<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/feeds/mostaccessed/journal?journal=bmcanesthesiol&amp;quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>BMC Anesthesiology - Most accessed articles</title>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcanesthesiol/</link>
        <description>The most accessed research articles published by BMC Anesthesiology</description>
        <dc:date>2009-11-05T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2253/9/7" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2253/9/6" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2253/4/8" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2253/9/4" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2253/9/5" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2253/8/6" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2253/8/8" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2253/9/3" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2253/9/2" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2253/9/1" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
        <extra:info rdf:parseType="Literal">
            <html:div style="font:14px Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                <html:span style="font-weight:bold">
                    This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central
                </html:span>
                <html:br />
                <html:span style="font-size: 12px;">
                    It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit
                    <html:br />
                    <html:a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/" style="color:#3333CC; font-size:12px;">
                        http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/
                    </html:a>
                    <html:br />
                </html:span>
            </html:div>
        </extra:info>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2253/9/7">
        <title>Protocol for the &quot;Michigan Awareness Control Study&quot;: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing electronic alerts based on bispectral index monitoring or minimum alveolar concentration for the prevention of intraoperative awareness</title>
        <description>Background:
The incidence of intraoperative awareness with explicit recall is 1-2/1000 cases in the United States. The Bispectral Index monitor is an electroencephalographic method of assessing anesthetic depth that has been shown in one prospective study to reduce the incidence of awareness in the high-risk population. In the B-Aware trial, the number needed to treat in order to prevent one case of awareness in the high-risk population was 138. Since the number needed to treat and the associated cost of treatment would be much higher in the general population, the efficacy of the Bispectral Index monitor in preventing awareness in all anesthetized patients needs to be clearly established. This is especially true given the findings of the B-Unaware trial, which demonstrated no significant difference between protocols based on the Bispectral Index monitor or minimum alveolar concentration for the reduction of awareness in high risk patients.Methods/DesignTo evaluate efficacy in the general population, we are conducting a prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing the Bispectral Index monitor to a non-electroencephalographic gauge of anesthetic depth. The total recruitment for the study is targeted for 30,000 patients at both low and high risk for awareness. We have developed a novel algorithm that is capable of real-time analysis of our electronic perioperative information system. In one arm of the study, anesthesia providers will receive an electronic page if the Bispectral Index value is &gt;60. In the other arm of the study, anesthesia providers will receive a page if the age-adjusted minimum alveolar concentration is &lt;0.5. Our minimum alveolar concentration algorithm is sensitive to both inhalational anesthetics and intravenous sedative-hypnotic agents.DiscussionAwareness during general anesthesia is a persistent problem and the role of the Bispectral Index monitor in its prevention is still unclear. The Michigan Awareness Control Study is the largest prospective trial of awareness prevention ever conducted.Trial RegistrationClinical Trial NCT00689091</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2253/9/7</link>
                <dc:creator>George Mashour</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kevin Tremper</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Michael Avidan</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Anesthesiology 2009, 9:7</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-11-05T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2253-9-7</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Anesthesiology</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2253</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>7</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-11-05T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2253/9/6">
        <title>Noninvasive cardiac output and blood pressure monitoring cannot replace an invasive monitoring system in critically ill patients </title>
        <description>Background:
Monitoring of cardiac output and blood pressure are standard procedures in critical care medicine. Traditionally, invasive techniques like pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) and arterial catheters are widely used. Invasiveness bears many risks of deleterious complications. Therefore, a noninvasive reliable cardiac output (CO) and blood pressure monitoring system could improve the safety of cardiac monitoring. The aim of the present study was to compare a noninvasive versus a standard invasive cardiovascular monitoring system.
Methods:
Nexfin HD is a continuous noninvasive blood pressure and cardiac output monitor system and is based on the development of the pulsatile unloading of the finger arterial walls using an inflatable finger cuff. During continuous BP measurement CO is calculated. We included 10 patients with standard invasive cardiac monitoring system (pulmonary artery catheter and arterial catheter) comparing invasively obtained data to the data collected noninvasively using the Nexfin HD.
Results:
Correlation between mean arterial pressure measured with the standard arterial monitoring system and the Nexfin HD was r2 = 0.67 with a bias of -2 mmHg and two standard deviations of &#177; 16 mmHg. Correlation between CO derived from PAC and the Nexfin HD was r2 = 0.83 with a bias of 0.23 l/min and two standard deviations of &#177; 2.1 l/min; the percentage error was 29%.
Conclusion:
Although the noninvasive CO measurement appears promising, the noninvasive blood pressure assessment is clearly less reliable than the invasively measured blood pressure. Therefore, according to the present data application of the Nexfin HD monitoring system in the ICU cannot be recommended generally. Whether such a tool might be reliable in certain critically ill patients remains to be determined.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2253/9/6</link>
                <dc:creator>John Stover</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Reto Stocker</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Renato Lenherr</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Thomas Neff</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Silvia Cottini</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Bernhard Zoller</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Markus Bechir</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Anesthesiology 2009, 9:6</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-10-12T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2253-9-6</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Anesthesiology</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2253</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>6</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-10-12T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2253/4/8">
        <title>Endotracheal tube cuff pressure in three hospitals, and the volume required to produce an appropriate cuff pressure</title>
        <description>Background:
Cuff pressure in endotracheal tubes should be in the range of 20-30 cm H2O. We tested the hypothesis that the tube cuff is inadequately inflated when manometers are not used.
Methods:
With IRB approval, we studied 93 patients under general anesthesia with an ET tube in place in one teaching and two private hospitals. Anesthetists were blinded to study purpose. Cuff pressure in tube sizes 7.0 to 8.5 mm was evaluated 60 min after induction of general anesthesia using a manometer connected to the cuff pilot balloon. Nitrous oxide was disallowed. After deflating the cuff, we reinflated it in 0.5-ml increments until pressure was 20 cmH2O.
Results:
Neither patient morphometrics, institution, experience of anesthesia provider, nor tube size influenced measured cuff pressure (35.3 +/- 21.6 cmH2O). Only 27% of pressures were within 20-30 cmH2O; 27% exceeded 40 cmH2O. Although it varied considerably, the amount of air required to achieve a cuff pressure of 20 cmH2O was similar with each tube size.
Conclusion:
We recommend that ET cuff pressure be set and monitored with a manometer.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2253/4/8</link>
                <dc:creator>Papiya Sengupta</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Daniel Sessler</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Paul Maglinger</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Spencer Wells</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Alicia Vogt</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jaleel Durrani</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Anupama Wadhwa</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Anesthesiology 2004, 4:8</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2004-11-29T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2253-4-8</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Anesthesiology</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2253</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>8</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2004-11-29T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2253/9/4">
        <title>Role of potassium and calcium channels in sevoflurane-mediated vasodilation in the foeto-placental circulation.</title>
        <description>Background:
Sevoflurane has been demonstrated to vasodilate the foeto-placental vasculature. We aimed to determine the contribution of modulation of potassium and calcium channel function to the vasodilatory effect of sevoflurane in isolated human chorionic plate arterial rings.
Methods:
Quadruplicate ex vivo human chorionic plate arterial rings were used in all studies. Series 1 and 2 examined the role of the K+ channel in sevoflurane-mediated vasodilation. Separate experiments examined whether tetraethylammonium, which blocks large conductance calcium activated K+ (KCa++) channels (Series 1A+B) or glibenclamide, which blocks the ATP sensitive K+ (KATP) channel (Series 2), modulated sevoflurane-mediated vasodilation. Series 3 &#8211; 5 examined the role of the Ca++ channel in sevoflurane induced vasodilation. Separate experiments examined whether verapamil, which blocks the sarcolemmal voltage-operated Ca++ channel (Series 3), SK&amp;F 96365 an inhibitor of sarcolemmal voltage-independent Ca++ channels (Series 4A+B), or ryanodine an inhibitor of the sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca++ channel (Series 5A+B), modulated sevoflurane-mediated vasodilation.
Results:
Sevoflurane produced dose dependent vasodilatation of chorionic plate arterial rings in all studies. Prior blockade of the KCa++ and KATP channels augmented the vasodilator effects of sevoflurane. Furthermore, exposure of rings to sevoflurane in advance of TEA occluded the effects of TEA. Taken together, these findings suggest that sevoflurane blocks K+ channels. Blockade of the voltage-operated Ca++channels inhibited the vasodilator effects of sevoflurane. In contrast, blockade of the voltage-independent and sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca++channels did not alter sevoflurane vasodilation.
Conclusion:
Sevoflurane appears to block chorionic arterial KCa++ and KATP channels. Sevoflurane also blocks voltage-operated calcium channels, and exerts a net vasodilatory effect in the in vitro foeto-placental circulation.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2253/9/4</link>
                <dc:creator>James Jarman</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Chrisen Maharaj</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Brendan Higgins</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Rachel Farragher</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Christopher Laffey</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Noel Flynn</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>John Laffey</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Anesthesiology 2009, 9:4</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-06-10T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2253-9-4</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Anesthesiology</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2253</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>4</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-06-10T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2253/9/5">
        <title>Population pharmacokinetics of remifentanil
in infants and children undergoing cardiac surgery</title>
        <description>Background:
The aim of this study was to provide a model-based analysis of the pharmacokinetics of remifentanil in infants and children undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).
Methods:
We studied nine patients aged 0.5 to 4 years who received a continuous remifentanil infusion via a computer-controlled infusion pump during cardiac surgery with mildly hypothermic CPB were studied. Arterial blood samples taken prior to, during and after CPB were analyzed for remifentanil concentrations using a validated gas-chromatographic mass-spectrophotometric assay. We used population mixed-effects modeling to characterize remifentanil pharmacokinetics. The final model was evaluated by its predictive performance.
Results:
The pharmacokinetics of remifentanil was described by a 1-compartment model with adjustments for CPB. Population mean parameter estimates were 1.41 L for volume of distribution (V) and 0.244 L/min for clearance. V was increased during CPB and post-CPB to 2.41 times the pre-CPB value. The median prediction error and the median of individual median absolute prediction error were 2.44% and 21.6%, respectively.
Conclusion:
Remifentanil dosage adjustments are required during and after CPB due to marked changes in the V of the drug. Simulations indicate that a targeted blood concentration of 14 ng/mL is achieved and maintained in 50% of typical patients by administration of an initial dose of 18 &#956;g remifentanil followed by an infusion of 3.7 &#956;g/min before, during and post-CPB, supplemented with a bolus dose of 25 &#956;g given at the start of CPB.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2253/9/5</link>
                <dc:creator>Wai Johnn Sam</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Gregory Hammer</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>David Drover</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Anesthesiology 2009, 9:5</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-07-27T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2253-9-5</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Anesthesiology</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2253</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>5</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-07-27T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2253/8/6">
        <title>Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of fenoldopam mesylate for blood pressure control in pediatric patients</title>
        <description>Background:
Fenoldopam mesylate, a selective dopamine1-receptor agonist, is used by intravenous infusion to treat hypertension in adults. Fenoldopam is not approved by the FDA for use in children; reports describing its use in pediatrics are limited. In a multi-institutional, placebo controlled, double-blind, multi-dose trial we determined the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) characteristics and side-effect profile of fenoldopam in children.
Methods:
Seventy seven (77) children from 3 weeks to 12 years of age scheduled for surgery in which deliberate hypotension would be induced were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned to one of five, blinded treatment groups (placebo or fenoldopam 0.05, 0.2, 0.8, or 3.2 mcg/kg/min iv) for a 30-minute interval after stabilization of anesthesia and placement of vascular catheters. Following the 30-minute blinded interval, investigators adjusted the fenoldopam dose to achieve a target mean arterial pressure in the open-label period until deliberate hypotension was no longer indicated (e.g., muscle-layer closure). Mean arterial pressure and heart rate were continuously monitored and were the primary endpoints.
Results:
Seventy-six children completed the trial. Fenoldopam at doses of 0.8 and 3.2 mcg/kg/min significantly reduced blood pressure (p &lt; 0.05) during the blinded interval, and doses of 1.0&#8211;1.2 mcg/kg/min resulted in continued control of blood pressure during the open-label interval. Doses greater than 1.2 mcg/kg/min during the open-label period resulted in increasing heart rate without additional reduction in blood pressure. Fenoldopam was well-tolerated; side effects occurred in a minority of patients. The PK/PD relationship of fenoldopam in children was determined.
Conclusion:
Fenoldopam is a rapid-acting, effective agent for intravenous control of blood pressure in children. The effective dose range is significantly higher in children undergoing anesthesia and surgery (0.8&#8211;1.2 mcg/kg/min) than as labeled for adults (0.05&#8211;0.3 mcg/kg/min). The PK and side-effect profiles for children and adults are similar.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2253/8/6</link>
                <dc:creator>Gregory Hammer</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Susan Verghese</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>David Drover</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Myron Yaster</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Joseph Tobin</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Anesthesiology 2008, 8:6</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2008-10-06T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2253-8-6</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Anesthesiology</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2253</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>6</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2008-10-06T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2253/8/8">
        <title>Contact heat evoked potentials using simultaneous EEG and fMRI and their correlation with evoked pain</title>
        <description>Background:
The Contact Heat Evoked Potential Stimulator (CHEPS) utilises rapidly delivered heat pulses with adjustable peak temperatures to stimulate the differential warm/heat thresholds of receptors expressed by A&#948; and C fibres. The resulting evoked potentials can be recorded and measured, providing a useful clinical tool for the study of thermal and nociceptive pathways. Concurrent recording of contact heat evoked potentials using electroencephalogram (EEG) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has not previously been reported with CHEPS. Developing simultaneous EEG and fMRI with CHEPS is highly desirable, as it provides an opportunity to exploit the high temporal resolution of EEG and the high spatial resolution of fMRI to study the reaction of the human brain to thermal and nociceptive stimuli.
Methods:
In this study we have recorded evoked potentials stimulated by 51&#176;C contact heat pulses from CHEPS using EEG, under normal conditions (baseline), and during continuous and simultaneous acquisition of fMRI images in ten healthy volunteers, during two sessions. The pain evoked by CHEPS was recorded on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
Results:
Analysis of EEG data revealed that the latencies and amplitudes of evoked potentials recorded during continuous fMRI did not differ significantly from baseline recordings. fMRI results were consistent with previous thermal pain studies, and showed Blood Oxygen Level Dependent (BOLD) changes in the insula, post-central gyrus, supplementary motor area (SMA), middle cingulate cortex and pre-central gyrus. There was a significant positive correlation between the evoked potential amplitude (EEG) and the psychophysical perception of pain on the VAS.
Conclusion:
The results of this study demonstrate the feasibility of recording contact heat evoked potentials with EEG during continuous and simultaneous fMRI. The combined use of the two methods can lead to identification of distinct patterns of brain activity indicative of pain and pro-nociceptive sensitisation in healthy subjects and chronic pain patients. Further studies are required for the technique to progress as a useful tool in clinical trials of novel analgesics.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2253/8/8</link>
                <dc:creator>Katherine Roberts</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Anastasia Papadaki</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Carla Goncalves</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mary Tighe</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Duncan Atherton</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ravikiran Shenoy</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Donald McRobbie</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Praveen Anand</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Anesthesiology 2008, 8:8</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2008-12-17T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2253-8-8</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Anesthesiology</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2253</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>8</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2008-12-17T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2253/9/3">
        <title>Head CT is of limited diagnostic value in critically ill patients who remain unresponsive after discontinuation of sedation</title>
        <description>Background:
Prolonged sedation is common in mechanically ventilated patients and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. We sought to determine the diagnostic value of head computed tomography (CT) in mechanically ventilated patients who remain unresponsive after discontinuation of sedation.
Methods:
A retrospective review of adult (age &gt;18 years of age) patients consecutively admitted to the medical intensive care unit of a tertiary care medical center. Patients requiring mechanical ventilation for management of respiratory failure for longer than 72 hours were included in the study group. A group that did not have difficulty with awakening was included as a control.
Results:
The median time after sedation was discontinued until a head CT was performed was 2 days (interquartile range 1.375&#8211;2 days). Majority (80%) of patients underwent head CT evaluation within the first 48 hours after discontinuation of sedation. Head CT was non-diagnostic in all but one patient who had a small subarachnoid hemorrhage. Twenty-five patients (60%) had a normal head CT. Head CT findings did not alter the management of any of the patients. The control group was similar to the experimental group with respect to demographics, etiology of respiratory failure and type of sedation used. However, while 37% of subjects in the control group had daily interruption of sedation, only 19% in the patient group had daily interruption of sedation (p &lt; 0.05).
Conclusion:
In patients on mechanical ventilation for at least 72 hours and who remain unresponsive after sedative discontinuation and with a non-focal neurologic examination, head CT is performed early and is of very limited diagnostic utility. Routine use of daily interruption of sedation is used in a minority of patients outside of a clinical trial setting though it may decrease the frequency of unresponsiveness from prolonged sedation and the need for head CT in patients mechanically ventilated for a prolonged period.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2253/9/3</link>
                <dc:creator>Jay Balachandran</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mairaj Jaleel</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Manu Jain</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Niraj Mahajan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ravi Kalhan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Rajesh Balagani</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Helen Donnelly</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Eugene Greenstein</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Gokhan Mutlu</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Anesthesiology 2009, 9:3</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-05-07T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2253-9-3</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Anesthesiology</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2253</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-05-07T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2253/9/2">
        <title>Efficacy of Sub-Tenon&apos;s block using an equal volume of local anaesthetic administered either as a single or as divided doses.a randomised clinical trial </title>
        <description>Background:
Sub-Tenon&apos;s anaesthetic is effective and reliable in producing both akinesia and anaesthesia for cataract surgery. Our clinical experience indicates that it is sometimes necessary when absolute akinesia is required during surgery to augment the block with 1&#8211;2 ml of local anaesthetic. Hypothesis was that after first injection some of the volume injected may spill out and before second injection the effect of hyaluronidase has taken place and second volume injectate will have desired effect.
Methods:
A prospective, randomised, control trial in which patients were randomly allocated to one of two groups. In group 1, single injection of 5 ml of local anaesthetic was injected. In group 2, 3 ml of the same anaesthetic solution was injected followed by application of gentle orbital pressure for 2 minutes. A further 2 ml of the same anaesthetic solution was injected through the same conjunctival incision. Measurement of movement in four quadrants of eye was done by the surgeon at 3 and 6 minutes. Intraocular pressure, chemosis, and subconjuctival haemorrhage were also measured.
Results:
Significant differences at 3 minutes between groups for overall movement, medial, superior, and lateral quadrants occurred. At 6 minutes no significant group differences emerged for the overall movement or for any of four quadrants.
Conclusion:
Single injection of local anaesthesia for sub-Tenon&apos;s block with mixture of lignocaine with adrenaline, bupivacaine and hyaluronidase was found to be superior to provide akinesia of ocular muscles compared to divided dose given by two injections. No difference in groups in terms of haemorrhage, chemosis, patient&apos;s satisfaction and intraocular pressure was found.Trial registrationTrial registration no-ISRCTN73431052</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2253/9/2</link>
                <dc:creator>Ehtesham Khan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jawad Mustafa</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>John McAdoo</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>George Shorten</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Anesthesiology 2009, 9:2</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-03-26T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2253-9-2</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Anesthesiology</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2253</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>2</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-03-26T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2253/9/1">
        <title>Nitrous oxide may not increase the risk of cancer recurrence after colorectal surgery:
a follow-up of a randomized controlled trial

</title>
        <description>Background:
Even the best cancer surgery is usually associated with minimal residual disease. Whether these remaining malignant cells develop into clinical recurrence is at least partially determined by adequacy of host defense, especially natural killer cell function. Anesthetics impair immune defenses to varying degrees, but nitrous oxide appears to be especially problematic. We therefore tested the hypothesis that colorectal-cancer recurrence risk is augmented by nitrous oxide administration during colorectal surgery.
Methods:
We conducted a 4- to 8-year follow-up of 204 patients with colorectal cancer who were randomly assigned to 65% nitrous oxide (n = 97) or nitrogen (n = 107), balanced with isoflurane and remifentanil. The primary outcome was the time to cancer recurrence. Our primary analysis was a multivariable Cox-proportional-hazards regression model that included relevant baseline variables. In addition to treatment group, the model considered patient age, tumor grade, dissemination, adjacent organ invasion, vessel invasion, and the number of nodes involved. The study had 80% power to detect a 56% or greater reduction in recurrence rates (i.e., hazard ratio of 0.44 or less) at the 0.05 significance level.
Results:
After adjusting for significant baseline covariables, risk of recurrence did not differ significantly for nitrous oxide and nitrogen, with a hazard ratio estimate (95% CI) of 1.10 (0.66, 1.83), P = 0.72. No two-way interactions with the treatment were statistically significant.
Conclusion:
Colorectal-cancer recurrence risks were not greatly different in patients who were randomly assigned to 65% nitrous oxide or nitrogen during surgery. Our results may not support avoiding nitrous oxide use to prevent recurrence of colorectal cancer.Implications StatementThe risk of colorectal cancer recurrence was similar in patients who were randomly assigned to 65% nitrous oxide or nitrogen during colorectal surgery.Trial RegistrationCurrent Controlled Clinical Trials NCT00781352 http://www.clinicaltrials.gov</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2253/9/1</link>
                <dc:creator>Edith Fleishmann</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Corinna Marschalek</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Katja Schlemitz</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jarrod Dalton</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Thomas Gruenberger</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Herbst Friedrich</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Andrea Kurz</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Daniel Sessler</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Anesthesiology 2009, 9:1</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-02-03T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2253-9-1</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Anesthesiology</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2253</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-02-03T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
