<?xml version = '1.0' encoding = 'UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss/styledrssBMC.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:extra="http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/schemas/extra/" xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/">
	<channel rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/rss">
		<extra:info rdf:parseType="Literal">
			<html:div xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" style="font:14px Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">
				<html:span style="font-weight:bold">This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central</html:span>
				<html:br/>
				<html:span style="font-size: 12px;">It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit <html:br/><html:a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/" style="color:#3333CC; font-size:12px;">http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/</html:a><html:br/>
				</html:span>
			</html:div>
		</extra:info>
		<title>BMC Women's Health - Most viewed articles</title>
		<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcwomenshealth/mostviewed/</link>
		<description>Most viewed articles in last 30 days from BMC Women's Health (ISSN 1472-6874) published by 
				
				BioMed Central
		</description>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
         <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6874/6/6"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6874/8/12"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6874/8/7"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6874/8/15"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6874/8/14"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6874/8/3"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6874/8/8"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6874/8/11"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6874/8/10"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6874/8/9"/>			    
            
            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
    </channel>
    
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6874/6/6">
            
            <title>Female genital mutilation of a karyotypic male presenting as a female with delayed puberty</title>
			<description>Background:
Female genital mutilation (FGM) is commonly practiced mainly in a belt reaching from East to West Africa north of the equator. The practice is known across socio-economic classes and among different ethnic, religious, and cultural groups. Few studies have been appropriately designed to measure the health effects of FGM. However, the outcome of FGM on intersex individuals has never been discussed before.Case presentationThe patient first presented as a female with delayed puberty. Hormonal analysis revealed a normal serum prolactin level of 215 Mu/L, a low FSH of 0.5 Mu/L, and a low LH of 1.1 Mu/L. Type IV FGM (Pharaonic circumcision) had been performed during childhood. Chromosomal analysis showed a 46, XY karyotype and ultrasonography verified a soft tissue structure in the position of the prostate.
Conclusion:
FGM pose a threat to the diagnosis and management of children with abnormal genital development in the Sudan and similar societies.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6874/6/6</link>		
			<dc:creator>M Ellaithi, T Nilsson, D Gisselsson, A Elagib, H Eltigani and I Fadl-Elmula</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>BMC Women's Health 2006, 6:6</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 1036</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2006-03-29</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6874-6-6</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Women's Health</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1472-6874</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>6</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>6</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2006-03-29</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6874/8/12">
            
            <title>Study of knowledge, perception and attitude of adolescent girls towards STIs/HIV, safer sex and sex education: (A cross sectional survey of urban adolescent school girls in South Delhi, India)</title>
			<description>Background:
Sexually Transmitted Infections (STI's), including HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus) mainly affects sexually active young people. Young adults aged 15&#8211;29 years, account for 32% of AIDS (Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome) cases reported in India and the number of young women living with HIV/AIDS is twice that of young men. The aim of the study was to evaluate adolescent school girls' knowledge, perceptions and attitudes towards STIs/HIV and safer sex practice and sex education and to explore their current sexual behaviour in India.
Methods:
A cross sectional study was carried out in 2007 in South Delhi, India to investigate the perception, knowledge and attitude of adolescent urban schoolgirls towards sexually transmitted Infections (STIs), HIV/AIDS, safer sex practice and sex education. the self-administered questionnaire was completed by 251 female students from two senior secondary schools.
Results:
More than one third of students in this study had no accurate understanding about the signs and symptoms of STIs other than HIV/AIDS. About 30% of respondents considered HIV/AIDS could be cured, 49% felt that condoms should not be available to youth, 41% were confused about whether the contraceptive pill could protect against HIV infection and 32% thought it should only be taken by married women.
Conclusion:
Though controversial, there is an immense need to implement gender-based sex education regarding STIs, safe sex options and contraceptives in schools in India</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6874/8/12</link>		
			<dc:creator>Alexandra McManus and Lipi Dhar</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>BMC Women's Health 2008, 8:12</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 574</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-07-23</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6874-8-12</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Women's Health</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1472-6874</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>12</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-23</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6874/8/7">
            
            <title>Abnormal vaginal bleeding in women of reproductive age: a descriptive study of initial management in general practice</title>
			<description>Background:
Abnormal vaginal bleeding (AVB) in women of reproductive age is a common reason for consulting a general practitioner. Nevertheless, how general practitioners (GPs) choose to initially manage AVB is largely unknown, as is the prevalence of underlying pathology of AVB in primary care.
Methods:
To investigate the initial diagnostic procedures and treatment for AVB used in general practice, we performed a descriptive study based on computerised medical records. New consultations for AVB in 2000 and 2001 were selected. Patient characteristics, diagnostic procedures and treatment were analysed.
Results:
In total, 270 new consultations were included. The majority of patients (75%) consulted the GP for AVB only once. GPs performed diagnostic procedures in 54% of all consultations. Overall, additional diagnostic procedures revealed abnormalities in 11% of women. However, the diagnostic procedures implemented by the GPs varied widely per bleeding type and contraceptive use. Anaemia was found in 36% of 45 women tested. Uterine fibroids were found in 41% of 27 women examined by ultrasound. Medication was prescribed in 34% of all consultations. A gynaecological referral was registered in 4% of all contacts.
Conclusion:
Initially, GPs tend to follow a policy of expectant management in women of reproductive age with AVB. However, when additional diagnostic procedures were performed, anaemia and uterine fibroids were found in a considerable number of women.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6874/8/7</link>		
			<dc:creator>Corlien JH de Vries, Margreet Wieringa-de Waard, Cl&#233;o-Lotte AG Vervoort, Willem M Ankum and Patrick JE Bindels</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>BMC Women's Health 2008, 8:7</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 493</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-04-15</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6874-8-7</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Women's Health</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1472-6874</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>7</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-15</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6874/8/15">
            
            <title>Factors associated with wife beating in Egypt: Analysis of two surveys (1995 and 2005)</title>
			<description>Background:
Wife beating is an important public health problem in many developing countries. We assessed the rates of wife beating and examined factors associated with wife beating in 1995 and 2005 in Egypt.
Methods:
We used data from two Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) conducted in Egypt in 1995 and 2005 using multistage household sampling. Data related to wife beating included information from 7122 women in 1995 and 5612 women in 2005. Logistic regression was used to analyze factors independently associated with wife beating. Special weights were used to obtain nationally representative estimates.
Results:
In 1995 17.5% of married women in Egypt experienced wife beating in the last 12 months, in 2005 &#8211; 18.9% or 16.0%, using different measures. The association between socio-demographic differentials and wife beating was weaker in the newer survey. The 12-month prevalence of wife beating was lower only when both partners were educated, but the differences across education levels were less pronounced in 2005. Based on the information available in the 2005 survey, more educated women experienced less severe forms of wife beating than less educated women.
Conclusion:
Different measures used in both surveys make a direct comparison difficult. The observed patterns indicate that the changes in prevalence may be masked by two opposite processes occurring in the society: a decrease in (severe forms of) wife beating and an increase in reporting of wife beating. Improving the access to education for women and raising education levels in the whole society may help reducing wife beating.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6874/8/15</link>		
			<dc:creator>Manas K Akmatov, Rafael T Mikolajczyk, Shokria Labeeb, Enas Dhaher and Md Mobarak Khan</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>BMC Women's Health 2008, 8:15</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 423</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-09-18</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6874-8-15</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Women's Health</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1472-6874</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>15</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-18</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6874/8/14">
            
            <title>Physical activity counseling in maternity and child health care &#8211; a controlled trial</title>
			<description>Background:
The purpose of the study is to examine the effects and feasibility of individual physical activity (PA) counseling in maternity and child health clinics in Finland.
Methods:
Three clinics including both maternity and child health care signed up for the experimental (EXP) and three for the control group (CON). The participants were 132 pregnant and 92 postpartum primiparas. The nurses in EXP integrated a primary and four booster PA counseling sessions into routine visits. An option for supervised group exercise was offered. In CON former practices, usually including brief PA advice, were continued. Leisure-time PA (LTPA) prior to pregnancy was elicited by questionnaire and followed 16&#8211;18 and 36&#8211;37 weeks' gestation in maternity clinics and 5 and 10 months postpartum in child health clinics. Feasibility included safety, participant responsiveness, realization of counseling and applicability.
Results:
According to analysis of covariance adjusted for baseline LTPA and possible confounders, no relative between-group differences in LTPA were found at the first follow-up in either maternity or child health clinics. At the last follow-up in maternity clinics the weekly number of at least moderate-intensity LTPA days was 43% (95% CI: 9, 87) higher and the weekly duration of at least moderate-intensity LTPA 154% (95% CI: 16, 455) higher in EXP compared with CON. Counseling proved feasible in both maternity and child health clinics.
Conclusion:
Counseling encouraged pregnant women to sustain their moderate-intensity LTPA and was feasible in routine practices. No effects were observed if counseling was initiated postpartum.Trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN21512277</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6874/8/14</link>		
			<dc:creator>Minna Aittasalo, Matti Pasanen, Mikael Fogelholm, Tarja I Kinnunen, Katriina Ojala and Riitta Luoto</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>BMC Women's Health 2008, 8:14</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 346</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-08-14</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6874-8-14</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Women's Health</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1472-6874</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>14</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-14</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6874/8/3">
            
            <title>Human lactobacilli as supplementation of clindamycin to patients with bacterial vaginosis reduce the recurrence rate; a 6-month, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study</title>
			<description>Background:
The primary objective of this study was to investigate if supplementary lactobacilli treatment could improve the initial cure rate after vaginal clindamycin therapy, and secondly, if lactobacilli as repeated adjunct treatment during 3 menstrual cycles could lengthen the time to relapse after initial cure.
Methods:
Women (n = 100) with bacterial vaginosis diagnosed by Amsel criteria were after informed consent offered vaginal clindamycin therapy followed by vaginal gelatine capsules containing either 109 freeze-dried lactobacilli or identical placebo capsules for 10 days during 3 menstrual cycles in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
Results:
The initial intent to treat (ITT) analysis for the one-month cure rate was 64% in the lactobacilli group and 78% in the placebo group (p > 0.05). However, any patient with missing or unclassified smears at the initial visit who continued the study and whose next smear indicated a cure was included in the cured group; the study also excluded two of the patients in the lactobacilli group who reported that they did not take any vaginal capsules. With consideration to these population changes, the initial cure rate would be 77% in the lactobacilli group. The 76 cured women were followed for 6 menstrual cycles or until relapse within that time span. At the end of the study, 64.9% (24/37) of the lactobacilli treated women were still BV-free compared to 46.2% (18/39) of the placebo treated women. Comparison of the two groups regarding "Time from cure to relapse" was statistically significant (p = 0.027) in favour of the lactobacilli treatment. Adjuvant therapy with lactobacilli contributed significantly to avoidance of relapse with a proportional Hazard Risk ratio (HR) of 0.73 (0.54&#8211;0.98) (p &lt; 0.05)
Conclusion:
The study shows that supplementary treatment combining two different strains of probiotic lactobacilli does not improve the efficacy of BV therapy during the first month of treatment, but for women initially cured, adjunct treatment of lactobacilli during 3 menstrual cycles lengthens the time to relapse significantly in that more women remained BV free at the end of the 6-month follow up.Trial registration numberISRCTN62879834</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6874/8/3</link>		
			<dc:creator>Per-G&#246;ran Larsson, Babill Stray-Pedersen, Kjeld R Ryttig and Stig Larsen</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>BMC Women's Health 2008, 8:3</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 346</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-01-15</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6874-8-3</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Women's Health</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1472-6874</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-01-15</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6874/8/8">
            
            <title>A systematic review of tests for lymph node status in primary endometrial cancer</title>
			<description>Background:
The lymph node status of a patient is a key determinate in staging, prognosis and adjuvant treatment of endometrial cancer. Despite this, the potential additional morbidity associated with lymphadenectomy makes its role controversial. This study systematically reviews the accuracy literature on sentinel node biopsy; ultra sound scanning, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computer tomography (CT) for determining lymph node status in endometrial cancer.
Methods:
Relevant articles were identified form MEDLINE (1966&#8211;2006), EMBASE (1980&#8211;2006), MEDION, the Cochrane library, hand searching of reference lists from primary articles and reviews, conference abstracts and contact with experts in the field. The review included 18 relevant primary studies (693 women). Data was extracted for study characteristics and quality. Bivariate random-effect model meta-analysis was used to estimate diagnostic accuracy of the various index tests.
Results:
MRI (pooled positive LR 26.7, 95% CI 10.6 &#8211; 67.6 and negative LR 0.29 95% CI 0.17 &#8211; 0.49) and successful sentinel node biopsy (pooled positive LR 18.9 95% CI 6.7 &#8211; 53.2 and negative LR 0.22, 95% CI 0.1 &#8211; 0.48) were the most accurate tests. CT was not as accurate a test (pooled positive LR 3.8, 95% CI 2.0 &#8211; 7.3 and negative LR of 0.62, 95% CI 0.45 &#8211; 0.86. There was only one study that reported the use of ultrasound scanning.
Conclusion:
MRI and sentinel node biopsy have shown similar diagnostic accuracy in confirming lymph node status among women with primary endometrial cancer than CT scanning, although the comparisons made are indirect and hence subject to bias. MRI should be used in preference, in light of the ASTEC trial, because of its non invasive nature.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6874/8/8</link>		
			<dc:creator>Tara J Selman, Christopher H Mann, Javier Zamora and Khalid S Khan</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>BMC Women's Health 2008, 8:8</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 343</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-05-05</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6874-8-8</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Women's Health</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1472-6874</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>8</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-05</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6874/8/11">
            
            <title>The ESEP study: Salpingostomy versus salpingectomy for tubal ectopic pregnancy; The impact on future fertility: A randomised controlled trial</title>
			<description>Background:
For most tubal ectopic pregnancies (EP) surgery is the treatment of first choice. Whether surgical treatment should be performed conservatively (salpingostomy) or radically (salpingectomy) in women wishing to preserve their reproductive capacity, is subject to debate. Salpingostomy preserves the tube, but bears the risks of both persistent trophoblast and repeat ipsilateral tubal EP. Salpingectomy, avoids these risks, but leaves only one tube for reproductive capacity. This study aims to reveal the trade-off between both surgical options: whether the potential advantage of salpingostomy, i.e. a better fertility prognosis as compared to salpingectomy, outweighs the potential disadvantages, i.e. persistent trophoblast and an increased risk for a repeat EP.Methods/DesignInternational multi centre randomised controlled trial comparing salpingostomy versus salpingectomy in women with a tubal EP without contra lateral tubal pathology. Hemodynamically stable women with a presumptive diagnosis of tubal EP, scheduled for surgery, are eligible for inclusion. Patients pregnant after in vitro fertilisation (IVF) and/or known documented tubal pathology are excluded. At surgery, a tubal EP must be confirmed. Only women with a tubal EP amenable to both interventions and a healthy contra lateral tube are included. Salpingostomy and salpingectomy are performed according to standard procedures of participating hospitals. Up to 36 months after surgery, women will be contacted to assess their fertility status at six months intervals starting form the day of the operation.The primary outcome measure is the occurrence of spontaneous viable intra uterine pregnancy. Secondary outcome measures are persistent trophoblast, repeat EP, all pregnancies including those resulting from IVF and financial costs. The analysis will be performed according to the intention to treat principle. A cost-effectiveness analysis will be performed within a decision analysis framework, based on costs per live birth, including IVF treatment whenever a spontaneous pregnancy does not occur. Patients' preferences will be assessed using a discrete choice experiment.DiscussionThis trial will provide evidence on the trade off between salpingostomy and salpingectomy for tubal EP in view of the pros and cons of both interventions and will offer guidance to clinicians in making the right treatment choice.Trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN37002267</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6874/8/11</link>		
			<dc:creator>Femke Mol, Annika Strandell, Davor Jurkovic, Tamer Yalcinkaya, Harold R Verhoeve, Carolien AM Koks, Paul JQ  van der Linden, Giuseppe CM Graziosi, Andreas L Thurkow, Annemieke Hoek, Lars Hogstr&#246;m, Ingemar Klinte, Kerstin Nilsson, Norah M van Mello, Willem M Ankum, Fulco van der Veen, Ben WM Mol, Petra J Hajenius and the European Surgery in Ectopic Pregnancy (ESEP) study group</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>BMC Women's Health 2008, 8:11</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 341</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-06-26</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6874-8-11</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Women's Health</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1472-6874</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>11</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-26</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6874/8/10">
            
            <title>The METEX study: Methotrexate versus expectant management in women with ectopic pregnancy: A randomised controlled trial</title>
			<description>Background:
Patients with ectopic pregnancy (EP) and low serum hCG concentrations and women with a pregnancy of unknown location (PUL) and plateauing serum hCG levels are commonly treated with systemic methotrexate (MTX). However, there is no evidence that treatment in these particular subgroups of women is necessary as many of these early EPs may resolve spontaneously. The aim of this study is whether expectant management in women with EP or PUL and with low but plateauing serum hCG concentrations is an alternative to MTX treatment in terms of treatment success, future pregnancy, health related quality of life and costs.Methods/DesignA multicentre randomised controlled trial in The Netherlands. Hemodynamically stable patients with an EP visible on transvaginal ultrasound and a plateauing serum hCG concentration &lt; 1,500 IU/L or with a persisting PUL with plateauing serum hCG concentrations &lt; 2,000 IU/L are eligible for the trial. Patients with a viable EP, signs of tubal rupture/abdominal bleeding, or a contra-indication for MTX will not be included. Expectant management is compared with systemic MTX in a single dose intramuscular regimen (1 mg/kg) in an outpatient setting. Serum hCG levels are monitored weekly; in case of inadequately declining, systemic MTX is installed or continued. In case of hemodynamic instability and/or signs of tubal rupture, surgery is performed. The primary outcome measure is an uneventful decline of serum hCG to an undetectable level by the initial intervention. Secondary outcomes are (re)interventions (additional systemic MTX injections and/or surgery), treatment complications, health related quality of life, financial costs, and future fertility. Analysis is performed according to the intention to treat principle. Quality of life is assessed by questionnaires before and at three time points after randomisation. Costs are expressed as direct costs with data on costs and used resources in the participating centres. Fertility is assessed by questionnaires after 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. Patients' preferences will be assessed using a discrete choice experiment.DiscussionThis trial will provide guidance on the present management dilemmas in women with EPs and PULs with low and plateauing serum hCG concentrations.Trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN 48210491</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6874/8/10</link>		
			<dc:creator>Norah M van Mello, Femke Mol, Albert H Adriaanse, Erik A Boss, Antonius B Dijkman, Johannes PR Doornbos, Mark Hans Emanuel, Jaap Friederich, Loes van der Leeuw-Harmsen, Jos P Lips, Evert JP van Santbrink, Harold R Verhoeve, Harry Visser, Willem M Ankum, Fulco van der Veen, Ben W Mol and Petra J Hajenius</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>BMC Women's Health 2008, 8:10</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 315</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-06-19</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6874-8-10</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Women's Health</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1472-6874</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>10</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-19</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6874/8/9">
            
            <title>Cervical dysplasia and cancer and the use of hormonal contraceptives in Jamaican women</title>
			<description>Background:
This study was conducted to determine whether use of hormonal contraceptives is associated with cervical dysplasia and cancer in a population where there is widespread use of hormonal contraception and the rates of cervical cancer remain high at 27.5/100,000.
Methods:
A case-control study was conducted among women visiting the colposcopy and gynaelogical clinics at a tertiary referral hospital. Two hundred and thirty six cases CIN I (72), II (59), III (54), cancer (51) and 102 controls, consented and were interviewed on use of contraceptives using a structured questionnaire. Logistic regression was used to determine odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) associated with use of hormonal contraception in cases and controls and in low and high risk cases. Recruitment was carried out from 2001&#8211;2002.
Results:
Contraceptives used were: oral contraceptives &#8211; 35%, injections (depot medroxy progesterone acetate (Depo-provera) &#8211; 10%, Intrauterine devices &#8211; 2%, combinations of these and tubal ligation &#8211; 30%. 23% reported use of 'other' methods, barrier contraceptives or no form of contraception. Barrier contraceptive use was not significantly different between cases and controls. Current and/or past exposure to hormonal contraceptives (HC) by use of the pill or injection, alone or in combination with other methods was significantly higher in the cases. In multivariate analysis with age and number of sexual partners as co-variates, use of hormonal contraception was associated both with disease, [OR, 1.92 (CI 1.11, 3.34; p = 0.02] and severity of the disease [OR, 2.22 (CI 1.05, 4.66) p = 0.036]. When parity and alcohol consumption were added to the model, hormonal contraception was no longer significant. The significant association with high risk disease was retained when the model was controlled for age and number of sexual partners. Depo-provera use (with age and number of sexual partners as covariates) was also associated with disease [OR, 2.43 (CI 1.39, 4.57), p = 0.006] and severity of disease [OR 2.51 (1.11, 5.64) p = 0.027]. With parity and alcohol added to this model, depo-provera use retained significance. Exposure to HC > 4 years conferred more risk for disease and severity of disease.
Conclusion:
Hormonal contraception did confer some risk of dysplasia and women using HC should therefore be encouraged to do regular Pap smear screening.</description>
			<link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6874/8/9</link>		
			<dc:creator>Norma McFarlane-Anderson, Patience E Bazuaye, Maria D Jackson, Monica Smikle and Horace M Fletcher</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>BMC Women's Health 2008, 8:9</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 284</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-05-30</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-6874-8-9</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>BMC Women's Health</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1472-6874</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>9</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-30</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
		
	<cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
         <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction"/>
         <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution"/>
         <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks"/>
	</cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
