<?xml version = '1.0' encoding = 'UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss/styledrssBMC.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:extra="http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/schemas/extra/" xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/">
	<channel rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/rss">
		<extra:info rdf:parseType="Literal">
			<html:div xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" style="font:14px Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">
				<html:span style="font-weight:bold">This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central</html:span>
				<html:br/>
				<html:span style="font-size: 12px;">It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit <html:br/><html:a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/" style="color:#3333CC; font-size:12px;">http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/</html:a><html:br/>
				</html:span>
			</html:div>
		</extra:info>
		<title>BMC Geriatrics - Most viewed articles</title>
		<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcgeriatr/mostviewed/</link>
		<description>Most viewed articles in last 30 days from BMC Geriatrics (ISSN 1471-2318) published by 
				
				BioMed Central
		</description>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
         <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/6/3"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/8/18"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/8/16"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/8/19"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/5/17"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/8/17"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/4/6"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/7/1"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/8/10"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/8/14"/>			    
            
            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
    </channel>
    
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/6/3">
            
            <title>Pain in elderly people with severe dementia: A systematic review of behavioural pain assessment tools</title>
			<description>Background:
Pain is a common and major problem among nursing home residents. The prevalence of pain in elderly nursing home people is 40&#8211;80%, showing that they are at great risk of experiencing pain. Since assessment of pain is an important step towards the treatment of pain, there is a need for manageable, valid and reliable tools to assess pain in elderly people with dementia.
Methods:
This systematic review identifies pain assessment scales for elderly people with severe dementia and evaluates the psychometric properties and clinical utility of these instruments. Relevant publications in English, German, French or Dutch, from 1988 to 2005, were identified by means of an extensive search strategy in Medline, Psychinfo and CINAHL, supplemented by screening citations and references. Quality judgement criteria were formulated and used to evaluate the psychometric aspects of the scales.
Results:
Twenty-nine publications reporting on behavioural pain assessment instruments were selected for this review. Twelve observational pain assessment scales (DOLOPLUS2; ECPA; ECS; Observational Pain Behavior Tool; CNPI; PACSLAC; PAINAD; PADE; RaPID; Abbey Pain Scale; NOPPAIN; Pain assessment scale for use with cognitively impaired adults) were identified. Findings indicate that most observational scales are under development and show moderate psychometric qualities.
Conclusion:
Based on the psychometric qualities and criteria regarding sensitivity and clinical utility, we conclude that PACSLAC and DOLOPLUS2 are the most appropriate scales currently available. Further research should focus on improving these scales by further testing their validity, reliability and clinical utility.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/6/3</link>		
			<dc:creator>Sandra MG Zwakhalen, Jan PH Hamers, Huda Huijer Abu-Saad and Martijn PF Berger</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>BMC Geriatrics 2006, 6:3</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 458</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2006-01-27</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2318-6-3</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Geriatrics</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1471-2318</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>6</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2006-01-27</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/8/18">
            
            <title>Haemoglobin, anaemia, dementia and cognitive decline in the elderly, a systematic review</title>
			<description>Background:
There have been suggestions that anaemia may increase risk of dementia or cognitive decline. There is also evidence that high haemoglobin levels increase risk of stroke and mortality. The elderly are more at risk of developing dementia or cognitive decline and are also more likely to suffer from anaemia, however, there is relatively little longitudinal literature  
Methods:
To evaluate the evidence for any relationship between incident cognitive decline or dementia in the elderly and anaemia or haemoglobin level, a systematic review and meta-analyses of peer reviewed publications were carried out. Medline, Embase and PsychInfo were searched for English language publications between 1996 and 2006. Criteria for inclusion were longitudinal studies of subjects aged 65 or more, with primary outcomes of incident dementia or cognitive decline. Other designs were excluded.
Results:
Three papers were identified and only two were able to be combined into a meta-analysis.  The combined ratio for these two studies was 1.94 (95 percent confidence intervals of 1.32-2.87) showing a significantly increased risk of incident dementia with anaemia. It was not possible to investigate the effect of higher levels of haemoglobin. 
Conclusions:
Anaemia is one factor to bear in mind when evaluating risk of incident dementia. However, there are few data available and the studies were methodologically varied so a cautionary note needs to be sounded and our primary recommendation is that further robust research be carried out.  </description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/8/18</link>		
			<dc:creator>Ruth Peters, Lisa Burch, James Warner, Nigel Beckett, Ruth Poulter and Christopher Bulpitt</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>BMC Geriatrics 2008, 8:18</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 393</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-08-08</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2318-8-18</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Geriatrics</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1471-2318</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>18</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-08</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/8/16">
            
            <title>The MOBILIZE Boston Study: Design and methods of a prospective cohort study of novel risk factors for falls in an older population</title>
			<description>Background:
Falls are the sixth leading cause of death in elderly people in the U.S. Despite progress in understanding risk factors for falls, many suspected risk factors have not been adequately studied. Putative risk factors for falls such as pain, reductions in cerebral blood flow, somatosensory deficits, and foot disorders are poorly understood, in part because they pose measurement challenges, particularly for large observational studies.
Methods:
The MOBILIZE Boston Study (MBS), an NIA-funded Program Project, is a prospective cohort study of a unique set of risk factors for falls in seniors in the Boston area. Using a door-to-door population-based recruitment, we have enrolled 765 persons aged 70 and older. The baseline assessment was conducted in 2 segments: a 3-hour home interview followed within 4 weeks by a 3-hour clinic examination. Measures included pain, cerebral hemodynamics, and foot disorders as well as established fall risk factors. For the falls follow-up, participants return fall calendar postcards to the research center at the end of each month. Reports of falls are followed-up with a telephone interview to assess circumstances and consequences of each fall. A second assessment is performed 18 months following baseline.
Results:
Of the 2382 who met all eligibility criteria at the door, 1616 (67.8%) agreed to participate and were referred to the research center for further screening. The primary reason for ineligibility was inability to communicate in English. Results from the first 600 participants showed that participants are largely representative of seniors in the Boston area in terms of age, sex, race and Hispanic ethnicity. The average age of study participants was 77.9 years (s.d. 5.5) and nearly two-thirds were women. The study cohort was 78% white and 17% black. Many participants (39%) reported having fallen at least once in the year before baseline.
Conclusion:
Our results demonstrate the feasibility of conducting comprehensive assessments, including rigorous physiologic measurements, in a diverse population of older adults to study non-traditional risk factors for falls and disability. The MBS will provide an important new data resource for examining novel risk factors for falls and mobility problems in the older population.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/8/16</link>		
			<dc:creator>Suzanne G Leveille, Douglas P Kiel, Richard N Jones, Anthony Roman, Marian T Hannan, Farzaneh A Sorond, Hyun G Kang, Elizabeth J Samelson, Margaret Gagnon, Marcie Freeman and Lewis A Lipsitz</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>BMC Geriatrics 2008, 8:16</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 378</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-07-18</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2318-8-16</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Geriatrics</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1471-2318</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>16</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-18</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/8/19">
            
            <title>A water-based training program that include perturbation exercises to improve stepping responses in older adults: study protocol for a randomized controlled cross-over trial</title>
			<description>Background:
Gait and balance impairments may increase the risk of falls, the leading cause of accidental death in the elderly population. Fall-related injuries constitute a serious public health problem associated with high costs for society as well as human suffering. A rapid step is the most important protective postural strategy, acting to recover equilibrium and prevent a fall from initiating. It can arise from large perturbations, but also frequently as a consequence of volitional movements. We propose to use a novel water-based training program which includes specific perturbation exercises that will target the stepping responses that could potentially have a profound effect in reducing risk of falling. We describe the water-based balance training program and a study protocol to evaluate its efficacy.
Methods:
The proposed water-based training program involves use of unpredictable, multi-directional perturbations in a group setting to evoke compensatory and volitional stepping responses. Perturbations are made by pushing slightly the subjects and by water turbulence, in 24 training sessions conducted over 12 weeks. Concurrent cognitive tasks during movement tasks are included. Principles of physical training and exercise including awareness, continuity, motivation, overload, periodicity, progression and specificity were used in the development of this novel program. Specific goals are to increase the speed of stepping responses and improve the postural control mechanism and physical functioning. A prospective, randomized, cross-over trial with concealed allocation, assessor blinding and intention-to-treat analysis will be performed to evaluate the efficacy of the water-based training program. A total of 36 community-dwelling adults (age 65-88) with no recent history of instability or falling will be assigned to either the perturbation-based training or a control group (no training). Voluntary step reaction times and postural stability using stabiliogram diffusion analysis will be tested before and after the 12 weeks of training.DiscussionThis study will determine whether a water-based balance training program that includes perturbation exercises, in a group setting, can improve speed of voluntary stepping responses and improve balance control. Results will help guide the development of more cost-effective interventions that can prevent the occurrence of falls in the elderly.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/8/19</link>		
			<dc:creator>Itshak Melzer, Ori Elbar, Irit Tsedek and Lars Oddsson</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>BMC Geriatrics 2008, 8:19</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 314</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-08-17</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2318-8-19</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Geriatrics</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1471-2318</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>19</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-17</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/5/17">
            
            <title>The feasibility of whole body vibration in institutionalised elderly persons and its influence on muscle performance, balance and mobility: a randomised controlled trial [ISRCTN62535013]</title>
			<description>Background:
Fatigue or lack of interest can reduce the feasibility of intensive physical exercise in nursing home residents. Low-volume exercise interventions with similar training effects might be an alternative. The aim of this randomised controlled trial was to investigate the feasibility of Whole Body Vibration (WBV) in institutionalised elderly, and its impact on functional capacity and muscle performance.
Methods:
Twenty-four nursing home residents (15 female, 9 male; mean age 77.5 &#177; 11.0 years) were randomised (stratification for age, gender and ADL-category) to 6 weeks static WBV exercise (WBV+, N = 13) or control (only static exercise; N = 11). Outcome measures were exercise compliance, timed up-and-go, Tinetti-test, back scratch, chair sit-and-reach, handgrip strength and linear isokinetic leg extension.
Results:
At baseline, WBV+ and control groups were similar for all outcome variables. Twenty-one participants completed the program and attended respectively 96% and 86% of the exercise sessions for the WBV+ and control groups. Training-induced changes in timed up-and-go and Tinetti-test were better for WBV+ compared to control (p = 0.029 for timed up-and-go, p = 0.001 and p = 0.002 for Tinetti body balance and total score respectively). In an alternative analysis (Worst Rank Score &amp; Last Observation Carried Forward) the differences in change remained significant on the Tinetti body balance and total score. No other significant differences in change between both groups were observed.
Conclusion:
In nursing home residents with limited functional dependency, six weeks static WBV exercise is feasible, and is beneficial for balance and mobility. The supplementary benefit of WBV on muscle performance compared to classic exercise remains to be explored further.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/5/17</link>		
			<dc:creator>Ivan Bautmans, Ellen Van Hees, Jean-Claude Lemper and Tony Mets</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>BMC Geriatrics 2005, 5:17</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 286</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2005-12-22</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2318-5-17</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Geriatrics</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1471-2318</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>17</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2005-12-22</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/8/17">
            
            <title>A new approach to physical activity maintenance: Rationale, design, and baseline data from the Keep Active Minnesota trial</title>
			<description>Background:
Since many individuals who initiate physical activity programs are highly likely to return to a sedentary lifestyle, innovative strategies to efforts to increase the number of physically active older adults who successfully maintain beneficial levels of PA for a substantial length of time are needed. 
Methods:
The Keep Active Minnesota Trial is a randomized controlled trial of an interactive phone- and mail-based intervention to help 50-70 year old adults who have recently increased their physical activity level, maintain that activity level over a 24-month period in comparison to usual care. Baseline, 6, 12, and 24 month measurement occurred via phone surveys with kilocalories expended per week in total and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (CHAMPS Questionnaire) as the primary outcome measures. Secondary outcomes include hypothesized mediators of physical activity change (e.g., physical activity enjoyment, self-efficacy, physical activity self-concept), body mass index, and depression. Seven day accelerometry data were collected on a sub-sample of participants at baseline and 24-month follow-up.DiscussionThe Keep Active Minnesota study offers an innovative approach to the perennial problem of physical activity relapse; by focusing explicitly on physical activity maintenance, the intervention holds considerable promise for modifying the typical relapse curve. Moreover, if shown to be efficacious, the use of phone- and mail-based intervention delivery offers potential for widespread dissemination. 
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:  NCT00283452.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/8/17</link>		
			<dc:creator>Nancy E Sherwood, Brian C Martinson, A LAUREN Crain, Marcia G Hayes, Nicolaas P Pronk and Patrick J O'Connor</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>BMC Geriatrics 2008, 8:17</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 285</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-07-25</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2318-8-17</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Geriatrics</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1471-2318</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>17</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-25</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/4/6">
            
            <title>The six-minute walk test in community dwelling elderly: influence of health status.</title>
			<description>Background:
The 6 minutes walk test (6MWT) is a useful assessment instrument for the exercise capacity of elderly persons. The impact of the health status on the 6MWT-distance in elderly, however, remains unclear, reducing its value in clinical settings. The objective of this study was to investigate to what extent the 6MWT-distance in community dwelling elderly is determined by health conditions.
Methods:
One hundred and fifty-six community dwelling elderly people (53 male, 103 female) were assessed for health status and performed the 6MWT. After clinical evaluation, electrocardiography and laboratory examination participants were categorized into a stratified six-level classification system according to their health status, going from A (completely healthy) to D (signs of active disease at the moment of examination).
Results:
The mean 6MWT-distance was 603 m (SD = 178). The 6MWT-distance decreased significantly with increasing age (ANOVA p = 0.0001) and with worsening health status (ANCOVA, corrected for age p &lt; 0.001).A multiple linear regression model with health status, age and gender as independent variables explained 31% of the 6MWT-distance variability. Anthropometrical measures (stature, weight and BMI) did not significantly improve the prediction model. A significant relationship between 6MWT-distance and stature was only present in category A (completely healthy).
Conclusions:
Significant differences in 6MWT-distance are observed according to health status in community-dwelling elderly persons. The proposed health categorizing system for elderly people is able to distinguish persons with lower physical exercise capacity and can be useful when advising physical trainers for seniors.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/4/6</link>		
			<dc:creator>Ivan Bautmans, Margareta Lambert and Tony Mets</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>BMC Geriatrics 2004, 4:6</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 267</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2004-07-23</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2318-4-6</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Geriatrics</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1471-2318</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>6</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2004-07-23</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/7/1">
            
            <title>The association between timed up and go test and history of falls: The Troms&#248; study</title>
			<description>Background:
Fall-related injuries in older adults are a major health problem. Although the aetiology of falls is multifactorial, physical factors are assumed to contribute significantly. The "Timed up and go test" (TUG) is designed to measure basic mobility function. This report evaluates the association between TUG times and history of falls.
Methods:
A retrospective, observational, population-based study was conducted on 414 men and 560 women with mean age 77.5 (SD 2.3). TUG time and falls during the previous 12 months were recorded. Covariates were age, sex, medical history and health-related mobility problems. Means, confidence intervals and test characteristics for TUG were calculated. Odds ratios and influence of covariates were examined by logistic regression.
Results:
The mean TUG time was 11.1s (SD 2.5) among male non-fallers and 13.0s (SD 7.8) among fallers. The difference was 1.9s (95%CI 0.9&#8211;3.0). The odds ratio for fallers being in the upper quartile was 2.1 (95%CI 1.4&#8211;3.3). Adjusted for covariates, the odds ratio was (OR = 1.8, 95%CI 1.1&#8211;2.9). The corresponding mean was 13.0s (SD 5.74) among female non-fallers and 13.9s (SD 8.5) among fallers. The difference was 0.9 (95%CI -0.3&#8211;2.1). The odds ratio for fallers being in upper quartile was 1.0 (95%CI 0.7&#8211;1.4). The area under the ROC curve was 0.50 (95%CI 0.45&#8211;0.55) in women and 0.56 (95%CI 0.50&#8211;0.62) in men.
Conclusion:
TUG is statistically associated with a history of falls in men but not in women. The ability to classify fallers is poor, and the clinical value of the association is therefore limited.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/7/1</link>		
			<dc:creator>Gyrd Thrane, Ragnar M Joakimsen and Eline Thornquist</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>BMC Geriatrics 2007, 7:1</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 267</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2007-01-12</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2318-7-1</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Geriatrics</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1471-2318</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>7</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2007-01-12</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/8/10">
            
            <title>Adverse outcomes following hospitalization in acutely ill older patients</title>
			<description>Background:
The longitudinal outcomes of patients admitted to acute care for elders units (ACE) are mixed. We studied the associations between socio-demographic and functional measures with hospital length of stay (LOS), and which variables predicted adverse events (non-independent living, readmission, death) 3 and 6 months later.
Methods:
Prospective cohort study of community-living, medical patients age 75 or over admitted to ACE at a teaching hospital.
Results:
The population included 147 subjects, median LOS of 9 days (interquartile range 5&#8211;15 days). All returned home/community after hospitalization. Just prior to discharge, baseline timed up and go test (TUG, P &lt; 0.001), bipedal stance balance (P = 0.001), and clinical frailty scale scores (P = 0.02) predicted LOS, with TUG as the only independent predictor (P &lt; 0.001) in multiple regression analysis. By 3 months, 59.9% of subjects remained free of an adverse event, and by 6 months, 49.0% were event free. The 3 and 6-month mortality was 10.2% and 12.9% respectively. Almost one-third of subjects had developed an adverse event by 6 months, with the highest risk within the first 3 months post discharge. An abnormal TUG score was associated with increased adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03 to 1.59, P = 0.03. A higher FMMSE score (adjusted HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.96, P = 0.003) and independent living before hospitalization (adjusted HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.84, P = 0.01) were associated with reduced risk of adverse outcome.
Conclusion:
Some ACE patients demonstrate further functional decline following hospitalization, resulting in loss of independence, repeat hospitalization, or death. Abnormal TUG is associated with prolonged LOS and future adverse outcomes.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/8/10</link>		
			<dc:creator>Roger Y Wong and William C Miller</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>BMC Geriatrics 2008, 8:10</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 239</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-05-14</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2318-8-10</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Geriatrics</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1471-2318</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>10</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-14</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/8/14">
            
            <title>The association of APOE genotype and cognitive decline in interaction with risk factors in a 65&#8211;69 year old community sample</title>
			<description>Background:
While the evidence of an association between the apolipoprotein E (APOE) *E4 allele and Alzheimer's disease is very strong, the effect of the *E4 allele on cognitive decline in the general population is more equivocal. A cross-sectional study on the lifespan effects of the *E4 allele 1 failed to find any effect of the *E4 allele on cognitive performance at ages 20&#8211;24, 40&#8211;44 or 60&#8211;64 years.
Methods:
In this four year follow-up study, we reexamine the effect of *E4 in the sample of 2,021 individuals, now aged 65&#8211;69 years.
Results:
Performance on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) was significantly poorer for *E4 homozygotes than heterozygotes or non-carriers. The effects of the *E4 genotype on cognitive decline over four years were found on the MMSE and Symbol-Digit Modalities test but only when controlling for risk factors such as head injury and education. Analyses were repeated with the exclusion of participants diagnosed with a mild cognitive disorder, with little change.
Conclusion:
It is possible that *E4 carriers become vulnerable to greater cognitive decline in the presence of other risk factors at 65&#8211;69 years of age.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/8/14</link>		
			<dc:creator>Helen Christensen, Philip J Batterham, Andrew J Mackinnon, Anthony F Jorm, Holly A Mack, Karen A Mather, Kaarin J Anstey, Perminder S Sachdev and Simon Easteal</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>BMC Geriatrics 2008, 8:14</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 228</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-07-14</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2318-8-14</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Geriatrics</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1471-2318</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>14</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-14</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
		
	<cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
         <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction"/>
         <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution"/>
         <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks"/>
	</cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
