<?xml version = '1.0' encoding = 'UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss/styledrssBMC.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:extra="http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/schemas/extra/" xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/">
	<channel rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/rss">
		<extra:info rdf:parseType="Literal">
			<html:div xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" style="font:14px Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">
				<html:span style="font-weight:bold">This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central</html:span>
				<html:br/>
				<html:span style="font-size: 12px;">It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit <html:br/><html:a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/" style="color:#3333CC; font-size:12px;">http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/</html:a><html:br/>
				</html:span>
			</html:div>
		</extra:info>
		<title>BMC Ophthalmology - Most viewed articles</title>
		<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcophthalmol/mostviewed/</link>
		<description>Most viewed articles in last 30 days from BMC Ophthalmology (ISSN 1471-2415) published by 
				
				BioMed Central
		</description>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
         <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2415/8/5"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2415/8/9"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2415/8/7"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2415/8/10"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2415/8/8"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2415/8/1"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2415/7/7"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2415/8/2"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2415/6/34"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2415/7/15"/>			    
            
            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
    </channel>
    
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2415/8/5">
            
            <title>Intravitreal vs. subtenon triamcinolone acetonide for the treatment of diabetic cystoid macular edema</title>
			<description>Background:
To assess the efficacy of the intravitreal (IVT) injection of Triamcinolone Acetonide (TA) as compared to posterior subtenon (SBT) capsule injection for the treatment of cystoid diabetic macular edema.
Methods:
Fourteen patients with type II diabetes mellitus and on insulin treatment, presenting diffuse cystoid macular edema were recruited. Before TA injection all focal lakes were treated by laser photocoagulation. In the same patients one eye was assigned to 4 mg IVT injection of TA and the fellow eye was then treated with 40 mg SBT injection of TA. Before and one, three and six months after treatment we measured visual acuity with ETDRS chart as well as thickness of the macula with optical coherence tomography (OCT) and intraocular pressure (IOP).
Results:
The eyes treated with an IVT injection displayed significant improvement in visual acuity, both after one (0.491 &#177; 0.070; p &lt; 0.001) and three months (0.500 &#177; 0.089; p &lt; 0.001) of treatment. Significant improvement was displayed also in eyes treated with an SBT injection, again after one (0.455 &#177; 0.069; p &lt; 0.001) and three months (0.427 &#177; 0.065; p &lt; 0.001). The difference between an IVT injection (0.809 &#177; 0.083) and SBT injection (0.460 &#177; 0.072) becomes significant six months after the treatment (p &lt; 0.001).Macular thickness of the eyes treated with IVT injection was significantly reduced both after one (222.7 &#177; 13.4 &#956;m; p &lt; 0.001) and after three months (228.1 &#177; 10.6 &#956;m; p &lt; 0.001) of treatment. The eyes treated with SBT injection displayed significant improvement after one (220.1 &#177; 15.1 &#956;m; p &lt; 0.001) and after three months (231.3 &#177; 10.9 &#956;m; p &lt; 0.001). The difference between the eyes treated with IVT injection (385.2 &#177; 11.3 &#956;m) and those treated with SBT injection (235.4 &#177; 8.7 &#956;m) becomes significant six months after the treatment (p &lt; 0.001).Intraocular pressure of the eyes treated with IVT injection significantly increased after one month (17.7 &#177; 1.1 mm/Hg; p &lt; 0.020), three (18.2 &#177; 1.2 mm/Hg; p &lt; 0.003) and six month (18.1 &#177; 1.3 mm/Hg; p &lt; 0.007) when compared to baseline value (16.1 &#177; 1.402 mm/Hg). In the SBT injection eyes we didn't display a significant increase of intraocular pressure after one (16.4 &#177; 1.2 mm/Hg; p &lt; 0.450), three (16.3 &#177; 1.1 mm/Hg; p &lt; 0.630) and six months (16.2 &#177; 1.1 mm/Hg; p &lt; 0.720) when compared to baseline value (16.2 &#177; 1.3 mm/Hg).
Conclusion:
The parabulbar subtenon approach can be considered a valid alternative to the intravitreal injection.Trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN67086909</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2415/8/5</link>		
			<dc:creator>Mauro Cellini, Alberto Pazzaglia, Eugenio Zamparini, Pietro Leonetti and Emilio C Campos</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>BMC Ophthalmology 2008, 8:5</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 790</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-03-17</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2415-8-5</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Ophthalmology</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1471-2415</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>5</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-17</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2415/8/9">
            
            <title>Effectiveness of mobile-phone short message service (SMS) reminders for ophthalmology outpatient appointments: Observational study</title>
			<description>Background:
Non-attendance for hospital outpatient appointments is a significant problem in many countries. It causes suboptimal use of clinical and administrative staff and financial losses, as well as longer waiting times. The use of Short Message Service (SMS) appointment reminders potentially offers a cost-effective and time-efficient strategy to decrease non-attendance and so improve the efficiency of outpatient healthcare delivery.
Methods:
An SMS text message was sent to patients with scheduled appointments between April and September 2006 in a hospital ophthalmology department in London, reminding them of their appointments. This group acted as the intervention group. Controls were patients with scheduled ophthalmology appointments who did not receive an SMS or any alternative reminder.
Results:
During the period of the study, 11.2% (50/447) of patients who received an SMS appointment reminder were non-attenders, compared to 18.1% (1720/9512) who did not receive an SMS reminder. Non-attendance rates were 38% lower in patients who received an SMS reminder than in patients who did not receive a reminder (RR of non-attendance = 0.62; 95% CI = 0.48 &#8211; 0.80).
Conclusion:
The use of SMS reminders for ophthalmology outpatient appointments was associated with a reduction of 38% in the likelihood of patients not attending their appointments, compared to no appointment reminder. The use of SMS reminders may also be more cost-effective than traditional appointment reminders and require less labour. These findings should be confirmed with a more rigorous study design before a wider roll-out.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2415/8/9</link>		
			<dc:creator>Elizabeth Koshy, Josip Car and Azeem Majeed</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>BMC Ophthalmology 2008, 8:9</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 488</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-05-31</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2415-8-9</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Ophthalmology</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1471-2415</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>9</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-31</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2415/8/7">
            
            <title>Specific detection of fungal pathogens by 18S rRNA gene PCR in microbial keratitis</title>
			<description>Background:
The sensitivity and specificity of 18S rRNA polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in the detection of fungal aetiology of microbial keratitis was determined in thirty patients with clinical diagnosis of microbial keratitis.
Methods:
Corneal scrapings from patients were used for Gram stain, culture and PCR analysis. PCR was performed with primer pairs targeted to the 18S rRNA gene. The result of the PCR was compared with conventional culture and Gram staining method. The PCR positive samples were identified by DNA sequencing of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of the rRNA gene. Main outcome measures were sensitivity and specificity of PCR in the detection of fungus in corneal keratitis.
Results:
Combination of microscopy and culture gave a positive result in 11 of 30 samples of microbial keratitis. PCR detected 10 of 11 samples that were positive by conventional method. One of the 19 samples that was negative by conventional method was positive by PCR. Statistical analysis revealed that the PCR to have a sensitivity of 90.9% and specificity of 94.7% in the detection of a fungal aetiology in microbial keratitis.
Conclusion:
PCR is a rapid, sensitive and useful method to detect fungal aetiology in microbial keratitis.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2415/8/7</link>		
			<dc:creator>Zunaina Embong, Wan Hazabbah Wan Hitam, Chan Yean Yean, Nur Haslindawaty Abdul Rashid, Balqis Kamarudin, Siti Khaironi Zainal Abidin, Sabariah Osman, Zainul F Zainuddin and Manickam Ravichandran</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>BMC Ophthalmology 2008, 8:7</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 291</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-04-29</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2415-8-7</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Ophthalmology</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1471-2415</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>7</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-29</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2415/8/10">
            
            <title>Prevalence of dry eye syndrome and diabetic retinopathy in type 2 diabetic patients</title>
			<description>Background:
This study was performed to assess the prevalence of dry eye syndrome and diabetic retinopathy (DR) in type 2 diabetic patients and their contributing factors.
Methods:
199 type 2 diabetic patients referred to Yazd Diabetes Research Center were consecutively selected. All Subjects were assessed by questionnaire about other diseases and drugs. Dry eye syndrome was assessed with Tear break up time tests and Schirmer. All the subjects underwent indirect ophthalmoscopy and retinal color photography. DR was graded according to early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) criteria.
Results:
Of 199 subjects, 108 patients (54.3%) suffer from dry eye syndrome. Although dry eye syndrome was more common in older and female patients, this association was not significant. But there was significantly association between dry eye syndrome and duration of diabetes (P = 0.01). Dry eye syndrome was more frequent in diabetic patients with DR (P = 0.02). DR was found in 140 patients (70.35%), which included 34 patients (17.1%) with mild non proliferative DR (NPDR), 34 patients (17.1%) with moderate NPDR, 22 patients (11.1%) with severe NPDR and 25 patients (25.1%) with proliferative DR (PDR). There were significant relation between age, sex and duration of diabetes and DR.
Conclusion:
In this study the prevalence of dry eye syndrome was 54.3%. Diabetes and dry eyes appear to have a common association. Further studies need to be undertaken to establish an etiologic relationship. However, examination for dry eye should be an integral part of the assessment of diabetic eye disease.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2415/8/10</link>		
			<dc:creator>Masoud Reza Manaviat, Maryam Rashidi, Mohammad Afkhami-Ardekani and Mohammad Reza Shoja</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>BMC Ophthalmology 2008, 8:10</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 256</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-06-02</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2415-8-10</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Ophthalmology</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1471-2415</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>10</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-02</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2415/8/8">
            
            <title>Rotational stability of the AcrySof SA60TT toric intraocular lenses: A cohort study</title>
			<description>Background:
To evaluate the rotational stability of the three types of AcrySof SA60TT toric intraocular lenses (Alcon, Switzerland) in cataract surgery after the first postoperative week.
Methods:
A retrospective study of 44 eyes in 33 patients. All patients underwent similar uncomplicated phacoemulsification cataract surgery. Seven eyes with corneal astigmatism of less than 1.5 D were implanted with the AcrySof SA60T3 intraocular lens. Seventeen eyes with astigmatism between 1.5 D and 2.25 D received the SA60T4 intraocular lens, and 20 eyes with more than 2.25 D of corneal astigmatism received the SA60T5 intraocular lens. Intraoperatively, the axis of the toric lens was aligned to the steepest axis of the corneal astigmatism. Main outcome measure was the postoperative position of the lens, assessed at 1 week and 3 months, using a specially designed angle measuring eyepiece for the slit lamp.
Results:
There was no significant difference in the rotational stability of the three types of toric intraocular lenses. Overall, the postoperative rotation was within 5 degrees in 95% and within 2 degrees in 68% of eyes. The mean absolute rotation was 2.2 &#177; 2.2 degrees. No lens showed more than 9 degrees of rotation, and no lens required secondary repositioning. There was no trend for either clockwise or anti-clockwise rotation. The surgical procedure did not change the corneal astigmatism.
Conclusion:
Once placed to it's position, each of the three types of the AcrySof SA60TT toric intraocular lenses demonstrate rotational stability in the capsular bag.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2415/8/8</link>		
			<dc:creator>Bruno Zuberbuhler, Theo Signer, Richard Gale and Eduard Haefliger</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>BMC Ophthalmology 2008, 8:8</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 241</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-05-06</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2415-8-8</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Ophthalmology</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1471-2415</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>8</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-06</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2415/8/1">
            
            <title>The importance of central corneal thickness measurements and decision making in general ophthalmology clinics: a masked observational study</title>
			<description>Background:
To assess the impact of knowing central corneal thickness (CCT) on glaucoma management in a United Kingdom district general hospital.
Methods:
A masked observational non-interventional study included 304 eyes of 152 consecutive glaucoma cases attending general clinic. CCT was measured using a hand-held pachymeter. IOP, as measured by the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), was adjusted for CCT using a normogram. Two identical study sheets were retrospectively constructed from each subject's case notes: one included the CCT and adjusted IOP information, the other excluded. Study sheets were randomly presented to a single masked observer to decide glaucoma management. The difference in management decision was noted.
Results:
The mean &#177; standard deviation CCT was 561.5 &#177; 35.7 &#956;m, 538.9 &#177; 41.4 &#956;m, 538.3 &#177; 40.3 &#956;m for ocular hypertension (OHT), primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) and normal pressure glaucoma (NPG) subjects respectively. IOP adjustment was greater than &#177;2 mmHg in 33.9%(103/304) of eyes. CCT and adjusted IOP information led to different treatment option in 37%(55/152). Of the most important changes 20.4%(31/152) cases would have been commenced on additional IOP-lowering medication, 2.0%(3/152) would have been counselled for trabeculectomy surgery and 3.3%(5/152) of the cohort would have been observed rather than treated.
Conclusion:
CCT and adjusted IOP measurement can influence glaucoma management in a clinical context. It helps attribute risk and hence aids patient management decisions.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2415/8/1</link>		
			<dc:creator>Ashish A Patwardhan, Mohammad Khan, Susan P Mollan and Paul Haigh</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>BMC Ophthalmology 2008, 8:1</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 216</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-01-20</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2415-8-1</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Ophthalmology</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1471-2415</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-01-20</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2415/7/7">
            
            <title>Unilateral external ophthalmoplegia in Miller Fisher syndrome: case report</title>
			<description>Background:
A description of the diagnostic features of Miller Fisher syndrome.Case presentationThe clinical presentation, investigation, and subsequent progress of our patient with clinical unilateral external ophthalmoplegia.
Conclusion:
Our case demonstrates the presentation of clinical unilateral external ophthalmoplegia as part of the full triad of Miller Fisher syndrome.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2415/7/7</link>		
			<dc:creator>Jonathan Smith, Lucy Clarke, Philip Severn and Robert Boyce</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>BMC Ophthalmology 2007, 7:7</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 206</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2007-04-17</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2415-7-7</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Ophthalmology</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1471-2415</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>7</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>7</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2007-04-17</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2415/8/2">
            
            <title>Which quality of life score is best for glaucoma patients and why?</title>
			<description>Background:
The glaucomas are generally asymptomatic diseases until they are very advanced. They affect 2% of the population over 40 years of age and therefore represent a significant public health issue. There have been a number of attempts to develop quality of life scales for the disease. This review discusses the pros and cons of these scales and suggests the best of the current ones for use in a clinical setting.
Methods:
Medline, Embase and Google Scholar were searched for relevant articles. No time period was defined and all types of article were included.
Results:
11 Quality of Life scores were identified that have been used with glaucoma patients.
Conclusion:
There is no generally accepted 'best' Quality of Life instrument for use in glaucoma. Many of the scales are biased towards physical symptoms and do little to address the personal or social factors of the disease. Further work is needed to produce scales that address all these areas as well as being simple to administer in a clinical setting.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2415/8/2</link>		
			<dc:creator>Philip Severn, Scott Fraser, Tracy Finch and Carl May</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>BMC Ophthalmology 2008, 8:2</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 203</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-01-23</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2415-8-2</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Ophthalmology</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1471-2415</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>2</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-01-23</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2415/6/34">
            
            <title>Development and validation of a computerized expert system for evaluation of automated visual fields from the Ischemic Optic Neuropathy Decompression Trial</title>
			<description>Background:
The objective of this report is to describe the methods used to develop and validate a computerized system to analyze Humphrey visual fields obtained from patients with non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION) and enrolled in the Ischemic Optic Neuropathy Decompression Trial (IONDT). The IONDT was a multicenter study that included randomized and non-randomized patients with newly diagnosed NAION in the study eye. At baseline, randomized eyes had visual acuity of 20/64 or worse and non-randomized eyes had visual acuity of better than 20/64 or were associated with patients refusing randomization. Visual fields were measured before treatment using the Humphrey Field Analyzer with the 24-2 program, foveal threshold, and size III stimulus.
Methods:
We used visual fields from 189 non-IONDT eyes with NAION to develop the computerized classification system. Six neuro-ophthalmologists ("expert panel") described definitions for visual field patterns defects using 19 visual fields representing a range of pattern defect types. The expert panel then used 120 visual fields, classified using these definitions, to refine the rules, generating revised definitions for 13 visual field pattern defects and 3 levels of severity. These definitions were incorporated into a rule-based computerized classification system run on Excel&#174; software. The computerized classification system was used to categorize visual field defects for an additional 95 NAION visual fields, and the expert panel was asked to independently classify the new fields and subsequently whether they agreed with the computer classification. To account for test variability over time, we derived an adjustment factor from the pooled short term fluctuation. We examined change in defects with and without adjustment in visual fields of study participants who demonstrated a visual acuity decrease within 30 days of NAION onset (progressive NAION).
Results:
Despite an agreed upon set of rules, there was not good agreement among the expert panel when their independent visual classifications were compared. A majority did concur with the computer classification for 91 of 95 visual fields. Remaining classification discrepancies could not be resolved without modifying existing definitions.Without using the adjustment factor, visual fields of 63.6% (14/22) patients with progressive NAION and no central defect, and all (7/7) patients with a paracentral defect, worsened within 30 days of NAION onset. After applying the adjustment factor, the visual fields of the same patients with no initial central defect and 5/7 of the patients with a paracentral defect were seen to worsen.
Conclusion:
The IONDT developed a rule-based computerized system that consistently defines pattern and severity of visual fields of NAION patients for use in a research setting.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2415/6/34</link>		
			<dc:creator>Steven E Feldon, Lori Levin, Roberta W Scherer, Anthony Arnold, Sophia M Chung, Lenworth N Johnson, Gregory Kosmorsky, Steven A Newman, Joanne Katz, Patricia Langenberg, P David Wilson, Shalom E Kelman, Kay Dickersin and members of the Ischemic Optic Neuropathy Decompression Trial Research Group</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>BMC Ophthalmology 2006, 6:34</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 199</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2006-11-20</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2415-6-34</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Ophthalmology</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1471-2415</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>6</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>34</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2006-11-20</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2415/7/15">
            
            <title>Idiopathic intracranial hypertension: the association between weight loss and the requirement for systemic treatment</title>
			<description>Background:
To determine whether weight loss is significantly associated with a discontinuation of treatment for idiopathic intracranial hypertension
Methods:
The notes of 36 patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension under regular review for at least 12 months by a single neuro-ophthalmologist were retrospectively reviewed. Weight was recorded at each assessment and weight loss recommended. Treatment was adjusted according to symptoms, visual function including visual fields and optic disc appearance only. Patients were divided according to duration of continuous follow-up, and then sub-divided as to whether they were on or not on treatment at most recent review and whether weight loss had been achieved compared to presentation. Survival analysis was performed to assess the probability of remaining on treatment having lost weight.
Results:
Considering the patients as 3 groups, those with at least 12 months follow-up (n = 36), those with at least 18 months follow-up (n = 24) and those with 24 months or more follow-up (n = 19), only the group with 24 months or more follow-up demonstrated a significant association between weight loss and stopping systemic treatment (Fisher's exact test, p = 0.04). Survival analysis demonstrated that the probability of being on treatment at 5 years having gained weight was 0.63 and having lost weight was 0.38 (log rank test, p = 0.04). The results suggest that final absolute body mass index is more important than the change in body mass index for patients who stop treatment (Mann Whitney U, p = 0.05).
Conclusion:
This is the first study to demonstrate that weight loss is associated with discontinuation of treatment. Unlike previous studies, our results suggest that final absolute body mass index is more important for stopping treatment than a proportional reduction in weight.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2415/7/15</link>		
			<dc:creator>Roger Wong, Stephen A Madill, Pravin Pandey and Paul Riordan-Eva</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>BMC Ophthalmology 2007, 7:15</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 197</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2007-09-21</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2415-7-15</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Ophthalmology</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1471-2415</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>7</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>15</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2007-09-21</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
		
	<cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
         <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction"/>
         <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution"/>
         <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks"/>
	</cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
