<?xml version = '1.0' encoding = 'UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss/styledrssBMC.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:extra="http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/schemas/extra/" xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/">
	<channel rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/rss">
		<extra:info rdf:parseType="Literal">
			<html:div xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" style="font:14px Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">
				<html:span style="font-weight:bold">This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central</html:span>
				<html:br/>
				<html:span style="font-size: 12px;">It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit <html:br/><html:a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/" style="color:#3333CC; font-size:12px;">http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/</html:a><html:br/>
				</html:span>
			</html:div>
		</extra:info>
		<title>BMC Cancer - Most viewed articles</title>
		<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmccancer/mostviewed/</link>
		<description>Most viewed articles in last 30 days from BMC Cancer (ISSN 1471-2407) published by 
				
				BioMed Central
		</description>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
         <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/8/169"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/8/177"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/8/155"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/8/168"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/8/154"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/8/148"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/8/176"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/8/166"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/8/179"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/7/231"/>			    
            
            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
    </channel>
    
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/8/169">
            
            <title>A polymorphism of EGFR extracellular domain is associated with progression free-survival in metastatic colorectal cancer patients receiving cetuximab-based treatment</title>
			<description>Background:
Cetuximab, a monoclonal antibody targeting Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR), is currently used in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), but predictive factors for therapeutic response are lacking. Mutational status of KRAS and EGFR, and EGFR copy number are potential determinants of cetuximab activity.
Methods:
We analyzed tumor tissues from 32 EGFR-positive mCRC patients receiving cetuximab/irinotecan combination and evaluable for treatment response. EGFR copy number was quantified by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). KRAS exon 1 and EGFR exons coding for extracellular regions were sequenced.
Results:
Nine patients experienced an objective response (partial response) and 23 were considered as nonresponders (12 with stable disease and 11 with progressive disease). There was no EGFR amplification found, but high polysomy was noted in 2 patients, both of which were cetuximab responders. No EGFR mutations were found but a variant of exon 13 (R521K) was observed in 12 patients, 11 of which achieved objective response or stable disease. Progression-free and overall survivals were significantly better in patients with this EGFR exon 13 variant. KRAS mutations were found in 14 cases. While there was a trend for an increased KRAS mutation frequency in nonresponder patients (12 mutations out of 23, 52%) as compared to responder patients (2 out of 9, 22%), authentic tumor response or long-term disease stabilization was found in KRAS mutated patients.
Conclusion:
This preliminary study suggests that: an increase in EGFR copy number may be associated with cetuximab response but is a rare event in CRC, KRAS mutations are associated with low response rate but do not preclude any cetuximab-based combination efficacy and EGFR exon 13 variant (R521K) may predict for cetuximab benefit.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/8/169</link>		
			<dc:creator>Anthony Gon&#231;alves, S&#233;verine Esteyries, Brynn Taylor-Smedra, Arnaud Lagarde, Mounay Ayadi, Genevi&#232;ve Monges, Fran&#231;ois Bertucci, Benjamin Esterni, Jean-Robert Delpero, Olivier Turrini, Bernard Lelong, Patrice Viens, Jean-Paul Borg, Daniel Birnbaum, Sylviane Olschwang and Fr&#233;d&#233;ric Viret</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>BMC Cancer 2008, 8:169</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 990</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-06-10</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2407-8-169</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Cancer</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1471-2407</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>169</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-10</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/8/177">
            
            <title>Depression and quality of life in cancer patients with and without pain: the role of pain beliefs</title>
			<description>Background:
Pain is said to be one of the most feared and distressing symptoms of cancer and one that disrupts all aspects of life. The purposes of this study were: 1) to compare depression and quality of life among Iranian cancer patients with and without pain; and 2) to determine the relationships between pain beliefs and depression and quality of life.MethodA consecutive sample of gastrointestinal cancer patients attending to Tehran Cancer Institute were entered into the study. Three standard instruments were used to measure quality of life (the EORTC QLQ-C30), depression (the HADS) and pain beliefs (the PBPI).
Results:
A total of 142 hospitalized gastrointestinal cancer patients, 98 with pain and 44 without pain were studied. The main findings of this study were that cancer patients with pain reported significantly lower levels of role functioning, emotional functioning and global quality of life. They also showed higher levels of depression than cancer patients who did not experience pain. Among patients with pain, higher scores on pain permanence and pain consistency were positively and significantly associated with higher depression. Also, higher scores on pain consistency were negatively and significantly associated with global quality of life.
Conclusion:
This study has demonstrated the effect of cancer pain on patients' quality of life and emotional status and has supported the multidimensional notion of the cancer pain experience in cancer patients. Although these data are correlational, they provide additional support for a biopsychosocial model of chronic pain.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/8/177</link>		
			<dc:creator>Azadeh Tavoli, Ali Montazeri, Rasool Roshan, Zahra Tavoli and Mahdiyeh Melyani</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>BMC Cancer 2008, 8:177</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 931</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-06-21</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2407-8-177</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Cancer</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1471-2407</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>177</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-21</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/8/155">
            
            <title>Penetrance estimates for BRCA1 and BRCA2 based on genetic testing in a Clinical Cancer Genetics service setting: risks of breast/ovarian cancer quoted should reflect the cancer burden in the family</title>
			<description>Background:
The identification of a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation in familial breast cancer kindreds allows genetic testing of at risk relatives. However, considerable controversy exists regarding the cancer risks in women who test positive for the family mutation. 
Methods:
We reviewed 385 unrelated families (223 with BRCA1 and 162 with BRCA2 mutations) ascertained through two regional cancer genetics services. We estimated the penetrance for both breast and ovarian cancer in female mutation carriers (904 proven mutation carriers - 1442 females in total assumed to carry the mutation) and also assessed the effect on penetrance of mutation position and birth cohort. 
Results:
Breast cancer penetrance to 70 and to 80 years was 68% (95%CI 64.7-71.3%) and 79.5% (95%CI 75.5-83.5%) respectively for BRCA1 and 75% (95%CI 71.7-78.3%) and 88% (95%CI 85.3-91.7%) for BRCA2. Ovarian cancer risk to 70 and to 80 years was 60% (95%CI 65-71%) and 65% (95%CI 75-84%) for BRCA1 and 30% (95%CI 25.5-34.5%) and 37% (95%CI 31.5-42.5%) for BRCA2 . These risks were borne out by a prospective study of cancer in the families and genetic testing of unaffected relatives. We also found evidence of a strong cohort effect with women born after 1940 having a cumulative risk of 22% for breast cancer by 40 years of age compared to 8% in women born before 1930 (p=0.0005). 
Conclusion:
In high-risk families, selected in a genetics service setting, women who test positive for the familial BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation are likely to have cumulative breast cancer risks in keeping with the estimates obtained originally from large families. This is particularly true for women born after 1940.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/8/155</link>		
			<dc:creator>D Gareth Evans, Andrew Shenton, Emma Woodward, Fiona Lalloo, Anthony Howell and Eamonn R Maher</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>BMC Cancer 2008, 8:155</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 786</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-05-30</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2407-8-155</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Cancer</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1471-2407</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>155</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-30</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/8/168">
            
            <title>Gene-expression of metastasized versus non-metastasized primary head and neck squamous cell carcinomas: A pathway-based analysis</title>
			<description>Background:
Regional lymph node metastasis is an important prognostic factor in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and plays a decisive role in the choice of treatment. Here, we present an independent gene expression validation study of metastasized versus non-metastasized HNSCC.
Methods:
We used a dataset recently published by Roepman et al. as reference dataset and an independent gene expression dataset of 11 metastasized and 11 non-metastasized HNSCC tumors as validation dataset. Reference and validation studies were performed on different microarray platforms with different probe sets and probe content. In addition to a supervised gene-based analysis, a supervised pathway-based analysis was performed, evaluating differences in gene expression for predefined tumorigenesis- and metastasis related gene sets.
Results:
The gene-based analysis showed 26 significant differentially expressed genes in the reference dataset, 21 of which were present on the microarray platform used in the validation study. 7 of these genes appeared to be significantly expressed in the validation dataset, but failed to pass the correction for multiple testing. The pathway-based analysis revealed 23 significant differentially expressed gene sets, 7 of which were statistically validated. These gene sets are involved in extracellular matrix remodeling (MMPs, MMP regulating pathways and the uPA system), hypoxia and angiogenesis (HIF1&#945; regulated angiogenic factors and HIF1&#945; regulated invasion).
Conclusion:
Pathways that are differentially expressed between metastasized and non-metastasized HNSCC are involved in the processes of extracellular matrix remodeling, hypoxia and angiogenesis. A supervised pathway-based analysis enhances the understanding of the biological context of the results, the comparability of results across different microarray studies, and reduces multiple testing problems by focusing on a limited number of pathways of interest instead of analyzing the large number of probes available on the microarray.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/8/168</link>		
			<dc:creator>Erik F Hensen, Maria J De Herdt, Jelle J Goeman, Jan Oosting, Vincent THBM Smit, Cees J Cornelisse and Robert J Baatenburg de Jong</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>BMC Cancer 2008, 8:168</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 753</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-06-10</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2407-8-168</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Cancer</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1471-2407</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>168</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-10</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/8/154">
            
            <title>Promoter methylation-associated loss of ID4 expression is a marker of tumour recurrence in human breast cancer</title>
			<description>Background:
Inhibitor of DNA binding/Inhibitor of differentiation 4 (ID4) is a critical factor for cell proliferation and differentiation in normal vertebrate development. ID4 has regulative functions for differentiation and growth of the developing brain. The role of ID1, ID2 and ID3 are expected to be oncogenic due to their overexpression in pancreatic cancer and colorectal adenocarcinomas, respectively. Aside from these findings, loss of ID3 expression was demonstrated in ovarian cancer. The aim of the present study was to reveal the factual role of ID4 in carcinogenesis in more detail, since its role for the pathogenesis of human breast cancer has been discussed controversially, assigning both oncogenic and tumour suppressive functions. 
Methods:
ID4 promoter methylation, ID4 mRNA expression and ID4 protein expression were analysed in primary human breast cancer specimens using methylation-specific PCR (MSP) (n=170), semiquantitative realtime RT-PCR (n=46) and immunhistochemistry (n=3), respectively. In order to demonstrate a functional association of ID4 promoter methylation with its gene silencing, we performed DNA demethylation analysis with four human breast cell lines using MSP and semiquantitative realtime RT-PCR. In addition, we performed correlations of ID4 promoter methylation with ID4 mRNA and ID4 protein expression in matched samples of breast tumour and corresponding normal tissue. We carried out statistical analyses in order to find correlations between ID4 promoter methylation and clinicopathological parameters. 
Results:
Frequent ID4 promoter methylation was observed in primary breast cancer samples (69%, 117/170). We found a tight correlation (P&lt;0.0001) between ID4 promoter methylation and loss of ID4 expression in primary breast cancer 3 specimens. Demethylating treatment with breast cancer cell lines was associated with clear ID4 mRNA re-expression. Tumours with ID4 promoter methylation showed distinct loss of ID4 expression on both transcription and protein level. Interestingly, ID4 promoter methylation was a factor for unfavourable recurrence-free survival (P=0.036) and increased risk for lymph node metastasis (P=0.030).  
Conclusion:
ID4 is indeed a novel tumour suppressor gene in normal human breast tissue and is epigenetically silenced during cancer development, indicating increased risk for tumour relapse. Thus, ID4 methylation status could serve as a prognostic biomarker in human breast cancer.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/8/154</link>		
			<dc:creator>Erik Noetzel, J&#252;rgen Veeck, Dieter Niederacher, Oliver Galm, Felicitas Horn, Arndt Hartmann, Ruth Kn&#252;chel and Edgar Dahl</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>BMC Cancer 2008, 8:154</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 684</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-05-30</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2407-8-154</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Cancer</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1471-2407</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>154</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-30</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/8/148">
            
            <title>Modified FOLFOX-6 chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer: Results of phase II study and comprehensive analysis of polymorphisms as a predictive and prognostic marker</title>
			<description>Background:
The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), folinic acid and oxaliplatin (modified FOLFOX-6) in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC), as first-line palliative combination chemotherapy. We also analyzed the predictive or prognostic value of germline polymorphisms of candidate genes associated with 5-FU and oxaliplatin.
Methods:
Seventy-three patients were administered a 2 hour infusion of oxaliplatin (100 mg/m2) and folinic acid (100 mg/m2) followed by a 46 hour continuous infusion of 5-FU (2,400 mg/m2). Genomic DNA from the patients' peripheral blood mononuclear cells was extracted. Ten polymorphisms within five genes were investigated including TS, GSTP, ERCC, XPD and XRCC.
Results:
The overall response rate (RR) was 43.8%. Median time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) were 6.0 months and 12.6 months, respectively. Toxicities were generally tolerable and manageable. The RR was significantly higher in patients with a 6-bp deletion homozygote (-6 bp/-6 bp) in TS-3'UTR (55.0% vs. 30.3% in +6 bp/+6 bp or +6 bp/-6 bp, p = 0.034), and C/A or A/A in XPD156 (52.0% vs. 26.1% in C/C, p = 0.038). The -6 bp/-6 bp in TS-3'UTR was significantly associated with a prolonged TTP and OS. In a multivariate analysis, the 6-bp deletion in TS-3'UTR was identified as an independent prognostic marker of TTP (hazard ratio = 0.561, p = 0.032).
Conclusion:
Modified FOLFOX-6 chemotherapy appears to be active and well tolerated as first line chemotherapy in AGC patients. The 6-bp deletion in TS-3'UTR might be a candidate to select patients who are likely to benefit from 5-FU based modified FOLFOX-6 in future large scale trial.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/8/148</link>		
			<dc:creator>Bhumsuk Keam, Seock-Ah Im, Sae-Won Han, Hye Seon Ham, Min A Kim, Do-Youn Oh, Se-Hoon Lee, Jee Hyun Kim, Dong-Wan Kim, Tae-You Kim, Dae Seog Heo, Woo Ho Kim and Yung-Jue Bang</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>BMC Cancer 2008, 8:148</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 651</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-05-27</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2407-8-148</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Cancer</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1471-2407</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>148</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-27</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/8/176">
            
            <title>Rapamycin delays growth of Wnt-1 tumors in spite of suppression of host immunity</title>
			<description>Background:
Rapamycin, an inhibitor of mammalian target of Rapamycin (mTOR), is an immunosuppressive agent that has anti-proliferative effects on some tumors. However, the role of Rapamycin-induced immune suppression on tumor progression has not been examined. 
Methods:
We developed a transplantation model for generation of mammary tumors in syngeneic recipients that can be used to address the role of the immune system on tumor progression. We examined the effect of Rapamycin on the immune system and growth of MMTV-driven Wnt-1 mammary tumors which were transplanted into irradiated and bone marrow-reconstituted, or naive mice. 
Results:
Rapamycin induced severe immunosuppression and significantly delayed the growth of Wnt-1 tumors. T cell depletion in spleen and thymus and reduction in T cell cytokine secretion were evident within 7 days of therapy. By day 20, splenic but not thymic T cell counts, and cytokine secretion recovered. We determined whether adoptive T cell therapy enhances the anti-cancer effect using ex vivo generated Rapamycin-resistant T cells. However, T cell transfer during Rapamycin therapy did not improve the outcome relative to drug therapy alone. Thus, we could not confirm that suppression of T cell immunity contributes to tumor growth in this model. Consistent with suppression of the mTOR pathway, decreased 4E-BP1, p70 S6-kinase, and S6 protein phosphorylation correlated with a decrease in Wnt-1 tumor cell proliferation. 
Conclusions:
Rapamycin has a direct anti-tumor effect on Wnt-1 breast cancer in vivo that involves inhibition of the mTOR pathway at doses that also suppress host immune responses. </description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/8/176</link>		
			<dc:creator>Elena V Svirshchevskaya, Jacoppo Mariotti, Mollie H Wright, Natalia Y Viskova, William Telford, Daniel H Fowler and Lyuba Varticovski</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>BMC Cancer 2008, 8:176</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 577</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-06-21</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2407-8-176</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Cancer</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1471-2407</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>176</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-21</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/8/166">
            
            <title>Comparative actions of progesterone, medroxyprogesterone acetate, drospirenone and nestorone on breast cancer cell migration and invasion</title>
			<description>Background:
Limited information is available on the effects of progestins on breast cancer progression and metastasis. Cell migration and invasion are central for these processes, and require dynamic cytoskeletal and cell membrane rearrangements for cell motility to be enacted.
Methods:
We investigated the effects of progesterone (P), medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), drospirenone (DRSP) and nestorone (NES) alone or with 17&#946;-estradiol (E2) on T47-D breast cancer cell migration and invasion and we linked some of these actions to the regulation of the actin-regulatory protein, moesin and to cytoskeletal remodeling.
Results:
Breast cancer cell horizontal migration and invasion of three-dimensional matrices are enhanced by all the progestins, but differences are found in terms of potency, with MPA being the most effective and DRSP being the least. This is related to the differential ability of the progestins to activate the actin-binding protein moesin, leading to distinct effects on actin cytoskeleton remodeling and on the formation of cell membrane structures that mediate cell movement. E2 also induces actin remodeling through moesin activation. However, the addition of some progestins partially offsets the action of estradiol on cell migration and invasion of breast cancer cells.
Conclusion:
These results imply that P, MPA, DRSP and NES alone or in combination with E2 enhance the ability of breast cancer cells to move in the surrounding environment. However, these progestins show different potencies and to some extent use distinct intracellular intermediates to drive moesin activation and actin remodeling. These findings support the concept that each progestin acts differently on breast cancer cells, which may have relevant clinical implications.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/8/166</link>		
			<dc:creator>Xiao-Dong Fu, Maria Silvia Giretti, Lorenzo Goglia, Marina Ines Flamini, Angel Matias Sanchez, Chiara Baldacci, Silvia Garibaldi, Regine Sitruk-Ware, Andrea Riccardo Genazzani and Tommaso Simoncini</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>BMC Cancer 2008, 8:166</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 574</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-06-09</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2407-8-166</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Cancer</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1471-2407</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>166</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-09</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/8/179">
            
            <title>ADAM9 is highly expressed in renal cell cancer and is associated with tumour progression</title>
			<description>Background:
A Disintegrin And Metalloprotease (ADAM) 9 has been implicated in tumour progression of various solid tumours, however, little is known about its role in renal cell carcinoma. We evaluated the expression of ADAM9 on protein and transcript level in a clinico-pathologically characterized renal cell cancer cohort.
Methods:
108 renal cancer cases were immunostained for ADAM9 on a tissue-micro-array. For 30 additional cases, ADAM9 mRNA of microdissected tumour and normal tissue was analyzed via quantitative RT-PCR. SPSS 14.0 was used to apply crosstables (Fisher's exact test and &#967;2-test), correlations and univariate as well as multivariate survival analyses.
Results:
ADAM9 was significantly up-regulated in renal cancer in comparison to the adjacent normal tissue on mRNA level. On protein level, ADAM9 was significantly associated with higher tumour grade, positive nodal status and distant metastasis. Furthermore, ADAM9 protein expression was significantly associated with shortened patient survival in the univariate analysis.
Conclusion:
ADAM9 is strongly expressed in a large proportion of renal cell cancers, concordant with findings in other tumour entities. Additionally, ADAM9 expression is significantly associated with markers of unfavourable prognosis. Whether the demonstrated prognostic value of ADAM9 is independent from other tumour parameters will have to be verified in larger study cohorts.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/8/179</link>		
			<dc:creator>Florian R Fritzsche, Kirsten Wassermann, Monika Jung, Angelika T&#246;lle, Ilka Kristiansen, Michael Lein, Manfred Johannsen, Manfred Dietel, Klaus Jung and Glen Kristiansen</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>BMC Cancer 2008, 8:179</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 565</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-06-26</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2407-8-179</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Cancer</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1471-2407</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>179</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-26</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/7/231">
            
            <title>Phase I dose escalation study of vinorelbine and topotecan combination chemotherapy in patients with recurrent lung cancer</title>
			<description>Background:
A platinum doublet is the current standard treatment for good performance status patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and extensive stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) with good performance status. However, platinum-based treatment may be associated with significant toxicities, therefore alternative platinum-free combinations should be investigated. Topotecan is a topoisomerase I inhibitor that exerts its cytotoxic effect through stabilization of the topoisomerase I-DNA complex. Preclinical data suggests synergy between topoisomerase I inhibitors and mitotic spindle poisons. Considerable hematologic toxicities have been reported with topotecan dosed for 5 consecutive days in combination with vinorelbine. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the optimal dosage and the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of topotecan and vinorelbine in patients with relapsed  or refractory non-small cell or small cell lung cancer administered on  an alternate dosing schedule.
Methods:
From February, 2004 to March, 2007 eighteen patients with advanced or recurrent NSCLC or SCLC previously treated with chemotherapy were enrolled. Patients were heavily pretreated with 22% having received at least 3 prior lines of chemotherapy. Vinorelbine was administered at a fixed dose (20 mg/m2) and topotecan at escalating doses (2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, and 4 mg/m2) on days 1 and 8 every 21 days.
Results:
The MTD was not reached in any of the 5 cohorts, with only one dose limiting toxicity (DLT) occurring in cohort 4. Non-hematological toxicities were manageable. One patient had a partial response with four patients (27%) achieving stable disease. The median progression-free and overall survival for all patients, were 2.7 months (95% CI: 1.6, 9.1) and 10.5 months (95% CI: 4.2, 22.7), respectively.
Conclusion:
Vinorelbine and topotecan administered on days 1 and 8 every 21 days is well tolerated without any DLT seen with previously investigated topotecan schedules. This doublet provides a potentially active non-platinum containing doublet for the treatment of patients with advanced SCLC and NSCLC. Vinorelbine and topotecan should therefore be investigated in subsequent phase II studies at a dose of 20 mg/m2 and 4 mg/m2, respectively.Trial Registration NumberNCT00287963.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/7/231</link>		
			<dc:creator>Matthew A Beldner, Carol A Sherman, Mark R Green, Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer, Uzair Chaudhary, Mario L Meyer, Andrew S Kraft and Alberto J Montero</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>BMC Cancer 2007, 7:231</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 541</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2007-12-20</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2407-7-231</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Cancer</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1471-2407</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>7</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>231</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2007-12-20</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
		
	<cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
         <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction"/>
         <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution"/>
         <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks"/>
	</cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
