<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/feeds/latestarticles/journal?journal=bmcoralhealth&amp;quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>BMC Oral Health - Latest Articles</title>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcoralhealth/</link>
        <description>The latest research articles published by BMC Oral Health</description>
        <dc:date>2009-07-10T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/9/17" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/9/16" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/9/15" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/9/14" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/9/13" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/9/12" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/9/11" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/9/10" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/9/9" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/9/8" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
        <extra:info rdf:parseType="Literal">
            <html:div style="font:14px Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                <html:span style="font-weight:bold">
                    This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central
                </html:span>
                <html:br />
                <html:span style="font-size: 12px;">
                    It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit
                    <html:br />
                    <html:a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/" style="color:#3333CC; font-size:12px;">
                        http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/
                    </html:a>
                    <html:br />
                </html:span>
            </html:div>
        </extra:info>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/9/17">
        <title>Reliability and cross-cultural validity of a Japanese version of the Dental Fear Survey</title>
        <description>Background:
This study established the reliability and construct validity of a Japanese version of the Dental Fear Survey (DFS).
Methods:
Two studies were carried out in separate populations. In the first, the instrument was translated and internal consistency and test-retest reliability was assessed. In the second, Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was used to test the hypothesis that the conceptual structure of the Japanese translation was consistent with the U.S. version.
Results:
In the first study (N=166), Cronbach alpha&apos;s ranged from .94 to .96 and test-retest reliability (Spearman correlation) ranged from .89 to .92. In the second study (N=2095), SEM was used on the covariance matrix of the 20 variables in a random sample of 600 questionnaires to evaluate the goodness of fit of the theoretical model and then, in an exploratory manner corrected for specification errors until a model that fit the data well was achieved.
Conclusion:
The Japanese version of the DFS appears reliable and demonstrates construct validity. The modeling confirms the three factors on which the English language version was based.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/9/17</link>
                <dc:creator>Toshiko Yoshida</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Peter Milgrom</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Yukako Mori</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Yukie Nakai</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mari Kaji</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Tsutomu Shimono</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ana Nora Donaldson</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Oral Health 2009, 9:17</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-07-10T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6831-9-17</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Oral Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-6831</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>17</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-07-10T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/9/16">
        <title>Poverty, social exclusion and dental caries of 12-year-old children: a cross-sectional study in Lima, Peru</title>
        <description>Background:
Socioeconomic differences in oral health have been reported in many countries. Poverty and social exclusion are two commonly used indicators of socioeconomic position in Latin America. The aim of this study was to explore the associations of poverty and social exclusion with dental caries experience in 12-year-old children.
Methods:
Ninety families, with a child aged 12 years, were selected from 11 underserved communities in Lima (Peru), using a two-stage cluster sampling. Head of households were interviewed with regard to indicators of poverty and social exclusion and their children were clinically examined for dental caries. The associations of poverty and social exclusion with dental caries prevalence were tested in binary logistic regression models.
Results:
Among children in the sample, 84.5% lived in poor households and 30.0% in socially excluded families. Out of all the children, 83.3% had dental caries. Poverty and social exclusion were significantly associated with dental caries in the unadjusted models (p=0.013 and 0.047 respectively). In the adjusted model, poverty remained significantly related to dental caries (p=0.008), but the association between social exclusion and dental caries was no longer significant (p=0.077). Children living in poor households were 2.25 times more likely to have dental caries (95% confidence interval: 1.24; 4.09), compared to those living in non-poor households.
Conclusions:
There was support for an association between poverty and dental caries, but not for an association between social exclusion and dental caries in these children. Some potential explanations for these findings are discussed.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/9/16</link>
                <dc:creator>Elsa Delgado-Angulo</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Martin Hobdell</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Eduardo Bernabe</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Oral Health 2009, 9:16</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-07-07T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6831-9-16</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Oral Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-6831</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>16</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-07-07T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/9/15">
        <title>Oral health status of 12-year-old school children in Khartoum state, the Sudan; a school-based survey</title>
        <description>Background:
Few studies have investigated the prevalence of dental caries among school children in the past decades in Sudan rendering it difficult to understand the status and pattern of oral health.
Methods:
A school-based survey was conducted using stratified random cluster sampling in Khartoum state, Sudan. Data was collected through interviews and clinical examination by a single examiner. DMFT was measured according to WHO criteria. Gingival index (GI) of Loe &amp; Silness and Plaque index (PI) of Silness &amp; Loe were used.
Results:
The mean DMFT for 12-year-olds was found to be 0.42 with a significant caries index (SiC) of 1.4. Private school attendees had significantly higher DMFT (0.57) when compared to public school attendees (0.4). The untreated caries prevalence was 30.5%. In multivariate analysis caries experience (DMFT &gt; 0) was found to be significantly and directly associated with socioeconomic status. The mean GI for the six index teeth was found to be 1.05 (CI 1.03 &#8211; 1.07) and the mean PI was 1.30 (CI 1.22 &#8211; 1.38).
Conclusion:
The prevalence of caries was found to be low. The school children with the higher socioeconomic status formed the high risk group.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/9/15</link>
                <dc:creator>Nazik Mostafa Nurelhuda</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Tordis Agnete Trovik</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Raouf Wahab Ali</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mutaz Faisal Ahmed</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Oral Health 2009, 9:15</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-06-15T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6831-9-15</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Oral Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-6831</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>15</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-06-15T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/9/14">
        <title>Impact of Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) on the treatment profile in pilot government dental clinics in Tanzania</title>
        <description>Background:
The predominant mode of treatment in government dental clinics in Tanzania has been tooth extraction because the economy could not support the conventional restorative care which depends on expensive equipment, electricity and piped water systems. Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) was perceived as a suitable alternative. A 3.5-year study was designed to document the changes in the treatment profiles ascribed to the systematic introduction of ART in pilot government dental clinics.
Methods:
Dental practitioners who were working in 13 government dental clinics underwent a 7-day ART training. Treatment record data on teeth extracted and teeth restored by the conventional and ART approaches were collected from these clinics for the three study periods. The mean percentage of ART restorations to total treatment, ART restorations to total restorations, and total restorations to total treatments rendered were computed. Differences between variables were determined by ANOVA, t-test and Chi-square.
Results:
The mean percentage of ART restorations to total treatment rendered was 0.4 (SE = 0.5) and 11.9 (SE = 1.1) during the baseline and second follow-up period respectively (ANOVA mixed model; P &lt; 0.0001). The mean percentage of ART restorations to total restorations rendered at baseline and 2nd follow-up period was 8.4% and 88.9% respectively (ANOVA mixed model; P &lt; 0.0001). The mean percentage of restorations to total treatment rendered at baseline and 2nd follow-up was 3.9% and 13.0%, respectively (ANOVA mixed model; P &lt; 0.0001). Ninety-nine percent of patients were satisfied with ART restorations, 96.6% willing to receive ART restoration again in future, and 94.9% willing to recommend ART treatment to their close relatives.
Conclusion:
ART introduction in pilot government dental clinics raised the number of teeth saved by restorative care. Countrywide introduction of the ART approach in Tanzania is recommended.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/9/14</link>
                <dc:creator>Emil Namakuka Kikwilu</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jo Frencken</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jan Mulder</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Oral Health 2009, 9:14</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-06-08T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6831-9-14</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Oral Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-6831</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>14</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-06-08T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/9/13">
        <title>Validity and reliability of the Child Perceptions Questionnaires applied in Brazilian children</title>
        <description>Background:
The Child Perceptions Questionnaires (CPQ8&#8211;10 and CPQ11&#8211;14) are indicators of child oral health-related quality of life. The aim of this study was to assess the validity and reliability of the self-applied CPQ8&#8211;10 and CPQ11&#8211;14 in Brazilian children, after translations and cultural adaptations in the Brazilian Portuguese language.
Methods:
Schoolchildren were recruited from general populations for pre-testing (n = 80), validity (n = 210), and test-retest reliability (n = 50) studies. They were also examined for dental caries, gingivitis, fluorosis, and malocclusion.
Results:
Children with greater dental caries experience in primary dentition had higher impacts on CPQ domains. Girls had higher scores for CPQ8&#8211;10 domains than boys. Mean CPQ11&#8211;14 scores were highest for 11-year-old children and lowest for 14-year-old children. Construct validity was supported by significant associations between the CPQ8&#8211;10 and CPQ11&#8211;14 scores and the global rating of oral health (r = 0.38, r = 0.43) and overall well-being (r = 0.39, r = 0.60), respectively. The Cronbach&apos;s alpha was 0.95 for both questionnaires. The test-retest reliabilities of the overall CPQ8&#8211;10 and CPQ11&#8211;14 scores were both excellent (ICC = 0.96, ICC = 0.92).
Conclusion:
The Brazilian Portuguese version of CPQ8&#8211;10 and CPQ11&#8211;14 was valuable and reliable for use in the Brazilian child population, although discriminant validity was sporadic due to the fact that impacts are mediated by others factors, such personal, social, and environmental variables.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/9/13</link>
                <dc:creator>Tais Barbosa</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Maria Claudia Tureli</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Maria Beatriz Gaviao</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Oral Health 2009, 9:13</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-05-18T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6831-9-13</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Oral Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-6831</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>13</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-05-18T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/9/12">
        <title>Periodontal conditions, oral Candida albicans and salivary proteins in type 2 diabetic subjects with emphasis on gender.  </title>
        <description>Background:
The association between periodontal conditions, oral yeast colonisation and salivary proteins in subjects with type 2 diabetes (T2D) is not yet documented. The present study aimed to assess the relationship between these variables in type 2 diabetic subjects with reference to gender.
Methods:
Fifty-eight type 2 diabetic subjects (23 males and 35 females) with random blood glucose level &#8805; 11.1 mmol/L were investigated. Periodontal conditions (plaque index [PI], bleeding on probing [BOP], probing pocket depth [PD] (4 to 6 mm and &#8805; 6 mm), oral yeasts, salivary immunoglobulin (Ig) A, IgG and total protein concentrations, and number of present teeth were determined.
Results:
Periodontal conditions (PI [p &lt; 0.00001], BOP [p &lt; 0.01] and PD of 4 to 6 mm [p &lt; 0.001], salivary IgG (&#956;g)/mg protein (p &lt; 0.001) and salivary total protein concentrations (p &lt; 0.05) were higher in type 2 diabetic females with Candida albicans (C. albicans) colonisation compared to males in the same group. Type 2 diabetic females with C. albicans colonisation had more teeth compared to males in the same group (p &lt; 0.0001).
Conclusion:
Clinical and salivary parameters of periodontal inflammation (BOP and IgG (&#956;g)/mg protein) were higher in type 2 diabetic females with oral C. albicans colonisation compared to males in the same group. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the association of gender with these variables in subjects with T2D.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/9/12</link>
                <dc:creator>Fawad Javed</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Lena Klingspor</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ulf Sundin</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mohammad Altamash</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Bjorn Klinge</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Per-Erik Engstrom</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Oral Health 2009, 9:12</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-05-12T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6831-9-12</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Oral Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-6831</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>12</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-05-12T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/9/11">
        <title>Development of Danish version of child oral-health-related quality of life questionnaires (CPQ8-10 and CPQ11-14)</title>
        <description>Background:
The Child Perceptions Questionnaire (CPQ) is a self-reported questionnaire developed to measure oral health-related quality of life in children. The CPQ aims to improve the description of children&apos;s oral health, while taking into consideration the importance of psychological aspects in the concept of health. The CPQ exists in two versions: the CPQ8&#8211;10 for children aged 8&#8211;10 years and the CPQ11&#8211;14 for those aged 11&#8211;14 years. The aim of this study was to develop a Danish version of the CPQ8&#8211;10 and the CPQ11&#8211;14 and to evaluate its validity for use among Danish-speaking children.
Methods:
The instruments were translated from English into Danish in accordance with a recommended translation procedure. Afterwards, they were tested among children aged 8&#8211;10 (n = 120) and 11&#8211;14 years (n = 225). The validity was expressed by the correlation between overall CPQ scores and i) self-reported assessment of the influence of oral conditions on everyday life (not at all, very little, some, a lot, very much) and ii) the self-reported rating of oral health. Furthermore, groups of children with assumed decreased oral health-related quality of life were compared with children with healthy oral conditions. Finally, we examined the internal consistency.
Results:
The correlation between overall CPQ scores and global assessments of the influence of oral conditions on everyday life showed Spearman correlation coefficients of 0.45, P &lt; 0.001 for CPQ8&#8211;10 and 0.50, P &lt; 0.001 for CPQ11&#8211;14. The correlation between overall CPQ scores and the self-reported rating of oral health showed Spearman correlation coefficients of 0.45, P &lt; 0.001 for CPQ8&#8211;10 and 0.17, P = 0.010 for CPQ11&#8211;14.The median overall CPQ8&#8211;10 scores were 7 for individuals with healthy oral conditions, 5 for individuals with cleft lip and palate, and 15 for individuals with rare oral diseases. The median overall CPQ11&#8211;14 scores were 9 for individuals with healthy oral conditions, 9 for individuals with cleft lip and palate, 17.0 for individuals with rare oral diseases, and 22.0 for individuals with fixed orthodontic appliances. There were statistically significant differences between the groups of children with healthy oral conditions and each of the subgroups, except for children with cleft lip and palate.Chronbach&apos;&#945; were 0.82 for CPQ8&#8211;10 and 0.87 for CPQ11&#8211;14.
Conclusion:
The results of this study reveal that the Danish CPQ8&#8211;10 and CPQ11&#8211;14, seem to be valid instruments for measuring oral health-related quality of life in children although its ability to discriminate between children with cleft lip and palate and healthy children seem to be limited.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/9/11</link>
                <dc:creator>Pia Wogelius</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hans Gjorup</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Dorte Haubek</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Rodrigo Lopez</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sven Poulsen</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Oral Health 2009, 9:11</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-04-22T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6831-9-11</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Oral Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-6831</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>11</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-04-22T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/9/10">
        <title>Utilization of the ART approach in a group of public oral health operators in South Africa: a 5-year longitudinal study</title>
        <description>Background:
A significant increase in the proportion of restorations to the number of tooth extractions was reported after the introduction of ART in an academic mobile dental service in South Africa. The changes were ascribed to its less threatening procedure. Based on these findings, ART was subsequently introduced into the public oral health service of Ekurhuleni district in the South African province of Gauteng. This article reports on the 5-year restorative treatment pattern of operators in the Ekurhuleni district, who adopted the ART approach into their daily dental practice.
Methods:
Of the 21 trained operators, 11 had placed more than 10% of restorations using ART at year 1 and were evaluated after 5 years. Data, including number of restored and extracted teeth and type of restoration, were drawn from clinical records 4 months before, and up to 5 years after training. The restoration/extraction ratio (REX score) and the proportion of ART restorations to the total number of restorations were calculated. The paired sample t-test and linear regression analysis were applied.
Results:
The mean percentage of ART restorations after 1 year was 24.0% (SE 7.2) and significantly increased annually to 42.7% (SE 9.2) after 5 years in permanent dentitions. In primary dentitions the mean percentage of ART restorations after 1 year was 80.6% (SE 4.9) and 72.6% (SE 8.8) after 5 years. The mean REX score before ART training was 0.08 (SE 0.03) and 0.07 (SE 0.04) for permanent and primary teeth, respectively and 0.11 (SE 0.03) and 0.17 (SE 0.05) after 5 years.
Conclusion:
Five years after training, ART had been used consistently in this selected group of operators as the predominant restorative treatment used for primary teeth and showed a significant annual increase in permanent teeth. However, this change had not resulted in an increase in the REX score in both dentitions.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/9/10</link>
                <dc:creator>Steffen Mickenautsch</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jo Frencken</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Oral Health 2009, 9:10</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-04-21T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6831-9-10</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Oral Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-6831</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>10</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-04-21T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/9/9">
        <title>Validating an alternate version of the chewing function questionnaire in partially dentate patients</title>
        <description>Background:
The aim of this study was to investigate the dimensionality, reliability, and validity of an alternate version of the chewing function questionnaire in partially dentate patients in Japan.
Methods:
Subjects were partially dentate patients who attended the prosthodontic clinic at Tokyo Medical and Dental University (N = 491, 71% women, mean age (&#177; SD): 63.0 &#177; 11.5 years). The questionnaire asked each subject to rate his or her ability to chew 20 common Japanese foods. For each individual, responses were combined to yield a chewing function summary score, with higher scores indicating better self-reported chewing ability. We used exploratory factor analysis to investigate the scores&apos; dimensionality. For validity assessment, we computed the correlations between the chewing function score and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL, as measured by the Japanese 14-item Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14)) Internal consistency of scores and test-retest reliability were investigated by asking a subset of subjects (N = 62) to complete the questionnaire twice, 2 weeks apart.
Results:
Exploratory factor analysis provided some evidence that self-reported chewing ability can be characterized by a summary score as the original authors suggest. Support for the validity of chewing function scores using the alternate version of the questionnaire was derived from correlations with OHIP-14 scores (r = -0.46, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.53 to -0.39); thus, better chewing ability was associated with less impaired OHRQoL. Internal consistency was &apos;satisfactory,&apos; with a Cronbach&apos;s alpha of 0.90 (lower limit of 95% CI: 0.89). The test-retest reliability was &apos;good,&apos; with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.69 (95% CI: 0.56 to 0.82).
Conclusion:
The alternate version of the chewing function questionnaire can be used as a stand-alone instrument because of the demonstrated reliability and validity of scores obtained using the questionnaire in partially dentate patients.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/9/9</link>
                <dc:creator>Kazuyoshi Baba</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mike John</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mika Inukai</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kumiko Aridome</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Yoshimasa Igarashi</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Oral Health 2009, 9:9</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-03-16T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6831-9-9</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Oral Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-6831</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>9</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-03-16T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/9/8">
        <title>A randomised control trial of the effectiveness of personalised letters sent subsequent to school dental inspections in increasing registration in unregistered children</title>
        <description>Background:
Recent studies have cast doubt on the effectiveness and efficiency of school based dental screening programmes in improving dental attendance or improving dental health. In 2002 the National Dental Inspection Programme was introduced in Scotland which categorises children by their dental health and informs parents of the findings via a personalised letter home and encourages dental registration. In addition, epidemiological data for local and national planning purposes is collected. This replaced an earlier school screening system in Lothian where a generic letter urging registration was sent to children who were identified as not being registered with a dentist. The objective of this study is to compare dental registrations rates among unregistered children in these two school inspection systems with a system where letters were sent home but no dental inspection was carried out.
Methods:
The study was designed as a single blinded, cluster randomised, controlled trial involving 12,765 12&#8211;13-year-old children attending all 65 state Secondary schools in Lothian and Fife during the academic year 2003/4.After stratifying for school size and range of social deprivation, schools were randomly allocated to one of four groups:1. &apos;Traditional&apos; inspection, letter to unregistered children only,2. Letter sent home to unregistered children only, no inspection,3. National Dental Inspection Programme, letter to all children,4. Control group in which the children were neither inspected nor sent a letter.Dental Registration status was compared at baseline and 3 months post inspection.
Results:
The registration levels in both the &apos;Traditional&apos; screening and the NDIP inspection groups rose 3 months post inspection (14% and 15.8% respectively) but were not significantly different from one another or the control group which rose by 15.8% (p &gt; 0.05). The group who were sent a letter home but were not inspected also has a rise in registration levels of 18.1% which was not significantly different from either of the groups who were inspected or the control group (p &gt; 0.05). The only significant predictors of registration were previous registration (p &lt; 0.05) and within those who previously registered, the length of time since last registration (P &lt; 0.001).
Conclusion:
Neither of the two dental inspection methods nor a letter home to unregistered children resulted in a significant rise in registration rates in 12&#8211;13-year-olds compared to a control group of children who received no intervention.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/9/8</link>
                <dc:creator>Chris Cunningham</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Rob Elton</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Gail Topping</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Oral Health 2009, 9:8</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-03-12T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6831-9-8</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Oral Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-6831</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>8</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-03-12T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
