<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/feeds/mostaccessed/journal?journal=bmchealthservres&amp;quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>BMC Health Services Research - Most accessed articles</title>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmchealthservres/</link>
        <description>The most accessed research articles published by BMC Health Services Research</description>
        <dc:date>2009-11-08T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/9/201" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/9/195" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/9/181" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/6/44" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/9/200" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/9/166" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/9/197" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/9/187" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/9/198" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/9/199" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
        <extra:info rdf:parseType="Literal">
            <html:div style="font:14px Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                <html:span style="font-weight:bold">
                    This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central
                </html:span>
                <html:br />
                <html:span style="font-size: 12px;">
                    It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit
                    <html:br />
                    <html:a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/" style="color:#3333CC; font-size:12px;">
                        http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/
                    </html:a>
                    <html:br />
                </html:span>
            </html:div>
        </extra:info>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/9/201">
        <title>Use of information and communication technologies to support effective work practice innovation in the health sector: a multi-site study </title>
        <description>Background:
Widespread adoption of information and communication technologies (ICT) is a key strategy to meet the challenges facing health systems internationally of increasing demands, rising costs, limited resources and workforce shortages. Despite the rapid increase in ICT investment, uptake and acceptance has been slow and the benefits fewer than expected. Absent from the research literature has been a multi-site investigation of how ICT can support and drive innovative work practice. This Australian-based project will assess the factors that allow health service organisations to harness ICT, and the extent to which such systems drive the creation of new sustainable models of service delivery which increase capacity and provide rapid, safe, effective, affordable and sustainable health care.DesignA multi-method approach will measure current ICT impact on workforce practices and develop and test new models of ICT use which support innovations in work practice. The research will focus on three large-scale commercial ICT systems being adopted in Australia and other countries: computerised ordering systems, ambulatory electronic medical record systems, and emergency medicine information systems. We will measure and analyse each system&apos;s role in supporting five key attributes of work practice innovation: changes in professionals&apos; roles and responsibilities; integration of best practice into routine care; safe care practices; team-based care delivery; and active involvement of consumers in care.DiscussionA socio-technical approach to the use of ICT will be adopted to examine and interpret the workforce and organisational complexities of the health sector. The project will also focus on ICT as a potentially disruptive innovation that challenges the way in which health care is delivered and consequently leads some health professionals to view it as a threat to traditional roles and responsibilities and a risk to existing models of care delivery. Such views have stifled debate as well as wider explorations of ICT&apos;s potential benefits, yet firm evidence of the effects of role changes on health service outcomes is limited. This project will provide important evidence about the role of ICT in supporting new models of care delivery across multiple healthcare organizations and about the ways in which innovative work practice change is diffused.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/9/201</link>
                <dc:creator>Johanna Westbrook</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jeffrey Braithwaite</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kathryn Gibson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Richard Paoloni</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Joanne Callen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Andrew Georgiou</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nerida Creswick</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Louise Robertson</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Health Services Research 2009, 9:201</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-11-08T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6963-9-201</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Health Services Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-6963</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>201</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-11-08T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/9/195">
        <title>An effectiveness analysis of healthcare systems using a systems theoretic approach</title>
        <description>Background:
The use of accreditation and quality measurement and reporting to improve healthcare quality and patient safety has been widespread across many countries. A review of the literature reveals no association between the accreditation system and the quality measurement and reporting systems, even when hospital compliance with these systems is satisfactory. Improvement of health care outcomes needs to be based on an appreciation of the whole system that contributes to those outcomes. The research literature currently lacks an appropriate analysis and is fragmented among activities. This paper aims to propose an integrated research model of these two systems and to demonstrate the usefulness of the resulting model for strategic research planning.Methods/designTo achieve these aims, a systematic integration of the healthcare accreditation and quality measurement/reporting systems is structured hierarchically. A holistic systems relationship model of the administration segment is developed to act as an investigation framework. A literature-based empirical study is used to validate the proposed relationships derived from the model. Australian experiences are used as evidence for the system effectiveness analysis and design base for an adaptive-control study proposal to show the usefulness of the system model for guiding strategic research.
Results:
Three basic relationships were revealed and validated from the research literature. The systemic weaknesses of the accreditation system and quality measurement/reporting system from a system flow perspective were examined. The approach provides a system thinking structure to assist the design of quality improvement strategies. The proposed model discovers a fourth implicit relationship, a feedback between quality performance reporting components and choice of accreditation components that is likely to play an important role in health care outcomes. An example involving accreditation surveyors is developed that provides a systematic search for improving the impact of accreditation on quality of care and hence on the accreditation/performance correlation.
Conclusion:
There is clear value in developing a theoretical systems approach to achieving quality in health care. The introduction of the systematic surveyor-based search for improvements creates an adaptive-control system to optimize health care quality. It is hoped that these outcomes will stimulate further research in the development of strategic planning using systems theoretic approach for the improvement of quality in health care.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/9/195</link>
                <dc:creator>Sheuwen Chuang</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kerry Inder</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Health Services Research 2009, 9:195</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-10-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6963-9-195</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Health Services Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-6963</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>195</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-10-24T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/9/181">
        <title>Community Health Needs Assessment with Precede-proceed Model: a mixed methods study</title>
        <description>Background:
Community health services in China have developed over the last few decades. In order to use limited health resources more effectively, we conducted a community health needs assessment. This aimed to provide an understanding of the community&apos;s health problems and the range of potential factors affecting risk behaviours for the priority health problems.
Methods:
We used the precede-proceed model for the needs assessment. Triangulation of data, methods and researchers were employed in data collection.
Results:
Main findings include: cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) were identified as the priority health problems in the study communities; risk factors associated with CVDs included smoking, physical inactivity and unhealthy eating behaviours, particularly amongst male residents with low education level; factors negatively affecting behaviours were classified into predisposing factors (limited knowledge, beliefs and lack of perceived needs), enabling factors (limited access to health promotion activities, unawareness of health promotion, lack of work-site and school health promotion, absence of health promotion related policy) and reinforcing factors (culture). Policies and organization were not perfect; there were limited staff skilled in providing health promotion in the community.
Conclusion:
CVDs were identified by the communities as priority health problems. Future health programs should focus on smoking, physical inactivity and unhealthy eating behaviours. Behaviour change strategies should take predisposing factors, enabling factors and reinforcing factors into consideration. Policies, organization and human resource need strengthening.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/9/181</link>
                <dc:creator>Ying Li</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jia Cao</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hui Lin</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kun Li</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Yang Wang</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jia He</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Health Services Research 2009, 9:181</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-10-09T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6963-9-181</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Health Services Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-6963</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>181</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-10-09T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/6/44">
        <title>The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire: psychometric properties, benchmarking data, and emerging research</title>
        <description>Background:
There is widespread interest in measuring healthcare provider attitudes about issues relevant to patient safety (often called safety climate or safety culture). Here we report the psychometric properties, establish benchmarking data, and discuss emerging areas of research with the University of Texas Safety Attitudes Questionnaire.
Methods:
Six cross-sectional surveys of health care providers (n = 10,843) in 203 clinical areas (including critical care units, operating rooms, inpatient settings, and ambulatory clinics) in three countries (USA, UK, New Zealand). Multilevel factor analyses yielded results at the clinical area level and the respondent nested within clinical area level. We report scale reliability, floor/ceiling effects, item factor loadings, inter-factor correlations, and percentage of respondents who agree with each item and scale.
Results:
A six factor model of provider attitudes fit to the data at both the clinical area and respondent nested within clinical area levels. The factors were: Teamwork Climate, Safety Climate, Perceptions of Management, Job Satisfaction, Working Conditions, and Stress Recognition. Scale reliability was 0.9. Provider attitudes varied greatly both within and among organizations. Results are presented to allow benchmarking among organizations and emerging research is discussed.
Conclusion:
The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire demonstrated good psychometric properties. Healthcare organizations can use the survey to measure caregiver attitudes about six patient safety-related domains, to compare themselves with other organizations, to prompt interventions to improve safety attitudes and to measure the effectiveness of these interventions.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/6/44</link>
                <dc:creator>John Sexton</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Robert Helmreich</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Torsten Neilands</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kathy Rowan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Keryn Vella</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>James Boyden</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Peter Roberts</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Eric Thomas</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Health Services Research 2006, 6:44</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2006-04-03T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6963-6-44</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Health Services Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-6963</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>6</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>44</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2006-04-03T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/9/200">
        <title>Comparison of distance measures in spatial analytical modeling for health service planning</title>
        <description>Background:
Several methodological approaches have been used to estimate distance in health service research. In this study, focusing on cardiac catheterization services, Euclidean, Manhattan, and the less widely known Minkowski distance metrics are used to estimate distances from patient residence to hospital. Distance metrics typically produce less accurate estimates than actual measurements, but each metric provides a single model of travel over a given network. Therefore, distance metrics, unlike actual measurements, can be directly used in spatial analytical modeling. Euclidean distance is most often used, but unlikely the most appropriate metric. Minkowski distance is a more promising method. Distances estimated with each metric are contrasted with road distance and travel time measurements, and an optimized Minkowski distance is implemented in spatial analytical modeling.
Methods:
Road distance and travel time are calculated from the postal code of residence of each patient undergoing cardiac catheterization to the pertinent hospital. The Minkowski metric is optimized, to approximate travel time and road distance, respectively. Distance estimates and distance measurements are then compared using descriptive statistics and visual mapping methods. The optimized Minkowski metric is implemented, via the spatial weight matrix, in a spatial regression model identifying socio-economic factors significantly associated with cardiac catheterization.
Results:
The Minkowski coefficient that best approximates road distance is 1.54; 1.31 best approximates travel time. The latter is also a good predictor of road distance, thus providing the best single model of travel from patient&apos;s residence to hospital. The Euclidean metric and the optimal Minkowski metric are alternatively implemented in the regression model, and the results compared. The Minkowski method produces more reliable results than the traditional Euclidean metric.
Conclusion:
Road distance and travel time measurements are the most accurate estimates, but cannot be directly implemented in spatial analytical modeling. Euclidean distance tends to underestimate road distance and travel time; Manhattan distance tends to overestimate both. The optimized Minkowski distance partially overcomes their shortcomings; it provides a single model of travel over the network. The method is flexible, suitable for analytical modeling, and more accurate than the traditional metrics; its use ultimately increases the reliability of spatial analytical models.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/9/200</link>
                <dc:creator>Rizwan Shahid</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Stefania Bertazzon</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Merril Knudtson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>William Ghali</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Health Services Research 2009, 9:200</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-11-06T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6963-9-200</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Health Services Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-6963</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>200</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-11-06T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/9/166">
        <title>Physician career satisfaction within specialties</title>
        <description>Background:
Specialty-specific data on career satisfaction may be useful for understanding physician workforce trends and for counseling medical students about career options.
Methods:
We analyzed cross-sectional data from 6,590 physicians (response rate, 53%) in Round 4 (2004-2005) of the Community Tracking Study Physician Survey. The dependent variable ranged from +1 to -1 and measured satisfaction and dissatisfaction with career. Forty-two specialties were analyzed with survey-adjusted linear regressions
Results:
After adjusting for physician, practice, and community characteristics, the following specialties had significantly higher satisfaction levels than family medicine: pediatric emergency medicine (regression coefficient = 0.349); geriatric medicine (0.323); other pediatric subspecialties (0.270); neonatal/prenatal medicine (0.266); internal medicine and pediatrics (combined practice) (0.250); pediatrics (0.250); dermatology (0.249);and child and adolescent psychiatry (0.203). The following specialties had significantly lower satisfaction levels than family medicine: neurological surgery (-0.707); pulmonary critical care medicine (-0.273); nephrology (-0.206); and obstetrics and gynecology (-0.188). We also found satisfaction was significantly and positively related to income and employment in a medical school but negatively associated with more than 50 work-hours per-week, being a full-owner of the practice, greater reliance on managed care revenue, and uncontrollable lifestyle. We observed no statistically significant gender differences and no differences between African-Americans and whites.
Conclusion:
Career satisfaction varied across specialties. A number of stakeholders will likely be interested in these findings including physicians in specialties that rank high and low and students contemplating specialty. Our findings regarding &quot;less satisfied&quot; specialties should elicit concern from residency directors and policy makers since they appear to be in critical areas of medicine.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/9/166</link>
                <dc:creator>J Paul Leigh</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Daniel Tancredi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Richard Kravitz</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Health Services Research 2009, 9:166</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-09-16T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6963-9-166</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Health Services Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-6963</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>166</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-09-16T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/9/197">
        <title>The Case for Developing Publicly-Accessible Datasets for Health Services Research in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) Region</title>
        <description>Background:
The existence of publicly-accessible datasets comprised a significant opportunity for health services research to evolve into a science that supports health policy making and evaluation, proper inter- and intra-organizational decisions and optimal clinical interventions. This paper investigated the role of publicly-accessible datasets in the enhancement of health care systems in the developed world and highlighted the importance of their wide existence and use in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region.DiscussionA search was conducted to explore the availability of publicly-accessible datasets in the MENA region. Although datasets were found in most countries in the region, those were limited in terms of their relevance, quality and public-accessibility. With rare exceptions, publicly-accessible datasets - as present in the developed world - were absent. Based on this, we proposed a gradual approach and a set of recommendations to promote the development and use of publicly-accessible datasets in the region. These recommendations target potential actions by governments, researchers, policy makers and international organizations.SummaryWe argue that the limited number of publicly-accessible datasets in the MENA region represents a lost opportunity for the evidence-based advancement of health systems in the region. The availability and use of publicly-accessible datasets would encourage policy makers in this region to base their decisions on solid representative data and not on estimates or small-scale studies; researchers would be able to exercise their expertise in a meaningful manner to both, policy makers and the public. The population of the MENA countries would exercise the right to benefit from locally- or regionally-based studies, versus imported and in &apos;best cases&apos; customized ones. Furthermore, on a macro scale, the availability of regionally comparable publicly-accessible datasets would allow for the exploration of regional variations and benchmarking studies.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/9/197</link>
                <dc:creator>Shadi Saleh</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mohamad Alameddine</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Fadi El-Jardali</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Health Services Research 2009, 9:197</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-10-29T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6963-9-197</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Health Services Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-6963</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>197</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-10-29T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/9/187">
        <title>Overcoming language barriers with foreign-language speaking patients: a survey to investigate intra-hospital variation in attitudes and practices </title>
        <description>Background:
Use of available interpreter services by hospital clincial staff is often suboptimal, despite evidence that trained interpreters contribute to quality of care and patient safety. Examination of intra-hospital variations in attitudes and practices regarding interpreter use can contribute to identifying factors that facilitate good practice.The purpose of this study was to describe attitudes, practices and preferences regarding communication with limited French proficiency (LFP) patients, examine how these vary across professions and departments within the hospital, and identify factors associated with good practices.
Methods:
A self-administered questionnaire was mailed to random samples of 700 doctors, 700 nurses and 93 social workers at the Geneva University Hospitals, Switzerland.
Results:
Seventy percent of respondents encounter LFP patients at least once a month, but this varied by department.66% of respondents said they preferred working with ad hoc interpreters (patient&apos;s family and bilingual staff), mainly because these were easier to access. During the 6 months preceding the study, ad hoc interpreters were used at least once by 71% of respondents, and professional interpreters were used at least once by 51%.Overall, only nine percent of respondents had received any training in how and why to work with a trained interpreter. Only 23.2% of respondents said the clinical service in which they currently worked encouraged them to use professional interpreters. Respondents working in services where use of professional interpreters was encouraged were more likely to be of the opinion that the hospital should systematically provide a professional interpreter to LFP patients (40.3%) as compared with those working in a department that discouraged use of professional interpreters (15.5%) and they used professional interpreters more often during the previous 6 months.
Conclusion:
Attitudes and practices regarding communication with LFP patients vary across professions and hospital departments. In order to foster an institution-wide culture conducive to ensuring adequate communication with LFP patients will require both the development of a hospital-wide policy and service-level activities aimed at reinforcing this policy and putting it into practice.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/9/187</link>
                <dc:creator>Patricia Hudelson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sarah Vilpert</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Health Services Research 2009, 9:187</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-10-15T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6963-9-187</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Health Services Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-6963</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>187</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-10-15T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/9/198">
        <title>The Impact of Statins on Health Services Utilization and Mortality in Older Adults Discharged from Hospital with Ischemic Heart Disease: a cohort study.</title>
        <description>Background:
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) carries a high burden of morbidity and mortality and is associated with significant utilization of health care resources, especially in the elderly. Numerous randomized trials have established the efficacy of cholesterol reduction with statin medications in decreasing mortality in high-risk populations. However, it is not known what the effect of the utilization of these medications in complex older adults has had on mortality and on the utilization of health services, such as physician visits, hospitalizations or cardiovascular procedures.
Methods:
This project linked clinical and hospital data from the Improving Cardiovascular Outcomes in Nova Scotia (ICONS) database with administrative data from the Population Health Research Unit to identify all older adults hospitalized with ischemic heart disease between October 15, 1997 and March 31, 2001. All patients were followed for at least one year or until death. Multiple regression techniques, including Cox proportional hazards models and generalized linear models were employed to compare health services utilization and mortality for statin users and non-statin users.
Results:
Of 4232 older adults discharged alive from the hospital, 1629 (38%) received a statin after discharge. In multivariate models after adjustment for demographic and clinical characteristics, and propensity score, statins were associated with a 26% reduction in all- cause mortality (hazard ratio (HR) 0.74, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.63-0.88). However, statin use was not associated with subsequent reductions in health service utilization, including re-hospitalizations (HR, 0.98, 95% CI 0.91-1.06), physician visits (relative risk (RR) 0.97, 95% CI 0.92-1.02) or coronary revascularization procedures (HR 1.15, 95% CI 0.97-1.36).
Conclusion:
As the utilization of statins continues to grow, their impact on the health care system will continue to be important. Future studies are needed to continue to ensure that those who would realize significant benefit from the medication receive it.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/9/198</link>
                <dc:creator>Charmaine Cooke</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Susan Kirkland</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ingrid Sketris</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jafna Cox</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Health Services Research 2009, 9:198</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-11-04T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6963-9-198</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Health Services Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-6963</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>198</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-11-04T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/9/199">
        <title>The Prostate Care Questionnaire for Patients (PCQ-P): Reliability, validity and acceptability.</title>
        <description>Background:
In England, prostate cancer patients report worse experience of care than patients with other cancers. However, no standard measure of patient experience of prostate cancer care is currently available. This paper describes an evaluation of the reliability, validity and acceptability of the PCQ-P, a newly developed instrument designed to measure patient experience of prostate cancer care.
Methods:
The reliability, acceptability and validity of the PCQ-P were tested through a postal survey and interviews with patients. The PCQ-P was posted to 1087 prostate cancer patients varying in age, occupation, and overall health status, sampled from five hospitals in England. Nonresponders received one reminder. To assess criterion validity, 935 patients were also sent sections of the National Centre for Social Research Shortened Questionnaire; and to assess test-retest reliability, 296 patients who responded to the questionnaire were resent it a second time three weeks later. A subsample of 20 prostate cancer patients from one hospital took part in qualitative interviews to assess validity and acceptability of the PCQ-P. Acceptability to service providers was evaluated based on four hospitals&apos; experiences of running a survey using the PCQ-P.
Results:
Questionnaires were returned by 865 patients (69.2%). Missing data was low across the sections, with the proportion of patients completing less than 50% of each section ranging from 4.5% to 6.9%. Across the sections of the questionnaire, internal consistency was moderate to high (Cronbach&apos;s alpha ranging from 0.63 to 0.80), and test-retest stability was acceptable (intraclass correlation coefficients ranging from 0.57 to 0.73). Findings on criterion validity were significant. Patient interviews indicated that the PCQ-P had high face validity and acceptability. Feedback from hospitals indicated that they found the questionnaire useful, and highlighted important considerations for its future use as part of quality improvement initiatives.
Conclusion:
The PCQ-P has been found to be acceptable to patients and service providers, and is ready for use for the measurement of patient experience in routine practice, service improvement programmes, and research.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/9/199</link>
                <dc:creator>Carolyn Tarrant</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Richard Baker</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Andrew Colman</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Paul Sinfield</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Shona Agarwal</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>John Mellon</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>William Steward</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Roger Kockelbergh</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Health Services Research 2009, 9:199</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-11-04T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6963-9-199</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Health Services Research</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-6963</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>199</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-11-04T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
