<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/feeds/mostaccessed/journal?journal=bmcinthealthhumrights&amp;quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>BMC International Health and Human Rights - Most accessed articles</title>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcinthealthhumrights/</link>
        <description>The most accessed research articles published by BMC International Health and Human Rights</description>
        <dc:date>2009-11-21T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-698X/9/28" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-698X/9/27" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-698X/9/26" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-698X/9/18" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-698X/9/25" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-698X/9/29" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-698X/9/24" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-698X/9/S1/S2" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-698X/9/17" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-698X/9/20" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
        <extra:info rdf:parseType="Literal">
            <html:div style="font:14px Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                <html:span style="font-weight:bold">
                    This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central
                </html:span>
                <html:br />
                <html:span style="font-size: 12px;">
                    It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit
                    <html:br />
                    <html:a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/" style="color:#3333CC; font-size:12px;">
                        http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/
                    </html:a>
                    <html:br />
                </html:span>
            </html:div>
        </extra:info>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-698X/9/28">
        <title>The role of community health workers in improving child health programmes in Mali</title>
        <description>Background:
Mortality of children under the age of five remains one of the most important public health challenges in developing countries. In rural settings, the promotion of household and community health practices through community health workers (CHWs) is among the key strategies to improve child health. The objective of this study was to assess the performance of CHWs in the promotion of basic child heath services in rural Mali.
Methods:
A community-based cross-sectional survey was undertaken using multi-stage cluster sampling of wards and villages. Data was collected through questionnaires among 401 child-caregivers and registers of 72 CHWs.
Results:
Of 401 households suppose to receive a visit by a CHW, 219 (54.6%; confidence interval 95%; 49.6-59.5) had received at least one visit in the last three months before the survey. The mother is the most important caregiver (97%); high percentage being illiterate. Caregivers treat fever and diarrhoea with the correct regimen in 40% and 11% of cases respectively. Comparative analysis between households with and without CHW visits showed a positive influence of CHWs on family health practices: knowledge on the management of child fever (p = &lt; 0.001), non-utilization of antibiotics in home treatment of diarrhoea (p = 0.003), presence of cloroquine in the household (p = 0.002), presence (p = 0.001) and use (p = &lt; 0.001) of bed nets. A total of 27 (38%) CHWs had not received supervision at all, against 45 (63%) who have been followed regularly each month during the last six months.
Conclusion:
Continuous training, transport means, adequate supervision and motivation of CHWs through the introduction of financial incentives and remuneration are among key factors to improve the work of CHWs in rural communities. Poor performance of basic household health practices can be related to irregular supply of drugs and the need of appropriate follow-up by CHWs.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-698X/9/28</link>
                <dc:creator>Freddy Perez</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hamady Ba</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sayed Dastagire</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mathias Altmann</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC International Health and Human Rights 2009, 9:28</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-11-10T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-698X-9-28</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC International Health and Human Rights</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-698X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>28</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-11-10T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-698X/9/27">
        <title>The forsaken mental health of the Indigenous Peoples - a moral case of outrageous exclusion in Latin America</title>
        <description>Background:
Mental health is neglected in most parts of the world. For the Indigenous Peoples of Latin America, the plight is even more severe as there are no specific mental health services designed for them altogether. Given the high importance of mental health for general health, the status quo is unacceptable. Lack of research on the subject of Indigenous Peoples&apos; mental health means that statistics are virtually unavailable. To illustrate their mental health status, one can nonetheless point to the high rates of poverty and extreme poverty in their communities, overcrowded housing, illiteracy, and lack of basic sanitary services such as water, electricity and sewage. At the dawn of the XXI century, they remain poor, powerless, and voiceless. They remain severely excluded from mainstream society despite being the first inhabitants of this continent and being an estimated of 48 million people. This paper comments, specifically, on the limited impact of the Pan American Health Organization&apos;s mental health initiative on the Indigenous Peoples of Latin America.DiscussionThe Pan American Health Organization&apos;s sponsored workshop &quot;Programas y Servicios de Salud Mental en Communidades Ind&#237;genas&quot; [Mental Health Programs and Services for the Indigenous Communities] in the city of Santa Cruz, Bolivia on July16 - 18, 1998, appeared promising. However, eleven years later, no specific mental health program has been designed nor developed for the Indigenous Peoples in Latin America. This paper makes four specific recommendations for improvements in the approach of the Pan American Health Organization: (1) focus activities on what can be done; (2) build partnerships with the Indigenous Peoples; (3) consider traditional healers as essential partners in any mental health effort; and (4) conduct basic research on the mental health status of the Indigenous Peoples prior to the programming of any mental health service.SummaryThe persistent neglect of the Indigenous Peoples&apos; mental health in Latin America raises serious concerns of moral and human rights violations. Since the Pan American Health Organization&apos; Health of the Indigenous Peoples Initiative 16 years ago, no mental health service designed for them has yet been created.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-698X/9/27</link>
                <dc:creator>Mario Incayawar</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sioui Maldonado-Bouchard</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC International Health and Human Rights 2009, 9:27</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-10-29T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-698X-9-27</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC International Health and Human Rights</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-698X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>27</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-10-29T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-698X/9/26">
        <title>Barriers to the effective treatment and prevention of malaria in Africa: A systematic review of qualitative studies</title>
        <description>Background:
In Africa, an estimated 300-500 million cases of malaria occur each year resulting in approximately 1 million deaths. More than 90% of these are in children under 5 years of age. To identify commonly held beliefs about malaria that might present barriers to its successful treatment and prevention, we conducted a systematic review of qualitative studies examining beliefs and practices concerning malaria in sub-Saharan African countries.
Methods:
We searched Medline and Scopus (1966-2009) and identified 39 studies that employed qualitative methods (focus groups and interviews) to examine the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of people living in African countries where malaria is endemic. Data were extracted relating to study characteristics, and themes pertaining to barriers to malaria treatment and prevention.
Results:
The majority of studies were conducted in rural areas, and focused mostly or entirely on children. Major barriers to prevention reported included a lack of understanding of the cause and transmission of malaria (29/39), the belief that malaria cannot be prevented (7/39), and the use of ineffective prevention measures (12/39). Thirty-seven of 39 articles identified barriers to malaria treatment, including concerns about the safety and efficacy of conventional medicines (15/39), logistical obstacles, and reliance on traditional remedies. Specific barriers to the treatment of childhood malaria identified included the belief that a child with convulsions could die if given an injection or taken to hospital (10/39).
Conclusion:
These findings suggest that large-scale malaria prevention and treatment programs must account for the social and cultural contexts in which they are deployed. Further quantitative research should be undertaken to more precisely measure the impact of the themes uncovered by this exploratory analysis.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-698X/9/26</link>
                <dc:creator>David Maslove</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Anisa Mnyusiwalla</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Edward Mills</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jessie McGowan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Amir Attaran</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kumanan Wilson</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC International Health and Human Rights 2009, 9:26</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-10-25T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-698X-9-26</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC International Health and Human Rights</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-698X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>26</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-10-25T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-698X/9/18">
        <title>The three main monotheistic religions and gm food technology: an overview of perspectives

</title>
        <description>Background:
Public acceptance of genetically modified crops is partly rooted in religious views. However, the views of different religions and their potential influence on consumers&apos; decisions have not been systematically examined and summarized in a brief overview. We review the positions of the Judaism, Islam and Christianity &#8211; the three major monotheistic religions to which more than 55% of humanity adheres to &#8211; on the controversies aroused by GM technology.DiscussionThe article establishes that there is no overarching consensus within the three religions. Overall, however, it appears that mainstream theology in all three religions increasingly tends towards acceptance of GM technology per se, on performing GM research, and on consumption of GM foods. These more liberal approaches, however, are predicated on there being rigorous scientific, ethical and regulatory scrutiny of research and development of such products, and that these products are properly labeled.SummaryWe conclude that there are several other interests competing with the influence exerted on consumers by religion. These include the media, environmental activists, scientists and the food industry, all of which function as sources of information and shapers of perception for consumers.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-698X/9/18</link>
                <dc:creator>Emmanuel Omobowale</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Peter Singer</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Abdallah Daar</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC International Health and Human Rights 2009, 9:18</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-08-22T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-698X-9-18</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC International Health and Human Rights</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-698X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>18</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-08-22T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-698X/9/25">
        <title>Employment in the Ecuadorian cut-flower industry and the risk of spontaneous abortion</title>
        <description>Background:
Research on the potentially adverse effects of occupational pesticide exposure on risk of spontaneous abortion (SAB) is limited, particularly among female agricultural workers residing in developing countries.
Methods:
Reproductive histories were obtained from 217 Ecuadorian mothers participating in a study focusing on occupational pesticide exposure and children&apos;s neurobehavioral development. Only women with 2+ pregnancies were included in this study (n = 153). Gravidity, parity and frequency of SAB were compared between women with and without a history of working in the cut-flower industry in the previous 6 years. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to assess the relation between SAB and employment in the flower industry adjusting for maternal age.
Results:
In comparison to women not working in the flower industry, women working in the flower industry were significantly younger (27 versus 32 years) and of lower gravidity (3.3 versus 4.5) and reported more pregnancy losses. A 2.6 (95% CI: 1.03-6.7) fold increase in the odds of pregnancy loss among exposed women was observed after adjusting for age. Odds of reporting an SAB increased with duration of flower employment, increasing to 3.4 (95% CI: 1.3, 8.8) among women working 4 to 6 years in the flower industry compared to women who did not work in the flower industry.
Conclusion:
This exploratory analysis suggests a potential adverse association between employment in the cut-flower industry and SAB. Study limitations include the absence of a temporal relation between exposure and SAB, no quantification of specific pesticides, and residual confounding such as physical stressors (i.e., standing). Considering that approximately half of the Ecuadorian flower laborers are women, our results emphasize the need for an evaluating the reproductive health effects of employment in the flower industry on reproductive health in this population.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-698X/9/25</link>
                <dc:creator>Alexis Handal</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sioban Harlow</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC International Health and Human Rights 2009, 9:25</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-10-08T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-698X-9-25</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC International Health and Human Rights</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-698X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>25</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-10-08T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-698X/9/29">
        <title>Household exposure to violence and human rights violations in western Bangladesh (I): prevalence, risk factors and consequences</title>
        <description>Background:
The ruling parties in Bangladesh have systematically used violence against political opponents and criminals. It is essential to 1) determine the magnitude and burden of organised crime and political violence (OPV) and human rights violations in the affected community, and to 2) identify the risk factors and key indicators for developing effective health intervention and prevention measures.
Methods:
The population-based study consisted of two parts: a household survey and OPV screening at mobile clinics (presented in Part II). A cross-sectional, multistage cluster household survey was conducted in the Meherpur district in February-March 2008; 22 clusters with a sample size of 1,101 households (population of 4,870) were selected.
Results:
Around 83% of households reported being exposed to at least two categories of OPV or human rights violations: 29% reported that the family members had been arrested or detained; 31% reported torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. Crude mortality rate was 17.9/1,000 and under 5 mortality rate was 75/1,000. The annual injury rate was 36%, lifetime experience of violence-related injury was 50%, and pain experience within 2 weeks was reported by 57%. Over 80% of the population over 35 years old complained of pain. High prevalence of injury, lifetime experience of OPV-related injury and pain complaints are related to the level of exposure to OPV and human rights violations. A financial burden was imposed on families with an injured person. A geographical variation was revealed regarding reports of torture and lifetime experience of violence-related injury. A combination of individual, relational, community and societal factors, including variables such as political party affiliation, conflict with other families, household income and residential area, affected the risk of victimisation in the household. The odds ratio for reporting extrajudicial execution of a family member was 9.22 for Awami League supporters, 9.15 for Bangladesh Nationalist Party supporters; and 3.97 for Jamaat-e-Islami Party supporters compared with families with no political involvement.
Conclusions:
The level of violence and human rights violations is high. The affected population suffers from violence-related injuries and traumas, which could be a factor contributing to poverty. Victimisation is not random.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-698X/9/29</link>
                <dc:creator>Shr-Jie Wang</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jens Modvig</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Edith Montgomery</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC International Health and Human Rights 2009, 9:29</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-11-21T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-698X-9-29</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC International Health and Human Rights</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-698X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>29</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-11-21T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-698X/9/24">
        <title>Reports of evidence planting by police among a community-based sample of injection drug users in Bangkok, Thailand</title>
        <description>Background:
Drug policy in Thailand has relied heavily on law enforcement-based approaches. Qualitative reports indicate that police in Thailand have resorted to planting drugs on suspected drug users to extort money or provide grounds for arrest. The present study sought to describe the prevalence and factors associated with this form of evidence planting by police among injection drug users (IDU) in Bangkok.
Methods:
Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with evidence planting of drugs by police among a community-based sample of IDU in Bangkok. We also examined the prevalence and average amount of money paid by IDU to police in order to avoid arrest.
Results:
252 IDU were recruited between July and August, 2008, among whom 66 (26.2%) were female and the median age was 36.5 years. In total, 122 (48.4%) participants reported having drugs planted on them by police. In multivariate analyses, this form of evidence planting was positively associated with midazolam use (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR] = 2.84; 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.58 - 5.11), recent non-fatal overdose (AOR = 2.56; 95%CI: 1.40 - 4.66), syringe lending (AOR = 2.08; 95%CI: 1.19 - 3.66), and forced drug treatment (AOR = 1.88; 95%CI: 1.05 - 3.36). Among those who reported having drugs planted on them, 59 (48.3%) paid police a bribe in order to avoid arrest.
Conclusion:
A high proportion of community-recruited IDU participating in this study reported having drugs planted on them by police. Drug planting was found to be associated with numerous risk factors including syringe sharing and participation in government-run drug treatment programs. Immediate action should be taken to address this form of abuse of power reportedly used by police.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-698X/9/24</link>
                <dc:creator>Nadia Fairbairn</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Karyn Kaplan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kanna Hayashi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Calvin Lai</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Evan Wood</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Thomas Kerr</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC International Health and Human Rights 2009, 9:24</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-10-07T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-698X-9-24</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC International Health and Human Rights</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-698X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>24</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-10-07T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-698X/9/S1/S2">
        <title>Global immunization: status, progress, challenges and future</title>
        <description>Vaccines have made a major contribution to public health, including the eradication of one deadly disease, small pox, and the near eradication of another, poliomyelitis.Through the introduction of new vaccines, such as those against rotavirus and pneumococcal diseases, and with further improvements in coverage, vaccination can significantly contribute to the achievement of the health-related United Nations Millennium Development Goals.The Global Immunization Vision and Strategy (GIVS) was developed by WHO and UNICEF as a framework for strengthening national immunization programmes and protect as many people as possible against more diseases by expanding the reach of immunization, including new vaccines, to every eligible person.This paper briefly reviews global progress and challenges with respect to public vaccination programmes.The most striking recent achievement has been that of reduction of global measles mortality from an estimated 750,000 deaths in 2000 down to 197,000 in 2007. Global vaccination coverage trends continued to be positive. In 2007 most regions reached more than 80% of their target populations with three doses of DPT containing vaccines. However, the coverage remains well short of the 2010 goal on 90% coverage, particularly in the WHO region of Africa (estimated coverage 74%), and South-East Asia, (estimated coverage 69%). Elements that have contributed to the gain in immunization coverage include national multi-year planning, district-level planning and monitoring, re-establishment of outreach services and the establishment of national budget lines for immunization services strengthening.Remaining challenges include the need to: develop and implement strategies for reaching the difficult to reach; support evidence-based decisions to prioritize new vaccines for introduction; strengthening immunization systems to deliver new vaccines; expand vaccination to include older age groups; scale up vaccine preventable disease surveillance; improve quality of immunization coverage monitoring and use the data to improve programme performance; and explore financing options for reaching the GIVS goals, particularly in lower-middle income countries.Although introduction of new vaccines is important,this should not be at the expense of sustaining existing immunization activities. Instead the introduction of new vaccine introduction should be viewed as an opportunity to strengthen immunization systems, increase vaccine coverage and reduce inequities of access to immunization services.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-698X/9/S1/S2</link>
                <dc:source>BMC International Health and Human Rights 2009, 9:S2</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-10-14T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-698X-9-S1-S2</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC International Health and Human Rights</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-698X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>S2</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-10-14T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-698X/9/17">
        <title>Correlates of unintended pregnancy among currently pregnant married women in Nepal</title>
        <description>Background:
Women living in every country, irrespective of its development status, have been facing the problem of unintended pregnancy. Unintended pregnancy is an important public health issue in both developing and developed countries because of its negative association with the social and health outcomes for both mothers and children. This study aims to determine the prevalence and the factors influencing unintended pregnancy among currently pregnant married women in Nepal.
Methods:
This paper reports on data drawn from Nepal Demographic and Health Survey (NDHS) which is a nationally representative survey. The analysis is restricted to currently pregnant married women at the time of survey. Association between unintended pregnancy and the explanatory variables was assessed in bivariate analysis using Chi-square tests. Logistic regression was used to assess the net effect of several independent variables on unintended pregnancy.
Results:
More than two-fifth of the currently pregnant women (41%) reported that their current pregnancy was unintended. The results indicate that age of women, age at first marriage, ideal number of children, religion, exposure to radio and knowledge of family planning methods were key predictors of unintended pregnancy. Experience of unintended pregnancy augments with women&apos;s age (odds ratio, 1.11). Similarly, increase in the women&apos;s age at first marriage reduces the likelihood of unintended pregnancy (odds ratio, 0.93). Those who were exposed to the radio were less likely (odds ratio, 0.63) to have unintended pregnancy compared to those who were not. Furthermore, those women who had higher level of knowledge about family planning methods were less likely to experience unintended pregnancy (odds ratio, 0.60) compared to those having lower level of knowledge.
Conclusion:
One of the important factors contributing to high level of maternal and infant mortality is unintended pregnancy. Programs should aim to reduce unintended pregnancy by focusing on all these identified factors so that infant and maternal mortality and morbidity as well as the need for abortion are decreased and the overall well-being of the family is maintained and enhanced.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-698X/9/17</link>
                <dc:creator>Ramesh Adhikari</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kusol Soonthorndhada</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Pramote Prasartkul</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC International Health and Human Rights 2009, 9:17</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-08-11T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-698X-9-17</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC International Health and Human Rights</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-698X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>17</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-08-11T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-698X/9/20">
        <title>Something old or something new? Social health insurance in Ghana</title>
        <description>Background:
There is considerable interest at present in exploring the potential of social health insurance to increase access to and affordability of health care in Africa. A number of countries are currently experimenting with different approaches. Ghana&apos;s National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) was passed into law in 2003 but fully implemented from late 2005. It has already reached impressive coverage levels. This article aims to provide a preliminary assessment of the NHIS to date. This can inform the development of the NHIS itself but also other innovations in the region.
Methods:
This article is based on analysis of routine data, on secondary literature and on key informant interviews conducted by the authors with stakeholders at national, regional and district levels over the period of 2005 to 2009.
Results:
In relation to its financing sources, the NHIS is heavily reliant on tax funding for 70&#8211;75% of its revenue. This has permitted quick expansion of coverage, partly through the inclusion of large exempted population groups. Card holders increased from 7% of the population in 2005 to 45% in 2008. However, only around a third of these are contributing to the scheme financially. This presents a sustainability problem, in that revenue is de-coupled from the growing membership. In addition, the NHIS offers a broad benefits package, with no co-payments and limited gate-keeping, and also faces cost escalation related to its new payment system and the growing utilisation of members. These features contributed to a growth in distressed schemes and failure to pay outstanding facility claims in 2008.The NHIS has had a considerable impact on the health system as a whole, taking on a growing role in funding curative care. In 2009, it is expected to contribute 41% of the overall resource envelope. However there is evidence that this funding is not additional but has been switched from other funding channels. There are some equity concerns about this, as the new funding source (a VAT-based tax) may be more regressive. In addition, membership of the NHIS at present has a pro-rich bias, and a pro-urban bias in relation to renewals. Only a very small proportion is registered as indigent, and there is some evidence of &apos;squeezing out&apos; of non-members from health care utilisation. Finally, considerable challenges remain in relation to strengthening the purchasing role of the NHIS, and also settling debates about its structure and accountability.
Conclusion:
Some trade-offs will be necessary between the existing wide benefits package of the NHIS and the laudable desire to reach universal coverage. The overall resource envelope for health is likely to be stable rather than increasing over the medium-term. In the longer term, the investment costs in the NHIS will only be justified if it is able to increase the cost-effectiveness of purchasing and the responsiveness of the system as a whole.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-698X/9/20</link>
                <dc:creator>Sophie Witter</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Bertha Garshong</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC International Health and Human Rights 2009, 9:20</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-08-28T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1472-698X-9-20</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC International Health and Human Rights</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-698X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>20</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-08-28T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
