for falls in the past week. TUG testing was not useful for falls in the past week, but performed best for more distant falls in the past month, 6 months, or year. TUG cutoffs with sensitivity over 80% and LR(-) of 0.17-0.32 could be identified for these time periods.
Conclusion:
Over 40% of community-dwelling elder ED patients report a fall within the past year. Balance plate and TUG testing were feasibly conducted in an ED setting. There is no relationship between scores on balance plate and TUG testing in these patients. In regression analysis, neither modality was significantly associated with patient provided history of falls. These modalities should not be adopted for screening purposes in elders in the ED setting without validation in future studies or as part of multi-factorial risk assessment.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-227X/9/19</link>
                <dc:creator>Jeffrey Caterino</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Rowan Karaman</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Vinay Arora</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jacqueline Martin</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Brian Hiestand</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Emergency Medicine 2009, 9:19</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-09-28T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-227X-9-19</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Emergency Medicine</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-227X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>19</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-09-28T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-227X/9/18">
        <title>The intuitive use of laryngeal airway tools by first year medical students</title>
        <description>Background:
Providing a secured airway is of paramount importance in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Although intubating the trachea is yet seen as gold standard, this technique is still reserved to experienced healthcare professionals. Compared to bag-valve facemask ventilation, however, the insertion of a laryngeal mask airway offers the opportunity to ventilate the patient effectively and can also be placed easily by lay responders. Obviously, it might be inserted without detailed background knowledge.The purpose of the study was to investigate the intuitive use of airway devices by first-year medical students as well as the effect of a simple, but well-directed training programme. Retention of skills was re-evaluated six months thereafter.
Methods:
The insertion of a LMA-Classic and a LMA-Fastrach performed by inexperienced medical students was compared in an airway model. The improvement on their performance after a training programme of overall two hours was examined afterwards.
Results:
Prior to any instruction, mean time to correct placement was 55.5 &#177; 29.6 s for the LMA-Classic and 38.1 &#177; 24.9 s for the LMA-Fastrach. Following training, time to correct placement decreased significantly with 22.9 &#177; 13.5 s for the LMA-Classic and 22.9 &#177; 19.0 s for the LMA-Fastrach, respectively (p &lt; 0.05). After six months, the results are comparable prior (55.6 &#177; 29.9 vs 43.1 &#177; 34.7 s) and after a further training period (23.5 &#177; 13.2 vs 26.6 &#177; 21.6, p &lt; 0.05).
Conclusion:
Untrained laypersons are able to use different airway devices in a manikin and may therefore provide a secured airway even without having any detailed background knowledge about the tool. Minimal theoretical instruction and practical skill training can improve their performance significantly. However, refreshment of knowledge seems justified after six months.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-227X/9/18</link>
                <dc:creator>Johannes Bickenbach</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Gereon Schaelte</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Stefan Beckers</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Michael Fries</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Matthias Derwall</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Rolf Rossaint</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Emergency Medicine 2009, 9:18</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-09-22T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-227X-9-18</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Emergency Medicine</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-227X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>18</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-09-22T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-227X/9/17">
        <title>Paramedic clinical decision making during high acuity emergency calls: design and methodology of a Delphi study</title>
        <description>Background:
The scope of practice of paramedics in Canada has steadily evolved to include increasingly complex interventions in the prehospital setting, which likely have repercussions on clinical outcome and patient safety. Clinical decision making has been evaluated in several health professions, but there is a paucity of work in this area on paramedics. This study will utilize the Delphi technique to establish consensus on the most important instances of paramedic clinical decision making during high acuity emergency calls, as they relate to clinical outcome and patient safety.Methods and designParticipants in this multi-round survey study will be paramedic leaders and emergency medical services medical directors/physicians from across Canada. In the first round, participants will identify instances of clinical decision making they feel are important for patient outcome and safety. On the second round, the panel will rank each instance of clinical decision making in terms of its importance. On the third and potentially fourth round, participants will have the opportunity to revise the ranking they assigned to each instance of clinical decision making. Consensus will be considered achieved for the most important instances if 80% of the panel ranks it as important or extremely important. The most important instances of clinical decision making will be plotted on a process analysis map.DiscussionThe process analysis map that results from this Delphi study will enable the gaps in research, knowledge and practice to be identified.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-227X/9/17</link>
                <dc:creator>Jan Jensen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Pat Croskerry</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Andrew Travers</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Emergency Medicine 2009, 9:17</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-09-21T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-227X-9-17</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Emergency Medicine</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-227X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>17</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-09-21T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-227X/9/16">
        <title>The nature and causes of unintended events reported at ten emergency departments</title>
        <description>Background:
Several studies on patient safety have shown that a substantial number of patients suffer from unintended harm caused by healthcare management in hospitals. Emergency departments (EDs) are challenging hospital settings with regard to patient safety. There is an increased sense of urgency to take effective countermeasures in order to improve patient safety. This can only be achieved if interventions tackle the dominant underlying causes. The objectives of our study are to examine the nature and causes of unintended events in EDs and the relationship between type of event and causal factor structure.
Methods:
Study at EDs of 10 hospitals in the Netherlands. The study period per ED was 8 to 14 weeks, in which staff were asked to report unintended events. Unintended events were broadly defined as all events, no matter how seemingly trivial or commonplace, that were unintended and could have harmed or did harm a patient. Reports were analysed with a Root Cause Analysis tool (PRISMA) by an experienced researcher.
Results:
522 unintended events were reported. Of the events 25% was related to cooperation with other departments and 20% to problems with materials/equipment. More than half of the events had consequences for the patient, most often resulting in inconvenience or suboptimal care. Most root causes were human (60%), followed by organisational (25%) and technical causes (11%). Nearly half of the root causes was external, i.e. attributable to other departments in or outside the hospital.
Conclusion:
Event reporting gives insight into diverse unintended events. The information on unintended events may help target research and interventions to increase patient safety. It seems worthwhile to direct interventions on the collaboration between the ED and other hospital departments.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-227X/9/16</link>
                <dc:creator>Marleen Smits</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Peter Groenewegen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Danielle Timmermans</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Gerrit van der Wal</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Cordula Wagner</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Emergency Medicine 2009, 9:16</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-09-18T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-227X-9-16</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Emergency Medicine</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-227X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>16</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-09-18T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-227X/9/15">
        <title>Intracranial bleeding in patients with traumatic brain injury: A prognostic study</title>
        <description>Background:
Intracranial bleeding (IB) is a common and serious consequence of traumatic brain injury (TBI). IB can be classified according to the location into: epidural haemorrhage (EDH) subdural haemorrhage (SDH) intraparenchymal haemorrhage (IPH) and subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH). Studies involving repeated CT scanning of TBI patients have found that IB can develop or expand in the 48 hours after injury. If IB enlarges after hospital admission and larger bleeds have a worse prognosis, this would provide a therapeutic rationale for treatments to prevent increase in the extent of bleeding. We analysed data from the Trauma Audit &amp; Research Network (TARN), a large European trauma registry, to evaluate the association between the size of IB and mortality in patients with TBI.
Methods:
We analysed 13,962 patients presenting to TARN participating hospitals between 2001 and 2008 with a Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) less than 15 at presentation or any head injury with Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) severity code 3 and above. The extent of intracranial bleeding was determined by the AIS code. Potential confounders were age, presenting Glasgow Coma Score, mechanism of injury, presence and nature of other brain injuries, and presence of extra-cranial injuries. The outcomes were in-hospital mortality and haematoma evacuation. We conducted a multivariable logistic regression analysis to evaluate the independent effect of large and small size of IB, in comparison with no bleeding, on patient outcomes. We also conducted a multivariable logistic regression analysis to assess the independent effect on mortality of large IB in comparison with small IB.
Results:
Almost 46% of patients had at some type of IB. Subdural haemorrhages were present in 30% of the patients, with epidural and intraparenchymal present in approximately 22% each. After adjusting for potential confounders, we found that large IB, wherever located, was associated with increased mortality in comparison with no bleeding. We also found that large IB was associated with an increased risk of mortality in comparison with small IB. The odds ratio for mortality for large SDH, IPH and EDH, in comparison with small bleeds, were: 3.41 (95% CI: 2.68-4.33), 3.47 (95% CI: 2.26-5.33) and 2.86 (95% CI: 1.86-4.38) respectively.
Conclusion:
Large EDH, SDH and IPH are associated with a substantially higher probability of hospital mortality in comparison with small IB. However, the limitations of our data, such as the large proportion of missing data and lack of data on other confounding factors, such as localization of the bleeding, make the results of this report only explanatory. Future studies should also evaluate the effect of IB size on functional outcomes.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-227X/9/15</link>
                <dc:creator>Pablo Perel</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ian Roberts</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Omar Bouamra</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Maralyn Woodford</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jane Mooney</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Fiona Lecky</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Emergency Medicine 2009, 9:15</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-08-03T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-227X-9-15</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Emergency Medicine</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-227X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>15</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-08-03T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-227X/9/14">
        <title>A survey of factors associated with the successful recognition of agonal breathing and cardiac arrest by 9-1-1 call takers: design and methodology.</title>
        <description>Background:
Cardiac arrest victims most often collapse at home, where only a modest proportion receives life-saving bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation. As many as 40% of all sudden cardiac arrest victims have agonal or abnormal breathing in the first minutes following cardiac arrest. 9-1-1 call takers may wrongly interpret agonal breathing as a sign of life, and not initiate telephone cardiopulmonary resuscitation instructions. Improving 9-1-1 call takers&apos; ability to recognize agonal breathing as a sign of cardiac arrest could result in improved bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation and survival rates for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest victims.Methods/DesignThe overall goal of this study is to design and conduct a survey of 9-1-1 call takers in the province of Ontario to better understand the factors associated with the successful identification of cardiac arrest (including patients with agonal breathing) over the phone, and subsequent administration of cardiopulmonary resuscitation instructions to callers. This study will be conducted in three phases using the Theory of Planned Behaviour. In Phase One, we will conduct semi-structured qualitative interviews with a purposeful selection of 9-1-1 call takers from Ontario, and identify common themes and belief categories. In Phase Two, we will use the qualitative interview results to design and pilot a quantitative survey. In Phase Three, a final version of the quantitative survey will be administered via an electronic medium to all registered call takers in the province of Ontario. We will perform qualitative thematic analysis (Phase One) and regression modelling (Phases Two and Three), to determine direct and indirect relationship of behavioural constructs with intentions to provide cardiopulmonary resuscitation instructions.DiscussionThe results of this study will provide valuable insight into the factors associated with the successful recognition of agonal breathing and cardiac arrest by 9-1-1 call takers. This will guide future interventional studies, which may include continuing education and protocol changes, in order to help increase the number of callers appropriately receiving cardiopulmonary resuscitation instructions, and save the lives of more cardiac arrest victims.Trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT00848588</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-227X/9/14</link>
                <dc:creator>Christian Vaillancourt</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jan Jensen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jeremy Grimshaw</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jamie Brehaut</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Manya Charette</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ann Kasaboski</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Martin Osmond</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>George Wells</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ian Stiell</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Emergency Medicine 2009, 9:14</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-07-31T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-227X-9-14</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Emergency Medicine</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-227X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>14</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-07-31T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-227X/9/13">
        <title>Crotaline Fab antivenom appears to be effective in cases of severe North American pit viper envenomation: An integrative review</title>
        <description>Background:
In 2000, the United States Food and Drug Administration approved Crotalidae Polyvalent Immune Fab (Ovine) (hereafter, FabAV), &quot;for the management of patients with minimal to moderate North American Crotalid envenomation.&quot; Because whole-IgG pit viper antivenom is no longer available in the United States, FabAV is currently the only specific treatment option available to United States clinicians treating snakebite victims of any severity. No clinical trial data are available concerning the effectiveness of FabAV for treatment of severe snakebite, but several published articles describe its use in this setting.
Methods:
We performed a comprehensive review of the English-language medical literature to identify all publications (1996 to July, 2008) containing data about the administration of FabAV. Two trained reviewers separately extracted case-level data concerning the administration of FabAV to patients with severe envenomation by North American crotaline snakes to a standardized form. Descriptive statistics were used. In addition, we hand-searched the US National Poison Data System reports for the years 2000&#8211;2006 to identify and describe any reports of death that occurred after FabAV administration.
Results:
The literature review found 147 unique publications regarding FabAV. Twenty-four evaluable cases of severe human envenomation treated with FabAV were identified in 19 publications. Seven cases were described in five cohort studies, and 17 cases were described in 14 single patient case reports or non-cohort case series. Sixty-five specific severe venom effects were reported in these 24 patients, of which 50 effects (77%) improved or resolved after FabAV therapy. Initial control of all severe venom effects was achieved in 12 patients (50%). The rate at which initial control was achieved was significantly higher among patients reported in the cohort series than in the case series and non-cohort reports (100% vs. 29%, P = 0.005). The median dose of FabAV used to obtain initial control was 6 vials (range: 4 &#8211; 18 vials). Nine patients had severe venom effects that persisted despite FabAV therapy. Recurrent and/or delayed-onset severe defibrination syndrome occurred in 12 patients, most of whom did not receive recommended maintenance FabAV dosing. No patient developed systemic bleeding.
Conclusion:
In this structured literature review, FabAV appears to be effective in the management of severe crotaline snake envenomation. Incomplete response to therapy, recurrence of venom effects, and delayed-onset venom effects were reported in case reports, but not reported in cohort studies.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-227X/9/13</link>
                <dc:creator>Eric Lavonas</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Tammi Schaeffer</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jamie Kokko</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sara Mlynarchek</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Gregory Bogdan</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Emergency Medicine 2009, 9:13</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-06-22T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-227X-9-13</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Emergency Medicine</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-227X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>13</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-06-22T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-227X/9/12">
        <title>Negative predictive value and potential cost savings of acute nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging in low risk patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome: A prospective single blinded study </title>
        <description>Background:
Previous studies from the USA have shown that acute nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) in low risk emergency department (ED) patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS) can be of clinical value. The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility and hospital economics of acute MPI in Swedish ED patients with suspected ACS.
Methods:
We included 40 patients (mean age 55 &#177; 2 years, 50% women) who were admitted from the ED at Lund University Hospital for chest pain suspicious of ACS, and who had a normal or non-ischemic ECG and no previous myocardial infarction. All patients underwent MPI from the ED, and the results were analyzed only after patient discharge. The current diagnostic practice of admitting the included patients for observation and further evaluation was compared to a theoretical &quot;MPI strategy&quot;, where patients with a normal MPI test would have been discharged home from the ED.
Results:
Twenty-seven patients had normal MPI results, and none of them had ACS. MPI thus had a negative predictive value for ACS of 100%. With the MPI strategy, 2/3 of the patients would thus have been discharged from the ED, resulting in a reduction of total hospital cost by some 270 EUR and of bed occupancy by 0.8 days per investigated patient.
Conclusion:
Our findings in a Swedish ED support the results of larger American trials that acute MPI has the potential to safely reduce the number of admissions and decrease overall costs for low-risk ED patients with suspected ACS.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-227X/9/12</link>
                <dc:creator>Jakob Forberg</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Catarina Hilmersson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Marcus Carlsson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hakan Arheden</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jonas Bjork</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Krister Hjalte</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ulf Ekelund</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Emergency Medicine 2009, 9:12</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-06-19T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-227X-9-12</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Emergency Medicine</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-227X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>12</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-06-19T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
