Skip to main content
Download PDF

Association between pathologic complete response and biochemical indicators after neoadjuvant therapy for HER2-positive breast cancer

World Journal of Surgical Oncology volume 22, Article number: 126 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Purpose

This study investigated the changes in the fasting blood glucose (FBG), fasting triglyceride (FTG), and fasting total cholesterol (FTC) levels during neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer (BC) and the association with pathologic complete response (pCR).

Methods

Relevant data from Sichuan Cancer Hospital from June 2019 to June 2022 were collected and analyzed, and FBG, FTG, and FTC were divided into baseline, change, and process groups, which were grouped to analyze the changes after receiving NAT and the association with pCR.

Results

In the estrogen receptor (ER)-negative subgroup, patients with low levels of FTG in the process group were more likely to achieve pCR compared to high levels, and in the progesterone receptor (PR)-negative subgroup, patients with lower FTG compared to higher FTG after receiving NAT was more likely to achieve pCR.

Conclusions

Patients with HER2-positive BC undergoing NAT develop varying degrees of abnormalities (elevated or decreased) in FBG, FTG, and FTC; moreover, the status of FTG levels during NAT may predict pCR in ER-negative or PR-negative HER2-positive BC.Early monitoring and timely intervention for FTG abnormalities may enable this subset of patients to increase the likelihood of obtaining a pCR along with management of abnormal markers.

Highlights

• Neoadjuvant therapy causes various fasting glucose, fasting triglyceride, and fasting cholesterol abnormalities.

• Fasting triglycerides may predict the pathologic complete response in some patients.

• Fasting blood glucose and fasting total cholesterol do not predict the pathologic complete response.

• Some patients may derive both short-term (achievement of pathologic complete response) and long-term (reduction of cardiovascular disease risk) benefits in conjunction with lipid management.

Background

Breast cancer (BC) represents the most common malignant tumor in women, posing a severe health threat [1]. Furthermore, 15% ~ 20% of BC are human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive, which is clinically characterized by strong invasiveness and poor prognosis [2, 3]. Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is the standard preferred initial treatment for patients with HER2-positive BC (tumor primary stage ≥ 2 or lymph node status stage ≥ 1). This includes the TCbHP regimen of trastuzumab (H) and pertuzumab (P) in combination with paclitaxel and platinum drugs, and the A/EC-THP regimen of cyclophosphamide in combination with anthracycline sequenced with paclitaxel in combination with HP drugs [4, 5].

Pathologic complete response (pCR) is widely used for the alternative assessment of NAT efficacy since patients who achieve a pCR after receiving NAT have longer event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) periods [6,7,8,9]. Therefore, studies on clinicopathologic factors predicting pCR in HER2-positive BC are emerging, including hormone receptor (HR) expression status [10], histologic grading [11], and clinical staging [12].

However, receiving NAT to obtain pCR may cause or exacerbate biochemical marker abnormalities, including fasting blood glucose (FBG), fasting triglycerides (FTG), and fasting total cholesterol (FTC), increasing the risk of other diseases, especially cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk [13,14,15,16,17]. The association between these commonly used, highly reproducible, inexpensive, and convenient biochemical markers and NAT and pCR in HER2-positive BC has not yet been established.

This study analyzes the FBG, FTG, and FTC association with the existing NAT regimen and pCR to provide medical evidence for early HER2-positive BC glycemic, lipid management and pCR prediction.

Methods

Subjects and research design

This study examined the clinical and pathologic data of HER2-positive invasive BC patients who were first diagnosed and underwent surgery after combined neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and dual-targeted therapy (regimen: TCbHP or A/EC-THP) at the Breast Surgery Center of Sichuan Cancer Hospital from June 2019 to June 2022 (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Technological route

Full size image

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

The study included (1) females, (2) first diagnosed with HER2-positive invasive BC at the hospital, (3) clinical stages II or III, (4) unilateral BC, (5) complete and available baseline-to-preoperative FBG, FTG, and FTC profiles in fasting venous blood, (6) complete clinical and pathologic data, and (7) those receiving TCbHP or A/EC-THP as the NAT treatment regimen.

The study excluded (1) males, (2) surgery without standardized NAT combined with dual-targeted therapy, (3) incomplete test, clinical, or pathologic data, (4) stages I or IV BC, (5) patients receiving weekly treatments, (6) those with previously diagnosed cancers at the time of admission, (7) occult BC, (8) those who changed their regimen during the NAT period, (9) those who did not undergo the full treatment course at the hospital, and (10) FBG, FTG, and FTC test data from non-fasting venous blood.

Pathologic interpretation criteria

Estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) status were determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC), with ER and PR positivity [18] defined as positive nuclear staining in at least 1% of tumor cells, and HR negativity defined as negative for both ER and PR; otherwise, it was considered HR positivity. HER2 status [19] was determined by IHC and fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH), with HER2 3 + and HER2 2 + /FISH-positivity for HER2 positivity.

Clinical interpretation criteria

The clinical staging was guided by the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer [20]. The menstrual status was interpreted in conjunction with questioning at the time of first diagnosis, age, and laboratory tests [21]. The reference ranges for follicle-stimulating hormone and estradiol in our hospital were (follicular phase 3.5–12.5, ovulatory phase 4.7–21.5, luteal phase 1.7–7.7, and menopausal phase 25.8–134.8) mIU/mL and (follicular phase 12.4–233, ovulatory phase 41–398, luteal phase 22.3–341, and menopausal phase < 5–138) pg/ml, respectively.

Biochemical interpretation criteria

The baseline patient group information was obtained from the test data at the first visit to the hospital (corresponding to the period before the start of the first NAT). The process group data was obtained from the average values of the period before the second NAT to the preoperative period. The FBG, FTG, and FTC reference ranges in the hospital were 3.89–6.11 mmol/L, 0.00–1.70 mmol/L, and 0.00–5.20 mmol/L, respectively, which might be interpreted differently by different testing instruments. Criteria for high and low FBG, FTG, and FTC interpretation in the baseline and process groups were determined by the cutoff values of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, whereas high and low FBG, FTG, and FTC interpretation in the change group was determined by comparing the sizes of the process and baseline groups (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

The overall and subgroup ROC curves: ROC curves of FBG, FTG, and FTC for the baseline and process groups in the overall analysis (with information on the cutoff value and AUCs) presented in Figs A and H, respectively; and ROC curves of FBG, FTG, and FTC for the baseline and process groups in the analysis of the ER-positive and ER-negative subgroups (with information on the cutoff value and AUCs) presented in Figs B, I, and C, and J, respectively.ROC curves of FBG, FTG, and FTC for baseline and process groups in PR-positive and PR-negative subgroup analyses (with information on cutoff values and AUCs) presented in Figs D, K, and E, and L, respectively; and ROC curves of FBG, FTG, and FTC for baseline and process groups in menopausal and non-menopausal subgroup analyses presented in Figs F, M, and G, and N, respectively (with information on information on cutoff values and AUCs)

Full size image

Efficacy evaluation

Since pCR is widely used as an alternative prognostic indicator for EFS and OS [6,7,8,9], this study assessed the efficacy of combined NAC and dual-targeted therapy in terms of whether pCR (ypT0/isypN0) was achieved [22].

Statistical methodology

Wilcoxon's rank-sum test was used to analyze the changes in the levels of FBG, FTG and FTC after NAC combined with dual-targeted therapy (p < 0.05 indicated statistically significant differences). The ROC curves were plotted using the R language (R 4.3.1) to determine the FBG, FTG, and FTC cutoff values in the groups, showing a change from continuous to dichotomous variables. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed using SAS 9.4 to examine the FBG, FTG, and FTC association with the pCR in the different groups (p < 0.05 indicated statistically significant differences).

Results

NAT affects FBG, FTG, and FTC

Combining NAC with dual-targeted therapy increased the FBG levels in both the overall and subgroup analyses, yielding statistically significant differences [(5.07 ± 1.19) mmol/L vs. (5.19 ± 0.76) mmol/L, (5.01 ± 0.86) mmol/L vs. (5.15 ± 0.70) mmol/L, (5.14 ± 1.44) mmol/L vs. (5.23 ± 0.82) mmol/L, (5.22 ± 1.41) mmol/L vs. (5.34 ± 0.90) mmol/L, (4.91 ± 0.85) mmol/L vs. (5.02 ± 0.54) mmol/L, (4.91 ± 0.86) mmol/L vs. (5.07 ± 0.55) mmol/L, and (5.20 ± 1.38) mmol/L vs. (5.28 ± 0.89) mmol/L, all p < 0.05] (Table 1).

Table 1 Comparison of differences between baseline and process groups
Full size table

Combining NAC with dual-targeted therapy increased the FTG levels in both the overall and subgroup analyses, yielding statistically significant differences [(1.59 ± 0.93) mmol/L vs. (1.79 ± 0.85) mmol/L, (1.53 ± 0.98) mmol/L vs. (1.74 ± 0.81) mmol/L, (1.64 ± 0.89) mmol/L vs. (1.85 ± 0.89) mmol/L, (1.80 ± 1.06) mmol/L vs. (1.99 ± 0.95) mmol/L, (1.34 ± 0.70) mmol/L vs. (1.58 ± 0.68) mmol/L, (1.51 ± 1.02) mmol/L vs. (1.67 ± 0.78) mmol/L, and (1.64 ± 0.86) mmol/L vs. (1.88 ± 0.90) mmol/L, all p < 0.05] (Table 1).

Combining NAC combined with dual-targeted therapy reduced the FTC levels in the overall, menopausal, ER-negative, and PR-negative subgroups [(5.04 ± 0.90) mmol/L vs. (5.00 ± 0.72) mmol/L, (5.30 ± 0.88) mmol/L vs. (5.06 ± 0.69) mmol/L, (5.14 ± 0.90) mmol/L vs. (5.03 ± 0.75) mmol/L, and (5.11 ± 0.89) mmol/L vs. (5.03 ± 0.78)) mmol/L], and increased these levels in the non-menopausal, ER-positive, and PR-positive subgroups [(4.76 ± 0.84) mmol/L vs. (4.93 ± 0.75) mmol/L, (4.94 ± 0.90) mmol/L, ( 4.94 ± 0.90) mmol/L vs. (4.97 ± 0.68) mmol/L, and (4.960 ± 0.91) mmol/L vs. (4.961 ± 0.63) mmol/L]. The differences were only statistically significant between the menopausal and non-menopausal subgroups (p < 0.05) (Table 1) (Fig. 2).

The overall baseline characterization and analysis

This study included HER2-positive patients (N = 125) meeting the enrollment criteria. Univariate and multivariate statistical analyses showed that the overall sample pCR rate was approximately 60.00%, while no other independent influencing factors predicted pCR, except for the HER2 expression status (pCR: 35.00% vs. 64.76%, OR = 3.413, 95% CI: 1.253–9.299, P = 0.0164) (Table 2).

Table 2 Analysis of patient characteristics on pCR (N = 125)
Full size table

The subgroup analysis based on the ER status

The ER-negative subgroup analysis showed that the FTG level in the process group (pCR: 80.39% vs. 46.15%, OR = 0.209, 95% CI: 0.057–0.760, P = 0.0175) was an independent influencing factor of pCR. The ER-positive subgroup analysis indicated that the PR expression status (pCR: 71.43% vs. 38.80%, OR = 0.248, 95% CI: 0.068–0.911, P = 0.0357) was an independent predictor of pCR (Table 3).

Table 3 Analysis of the effect of the patient characteristics on pCR (ER-/ER +)
Full size table

The subgroup analysis based on the PR status

The PR-negative subgroup analysis showed that the clinical stage (pCR: 82.50% vs. 54.84%, OR = 0.234, 95% CI: 0.075–0.731, P = 0.0124) and triglyceride trend (pCR: 94.12% vs. 62.96%, OR = 0.095, 95% CI: 0.011–0.805, P = 0.0309) independently influenced pCR. No factors independently influencing pCR were present in the PR-positive subgroup (Table 4).

Table 4 Analysis of the effect of patient characteristics on pCR (PR-/PR +)
Full size table

The subgroup analysis based on the menstrual status

The menopausal subgroup analysis showed that the clinical stage (pCR: 73.33% vs. 52.38%, OR = 0.152, 95% CI: 0.041–0.559, P = 0.0046), HR expression status (pCR: 77.78% vs. 53.33%, OR = 0.179, 95% CI: 0.047–0.675, P = 0.0111), and NAT regimen (pCR: 47.62% vs. 75.56%, OR = 4.233, 95%CI: 1.193–15.017, P = 0.0255) independently influenced pCR. No independent pCR predictors were present in the non-menopausal subgroup (Table 5).

Table 5 Analysis of the effect of the patient characteristics on pCR (Non-menopause/Menopause)
Full size table

Discussion

FBG

Both the overall and subgroup (Wilcoxon's rank-sum test) analyses showed that although combining NAC with dual-targeted therapy increased the FBG levels (all p < 0.05), the mean values of the elevated levels did not exceed the normal reference ranges (normal range of FBG in the hospital: 3.89–6.11 mmol/L). The factors responsible for increasing the mean blood glucose level may be related to chemotherapeutic drug toxicity and dexamethasone pretreatment. The platinum, paclitaxel, and cyclophosphamide used during the NAT in this study kill tumor cells and damage pancreatic islet β-cells, decreasing insulin secretion, abnormal glucose tolerance, and elevated blood glucose. In addition, since patients receiving glucose-lowering therapy were not excluded from this study, it was hypothesized that the effect of NAT on FBG might be even more significant. Therefore, BC patients receiving combined NAC and dual-targeted therapy should pay close attention to their blood glucose levels. Further association analyses of the overall and multiple subgroups showed no association between FBG and pCR (p > 0.05), indicating that NAT increased the FBG levels, while FBG could not predict pCR.

FTG and FTC

FTG

Both the overall and subgroup (Wilcoxon's rank-sum test) analyses showed that combined NAC and dual-targeted therapy increased the FTG levels (all p < 0.05). Except for the PR-positive and non-menopausal subgroups, the mean FTG level of the overall and other subgroups exceeded the reference range (normal range of FTG in our hospital: 0.00–1.70 mmol/L) after NAT. The logistic regression analyses indicated that low levels of FTG during NAT and decreased FTG after NAT predicted higher pCR rates in ER-negative/HER2-positive and PR-negative/HER2-positive patients, respectively (p < 0.05). In addition, since patients who received triglyceride-lowering therapy were not excluded from this study, the FTG levels of all patients exposed to combined NAC and dual-targeted therapy should be closely monitored. They should receive possible triglyceride-lowering therapy in a timely manner, especially ER-negative/HER2-positive and PR-negative/HER2-positive patients with BC, since their triglyceride-lowering therapy possibly enhances pCR.

FTC

The overall analysis (Wilcoxon's rank-sum test) showed that combined NAC and dual-targeted therapy decreased the FTC levels. In addition, although the FTC levels increased in the ER/PR-positive subgroups and decreased in the ER/PR-negative subgroups, the differences were not statistically significant (all p > 0.05). The subgroup analysis of the menstrual status showed that combined NAC and dual-targeted therapy decreased the FTC levels in the menopausal group while increasing those in the non-menopausal group (both p < 0.05) (normal range of FTC in the hospital: 0.00–5.20 mmol/L). Further, overall and multi-subgroup logistic regression analyses indicated that FTC did not independently influence pCR (p > 0.05). Therefore, although NAT elevated the FTC levels, FTC did not predict pCR.

Summaries

In terms of NAT affecting lipids, previous studies have shown that (neo)adjuvant therapy leads to elevated FTG and FTC levels in BC patients [23,24,25,26,27]. However, our results were only partially the same as previous studies, as we found that FTG was significantly elevated in both overall and subgroups (both p < 0.05), but FTC was significantly elevated only in the non-menopausal subgroup (p < 0.05) and decreased in the menopausal group (p < 0.05). The possible reasons for the differences were analyzed as differences in treatment regimens, molecular typing and enrollment criteria. In terms of lipid prediction of pCR, our study found that FTG in process and change groups could only predict pCR in some HER2-positive BCs. On the contrary, unlike our study, some studies [23] found no significant association between lipid levels and pCR rate in both baseline and process groups, which may be related to different group stratification methods and study backgrounds. Since, as far as is known, this is the first high-quality retrospective study on FTG and FTC based exclusively on combined NAC and dual-targeted therapy in the context of HER2-positive BC, there is a lack of reference to previous studies.

It should be noted that lipid is a general term for serum FTG, FTC, and lipoid, and FTG and FTC, as the most clinically relevant lipids, are not only associated with the development of CVD, but also with a multiple of developmental processes such as cell growth, proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, motility, and metastasis in BC [28,29,30,31]. In HER2-positive breast cancer, fatty acid accumulation due to dyslipidemia also promotes drug resistance via acyl-CoAcholesterolacyltransferase and apolipoprotein E receptors [32]. In addition, CVD is an important cause of death after a diagnosis of BC, and women with BC have a higher risk of developing CVD than women in the general population [33, 34]. Therefore, controlling FTG and FTC at reasonable levels is crucial for BC patients treated with NAT.

Clinical and pathologic

In addition to biochemical indexes (FTG), this study indicated that the clinical stage, treatment regimen, and expression status of HER2 and HR (all p < 0.05) displayed good pCR predictive in some cases, which was consistent with previous studies.

Limitations

Since this was a single-center retrospective study, the case samples were small, and bias might be evident in case selection, possibly influencing the results. In addition, limited by the lack of high-density lipoprotein, low-density lipoprotein, and very-low-density lipoprotein information, further subgroup analysis could not be performed. Finally, this study was more concerned with describing the statistical differences and did not explore the molecular mechanisms underlying the association between biochemical indicators and pCR. Therefore, further multicenter prospective studies with high-quality, large samples and basic research are necessary.

Conclusions

Combined NAC and dual-targeted therapy increase the overall and subgroup FBG and FTG levels (p < 0.05), while the FTC was lower in the menopausal group and higher in the non-menopausal group (p < 0.05). In addition to the clinicopathologic features, the lower FTG level during and after treatment could be used as an independent influence to predict ER-negative and PR-negative pCR, respectively (p < 0.05). Overall and subgroup analyses showed that FBG and FTC did not predict pCR (p > 0.05). Early and timely intervention of FTG levels based on pathologic features may improve the pCR rate and reduce the likelihood of long-term CVD risk in HER2-positive BC treated via combined NAC and dual-target therapy.

Availability of data and materials

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Abbreviations

A/E:

Anthracycline

AUC:

Area under curve

BC:

Breast cancer

C:

Cyclophosphamide

Cb:

Platinum drugs

CI:

Confidence interval

CVD:

Cardiovascular disease

EFS:

Event-free survival

ER:

Estrogen receptor

FBG:

Fasting blood glucose

FISH:

Fluorescence in-situ hybridization

FTC:

Fasting total cholesterol

FTG:

Fasting triglyceride

H:

Trastuzumab

HER2:

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2

HR:

Hormone receptor

IHC:

Immunohistochemistry

NAC:

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy

NAT:

Neoadjuvant therapy

non-pCR :

Non-pathologic complete response

OR:

Odds ratio

OS:

Overall survival

pCR:

Pathologic complete response

P:

Pertuzumab

ROC:

Receiver operating characteristic

RP:

Progesterone receptor

SAS:

Statistical analysis

T:

Paclitaxel drugs

References

  1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–49. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Loibl S, Gianni L. HER2-positive breast cancer. Lancet. 2017;389(10087):2415–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32417-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Slamon DJ, Godolphin W, Jones LA, et al. Studies of the HER-2/neu proto-oncogene in human breast and ovarian cancer. Science. 1989;244(4905):707–12. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2470152.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gradishar WJ, Moran MS, Abraham J, et al. Breast Cancer, Version 3.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2022;20(6):691–722. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2022.0030.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Burstein HJ, Curigliano G, Thürlimann B, et al. Customizing local and systemic therapies for women with early breast cancer Guidelines for treatment of early breast cancer: the St. Gallen International Consensus 2021. Ann Oncol. 2021;32(10):1216–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2021.06.023.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Spring L, Greenup R, Niemierko A, et al. Pathologic Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Long-Term OuFTComes Among Young Women With Breast Cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2017;15(10):1216–23. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2017.0158.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cortazar P, Geyer CE Jr. pathologic complete response in neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(5):1441–6. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4404-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Spring LM, Fell G, Arfe A, et al. Pathologic Complete Response after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Impact on Breast Cancer Recurrence and Survival: A Comprehensive Meta-analysis. Clin Cancer Res. 2020;26(12):2838–48. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-3492.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. van Mackelenbergh MT, Loibl S, UnFTCh M, et al. Pathologic Complete Response and Individual Patient Prognosis After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Plus Anti-Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Therapy of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Early Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41(16):2998–3008. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.22.02241.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu X, Liu Z, Li C, et al. PR status is a more decisive factor in efficacy of adding pertuzumab into neoadjuvant therapy for HER2-positive and lymph node-positive breast cancer than ER status: a real-world retrospective study in China. World J Surg Oncol. 2023;21(1):296. Published 2023 Sep 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-023-03178-4

  11. Katayama A, Miligy IM, Shiino S, et al. Predictors of pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant treatment and changes to post-neoadjuvant HER2 status in HER2-positive invasive breast cancer. Mod Pathol. 2021;34(7):1271–81. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41379-021-00738-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Pons L, Hernández L, Urbizu A, et al. Pre- and Post-Neoadjuvant Clinicopathologic Parameters Can Help in the Prognosis and the Prediction of Response in HER2+ and Triple Negative Breast Cancer. Cancers (Basel). 2023;15(12):3068. Published 2023 Jun 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15123068

  13. Greenlee H, Iribarren C, Rana JS, et al. Risk of Cardiovascular Disease in Women With and Without Breast Cancer: The Pathways Heart Study. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(15):1647–58. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.21.01736.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Jakobsen M, Kolodziejczyk C, Jensen MS, et al. Cardiovascular disease in women with breast cancer - a nationwide cohort study. BMC Cancer. 2021;21(1):1040. Published 2021 Sep 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08716-5

  15. Kolodziejczyk C, Jakobsen M, Sall Jensen M, et al. Mortality from cardiovascular disease in women with breast cancer - a nationwide registry study. Acta Oncol. 2021;60(10):1257–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2021.1959054.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Patnaik JL, Byers T, DiGuiseppi C, Dabelea D, Denberg TD. Cardiovascular disease competes with breast cancer as the leading cause of death for older females diagnosed with breast cancer: a retrospective cohort study. Breast Cancer Res. 2011;13(3):R64. Published 2011 Jun 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/bcr2901

  17. Möhl A, Behrens S, Flaßkamp F, et al. The impact of cardiovascular disease on all-cause and cancer mortality: results from a 16-year follow-up of a German breast cancer case-control study. Breast Cancer Res. 2023;25(1):89. Published 2023 Jul 27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-023-01680-x

  18. Hammond ME, Hayes DF, Dowsett M, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology/College Of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer [published correction appears in J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jul 20;28(21):3543]. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(16):2784–2795. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.6529

  19. Tarantino P, Hamilton E, Tolaney SM, et al. HER2-Low Breast Cancer: Pathological and Clinical Landscape. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(17):1951–62. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.19.02488.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hortobagyi GN, Connolly JL, Edge SB, et al. . Breast In: Amin MB, Edge S, Greene F, et al, eds. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 8th ed New York, NY: Springer International Publishing; 2016.

  21. "Chinese Anti-Cancer association breast cancer diagnosis and treatment guidelines and norms (2019 edition)." Chinese Journal of Cancer 29.08 (2019): 609–680. https://doi.org/10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2019.08.009.

  22. Cortazar P, Zhang L, UnFTCh M, et al. pathologic complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis [published correction appears in Lancet. 2019 Mar 9;393(10175):986]. Lancet. 2014;384(9938):164–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62422-8

  23. Li X, Liu ZL, Wu YT, et al. Status of lipid and lipoprotein in female breast cancer patients at initial diagnosis and during chemotherapy. Lipids Health Dis. 2018;17(1):91. Published 2018 Apr 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12944-018-0745-1

  24. Ma Y, Lv M, Yuan P, Chen X, Liu Z. Dyslipidemia is associated with a poor prognosis of breast cancer in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. BMC Cancer. 2023;23(1):208. Published 2023 Mar 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-10683-y

  25. Xu L, Dong Q, Long Y, Tang X, Zhang N, Lu K. Dynamic Changes of Blood Lipids in Breast Cancer Patients After (Neo)adjuvant Chemotherapy: A Retrospective Observational Study. Int J Gen Med. 2020;13:817–823. Published 2020 Oct 14. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S273056

  26. Rzymowska J. Effect of cytotoxic chemotherapy on serum lipid levels in breast cancer patients. Pathobiology. 1999;67(3):129–32. https://doi.org/10.1159/000028062.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tian W, Yao Y, Fan G, et al. Changes in lipid profiles during and after (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy in women with early-stage breast cancer: A retrospective study. PLoS One. 2019;14(8):e0221866. Published 2019 Aug 29. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221866

  28. Huang C, Freter C. Lipid metabolism, apoptosis and cancer therapy. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16(1):924–949. Published 2015 Jan 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms16010924

  29. Alikhani N, Ferguson RD, Novosyadlyy R, et al. Mammary tumor growth and pulmonary metastasis are enhanced in a hyperlipidemic mouse model. Oncogene. 2013;32(8):961–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2012.113.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Pelton K, Coticchia CM, Curatolo AS, et al. Hypercholesterolemia induces angiogenesis and accelerates growth of breast tumors in vivo. Am J Pathol. 2014;184(7):2099–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpath.2014.03.006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Xia W, Wang H, Zhou X, et al. The role of cholesterol metabolism in tumor therapy, from bench to bed. Front Pharmacol. 2023;14:928821. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2023.928821.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Zipinotti dos Santos D, de Souza JC, Pimenta TM, et al. The impact of lipid metabolism on breast cancer: a review about its role in tumorigenesis and immune escape. Cell Commun Signal. 2023;21(1):161. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12964-023-01178-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Abdel-Qadir H, Austin PC, Lee DS, et al. A Population-Based Study of Cardiovascular Mortality Following Early-Stage Breast Cancer [published correction appears in JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Jul 1;2(7):821]. JAMA Cardiol. 2017;2(1):88-93. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2016.3841

  34. Gernaat SAM, Ho PJ, Rijnberg N, et al. Risk of death from cardiovascular disease following breast cancer: a systematic review. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017;164(3):537–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-017-4282-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (funding number: 82003522), Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province (funding number: 2023NSFSC0548), and the Wu Jieping Medical Foundation (funding number: 320.6750.2023–18-99). Support was provided in research design and communication, literature download, and article publication.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Wei Chen and Jing Zhang contributed equally to this work as co-first author.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Breast Surgery Department, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China, No. 55, Section 4, Renmin South Road, Sichuan

    Wei Chen, Zongshun Chen & Junjie Li

  2. School of Medical and Life Sciences, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China

    Wei Chen & Zongshun Chen

  3. Department of Epidemiology, School of Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China, No. 601, Huangpu Avenue West, Tianhe District, 510632

    Jing Zhang, Fenxiang Li & Da-Lin Lu

Authors
  1. Wei Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jing Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Fenxiang Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zongshun Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Junjie Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Da-Lin Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

DlL and JjL were responsible for conceptualizing and designing the research. All authors contributed to the acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of the data. The draft was produced by WC and JZ. All authors made critical revisions to the manuscript. The statistical analysis was conducted by WC, JZ, and FxL, while ZsC provided material support. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Junjie Li or Da-Lin Lu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics of approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Medical Research and Medical New Technology of Sichuan Cancer Hospital. The procedures used were consistent with the principles of the Helsinki Declaration.

Competing interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, W., Zhang, J., Li, F. et al. Association between pathologic complete response and biochemical indicators after neoadjuvant therapy for HER2-positive breast cancer. World J Surg Onc 22, 126 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-024-03366-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-024-03366-w

Keywords

World Journal of Surgical Oncology

ISSN: 1477-7819

Contact us