<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/feeds/latestarticles/journal?journal=bmcnurs&amp;quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>BMC Nursing - Latest Articles</title>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcnurs/</link>
        <description>The latest research articles published by BMC Nursing</description>
        <dc:date>2009-09-13T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/8/9" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/8/8" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/8/7" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/8/6" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/8/5" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/8/4" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/8/3" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/8/2" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/8/1" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/7/15" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
        <extra:info rdf:parseType="Literal">
            <html:div style="font:14px Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                <html:span style="font-weight:bold">
                    This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central
                </html:span>
                <html:br />
                <html:span style="font-size: 12px;">
                    It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit
                    <html:br />
                    <html:a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/" style="color:#3333CC; font-size:12px;">
                        http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/
                    </html:a>
                    <html:br />
                </html:span>
            </html:div>
        </extra:info>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/8/9">
        <title>Iranian nurses&apos; constraint for research utilization</title>
        <description>Background:
This paper identifies the views of Iranian clinical nurses regarding the utilization of nursing research in practice. There is a need to understand what restricts Iranian clinical nurses to use research findings. The aim of this study was to identify practicing nurses&apos; view of aspects which they perceived constrain them from research utilization that summarizes and uses research findings to address a nursing practice problem.
Methods:
Data were collected during 6 months by means of face-to face interviews follow by one focus group. Analysis was undertaken using a qualitative content analysis.
Results:
Findings disclosed some key themes perceived by nurses to restrict them to use research findings: level of support require to be research active, to be research minded, the extent of nurses knowledge and skills about research and research utilization, level of educational preparation relating to using research, administration and executive challenges in clinical setting, and theory-practice gap.
Conclusion:
This study identifies constraints that require to be overcome for clinical nurses to actively get involved in research utilization. In this study nurses were generally interested to use research findings. However they felt restricted because of lack of time, lack of peer and manager support and limited knowledge and skills of the research process. This study also confirms that research utilization and the change to research nursing practice are complex issues which require both organizational and educational efforts.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/8/9</link>
                <dc:creator>Mahvash Salsali</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Neda Mehrdad</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Nursing 2009, 8:9</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-09-13T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6955-8-9</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Nursing</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-6955</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>9</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-09-13T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/8/8">
        <title>Women with postpartum depression: &quot;my husband&quot; stories</title>
        <description>Background:
The research on Postpartum Depression (PPD) to date suggests that there is a knowledge gap regarding women&apos;s perception of their partners&apos; role as carer and care activities they perform. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to describe women&apos;s understanding of their partners&apos; or husbands&apos; involvement in the midst of PPD.
Methods:
This study used interview data from a larger study of northern and rural Ontario women&apos;s stories of help-seeking for PPD. The interpretive description approach was used to illustrate the complexity of women&apos;s spousal connections in PPD. Data from a purposive community sample of 27 women who self-identified as having been diagnosed with PPD was used. From the verbatim transcribed interviews a number of data excerpts were identified and labeled as &quot;my husband&quot; stories. Narrative analysis was employed to examine these stories.
Results:
During this time of vulnerability, the husbands&apos; physical, emotional and cognitive availability positively contributed to the women&apos;s functioning and self-appraisals as wife and mother. Their representations of their husbands&apos; &apos;doing for&apos; and/or &apos;being with&apos; promoted their well-being and ultimately protected the family.
Conclusion:
Given that husbands are perceived to be central in mitigating women&apos;s suffering with PPD, the consistent implementation of a triad orientation, that includes woman, child and partner rather than a more traditional and convenient dyadic orientation, is warranted in comprehensive postpartum care. Finally, this study contributes a theoretical understanding of responsive as well as reactive connections between women and family members during the postpartum period.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/8/8</link>
                <dc:creator>Phyllis Montgomery</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Patricia Bailey</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sheri Johnson Purdon</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Susan Snelling</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Carol Kauppi</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Nursing 2009, 8:8</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-09-05T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6955-8-8</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Nursing</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-6955</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>8</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-09-05T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/8/7">
        <title>Children&apos;s vomiting following posterior fossa surgery: A retrospective study 
</title>
        <description>Background:
Nausea and vomiting is a problem for children after neurosurgery and those requiring posterior fossa procedures appear to have a high incidence. This clinical observation has not been quantified nor have risk factors unique to this group of children been elucidated.
Methods:
A six year retrospective chart audit at two Canadian children&apos;s hospitals was conducted. The incidence of nausea and vomiting was extracted. Hierarchical multivariable logistic regression was used to quantify risk and protective factors at 120 hours after surgery and early vs. late vomiting.
Results:
The incidence of vomiting over a ten day postoperative period was 76.7%. Documented vomiting ranged from single events to greater than 20 over the same period. In the final multivariable model: adolescents (age 12 to &lt;17) were less likely to vomit by 120 hours after surgery than other age groups; those who received desflurane, when compared to all other volatile anesthetics, were more likely to vomit, yet the use of ondansetron with desflurane decre kelihood. Children who had intraoperative ondansetron were more likely to vomit in the final multivariable model (perhaps because of its use, in the clinical judgment of the anesthesiologist, for children considered at risk). Children who started vomiting in the first 24 hours were more likely to be school age (groups 4 to &lt;7 and 7 to &lt;12) and receive desflurane. Nausea was not well documented and was therefore not analyzed.
Conclusion:
The incidence of vomiting in children after posterior fossa surgery is sufficient to consider all children requiring these procedures to be at high risk for POV. Nausea requires better assessment and documentation.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/8/7</link>
                <dc:creator>Susan Neufeld</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Christine Newburn-Cook</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Donald Schopflocher</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Belinda Dundon</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Herta Yu</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jane Drummond</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Nursing 2009, 8:7</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-07-13T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6955-8-7</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Nursing</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-6955</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>7</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-07-13T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/8/6">
        <title>A randomized cross-over study of the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation among females performing 30:2 and Hands-Only cardiopulomary resuscitation </title>
        <description>Background:
Hands-Only cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is recommended for use on adult victims of witnessed out-of-hospital (OOH) sudden cardiac arrest or in instances where rescuers cannot perform ventilations while maintaining minimally interrupted quality compressions. Promotion of Hands-Only CPR should improve the incidence of bystander CPR and, subsequently, survival from OOH cardiac arrest; but, little is known about a rescuer&apos;s ability to deliver continuous chest compressions of adequate rate and depth for periods typical of emergency services response time. This study evaluated chest compression rate and depth as subjects performed Hands-Only CPR for 10 minutes. For comparison purposes, each also performed chest compressions with ventilations (30:2) CPR. It also evaluated fatigue and changes in body biomechanics associated with each type of CPR.
Methods:
Twenty healthy female volunteers certified in basic life support performed Hands-Only CPR and 30:2 CPR on a manikin. A mixed model repeated measures cross-over design evaluated chest compression rate and depth, changes in fatigue (chest compression force, perceived exertion, and blood lactate level), and changes in electromyography and joint kinetics and kinematics.
Results:
All subjects completed 10 minutes of 30:2 CPR; but, only 17 completed 10 minutes of Hands-Only CPR. Rate, average depth, percentage at least 38 millimeters deep, and force of compressions were significantly lower in Hands-Only CPR than in 30:2 CPR. Rates were maintained; but, compression depth and force declined significantly from beginning to end CPR with most decrement occurring in the first two minutes. Perceived effort and joint torque changes were significantly greater in Hands-Only CPR. Performance was not influenced by age.
Conclusion:
Hands-Only CPR required greater effort and was harder to sustain than 30:2 CPR. It is not known whether the observed greater decrement in chest compression depth associated with Hands-Only CPR would offset the potential physiological benefit of having fewer interruptions in compressions during an actual resuscitation. The dramatic decrease in compression depth in the first two minutes reinforces current recommendations that rescuers take turns performing compressions, switching every two minutes or less. Further study is recommended to determine the impact of real-time feedback and dispatcher coaching on rescuer performance.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/8/6</link>
                <dc:creator>Cynthia Trowbridge</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jesal Parekh</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mark Ricard</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jerald Potts</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>W Patrickson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Carolyn Cason</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Nursing 2009, 8:6</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-07-07T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6955-8-6</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Nursing</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-6955</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>6</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-07-07T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/8/5">
        <title>Practice nursing in Australia: A review of education and career pathways </title>
        <description>Background:
Nurses in Australia are often not educated in their pre registration years to meet the needs of primary care. Careers in primary care may not be as attractive to nursing graduates as high-tech settings such as intensive or acute care. Yet, it is in primary care that increasingly complex health problems are managed. The Australian government has invested in incentives for general practices to employ practice nurses. However, no policy framework has been developed for practice nursing to support career development and post-registration education and training programs are developed in an ad hoc manner and are not underpinned by core professional competencies. This paper reports on a systematic review undertaken to establish the available evidence on education models and career pathways with a view to enhancing recruitment and retention of practice nurses in primary care in Australia.
Methods:
Search terms describing education models, career pathways and policy associated with primary care (practice) nursing were established. These search terms were used to search electronic databases. The search strategy identified 1394 citations of which 408 addressed one or more of the key search terms on policy, education and career pathways. Grey literature from the UK and New Zealand internet sites were sourced and examined. The UK and New Zealand Internet sites were selected because they have well established and advanced developments in education and career pathways for practice nurses.Two reviewers examined titles, abstracts and studies, based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Disagreement between the reviewers was resolved by consensus or by a third reviewer.
Results:
Significant advances have been made in New Zealand and the UK towards strengthening frameworks for primary care nursing education and career pathways. However, in Australia there is no policy at national level prepare nurses to work in primary care sector and no framework for education or career pathways for nurses working in that sector.
Conclusion:
There is a need for national training standards and a process of accreditation for practice nursing in Australia to support the development of a responsive and sustainable nursing workforce in primary care and to provide quality education and career pathways.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/8/5</link>
                <dc:creator>Rhian Parker</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Helen Keleher</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Karen Francis</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Omar Abdulwadud</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Nursing 2009, 8:5</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-05-27T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6955-8-5</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Nursing</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-6955</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>5</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-05-27T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/8/4">
        <title>Competency, confidence and conflicting evidence: key issues affecting health visitors&apos; use of research evidence in practice</title>
        <description>Background:
Health visitors play a pivotal position in providing parents with up-to-date evidence-based care on child health. The recent controversy over the safety of the MMR vaccine has drawn attention to the difficulties they face when new research which raises doubts about current guidelines and practices is published. In the aftermath of the MMR controversy, this paper investigates the sources health visitors use to find out about new research evidence on immunisation and examines barriers and facilitators to using evidence in practice. It also assesses health visitors&apos; confidence in using research evidence.
Methods:
Health visitors were recruited from the 2007 UK Community Practitioners&apos; and Health Visitors&apos; Association conference. All delegates were eligible to complete the questionnaire if in their current professional role they advise parents about childhood immunisation or administer vaccines to children. Of 228 who were eligible, 185 completed the survey (81.1%).
Results:
These health visitors used a wide range of resources to find out about new research evidence on childhood immunisation. Popular sources included information leaflets and publications, training days, nursing journals and networking with colleagues. A lack of time was cited as the main barrier to searching for new evidence. The most common reason given for not using research in practice was a perception of conflicting research evidence. Understanding the evidence was a key facilitator. Health visitors expressed less confidence about searching and explaining research on childhood immunisation than evidence on weaning and a baby&apos;s sleep position.
Conclusion:
Even motivated health visitors feel they lack the time and, in some cases, the skills to locate and appraise research evidence. This research suggests that of the provision of already-appraised research would help to keep busy health professionals informed, up-to-date and confident in responding to public concerns, particularly when there is apparently conflicting evidence. Health visitors&apos; relative lack of confidence about research on immunisation suggests there is still a job to be done in rebuilding confidence in evidence on childhood immunisation. Further research on what makes evidence more comprehensible, convincing and useable would contribute to understanding how to bridge the gulf between evidence and practice.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/8/4</link>
                <dc:creator>Shona Hilton</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Helen Bedford</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Michael Calnan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kate Hunt</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Nursing 2009, 8:4</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-04-20T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6955-8-4</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Nursing</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-6955</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>4</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-04-20T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/8/3">
        <title>A national cross-sectional study on nurses&apos; intent to leave and job satisfaction in Lebanon: implications for policy and practice</title>
        <description>Background:
Lebanon is perceived to be suffering from excessive nurse migration, low job satisfaction, poor retention and high turnover. Little is known about the magnitude of nurse migration and predictors of intent to leave. The objective of this study is to determine the extent of nurses&apos; intent to leave and examine the impact of job satisfaction on intent to leave. Intent to leave was explored to differentiate between nurses who intend to leave their current hospital and those intending to leave the country.
Methods:
A cross-sectional design was used to survey nurses currently practicing in Lebanese hospitals. A total of 1,793 nurses employed in 69 hospitals were surveyed. Questions included those relating to demographic characteristics, intent to leave, and the McCloskey Mueller Satisfaction Scale. Univariate descriptive statistics were conducted on sample&apos;s demographic characteristics including gender, age, marital status and educational level. Bivariate associations between intent to leave and demographic characteristics were tested using Pearson Chi-square. Differences in satisfaction scores between nurses with and without intent to leave were tested using t-test and ANOVA f-test. A multinomial logistic regression model was created to predict intent to leave the hospital and intent to leave the country.
Results:
An alarming 67.5% reported intent to leave within the next 1 to 3 years, many of whom disclosed intent to leave the country (36.7%). Within nurses who reported an intent to leave the hospital but stay in Lebanon, 22.1% plan to move to a different health organization in Lebanon, 29.4% plan to leave the profession and 48.5% had other plans. Nurses reported being least satisfied with extrinsic rewards. A common predictor of intent to leave the hospital and the country was dissatisfaction with extrinsic rewards. Other predictors of intent to leave (country or hospital) included age, gender, marital status, degree type, and dissatisfaction with scheduling, interaction opportunities, and control and responsibility.
Conclusion:
Study findings demonstrate linkages between job satisfaction, intent to leave, and migration in a country suffering from a nursing shortage. Findings can be used by health care managers and policy makers in managing job satisfaction, intent to leave and nurse migration.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/8/3</link>
                <dc:creator>Fadi El-Jardali</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hani Dimassi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nuhad Dumit</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Diana Jamal</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Gladys Mouro</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Nursing 2009, 8:3</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-03-12T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6955-8-3</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Nursing</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-6955</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-03-12T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/8/2">
        <title>Practice Nurses&apos; views of their role in the management of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/Myalagic Encephalitis: a qualitative study</title>
        <description>Background:
NICE guidelines suggest that patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/Myalgic Encephalitis (CFS/ME) should be managed in Primary Care. Practice Nurses are increasingly being involved in the management of long-term conditions, so are likely to also have a growing role in managing CFS/ME. However their attitudes to, and experiences of patients with CFS/ME and its management must be explored to understand what barriers may exist in developing their role for this group of patients. The aim of this study was to explore Practice Nurses&apos; understanding and beliefs about CFS/ME and its management.
Methods:
Semi-structured interviews with 29 Practice Nurses. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and an iterative approach used to develop themes from the dataset.
Results:
Practice nurses had limited understanding about CFS/ME which had been largely gained through contact with patients, friends, personal experiences and the media rather than formal training. They had difficulty seeing CFS/ME as a long term condition. They did identify a potential role they could have in management of CFS/ME but devalued their own skills in psychological intervention, and suggested counselling would be an appropriate therapeutic option. They recognised a need for further training and on going supervision from both medical and psychological colleagues. Some viewed the condition as contentious and held pejorative views about CFS/ME. Such scepticism and negative attitudes will be a significant barrier to the management of patients with CFS/ME in primary care.
Conclusion:
The current role of Practice Nurses in the ongoing management of patients with CFS/ME is limited. Practice Nurses have little understanding of the evidence-base for treatment of CFS/ME, particularly psychological therapies, describing management options in terms of advice giving, self-help or counselling. Practice Nurses largely welcomed the potential development of their role in this area, but identified barriers and training needs which must be addressed to enable them to feel confident managing of patients with this condition. Training must begin by addressing negative attitudes to patients with CFS/ME.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/8/2</link>
                <dc:creator>Carolyn Chew-Graham</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Rebecca Dixon</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jonathan Shaw</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nina Smyth</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Karina Lovell</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sarah Peters</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Nursing 2009, 8:2</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-01-22T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6955-8-2</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Nursing</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-6955</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>2</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-01-22T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/8/1">
        <title>Older cancer patients&apos; information and support needs surrounding treatment: An evaluation through the eyes of patients, relatives and professionals</title>
        <description>Background:
Providing cancer patients with adequate treatment information is important for patients&apos; health, well-being and satisfaction. Nurses play an important role in patient education. So far, few studies focused on the specific information needs of older cancer patients surrounding chemotherapy treatment. Given the growing incidence of cancer among older individuals, insight in these needs is crucial. This article describes the views of older cancer patients, their relatives and professionals on older patients&apos; specific communication needs regarding chemotherapy treatment.
Methods:
A qualitative design was used. Five focus group interviews were held with older cancer patients and their partners (two groups) and professionals with a background in nursing, oncology, gerontology and/or patient-provider communication (three groups). In addition, face to face in-depth interviews were conducted with older cancer patients. A total number of 38 patients and relatives participated, with a mean age of 67.6 years. The focus groups and interviews were audio-recorded for subsequent transcription and analysis.
Results:
Older people have more difficulties processing and remembering information than younger ones. A trustful environment appears to be a prerequisite for reflection of older patients on the information provided and individualized information is essential to enhance memory of information. However, the results show that both patients and professionals experienced insufficient exploration of the patients&apos; personal situation and individual information needs. Patients also strengthened the importance of sensitive communication, e.g. showing empathy en emotional support, throughout the continuum of cancer care. Moreover, potential areas of improvement were identified, including engaging the patients&apos; relatives and encouraging patients and relatives to ask questions.
Conclusion:
Patient education should be more tailored to older cancer patients&apos; individual information and support needs and abilities by exploring the required amount and content of information, treatment goals and expectations. Nurses can establish a trustful environment by showing empathy and emotional support. Recommendations are given to enhance recall of information in older patients; information giving should be more structured by summarizing and repeating the most important, personally relevant information. To adapt to specific information needs, communication training for nurses and the use of aids such as a question prompt sheet could be useful tools.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/8/1</link>
                <dc:creator>Elise Posma</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Julia van Weert</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jesse Jansen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jozien Bensing</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Nursing 2009, 8:1</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-01-19T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6955-8-1</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Nursing</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-6955</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-01-19T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/7/15">
        <title>Young carers in Germany: to live on as normal as possible - a grounded theory study</title>
        <description>Background:
In contrast to a growing body of research on the situation of adult family care givers, in Germany hardly anything is known about the situation of children and teenagers who are involved in the care of their relatives.
Methods:
In this Grounded Theory study 81 semi structured interviews have been carried out with children and their parents in 34 families, in which one member is chronically ill. 41 children and 41 parents participated and the sample is heterogeneous and diverse.
Results:
On the one hand, there is the phenomenon &apos;keeping the family together&quot;, which describes how families themselves cope with the chronic illness and also, which tasks to what extent are being shifted and redistributed within the family in order to manage daily life. Influencing factors, the children&apos;s motives as well as the impact on the children also belong to this phenomenon. The second phenomenon &apos;to live a normal course of life&apos; describes concrete wishes and expectations of support for the family to manage the hindered daily life. These two phenomena linked together constitute the &apos;model of experience and construction of familial care, in which children take over an active role&apos;.
Conclusion:
It will be discussed, that the more families are in dire need of support, the more their distress becomes invisible, furthermore, that management of chronic illness is a process, in which the entire family is involved, and thus needs to be considered, and finally, that young carer&apos;s relief is not possible without relief of their parents.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6955/7/15</link>
                <dc:creator>Sabine Metzing-Blau</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Wilfried Schnepp</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Nursing 2008, 7:15</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2008-12-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6955-7-15</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Nursing</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-6955</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>7</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>15</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2008-12-24T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
