<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/feeds/latestarticles/journal?journal=bmcgeriatr&amp;quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>BMC Geriatrics - Latest Articles</title>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcgeriatr/</link>
        <description>The latest research articles published by BMC Geriatrics</description>
        <dc:date>2009-12-03T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/9/55" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/9/54" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/9/53" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/9/52" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/9/51" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/9/50" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/9/49" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/9/48" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/9/47" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/9/46" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
        <extra:info rdf:parseType="Literal">
            <html:div style="font:14px Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                <html:span style="font-weight:bold">
                    This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central
                </html:span>
                <html:br />
                <html:span style="font-size: 12px;">
                    It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit
                    <html:br />
                    <html:a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/" style="color:#3333CC; font-size:12px;">
                        http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/
                    </html:a>
                    <html:br />
                </html:span>
            </html:div>
        </extra:info>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/9/55">
        <title>A new method to assess perceived well-being among elderly people - a feasibility study</title>
        <description>Background:
A simple but countable electronic device has been developed to gain reliable information on elderly patients&apos; perceived well-being. The device has been tested and proven to be technically functional and countable. It was now tested in two care homes for the elderly and two private homes to evaluate if it provided solid information about the well-being of elderly persons. This report illustrates the practical usage of the device and shows its efficiency in gathering solid well-being information from the focus group.
Methods:
The test arrangement was carried out by assigning a group of volunteers (n=10) in care homes for the elderly for two weeks. The time period was long enough to collect a sufficient amount of information to evaluate the perceived well-being of the test subjects. Perceived well-being was assessed by using a Con-Dis device and by filling out an attached questionnaire - RAI - at the same time. RAI consisted of questions concerning mood, pain and quality of life. A standardised RAVA questionnaire with 12 questions concerning test subject&apos;s health was also answered once during the two-week time period by each test subject. After the test period the data obtained by Con-Dis was compared with the findings collected using questionnaires.
Results:
A statistically significant correlation was found between perceived well-being (measured by Con-Dis) and questionnaire-based mood (r=0,66, Pearson Correlation Coefficient) and quality of life (r=0,68). No statistically significant correlation was found between perceived well-being and pain (r=0,28). Technical functionality and feasibility of Con-Dis were good during the test period. Some problems arose because the test subjects were elderly and some in poor physical condition.
Conclusions:
On the basis of the collected results, the Con-Dis device presented information on the test subjects&apos; perceived well-being that appeared to correlate with certain aspects of their health status. The test subjects&apos; mood and quality of life but not pain had a statistically significant association with the perceived well-being level measured by Con-Dis.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/9/55</link>
                <dc:creator>Jori Reijula</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Toni Rosendahl</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kari Reijula</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Paula Roilas</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Heikki Roilas</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Raimo Sepponen</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Geriatrics 2009, 9:55</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-12-03T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2318-9-55</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Geriatrics</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2318</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>55</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-12-03T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/9/54">
        <title>Feasibility and effects of preventive home visits for at-risk older people: Design of a randomized controlled trial
</title>
        <description>Background:
The search for preventive methods to mitigate functional decline and unwanted relocation by older adults living in the community is important. Preventive home visit (PHV) models use infrequent but regular visits to older adults by trained practitioners with the goal of maintaining function and quality of life. Evidence about PHV efficacy is mixed but generally supportive. Yet interventions have rarely combined a comprehensive (biopsychosocial) occupational therapy intervention protocol with a home visit to older adults. There is a particular need in the USA to create and examine such a protocol.
Methods:
The study is a single-blind randomized controlled pilot trial designed to assess the feasibility, and to obtain preliminary efficacy estimates, of an intervention consisting of preventive home visits to community-dwelling older adults. An occupational therapy-based preventive home visit (PHV) intervention was developed and is being implemented and evaluated using a repeated measures design. We recruited a sample of 110 from a population of older adults (75+) who were screened and found to be at-risk for functional decline. Participants are currently living in the community (not in assisted living or a skilled nursing facility) in one of three central North Carolina counties. After consent, participants were randomly assigned into experimental and comparison groups. The experimental group receives the intervention four times over a 12 month follow-up period while the comparison group receives a minimal intervention of mailed printed materials. Pre- and post-intervention measures are being gathered by questionnaires administered face-to-face by a treatment-blinded research associate. Key outcome measures include functional ability, participation, life satisfaction, self-rated health, and depression. Additional information is collected from participants in the experimental group during the intervention to assess the feasibility of the intervention and potential modifiers. Fidelity is being addressed and measured across several domains.DiscussionFeasibility indications to date are positive. Although the protocol has some limitations, we expect to learn enough about the intervention, delivery and effects to support a larger trial with a more stringent design and enhanced statistical power.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT00985283</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/9/54</link>
                <dc:creator>Malcolm Cutchin</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Susan Coppola</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Vibeke Talley</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Judie Svihula</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Diane Catellier</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kendra Healwole Shank</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Geriatrics 2009, 9:54</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-12-03T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2318-9-54</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Geriatrics</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2318</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>54</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-12-03T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/9/53">
        <title>Falls following discharge after an in-hospital fall</title>
        <description>Background:
Falls are the most common adverse events reported in hospitalized patients. While there is a growing body of literature on fall prevention in the hospital, the data examining the fall rate and risk factors for falls in the immediate post-hospitalization period has not been well described. The objectives of the present study were to determine the fall rate of in-hospital fallers at home and to explore the risk factors for falls during the immediate post-hospitalization period.MethodWe identified patients who sustained a fall on one of 16 medical/surgical nursing units during an inpatient admission to an urban community teaching hospital. After discharge, falls were ascertained using weekly telephone surveillance for 4 weeks post-discharge. Patients were followed until death, loss to follow up or end of study (four weeks). Time spent rehospitalized or institutionalized was censored in rate calculations.
Results:
Of 95 hospitalized patients who fell during recruitment, 65 (68%) met inclusion criteria and agreed to participate. These subjects contributed 1498 person-days to the study (mean duration of follow-up = 23 days). Seventy-five percent were African-American and 43% were women. Sixteen patients (25%) had multiple falls during hospitalization and 23 patients (35%) suffered a fall-related injury during hospitalization. Nineteen patients (29%) experienced 38 falls at their homes, yielding a fall rate of 25.4/1,000 person-days (95% CI: 17.3-33.4). Twenty-three patients (35%) were readmitted and 3(5%) died. One patient experienced a hip fracture. In exploratory univariate analysis, persons who were likely to fall at home were those who sustained multiple falls in the hospital (p=0.008).
Conclusions:
Patients who fall during hospitalization, especially on more than one occasion, are at high risk for falling at home following hospital discharge. Interventions to reduce falls would be appropriate to test in this high-risk population.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/9/53</link>
                <dc:creator>Rick Davenport</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Georgeta Vaidean</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Carol Jones</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>A. Michelle Chandler</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Lori Kessler</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Lorraine Mion</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ronald Shorr</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Geriatrics 2009, 9:53</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-12-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2318-9-53</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Geriatrics</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2318</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>53</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/9/52">
        <title>Comparing the Functional Independence Measure and the interRAI/MDS for use in the functional assessment of older adults: A review of the literature
</title>
        <description>Background:
The rehabilitation of older persons is often complicated by increased frailty and medical complexity - these in turn present challenges for the development of health information systems. Objective investigation and comparison of the effectiveness of geriatric rehabilitation services requires information systems that are comprehensive, reliable, valid, and sensitive to clinically relevant changes in older persons. The Functional Independence Measure is widely used in rehabilitation settings - in Canada this is used as the central component of the National Rehabilitation Reporting System of the Canadian Institute of Health Information. An alternative system has been developed by the interRAI consortium. We conducted a literature review to compare the development and measurement properties of these two systems.
Methods:
English language literature published between 1983 (initial development of the FIM) and 2008 was searched using Medline and CINAHL databases, and the reference lists of retrieved articles. Relevant articles were summarized and charted using the criteria proposed by Streiner. Additionally, attention was paid to the ability of the two systems to address issues particularly relevant to older rehabilitation clients, such as medical complexity, comorbidity, and responsiveness to small but clinically meaningful improvements.
Results:
In total, 66 articles were found that met the inclusion criteria. The majority of FIM articles studied inpatient rehabilitation settings while the majority of interRAI/MDS articles focused on nursing home settings. There is evidence supporting the reliability of both instruments. There were few articles that investigated the construct validity of the interRAI/MDS.
Conclusions:
Additional psychometric research is needed on both the FIM and MDS, especially with regard to their use in different settings and with different client groups.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/9/52</link>
                <dc:creator>Christine Glenny</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Paul Stolee</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Geriatrics 2009, 9:52</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-11-29T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2318-9-52</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Geriatrics</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2318</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>52</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-11-29T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/9/51">
        <title>Implementation of preventive strength training in residential geriatric care: a multi-centre study protocol with one year of interventions on multiple levels</title>
        <description>Background:
There is scientific evidence that preventive physical exercise is effective even in high age. In contrast, there are few opportunities of preventive exercise for highly aged people endangered by or actually in need of care. For example, they would not be able to easily go to training facilities; standard exercises may be too intensive and therefore be harmful to them; orientation disorders like dementia would exacerbate individuals and groups in following instructions and keeping exercises going on. In order to develop appropriate interventions, these and other issues were assigned to different levels: the individual-social level (ISL), the organisational-institutional level (OIL) and the political-cultural level (PCL). Consequently, this conceptional framework was utilised for development, implementation and evaluation of a new strength and balance exercise programme for old people endangered by or actually in need of daily care. The present paper contains the development of this programme labeled ``fit for 100&apos;&apos;, and a study protocol of an interventional single-arm multi-centre trial.
Methods:
The intervention consisted of (a) two group training sessions every week over one year, mainly resistance exercises, accompanied by sensorimotor and communicative group exercises and games (ISL), (b) a sustainable implementation concept, starting new groups by instructors belonging to the project, followed by training and supervision of local staff, who stepwise take over the group (OIL), (c) informing and convincing activities in professional, administrative and governmental contexts, public relation activities, and establishing an advisory council with renowned experts and public figures (PCL). Participating institutions of geriatric care were selected through several steps of quality criteria assessment. Primary outcome measures were continuous documentation of individual participation (ISL), number of groups continued without external financial support (at the end of the project, and after one year) (OIL). Secondary outcome was measured by sensorimotor tests and care-related assessments  in the beginning and every 16 weeks (ISL), by qualitative outcome descriptions 12 months after group implementation (OIL) and by analysis of media response and structured interviews with stakeholders, also after 12 months (PCL).
Conclusions:
Exemplarily, preventive exercise has been established for a neglected target population. The multi-level approach used here seems to be helpful to overcome institutional and individual (attitude) barriers.Trial registration:Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN55213782</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/9/51</link>
                <dc:creator>Michael Brach</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Frank Nieder</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ulrike Nieder</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Heinz Mechling</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Geriatrics 2009, 9:51</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-11-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2318-9-51</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Geriatrics</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2318</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>51</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-11-24T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/9/50">
        <title>Gender-specific associations of vision and hearing impairments with adverse health outcomes in older Japanese: a population-based cohort study</title>
        <description>Background:
Several epidemiological studies have shown that self-reported vision and hearing impairments are associated with adverse health outcomes (AHOs) in older populations; however, few studies have used objective sensory measurements or investigated the role of gender in this association. Therefore, we examined the association of vision and hearing impairments (as measured by objective methods) with AHOs (dependence in activities of daily living or death), and whether this association differed by gender.
Methods:
From 2005 to 2006, a total of 801 residents (337 men and 464 women) aged 65 years or older of Kurabuchi Town, Gunma, Japan, participated in a baseline examination that included vision and hearing assessments; they were followed up through September 2008. Vision impairment was defined as a corrected visual acuity of worse than 0.5 (logMAR = 0.3) in the better eye, and hearing impairment was defined as a failure to hear a 30 dB hearing level signal at 1 kHz in the better ear. Information on outcomes was obtained from the town hall and through face-to-face home visit interviews. We calculated the risk ratios (RRs) of AHOs for vision and hearing impairments according to gender.
Results:
During a mean follow-up period of 3 years, 34 men (10.1%) and 52 women (11.3%) had AHOs. In both genders, vision impairment was related to an elevated risk of AHOs (multi-adjusted RR for men and women together = 1.60, 95% CI = 1.05-2.44), with no statistically significant interaction between the genders. In contrast, a significant association between hearing impairment and AHOs (multi-adjusted RR = 3.10, 95% CI = 1.43-6.72) was found only in the men.
Conclusions:
In this older Japanese population, sensory impairments were clearly associated with AHOs, and the association appeared to vary according to gender. Gender-specific associations between sensory impairments and AHOs warrant further investigation.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/9/50</link>
                <dc:creator>Takehiro Michikawa</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Yuji Nishiwaki</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Yuriko Kikuchi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Makiko Nakano</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Satoko Iwasawa</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Keiko Asakura</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ai Milojevic</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kunio Mizutari</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hideyuki Saito</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Susumu Ishida</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Tomonori Okamura</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Toru Takebayashi</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Geriatrics 2009, 9:50</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-11-22T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2318-9-50</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Geriatrics</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2318</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>50</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-11-22T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/9/49">
        <title>Inverse association between insulin resistance and gait speed in nondiabetic older men: Results from the U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999-2002</title>
        <description>Background:
Recent studies have revealed the associations between insulin resistance (IR) and geriatric conditions such as frailty and cognitive impairment. However, little is known about the relation of IR to physical impairment and limitation in the aging process, eg. slow gait speed and poor muscle strength. The aim of this study is to determine the effect of IR in performance-based physical function, specifically gait speed and leg strength, among nondiabetic older adults.
Methods:
Cross-sectional data were from the population-based National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1999-2002). A total of 1168 nondiabetic adults (&#8805; 50 years) with nonmissing values in fasting measures of insulin and glucose, habitual gait speed (HGS), and leg strength were analyzed. IR was assessed by homeostasis model assessment (HOMA-IR), whereas HGS and peak leg strength by the 20-foot timed walk test and an isokinetic dynamometer, respectively. We used multiple linear regression to examine the association between IR and performance-based physical function.
Results:
IR was inversely associated with gait speed among the men. After adjusting demographics, body mass index, alcohol consumption, smoking status, chronic co-morbidities, and markers of nutrition and cardiovascular risk, each increment of 1 standard deviation in the HOMA-IR level was associated with a 0.04 m/sec decrease (p = 0.003) in the HGS in men. We did not find such association among the women. The IR-HGS association was not changed after further adjustment of leg strength. Last, HOMA-IR was not demonstrated in association with peak leg strength.
Conclusion:
IR is inversely associated with HGS among older men without diabetes. The results suggest that IR, an important indicator of gait function among men, could be further investigated as an intervenable target to prevent walking limitation.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/9/49</link>
                <dc:creator>Chen-Ko Kuo</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Lian-Yu Lin</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Yau-Hua Yu</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kuan-Han Wu</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hsu-Ko Kuo</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Geriatrics 2009, 9:49</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-11-19T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2318-9-49</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Geriatrics</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2318</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>49</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-11-19T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/9/48">
        <title>The rationale and design of the antihypertensives and vascular, endothelial, and cognitive function (AVEC) trial in elderly hypertensives with early cognitive impairment: Role of the renin angiotensin system inhibition.</title>
        <description>Background:
Prior evidence suggests that the renin angiotensin system and antihypertensives that inhibit this system play a role in cognitive, central vascular, and endothelial function. Our objective is to conduct a double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial, the antihypertensives and vascular, endothelial, and cognitive function (AVEC), to compare 1 year treatment of 3 antihypertensives (lisinopril, candesartan, or hydrochlorothiazide) in their effect on memory and executive function, cerebral blood flow, and central endothelial function of seniors with hypertension and early objective evidence of executive or memory impairments.Methods/DesignThe overall experimental design of the AVEC trial is a 3-arm double blind randomized controlled clinical trial. A total of 100 community eligible individuals (60 years or older) with hypertension and early cognitive impairment are being recruited from the greater Boston area and randomized to lisinopril, candesartan, or hydrochlorothiazide (&quot;active control&quot;) for 12 months. The goal of the intervention is to achieve blood pressure control defined as SBP &lt; 140 mm Hg and DBP &lt; 90 mm Hg. Additional antihypertensives are added to achieve this goal if needed. Eligible participants are those with hypertension, defined as a blood pressure 140/90 mm Hg or greater, early cognitive impairment without dementia defined (10 or less out of 15 on the executive clock draw test or 1 standard deviation below the mean on the immediate memory subtest of the repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status and Mini-Mental-Status-exam &gt;20 and without clinical diagnosis of dementia or Alzheimer&apos;s disease). Individuals who are currently receiving antihypertensives are eligible to participate if the participants and the primary care providers are willing to taper their antihypertensives. Participants undergo cognitive assessment, measurements of cerebral blood flow using Transcranial Doppler, and central endothelial function by measuring changes in cerebral blood flow in response to changes in end tidal carbon dioxide at baseline (off antihypertensives), 6, and 12 months. Our outcomes are change in cognitive function score (executive and memory), cerebral blood flow, and carbon dioxide cerebral vasoreactivity.DiscussionThe AVEC trial is the first study to explore impact of antihypertensives in those who are showing early evidence of cognitive difficulties that did not reach the threshold of dementia. Success of this trial will offer new therapeutic application of antihypertensives that inhibit the renin angiotensin system and new insights in the role of this system in aging.Trial RegistrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT00605072</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/9/48</link>
                <dc:creator>Ihab Hajjar</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Meaghan Hart</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>William Milberg</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Vera Novak</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Lewis Lipsitz</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Geriatrics 2009, 9:48</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-11-18T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2318-9-48</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Geriatrics</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2318</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>48</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-11-18T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/9/47">
        <title>A frailty index to predict the mortality risk in a population of senior mexican adults </title>
        <description>Background:
Frailty in the elderly can be regarded as nonspecific vulnerability to adverse health outcomes, caused by multiple factors. The aim was to analyze the relationships between the frailty index, age and mortality in a two year follow up study of Mexican elderly.
Methods:
A frailty index was developed using 34 variables. To obtain the index, the mean of the total score for each individual was obtained. Survival analyses techniques were used to examine the risk ratios for the different levels of the frailty index. Kaplan-Meier estimates were obtained, adjusted for age and gender. Cox proportional hazards models were also built to obtain hazard ratio estimates.
Results:
A total of 4082 participants was analyzed. Participants had an average age of 73 years and 52.5% were women. On average, participants were followed-up for 710 days (standard deviation = 111 days) and 279 of them died. Mortality increased with the frailty index level, especially in those with levels between .21 to .65, reaching approximately 17% and 21%, respectively. Cox proportional hazards models showed that participants with frailty index levels associated to increased mortality (.21 and higher) represent 24.0% of those aged 65-69 years and 47.6% of those 85 and older.
Conclusion:
The frailty index shows the properties found in the other studies, it allows stratifying older Mexican into several groups different by the degree of the risk of mortality, and therefore the frailty index can be used in assessing health of elderly.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/9/47</link>
                <dc:creator>Jose Garcia-Gonzalez</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Carmen Garcia-Pena</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Francisco Franco-Marina</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Luis Gutierrez-Robledo</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Geriatrics 2009, 9:47</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-11-03T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2318-9-47</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Geriatrics</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2318</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>47</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-11-03T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/9/46">
        <title>Falls among community-residing stroke survivors following inpatient
rehabilitation: a descriptive analysis of longitudinal data</title>
        <description>Background:
Stroke victims are at relatively high risk for injurious falls. The purpose of this study was to document longitudinal fall patterns following inpatient rehabilitation for first-time stroke survivors.
Methods:
Participants (n = 231) were recruited at the end of their rehab stay and interviewed monthly via telephone for 1 to 32 months regarding fall incidents. Analyses were conducted on: total reports of falls by month over time for first-time and repeat fallers, the incidence of falling in any given month; and factors differing between fallers and non fallers.
Results:
The largest percentage of participants (14%) reported falling in the first month post-discharge. After month five, less than 10% of the sample reported falling, bar months 15 (10.4%) and 23 (13.2%). From months one to nine, the percentage of those reporting one fall with and without a prior fall were similar. After month nine, the number of individuals who reported a single fall with a fall history was twice as high compared to those without a prior fall who reported falling. In both cases the percentages were small. A very small subset of the population emerged who fell multiple times each month, most of whom had a prior fall history. At least a third of the sample reported a loss of balance each month. Few factors differed significantly between fallers and non-fallers in months one to six.
Conclusion:
Longitudinal data suggest that falls most likely linked to first time strokes occur in the first six months post discharge, particularly month one. Data routinely available at discharge does not distinguish fallers from non-fallers. Once a fall incident has occurred however, preventive intervention is warranted.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/9/46</link>
                <dc:creator>Laura Wagner</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Victoria Phillips</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Amanda Hunsaker</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Pamela Forducey</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Geriatrics 2009, 9:46</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-10-14T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1471-2318-9-46</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>BMC Geriatrics</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1471-2318</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>46</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-10-14T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
