<?xml version = '1.0' encoding = 'UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss/styledrssBMC.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:extra="http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/schemas/extra/" xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/">
	<channel rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/rss">
		<extra:info rdf:parseType="Literal">
			<html:div xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" style="font:14px Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">
				<html:span style="font-weight:bold">This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central</html:span>
				<html:br/>
				<html:span style="font-size: 12px;">It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit <html:br/><html:a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/" style="color:#3333CC; font-size:12px;">http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/</html:a><html:br/>
				</html:span>
			</html:div>
		</extra:info>
		<title>BMC Oral Health - Latest articles</title>
		<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcoralhealth/</link>
		<description>The latest articles from BMC Oral Health (ISSN 1472-6831) published by 
				
				BioMed Central
		</description>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/8/19"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/8/18"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/8/17"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/8/16"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/8/15"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/8/14"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/8/13"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/8/12"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/8/11"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/8/10"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/8/9"/>			    
            
            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
    </channel>  
    
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/8/19">
            
            <title>Oral maxillofacial neoplasms in an East African population a 10 year retrospective study of 1863 cases using histopathological reports.</title>
			<description>Introduction and objective
Neoplasms of the oral maxillofacial area are an interesting entity characterized by differences in nomenclature and classification at different centers.
We report neoplastic diagnoses seen at the departments of oral maxillofacial surgery of Muhimbili and Mulago referral hospitals in Tanzania and Uganda respectively over a 10 year period.
Methods:
We retrieved histopathological reports archived at the departments of oral maxillofacial surgery of Muhimbili and Mulago referral hospitals in Tanzania and Uganda respectively over a 10 year period from June 1989-July 1999.
Results:
In the period between June 1989 and July 1999, 565 and 1298 neoplastic oro-facial cases were retrieved of which 284 (50.53%) and 967 (74.54%) were malignant neoplasms at Muhimbili and Mulago hospitals respectively. Overall 67.28% of the diagnoses recorded were malignant with Kaposi's sarcoma (21.98%), Burkiits lymphoma (20.45%), and squamous cell carcinoma (15.22%) dominating that group while ameloblastoma (9.23%), fibromas (7.3%) and pleomorphic adenoma (4.95%) dominated the benign group.
The high frequency of malignancies could be due to inclusion criteria and the clinical practice of selective histopathology investigation. However, it may also be due to higher chances of referrals in case of malignancies.
Conclusion:
There is need to reexamine the slides in these two centers in order to bring them in line with the most recent WHO classification so as to allow for comparison with reports from else where.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/8/19</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Adriane Kamulegeya and Boniphace Kalyanyama</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>BMC Oral Health 2008, 8:19</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-07-23</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6831-8-19</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Oral Health</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1472-6831</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>19</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-23</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/8/18">
            
            <title>Study protocol of the Center for Oral Health Research in Appalachia (COHRA) etiology study</title>
			<description>Background:
People in Appalachia experience some of the worst oral health in the United States. To develop effective intervention and prevention strategies in Appalachia, we must understand the complex relationships among the contributing factors and how they affect the etiology of oral diseases. To date, no such comprehensive analysis has been conducted. This report summarizes the characteristics of the sample and describes the protocol of a study determining contributions of individual, family, and community factors to oral diseases in Appalachian children and their relatives.Methods/DesignFamilies participated in a comprehensive assessment protocol involving interviews, questionnaires, a clinical oral health assessment, a microbiological assessment, and collection of DNA. The design of the study is cross-sectional.
Conclusion:
Due to its multilevel design and large, family-based sample, this study has the potential to greatly advance our understanding of factors that contribute to oral health in Appalachian children.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/8/18</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Deborah E Polk, Robert J Weyant, Richard J Crout, Daniel W McNeil, Ralph E Tarter, John G Thomas and Mary L Marazita</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>BMC Oral Health 2008, 8:18</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-06-03</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6831-8-18</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Oral Health</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1472-6831</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>18</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-03</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/8/17">
            
            <title>Prevalence of putative virulence factors and antimicrobial susceptibility of Enterococcus faecalis isolates from patients with dental Diseases</title>
			<description>Background:
This study investigated the prevalence of Enterococcus faecalis, its putative virulence factors and antimicrobial susceptibility in individuals with and without dental diseases. A total of 159 oral rinse specimens were collected from patients (n = 109) suffering from dental diseases and healthy controls (n = 50).
Results:
E. faecalis was detected using only culture in 8/109 (7.3%) of the patients with various types of dental diseases, whereas no E. faecalis was found in the healthy controls weather using both culture and PCR. Phenotype characterizations of the 8 E. faecalis isolates indicated that 25% of the isolates produced haemolysin and 37.5% produced gelatinase. Most important virulence genes; collagen binding protein (ace) and endocarditis antigen (efaA) were present in all 8 E. faecalis isolates, while haemolysin activator gene (cylA) was detected only in 25% of isolates, and all isolates were negative for esp gene. All E. faecalis isolates were 100% susceptible to ampicillin, chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, vancomycin, and teicoplanin, and to less extent to erythromycin (62.5%).
Conclusion:
This study shows that all E. faecalis isolates were recovered only from patients with dental diseases especially necrotic pulps, and all isolates carried both collagen binding protein and endocarditis antigen genes and highly susceptible to frequently used antimicrobial drugs in Jordan.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/8/17</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Randa Salah, Najla Dar-Odeh, Osama Abu Hammad and Asem A Shehabi</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>BMC Oral Health 2008, 8:17</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-06-01</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6831-8-17</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Oral Health</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1472-6831</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>17</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/8/16">
            
            <title>Statin use is associated with fewer periodontal lesions: A retrospective study</title>
			<description>Background:
Inflammatory processes are considered to participate in the development of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Statins have been used successfully in the prevention and treatment of coronary heart disease. Chronic periodontitis has been suggested to contribute to CVD. The aim of this study was to examine the association of statin use and clinical markers of chronic periodontitis.
Methods:
Periodontal probing pocket depth (PPD) values were collected from dental records of 100 consecutive adult patients referred to a university dental clinic for treatment of advanced chronic periodontitis. A novel index, Periodontal Inflammatory Burden Index (PIBI), was derived from the PPD values to estimate systemic effects of periodontitis.
Results:
Periodontitis patients taking statins had a 37% lower number of pathological periodontal pockets than those without statin medication (P = 0.00043). PIBI, which combines and unifies the data on PPD, was 40% smaller in statin using patients than in patients without statin (P = 0.00069). PIBI of subjects on simvastatin and atorvastatin both differed significantly from patients without statin and were on the same level. The subjects' number of teeth had no effect on the results
Conclusion:
Patients on statin medication exhibit fewer signs of periodontal inflammatory injury than subjects without the statin regimen. PIBI provides a tool for monitoring inflammatory load of chronic periodontitis. The apparent beneficial effects of statins may in part be mediated by their pleiotropic anti-inflammatory effect on periodontal tissue.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/8/16</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Otso Lindy, Kimmo Suomalainen, Marja M&#228;kel&#228; and Seppo Lindy</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>BMC Oral Health 2008, 8:16</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-05-15</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6831-8-16</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Oral Health</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1472-6831</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>16</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-15</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/8/15">
            
            <title>Psychometric properties of Spanish-language adult dental fear measures</title>
			<description>Background:
It would be useful to have psychometrically-sound measures of dental fear for Hispanics, who comprise the largest ethnic minority in the United States. We report on the psychometric properties of Spanish-language versions of two common adult measures of dental fear (Modified Dental Anxiety Scale, MDAS; Dental Fear Survey, DFS), as well as a measure of fear of dental injections (Needle Survey, NS).
Methods:
Spanish versions of the measures were administered to 213 adults attending Hispanic cultural festivals, 31 students (who took the questionnaire twice, for test-retest reliability), and 100 patients at a dental clinic. We also administered the questionnaire to 136 English-speaking adults at the Hispanic festivals and 58 English-speaking students at the same college where we recruited the Spanish-speaking students, to compare the performance of the English and Spanish measures in the same populations.
Results:
The internal reliabilities of the Spanish MDAS ranged from 0.80 to 0.85. Values for the DFS ranged from 0.92 to 0.96, and values for the NS ranged from 0.92 to 0.94. The test-retest reliabilities (intra-class correlations) for the three measures were 0.69, 0.86, and 0.94 for the MDAS, DFS, and NS, respectively. The three measures showed moderate correlations with one another in all three samples, providing evidence for construct validity. Patients with higher scores on the measures were rated as being more anxious during dental procedures. Similar internal reliabilities and correlations were found in the English-version analyses. The test-retest values were also similar in the English students for the DFS and NS; however, the English test-retest value for the MDAS was better than that found in the Spanish students.
Conclusion:
We found evidence for the internal reliability, construct validity, and criterion validity for the Spanish versions of the three measures, and evidence for the test-retest reliability of the Spanish versions of the DFS and NS.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/8/15</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Trilby Coolidge, Mark A Chambers, Laura J Garcia, Lisa J Heaton and Susan E Coldwell</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>BMC Oral Health 2008, 8:15</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-05-12</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6831-8-15</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Oral Health</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1472-6831</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>15</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-12</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/8/14">
            
            <title>Malocclusion, psycho-social impacts and treatment need: A cross-sectional study of Tanzanian primary school-children</title>
			<description>Background:
studies on the relationship between children's malocclusion and its psycho-social impacts are so far largely unexplored in low-income countries. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of malocclusion, reported dental problems and dissatisfaction with dental appearance among primary school children in Tanzania. The relationship of dissatisfaction with socio-demographic characteristics, clinically defined malocclusion and psychosocial impacts of dental anomalies was investigated. Orthodontic treatment need was estimated using an integrated socio-dental approach.MethodOne thousand six hundred and one children (mean age 13 yr) attending primary schools in the districts of Kinondoni and Temeke completed face to face interviews and a full mouth clinical examination. The survey instrument was designed to measure a Kiswahili translated and culturally adapted Child Oral Impact on Daily Performance (Child-OIDP) frequency score, reported dental problems, dissatisfaction with dental appearance/function and socio-demographic characteristics.
Results:
The prevalence of malocclusion varied from 0.9% (deep bite) to 22.5% (midline shift) with a total of 63.8% having at least one type of anomaly. Moderate proportions of children admitted dental problems; ranging from 7% (space position) to 20% (pain). The odds ratio of having problems with teeth position, spaces, pain and swallowing if having any malocclusion were, respectively 6.7, 3.9, 1.4 and 6.8. A total of 23.3% children were dissatisfied with dental appearance/function. Children dissatisfied with their dental appearance were less likely to be Temeke residents (OR = 0.5) and having parents of higher education (OR = 0.6) and more likely to reporting problem with teeth position (OR = 4.3) and having oral impacts (OR = 2.7). The socio-dental treatment need of 12% was five times lower than the normative need assessment of 63.8%.
Conclusion:
Compared to the high prevalence of malocclusion, psycho social impacts and dissatisfaction with appearance/function was not frequent among Tanzanian schoolchildren. Subjects with malocclusion reported problems most frequently and malocclusion together with other psycho-social impact scores determined children's satisfaction with teeth appearance- and function.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/8/14</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Matilda Mtaya, Anne N Astrom and Pongsri Brudvik</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>BMC Oral Health 2008, 8:14</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-05-06</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6831-8-14</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Oral Health</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1472-6831</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>14</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-06</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/8/13">
            
            <title>Systematic review of the relation between smokeless tobacco and non-neoplastic oral diseases in Europe and the United States</title>
			<description>Background:
How smokeless tobacco contributes to non-neoplastic oral diseases is unclear. It certainly increases risk of oral mucosal lesions, but reviewers disagree as to other conditions. In some areas, especially South-East Asia, risk is difficult to quantify due to the many products, compositions (including non-tobacco ingredients), and usage practices involved. This review considers studies from Europe (in practice mainly Scandinavia) and from the USA.
Methods:
Experimental and epidemiological studies published in 1963&#8211;2007 were identified that related risk of oral lesions to smokeless tobacco use. Data were assessed separately for oral mucosal lesions, periodontal and gingival diseases, dental caries and tooth loss, and oral pain.
Results:
Oral mucosal lesions: Thirty-three epidemiological studies consistently show a strong dose-related effect of current snuff on oral mucosal lesion prevalence. In Scandinavia, users have a near 100% prevalence of a characteristic "snuff-induced lesion", but prevalence of the varied lesions reported in the USA is lower. Associations with chewing tobacco are weaker. The lack of clear association with former use suggests reversibility following cessation, consistent with experimental studies showing rapid lesion regression on quitting.Periodontal and gingival diseases: Two of four studies report a significant association of snuff with attachment loss and four out of eight with gingival recession. Snuff is not clearly related to gingivitis or periodontal diseases. Limited evidence suggests chewing tobacco is unrelated to periodontal or gingival diseases.Tooth loss: Swedish studies show no association with snuff, but one US study reported an association with snuff, and another with chewing tobacco.Dental caries: Evidence from nine studies suggests a possible relationship with use of smokeless tobacco, particularly chewing tobacco, and the risk of dental caries.Oral pain: Limited evidence precludes any clear conclusion.
Conclusion:
This review confirms the strong association of current use of smokeless tobacco, particularly snuff, with prevalence of oral mucosal lesions. It provides suggestive evidence of an association of snuff use with gingival recession and attachment loss, and of chewing tobacco with dental caries. While smokeless tobacco clearly increases risk of oral mucosal lesions, interpretation for other endpoints is limited by study weaknesses, including poor confounding control.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/8/13</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Gerd Kallischnigg, Rolf Weitkunat and Peter N Lee</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>BMC Oral Health 2008, 8:13</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-05-01</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6831-8-13</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Oral Health</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1472-6831</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>13</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/8/12">
            
            <title>Human bite injuries in the oro-facial region at the Muhimbili National Hospital, Tanzania</title>
			<description>Background:
Human bites in the maxillofacial region compromise function and aesthetics, resulting in social and psychological effects. There is paucity of information regarding human bite injuries in Tanzania. The aim of the study was to assess the occurrence, treatment modalities and prognosis of human bite injuries in the oro-facial region at the Muhimbili National Hospital Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Methods:
In a prospective study the details of patients with human bite injuries in the oro-facial region who attended at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery of the Muhimbili National Hospital between January 2001 and December 2005 were recorded. Data included information on age, sex, site, duration of the injury at the time of reporting to hospital, reasons, details of treatment offered and outcome after treatment.
Results:
A total of 33 patients, 13 males and 20 females aged between 12 and 49 years with human bite injuries in the oro-facial region were treated. Thirty patients presented with clean uninfected wounds while 3 had infected wounds. The most (45.5%) frequently affected site was the lower lip. Treatment offered included thorough surgical cleansing with adequate surgical debridement and primary suturing. Tetanus prophylaxis and a course of broad-spectrum antibiotics were given to all the patients. In 90% of the 30 patients who were treated by suturing, the healing was uneventful with only 10% experiencing wound infection or necrosis. Three patients who presented with wounds that had signs of infection were treated by surgical cleansing with debridement, antibiotics and daily dressing followed by delayed primary suturing.
Conclusion:
Most of the human bite injuries in the oro-facial region were due to social conflicts. Although generally considered to be dirty or contaminated they could be successfully treated by surgical cleansing and primary suture with a favourable outcome. Management of such injuries often need multidisciplinary approach.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/8/12</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Farrid M Shubi, Omar JM Hamza, Boniphace M Kalyanyama and Elison NM Simon</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>BMC Oral Health 2008, 8:12</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-04-30</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6831-8-12</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Oral Health</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1472-6831</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>12</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-30</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/8/11">
            
            <title>The Dutch version of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-NL): Translation, reliability and construct validity</title>
			<description>Background:
The purpose of this study was to make a cross-culturally adapted, Dutch version of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP), a 49-item questionnaire measuring oral health-related quality of life, and to examine its psychometric properties.
Methods:
The original English version of the OHIP was translated into the Dutch language, following the guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures. The resulting OHIP-NL's psychometric properties were examined in a sample of 119 patients (68.9 % women; mean age = 57.1 &#177; 12.2 yrs). They were referred to the clinic of Prosthodontics and Implantology with complaints concerning their partial or full dentures or other problems with missing teeth. To establish the reliability of the OHIP-NL, internal consistency and test-retest reliability (N = 41; 1 &#8211; 2 weeks interval) were examined, using Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), respectively. Further, construct validity was established by calculating ANOVA.
Results:
Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were excellent (Cronbach's alpha = 0.82 &#8211; 0.97; ICC = 0.78 &#8211; 0.90). In addition, all associations were significant and in the expected direction.
Conclusion:
In conclusion: the OHIP-NL can be considered a reliable and valid instrument to measure oral health-related quality of life.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/8/11</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Marylee J van der Meulen, Mike T John, Machiel Naeije and Frank Lobbezoo</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>BMC Oral Health 2008, 8:11</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-04-11</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6831-8-11</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Oral Health</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1472-6831</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>11</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-11</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/8/10">
            
            <title>Dental general anaesthetic receipt among Australians aged 15+ years, 1998&#8211;1999 to 2004&#8211;2005</title>
			<description>Background:
Adults receive dental general anaesthetic (DGA) care when standard dental treatment is not possible. Receipt of DGA care is resource-intensive and not without risk. This study explores DGA receipt among 15+-year-old Australians by a range of risk indicators.
Methods:
DGA data were obtained from Australia's Hospital Morbidity Database from 1998&#8211;1999 to 2004&#8211;2005. Poisson regression modeling was used to examine DGA rates in relation to age, sex, Indigenous status, location and procedure.
Results:
The overall DGA rate was 472.79 per 100,000 (95% CI 471.50&#8211;474.09). Treatment of impacted teeth (63.7%) was the most common reason for DGA receipt, followed by dental caries treatment (12.4%), although marked variations were seen by age-group. After adjusting for other covariates, DGA rates among 15&#8211;19-year-olds were 13.20 (95% CI 12.65&#8211;13.78) times higher than their 85+-year-old counterparts. Females had 1.46 (95% CI 1.45&#8211;1.47) times the rate of their male counterparts, while those living in rural/remote areas had 2.70 (95% CI 2.68&#8211;2.72) times the rate of metropolitan-dwellers. DGA rates for non-Indigenous persons were 4.88 (95% CI 4.73&#8211;5.03) times those of Indigenous persons. The DGA rate for 1+ extractions was 461.9 per 100,000 (95% CI 460.6&#8211;463.2), compared with a rate of 23.6 per 100,000 (95% CI 23.3&#8211;23.9) for 1+ restorations.
Conclusion:
Nearly two-thirds of DGAs were for treatment of impacted teeth. Persons aged 15&#8211;19 years were disproportionately represented among those receiving DGA care, along with females, rural/remote-dwellers and those identifying as non-Indigenous. More research is required to better understand the public health implications of DGA care among 15+-year-olds, and how the demand for receipt of such care might be reduced.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/8/10</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Lisa M Jamieson and Kaye F Roberts-Thomson</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>BMC Oral Health 2008, 8:10</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-04-11</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6831-8-10</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Oral Health</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1472-6831</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>10</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-11</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/8/9">
            
            <title>Inequalities in public water supply fluoridation in Brazil: An ecological study</title>
			<description>Background:
The literature is scarce on the social and geographic inequalities in the access to and implementation of the fluoridation of public water supplies. This study adds knowledge to the Brazilian experience of the chronic privation of water and wastewater policies, access to potable water and fluoridation in the country. Thus, the aim of this study was to verify possible inequalities in the population's access to fluoridated drinking water in 246 Brazilian municipalities.
Methods:
The information on the process of water fluoridation in the municipalities and in the macro region in which each municipality is located was obtained from the national epidemiological survey which was concluded in 2003. The data relating to the human development index at municipal level (HDI-M) and access to mains water came from the Brazilian Human Development Atlas, whilst the size of the population was obtained from a governmental source. The Fisher exact test (P &lt; 0.05) was employed to identify significant associations between the explanatory variables and their ability to predict the principal outcomes of interest to this study, namely the presence or absence of the water fluoridation process in the municipalities as well as the length of time during which this measure has been implemented. Linear regression was used to observe the associations between the relevant variables in a multivariate environment.
Results:
The results clearly showed that there is a relationship between municipalities with larger populations, located in more socio-economically advantaged regions and with better HDI-M, and where fluoridation is both present and has been implemented for a longer period of time (started before 1990).
Conclusion:
The findings suggest that the aim of treating water with fluoride may not be being adequately achieved, requiring more effective strategies so that access to this measure can be expanded equitably.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/8/9</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Marilisa CL Gabardo, Wander J da Silva, Marcia Olandoski, Simone T Moys&#233;s and Samuel J Moys&#233;s</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>BMC Oral Health 2008, 8:9</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-04-10</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6831-8-9</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Oral Health</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1472-6831</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>9</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-10</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
		
    <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
         <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction"/>
         <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution"/>
         <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks"/>
	</cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
