<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/feeds/editorspicks?journal=bmcecol&amp;quantity=">
        <title>Editor's picks</title>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcecol/</link>
        <description>The editor's pick of recent articles published by BMC Ecology</description>
        <dc:date>2012-05-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6785/12/6" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6785/12/5" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6785/12/4" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6785/12/3" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6785/12/1" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
                 <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6785/12/6">
        <title>Adaptive and variable intraguild predators facilitate local coexistence in an intraguild predation module
</title>
        <description>Background:
Intraguild predation (IGP) is common in nature, but its ecological role is still illusive. A number of studies have investigated a three species IGP module that consists of an intraguild predator, intraguild prey, and resource species in which the intraguild predator and the intraguild prey exploitatively compete for the resource while the intraguild predator also consumes the intraguild prey. A common prediction of models of the IGP module is that the coexistence of the species is difficult, which is considered inconsistent to the ubiquity of IGP in nature. This study revisits the IGP module and provides an alternative coexistence mechanism by focusing on a commonly used analysis method (i.e., invasion analysis) in light of individual variation in adaptive behavior.
Results:
Invasion analysis underestimates the possibility of coexistence regardless of the presence or absence of adaptive behavior. Coexistence is possible even when invasion analysis predicts otherwise. The underestimation by invasion analysis is pronounced when the intraguild predator forages adaptively, which is even further pronounced when the expression of foraging behavior is variable among intraguild predators.
Conclusions:
The possibility of coexistence in the IGP module is greater than previously thought, which may have been partly due to how models were analyzed. Inconsistent conclusions may result from the same model depending on how the model is analyzed. Individual variation in adaptive behavior can be an important factor promoting the coexistence of species in IGP modules.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6785/12/6</link>
                <dc:creator>San-He Wu</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Toshinori Okuyama</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Ecology 2012, 12:6</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-05-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>10.1186/1472-6785-12-6</dc:identifier>
                            <dc:title>Coexistence in intraguild predation</dc:title>
                            <dc:description>Invasion analysis underestimates the possibility of coexistence in intraguild predation modules when individual variation in adaptive foraging behaviour is taken into account, suggesting that the possibility of stable coexistence is greater than previously thought.</dc:description>
                <prism:require>/content/figures/1472-6785-12-6-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>BMC Ecology</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-6785</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>12</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>6</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-05-24T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6785/12/5">
        <title>Habitat fragmentation impacts mobility in a common and widespread woodland butterfly: do sexes respond differently?</title>
        <description>Background:
Theory predicts a nonlinear response of dispersal evolution to habitat fragmentation. First, dispersal will be favoured in line with both decreasing area of habitat patches and increasing inter-patch distances. Next, once these inter-patch distances exceed a critical threshold, dispersal will be counter-selected, unless essential resources no longer co-occur in compact patches but are differently scattered; colonization of empty habitat patches or rescue of declining populations are then increasingly overruled by dispersal costs like mortality risks and loss of time and energy. However, to date, most empirical studies mainly document an increase of dispersal associated with habitat fragmentation. We analyzed dispersal kernels for males and females of the common, widespread woodland butterfly Pararge aegeria in highly fragmented landscape, and for males in landscapes that differed in their degree of habitat fragmentation.
Results:
The male and female probabilities of moving were considerably lower in the highly fragmented landscapes compared to the male probability of moving in fragmented agricultural and deciduous oak woodland landscapes. We also investigated whether, and to what extent, daily dispersal distance in the highly fragmented landscape was influenced by a set of landscape variables for both males and females, including distance to the nearest woodland, area of the nearest woodland, patch area and abundance of individuals in the patch. We found that daily movement distance decreased with increasing distance to the nearest woodland in both males and females. Daily distances flown by males were related to the area of the woodland capture site, whereas no such effect was observed for females.
Conclusion:
Overall, mobility was strongly reduced in the highly fragmented landscape, and varied considerably among landscapes with different spatial resource distributions. We interpret the results relative to different cost-benefit ratios of movements in fragmented landscapes.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6785/12/5</link>
                <dc:creator>Benjamin Bergerot</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Thomas Merckx</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hans Van Dyck</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Michel Baguette</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Ecology 2012, 12:5</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-04-27T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>10.1186/1472-6785-12-5</dc:identifier>
                            <dc:title>Butterfly dispersal linked to landscape</dc:title>
                            <dc:description>Dispersal of the woodland butterfly, Pararge aegeria, is lower in highly fragmented urban landscapes compared to fragmented agricultural and continuous woodland landscapes, with males more likely to remain in large patches than females.</dc:description>
                <prism:require>/content/figures/1472-6785-12-5-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>BMC Ecology</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-6785</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>12</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>5</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-04-27T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6785/12/4">
        <title>Mapping the social network: tracking lice in a wild primate (&lt;it&gt;Microcebus rufus&lt;/it&gt;) population to infer social contacts and vector potential</title>
        <description>Background:
Studies of host-parasite interactions have the potential to provide insights into the ecology of both organisms involved. We monitored the movement of sucking lice (Lemurpediculus verruculosus), parasites that require direct host-host contact to be transferred, in their host population of wild mouse lemurs (Microcebus rufus). These lemurs live in the rainforests of Madagascar, are small (40 g), arboreal, nocturnal, solitary foraging primates for which data on population-wide interactions are difficult to obtain. We developed a simple, cost effective method exploiting the intimate relationship between louse and lemur, whereby individual lice were marked, without removal from their host, with an individualized code, and tracked throughout the lemur population. We then tested the hypotheses that 1) the frequency of louse transfers, and thus interactions, would decrease with increasing distance between paired individual lemurs; 2) due to host polygynandry, social interactions and hence louse transfers would increase during the onset of the breeding season; and 3) individual mouse lemurs would vary in their contributions to the spread of lice.
Results:
We show that louse transfers involved 43.75% of the studied lemur population, exclusively males. Louse transfers peaked during the breeding season, perhaps due to increased social interactions between lemurs. Although trap-based individual lemur ranging patterns are restricted, louse transfer rate does not correlate with the distance between lemur trapping locales, indicating wider host ranging behavior and a greater risk of rapid population-wide pathogen transmission than predicted by standard trapping data alone. Furthermore, relatively few lemur individuals contributed disproportionately to the rapid spread of lice throughout the population.
Conclusions:
Using a simple method, we were able to visualize exchanges of lice in a population of cryptic wild primates. This method not only provided insight into the previously unseen parasite movement between lemurs, but also allowed us to infer social interactions between them. As lice are known pathogen vectors, our method also allowed us to identify the lemurs most likely to facilitate louse-mediated epidemics. Our approach demonstrates the potential to uncover otherwise inaccessible parasite-host, and host social interaction data in any trappable species parasitized by sucking lice.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6785/12/4</link>
                <dc:creator>Sarah Zohdy</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Addison D Kemp</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Lance A Durden</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Patricia C Wright</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jukka Jernvall</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Ecology 2012, 12:4</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-03-26T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>10.1186/1472-6785-12-4</dc:identifier>
                            <dc:title>Lice measure lemur social interactions</dc:title>
                            <dc:description>Transfer of lice between wild mouse lemurs indicates wider host ranging behavior and a greater risk of rapid population-wide pathogen transmission than predicted by standard lemur trapping data alone.</dc:description>
                <prism:require>/content/figures/1472-6785-12-4-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>BMC Ecology</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-6785</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>12</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>4</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-03-26T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6785/12/3">
        <title>Palms, peccaries and perturbations: widespread effects of small-scale disturbance in tropical forests</title>
        <description>Background:
Disturbance is an important process structuring ecosystems worldwide and has long been thought to be a significant driver of diversity and dynamics. In forests, most studies of disturbance have focused on large-scale disturbance such as hurricanes or tree-falls. However, smaller sub-canopy disturbances could also have significant impacts on community structure. One such sub-canopy disturbance in tropical forests is abscising leaves of large arborescent palm (Arececeae) trees. These leaves can weigh up to 15 kg and cause physical damage and mortality to juvenile plants. Previous studies examining this question suffered from the use of static data at small spatial scales. Here we use data from a large permanent forest plot combined with dynamic data on the survival and growth of &gt; 66,000 individuals over a seven-year period to address whether falling palm fronds do impact neighboring seedling and sapling communities, or whether there is an interaction between the palms and peccaries rooting for fallen palm fruit in the same area as falling leaves. We tested the wider generalisation of these hypotheses by comparing seedling and sapling survival under fruiting and non-fruiting trees in another family, the Myristicaceae.
Results:
We found a spatially-restricted but significant effect of large arborescent fruiting palms on the spatial structure, population dynamics and species diversity of neighbouring sapling and seedling communities. However, these effects were not found around slightly smaller non-fruiting palm trees, suggesting it is seed predators such as peccaries rather than falling leaves that impact on the communities around palm trees. Conversely, this hypothesis was not supported in data from other edible species, such as those in the family Myristicaceae.
Conclusions:
Given the abundance of arborescent palm trees in Amazonian forests, it is reasonable to conclude that their presence does have a significant, if spatially-restricted, impact on juvenile plants, most likely on the survival and growth of seedlings and saplings damaged by foraging peccaries. Given the abundance of fruit produced by each palm, the widespread effects of these small-scale disturbances appear, over long time-scales, to cause directional changes in community structure at larger scales.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6785/12/3</link>
                <dc:creator>Simon A Queenborough</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Margaret R Metz</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Thorsten Wiegand</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Renato Valencia</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Ecology 2012, 12:3</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-03-19T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>10.1186/1472-6785-12-3</dc:identifier>
                            <dc:title>Seed predators influence tropical forests</dc:title>
                            <dc:description>Large fruiting palm trees exert a significant effect on the spatial structure, population dynamics and species diversity of neighbouring sapling and seedling communities, which is not reflected by non-fruiting palms, suggesting seed predators as the cause</dc:description>
                <prism:require>/content/figures/1472-6785-12-3-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>BMC Ecology</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-6785</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>12</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-03-19T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6785/12/1">
        <title>Plant and animal endemism in the eastern Andean slope: challenges to conservation</title>
        <description>Background:
The Andes-Amazon basin of Peru and Bolivia is one of the most data-poor, biologically rich, and rapidly changing areas of the world. Conservation scientists agree that this area hosts extremely high endemism, perhaps the highest in the world, yet we know little about the geographic distributions of these species and ecosystems within country boundaries. To address this need, we have developed conservation data on endemic biodiversity (~800 species of birds, mammals, amphibians, and plants) and terrestrial ecological systems (~90; groups of vegetation communities resulting from the action of ecological processes, substrates, and/or environmental gradients) with which we conduct a fine scale conservation prioritization across the Amazon watershed of Peru and Bolivia. We modelled the geographic distributions of 435 endemic plants and all 347 endemic vertebrate species, from existing museum and herbaria specimens at a regional conservation practitioner&apos;s scale (1:250,000-1:1,000,000), based on the best available tools and geographic data. We mapped ecological systems, endemic species concentrations, and irreplaceable areas with respect to national level protected areas.
Results:
We found that sizes of endemic species distributions ranged widely (&lt; 20 km2 to &gt; 200,000 km2) across the study area. Bird and mammal endemic species richness was greatest within a narrow 2500-3000 m elevation band along the length of the Andes Mountains. Endemic amphibian richness was highest at 1000-1500 m elevation and concentrated in the southern half of the study area. Geographical distribution of plant endemism was highly taxon-dependent. Irreplaceable areas, defined as locations with the highest number of species with narrow ranges, overlapped slightly with areas of high endemism, yet generally exhibited unique patterns across the study area by species group. We found that many endemic species and ecological systems are lacking national-level protection; a third of endemic species have distributions completely outside of national protected areas. Protected areas cover only 20% of areas of high endemism and 20% of irreplaceable areas. Almost 40% of the 91 ecological systems are in serious need of protection (= &lt; 2% of their ranges protected).
Conclusions:
We identify for the first time, areas of high endemic species concentrations and high irreplaceability that have only been roughly indicated in the past at the continental scale. We conclude that new complementary protected areas are needed to safeguard these endemics and ecosystems. An expansion in protected areas will be challenged by geographically isolated micro-endemics, varied endemic patterns among taxa, increasing deforestation, resource extraction, and changes in climate. Relying on pre-existing collections, publically accessible datasets and tools, this working framework is exportable to other regions plagued by incomplete conservation data.</description>
        <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6785/12/1</link>
                <dc:creator>Jennifer J Swenson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Bruce E Young</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Stephan Beck</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Pat Comer</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jesús H Córdova</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jessica Dyson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Dirk Embert</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Filomeno Encarnación</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Wanderley Ferreira</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Irma Franke</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Dennis Grossman</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Pilar Hernandez</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sebastian K Herzog</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Carmen Josse</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Gonzalo Navarro</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Víctor Pacheco</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Bruce A Stein</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Martín Timaná</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Antonio Tovar</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Carolina Tovar</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Julieta Vargas</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Carlos M Zambrana-Torrelio</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>BMC Ecology 2012, 12:1</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-01-27T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>10.1186/1472-6785-12-1</dc:identifier>
                            <dc:title>Conservation needs in the Andes</dc:title>
                            <dc:description>Areas of high endemic species concentrations in the Andes-Amazon basin are in need of greater protection at the national level, as revealed by accurate species distribution maps that combine climate, topography, vegetation and biodiversity data.</dc:description>
                <prism:require>/content/figures/1472-6785-12-1-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>BMC Ecology</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1472-6785</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>12</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-01-27T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>

