Skip to main content
Download PDF

Huang Lian Jie Du Decoction enhances the anti-tumor efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors by activating TLR7/8 signalling in melanoma

BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies volume 24, Article number: 156 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The clinical application of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is limited by their drug resistance, necessitating the development of ICI sensitizers to improve cancer immunotherapy outcomes. Huang Lian Jie Du Decoction (HLJD, Oren-gedoku-to in Japanese, Hwangryunhaedok-tang in Korean), a famous traditional Chinese medicinal prescription, has exhibited potential in the field of cancer treatment. This study aims to investigate the impact of HLJD on the efficacy of ICIs in melanoma and elucidate the underlying mechanisms.

Methods

The potential synergistic effects of HLJD and ICIs were investigated on the tumor-bearing mice model of B16F10 melanoma, and the tumor infiltration of immune cells was tested by flow cytometry. The differential gene expression in tumors between HLJD and ICIs group and ICIs alone group were analyzed by RNA-seq. The effects of HLJD on oxidative stress, TLR7/8, and type I interferons (IFN-Is) signaling were further validated by immunofluorescence, PCR array, and immunochemistry in tumor tissue.

Results

HLJD enhanced the anti-tumor effect of ICIs, significantly inhibited tumor growth, and prolonged the survival duration in melanoma. HLJD increased the tumor infiltration of anti-tumor immune cells, especially DCs, CD4+ T cells and CD8+T cells. Mechanically, HLJD activated the oxidative stress and TLR7/8 signaling pathway and IFN-Is-related genes in tumors.

Conclusions

HLJD enhanced the therapeutic benefits of ICIs in melanoma, through increasing reactive oxygen species (ROS), promoting the TLR7/8 pathway, and activating IFN-Is signaling, which in turn activated DCs and T cells.

Peer Review reports

Background

Melanoma accounts for 75% of skin cancer-related deaths [1]. Over the past three decades, the incidence of melanoma has exhibited an upward trend due to factors such as an aging population, continued use of tanning beds, increased exposure to sunlight, and heightened awareness and detection [2]. While surgical removal often yields success in treating early-stage melanoma, the outlook for patients with advanced melanoma remains bleak [3]. Significantly, the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), a recent addition to the category of immunomodulatory drugs, has substantially improved survival rates in cancer patients [4]. Monoclonal antibodies targeting the immune checkpoint molecule CTLA-4 and PD-1/PD- L1 were approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of advanced melanoma [5]. However, with only 50% of melanoma patients exhibiting long-term responses to ICIs [5], there is an urgent demand for innovative approaches to enhance their effectiveness.

The core mechanism of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in cancer treatment revolves around reactivating the adaptive immune system, primarily T cells, to eliminate tumors [6]. This reactivation, crucial for initiating, sustaining, and establishing enduring protective memory T-cell responses within adaptive immunity, hinges on the foundational support of the innate immune response [7]. Within the innate immune response, pattern-recognition receptors (PRRs), like Toll-like receptors (TLRs) [8], play a pivotal role by recognizing conserved pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), including bacterial cell walls, proteins, lipopolysaccharides (LPS), and viral RNA/DNA [9, 10]. TLR7 and TLR8, are two members of the TLR family expressed on the surface of the endosome, both of which recognize homologous ligands and trigger the production of proinflammatory cytokines and type I interferons (IFN-Is) in immune cells [11]. Notably, TLR7/8 agonists have found utility as adjuvants in cancer immunotherapy due to their capacity to induce the production of IFN-Is, proinflammatory cytokines, chemokines, and the upregulation of costimulatory molecules through the MyD88 pathway [12]. Consequently, when exposed to these cytokines, dendritic cells and other antigen-presenting cells (APCs) acquire enhanced costimulatory and antigen-presenting capabilities, culminating in the activation of adaptive immune responses [13].

Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) has been shown to have efficacy in improving life quality and prolonging the survival time in cancer patients [14, 15], and enhancing the response of radiotherapy, chemotherapy, targeted therapy and photodynamic therapy to cancer [16,17,18,19,20]. Huang Lian Jie Du Decoction (HLJD, Oren-gedoku-to in Japanese, Hwangryunhaedok-tang in Korean), a classical TCM formula with anti-inflammatory effects, has been widely used as combination therapy for cancer [21, 22], arthritis [23], cerebral ischemia/reperfusion [24, 25], type II diabetes [26, 27], and atopic dermatitis [28] in China [29]. It is comprised of Scutellariae Radix, Coptidis Rhizoma, Phellodendri Chinensis Cortex and Gardeniae Fructus. In this study, we aim to investigate the impact of HLJD on the efficacy of ICIs in melanoma and elucidate the underlying mechanisms based on TLR7/8 signaling.

Methods

UHPLC-Q/Preparation of decoction and chromatographic analysis

A total of four herbs in HLJD including Rhizoma coptidis, Radix scutellariae, Cortex phellodendri and Fructus gardenia were obtained from Shanghai Hongqiao Chinese Medicine Tablet Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China), and were further authenticated by the corresponding author Jinfeng Wu as herbs originating form Scutellaria baicalensis Georgi, Coptis chinensis Franch, Phellodendron chinense Schneid., Gardenia jasminoides Ellis, respectively. A voucher specimen for all herbs (HLJD-20,220,905) has been deposited at Specimen Museum of Huashan Hospital, Fudan University.

Epiberberine, berberine, palmatine, coptisine, phellodendrine chloride, baicalin, and gardenoside (1–2 mg each), were dissolved in methanol to obtain stock solutions of each reference substance. These solutions were then mixed into a reference solution at a concentration of 1 µg/mL. Coptidis Rhizoma (54 g), Scutellariae Radix (36 g), Phellodendri Chinensis Cortex (36 g) and Gardeniae Fructus (54 g), respectively, add 7 times the amount of water to soak for 30 min, heat and reflux for 60 min, and extract twice. The extract was combined and concentrated under reduced pressure to obtain 38.466 g of extract, and the extract rate was 21.37%. We then took 0.522 g of extract, added water to prepare 40 mL solution, centrifuged at 12,000 rpm at 4 °C for 15 min, transferred the supernatant (100 µL) to the liquid phase vial, and loaded the sample for test. Instrument and chromatographic conditions were the same as described in our previous article [30].

Reagents

HLJD decoction was prepared as above and stored at − 20 °C. The following flow cytometric antibodies were obtained from Biolegend (San Diego, CA, USA): anti-mouse CD45-APC/Cy7 (Cat#157,617), anti-mouse F4/80-PE (Cat#123,110), anti-mouse CD11b-FITC (Cat#101,206), anti-mouse CD11c-PE/Cy7 (Cat#117,318), anti-mouse CD8a-FITC (Cat#155,004), anti-mouse CD4 PerCP/Cy5.5 (Cat#100,434) and anti-mouse CD3ε-PE/Cy7 (Cat#155,706). Fixable Viability Stain (FVS) 700 was purchased from BD Bioscience (San Jose, CA, USA, Cat#564,997). Primary antibody against mouse TLR7 was purchased from Proteintech (Wuhan, China), and secondary antibodies and DAPI were obtained from Servicebio (Wuhan, China). ROS staining solution (Cat#D7008) was purchased from SIGMA (St. Louis, MO, USA). Mouse anti-PD-1 antibody and anti-CTLA-4 antibody were purchased from Bioxcell (Lebanon, NH, USA).

Cell line and animals

B16F10 cell line was purchased from the Cell Bank of the China Science Academy (Shanghai, China) and cultured in RPMI 1640 media supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, ScienCell, Carsbad, CA, USA, Cat#0500) at 37 °C in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere. Six-week-old female C57BL/6 J mice from Zhejiang Vital River Laboratory Animal Technology Co. (Zhejiang, China), were housed in the animal room of Fudan University in a pathogen-free environment. Mice were raised at a constant temperature (25 ± 2 °C) and a proper humidity (60% ± 2%), and were allowed free access to food and water. The light/dark cycle was 12 h light/12 h dark. Fudan University’s animal ethics committee reviewed and approved all animal experiments (202,012,035 S) on 03-12-2020.

Animal experiments

The therapeutic effects of saline, HLJD, ICIs (anti-PD-1 + anti-CTLA-4), and the combination of HLJD and ICIs were examined on C57BL/6 mice bearing B16F10 tumor. B16F10 cells were suspended in RPMI1640 culture medium without FBS. Suspension of 2.0 × 105 cells in 100 µL medium was injected subcutaneously in the right flank of C57BL/6 J mice. When the tumor volume reached about 40–80 mm3, the mice were assigned to 4 groups (6 mice per group) at random: control group (saline, intragastrically (i.g.), every day), HLJD group (i.g., 13.5 g/kg every day), ICIs group (anti-PD-1: intraperitoneally (i.p.), 10 mg/kg; anti-CTLA-4: i.p., 5 mg/kg every three days for three times), and combination of HLJD (i.g., 13.5 g/kg every day) and ICIs (anti-PD-1: i.p., 10 mg/kg; anti-CTLA-4: i.p., 5 mg/kg every three days for three times). The treatment was initiated on day 9. The HLJD dosage for mice was derived from the established safe human dosage. No adverse effects were observed in the mice throughout the experiment. Tumor size was measured every two days with a digital caliper and was calculated as ab2/2 (a = the longest diameter, b = the shortest diameter). Tumor volumes were measured once every 2 days and the results were presented with tumor growth curves plotted at day 17. Survival curves were generated for the time until tumors reached the study endpoint (the mouse reached natural death, or the tumor reached the volume of 2000 mm3). Mice were euthanized at the experiment endpoint. The mice were anesthetized using an intraperitoneal injection of a mixture of ketamine (100 mg/kg) and xylazine (10 mg/kg). Once the mice were confirmed to be deeply anesthetized by verifying the absence of pedal withdrawal reflex, they were euthanized using cervical dislocation. The methods of anesthesia and euthanasia used in this study adhere to the guidelines set forth in the American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) Guidelines for the Euthanasia of Animals, 2020 edition.

Flow Cytometry Assay

To analyze tumor-infiltrating immune cells, the tumors were first excised and minced into small pieces. The tissue fragments were then filtered through a 40 μm cell strainer to remove larger tissue pieces, followed by two washes to obtain a single-cell suspension. Subsequently, the cells were treated with 1x red blood cell lysis buffer to eliminate erythrocyte contamination. Finally, following washing and cell counting, the cells were processed through the appropriate FACS staining protocol as previously described [31]. Dendritic cells (DCs) were then stained with anti-mouse antibodies against CD45, F4/80, CD11b and CD11c, and T cells were labelled with antibodies against CD45, CD3, CD4, and CD8, according to the manufacturer’s protocols. We performed flow cytometry with the BD LSRFortessa and analyzed the data with FlowJo (Ashland, OR, USA).

Immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence

Immunohistochemistry was performed as described in our previous article [32]. Briefly, after being fixed with 4% formaldehyde, the tumor tissue was paraffin-embedded and sliced into 8–10 μm thick sections and incubated with TLR7 primary antibodies. Immunofluorescence was used to measure ROS levels in the tumor tissue. Fresh-frozen tumor tissue was serially sectioned at 8–10 μm thickness and incubated in ROS staining solution at 37 °C for 30 min in the dark. Then stained with DAPI solution at room temperature for 10 min and kept in a dark place. After washing three times with PBS in a Rocker device, the images were acquired by Fluorescent Microscopy (NIKON Eclipse Ci, Japan).

RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) analysis

The miRNeasy Micro Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) was used to isolate the total RNA of tumor tissue. RNA concentration and purity were determined with the Bioanalyzer 4,200 (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The RNA-seq analysis was conducted following the detailed methodology described in our previous study [32].

qRT-PCR array

Based on the manufacturer’s protocol (Wcgene Biotech, Shanghai, China), gene expression profiles were analyzed using mouse Oxidative Stress PCR Array plate and mouse type I IFN PCR Array plate. Data were analyzed using Wcgene Biotech software. It was considered that genes with fold changes higher than 2 or lower than − 2 were biologically significant.

ELISA

The level of IFN-α in the tumor tissue was measured by Mouse IFN-α ELISA kit (QuantiCyto, EMC035a) following the manufacturer’s instructions.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 8 software (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). The data were expressed as the median values ± standard deviation (SD). The statistical significance of the differences between the two groups was analyzed using the student’s t-test, and comparisons among multiple groups by one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. Tumor volume differences were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test for multiple comparisons. Survival data were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. P value less than 0.05 were regarded as a statistically significant difference. (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001).

Results

The active ingredients of HLJD

To analyze the pharmacological basis of the drug substance, chromatograms of mixed standards and HLJD were compared to properly characterize the components of the HLJD decoction (Fig. 1). We found that epiberberine, berberine, coptisine, palmatine, phellodendrine chloride, baicalin and gardenoside in HLJD were approximately detected to be 5332.42, 3711.690, 13652.51, 1069.15, 2243.74, 29163.21, 21334.80 µg/g, respectively. These results indicated that epiberberine, berberine, coptisine, palmatine, phellodendrine chloride, baicalin and gardenoside might be the active ingredients of HLJD in treating disease.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Representative full-scan chromatograms of (A) Standard solutions; (B) Sample solution: Epiberberine (5.82 min), berberine (6.42 min), palmatine (6.36 min), coptisine (5.86 min), Phellodendrine chloride (4.18 min), baicalin (5.97 min), gardenoside (4.27 min)

Full size image

HLJD improved ICI’s inhibition of tumor growth and increased survival in melanoma-bearing mice

To evaluate the effects of HLJD in enhancing the response of ICIs, we established a tumor-bearing animal model of B16F10 melanoma and initiated intervention with HLJD and ICIs on the 9th day following B16F10 cell inoculation. (Fig. 2A and Supplemental Table 1). We found that the HLJD + ICIs group markedly suppressed melanoma growth (Fig. 2B), and had a higher survival (P < 0.01, Fig. 2C), as compared to ICIs alone. There were no significant differences in body weight change between the groups (data not shown). The above data demonstrated that HLJD improved ICI’s inhibition of tumor growth and increased survival in melanoma-bearing mice.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Effects of HLJD for the treatment of B16F10 growth in vivo. (A) Schematic illustration of the experiment design. (B) Tumor growth curves on B16F10-tumor-bearing mice with different treatments as indicated. (C) Survival curves of mice in each group. (n = 6 mice/group). Differences in tumor volume were evaluated using two-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. Survival outcomes were assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis. (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001). HLJD = Huang Lian Jie Du Decoction, ICIs = anti-PD-1 + anti-CTLA-4

Full size image

HLJD increased tumor infiltration of DCs, CD4+T and CD8+T cells in tumor

The infiltration of immune cells plays a vital role in ICI response [33]. On the 17th day after tumor inoculation, the infiltration of immune cells in the tumor site was analyzed by flow cytometric (Fig. 3A and B). We found that compared with the treatment by ICIs alone or HLJD alone, HLJD combined with ICIs significantly increased the tumor infiltration of DCs (Fig. 3C), CD4+T and CD8+T cells (Fig. 3D, E). Tumor infiltration of MDSCs and macrophages was not differentially affected (Supplemental Fig. 1). Altogether, HLJD increased tumor infiltration of DCs, CD4+T and CD8+T cells in tumor.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Analysis of tumor immune cell infiltration. (A and B) Representative flow cytometric plot of DCs, CD4+T cells and CD8+T cells in tumors. (C-E) The percentages of DCs, CD4+T cells and CD8+T cells in tumors following different treatments. (n = 3 mice/group) Statistical differences between treatment groups were determined using one-way ANOVA with subsequent Tukey’s post hoc analysis for multiple comparisons. (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001). HLJD = Huang Lian Jie Du Decoction, ICIs = anti-PD-1 + anti-CTLA-4

Full size image

HLJD upregulated TLR7/8 pathways in tumor

To further explore the mechanistic insights into the beneficial effect of HLJD, we conducted RNA-seq analysis using tumor tissue from the HLJD + ICIs group and ICIs alone group. A total of 89 downregulated genes and 590 upregulated genes were found in the HLJD + ICIs group, as compared to the ICIs alone group (Fig. 4A, n = 3 mice/group). To further understand the interactions between significant signaling pathways, an interaction net was built using Path-Net analysis. As shown in Fig. 4B, combined HLJD and ICIs treatment increased activation of the TLR signaling pathway, as compared to ICIs alone. The mRNA expression of TLR7 (1.45 fold change) and TLR8 (1.24 fold change) in the HLJD + ICIs treatment group were upregulated, as compared to the ICIs treated alone group. The protein expression of TLR7 was confirmed by immunohistochemistry analysis (Fig. 4C), which is in line with the change in mRNA expression.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Toll-like receptor signaling pathway is activated after HLJD treatment. (A) RNA-seq analysis was performed and the volcano plot was demonstrated. (n = 3 mice/group) (B) Interaction net of the significant pathways (Path-Net) of differentially signaling pathways. (C) Immunohistochemistry was used to analyze the expression levels of TLR7 (400×). HLJD = Huang Lian Jie Du Decoction, ICIs = anti-PD-1 + anti-CTLA-4

Full size image

HLJD activated type I IFN signaling in tumor

TLR7 induces IFN-Is and pro-inflammatory cytokine production [34, 35]. We next investigated the expression of Type I IFN signalling-associated genes using PCR array. Results found that the mRNA levels of many IFN-Is-related genes were upregulated, including TLR7, TLR8, IFNAB, IFNA6, IFNE, IL10, IFITM2, H2-K1, and SH2D1A, after HLJD and ICIs treatment (Fig. 5A, B, and C). We further detected the transcription level of IRF7, which is one of the major regulators in the IFN-I signaling, and found it was also increased in the HLJD and ICIs treated group (Fig. 5D). IFN-α is one of the major products of IFN-I signaling, which can be regulated by IRF7. In addition, the level of IFN-α in the HLJD and ICIs treated group was much higher than that in the ICIs alone group (Fig. 5E). These findings suggested that HLJD activated TLR7/8 and Type I IFN signaling in tumors.

Fig. 5
figure 5

HLJD treatment upregulated Type I IFN signaling. (A, B and C) Volcano Plot graph and Bar graphs of PCR-array of TLR7/8 and Type I IFN signaling axis. (D) The expression of IRF7 was determined by qRT-PCR. (E) IFN-α quantification by ELISA in tumor tissue. Statistical differences were determined using the student’s t-test. (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01) HLJD = Huang Lian Jie Du Decoction, ICIs = anti-PD-1 + anti-CTLA-4

Full size image

HLJD increased the oxidative stress in the tumor

Activation of TLR pathways and oxidative stress can mutually promote each other [36], and IFN-I enhances the production of ROS [37]. To investigate how the HLJD contributes to the activation of TLR and IFN-I signaling pathways, we tested the ROS in tumors using immunofluorescence. As shown in Fig. 6A, ROS was markedly increased in the HLJD + ICI group, as compared to the ICI alone group. We also detected the mRNA expression levels of oxidative stress-associated genes by PCR array and found upregulation of the expressions of CYBA, GPX3, NOS1, UCP3, MB after combined HLJD and ICI treatment (Fig. 6B, C). These results indicated that HLJD increased the oxidative stress in the tumor.

Fig. 6
figure 6

HLJD increased oxidative stress in tumor tissue. (A) Representative immunofluorescence images of ROS in tumor tissue (200×). (B and C) Volcano Plot graph and Bar graphs of PCR-array of oxidative stress-related genes. Statistical differences were determined using the student’s t-test. (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01) HLJD = Huang Lian Jie Du Decoction, ICIs = anti-PD-1 + anti-CTLA-4

Full size image

Discussion

TCM decoctions have been increasingly recognized for their role as ICI sensitizers in oncology. Notably, our study is the first to report the immunotherapy sensitizing effects of HLJD decoction. Beyond HLJD, other TCM formulations have also shown promise. Gegen Qinlian Decoction (GQD) was found to enhance anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody therapy by modulating the gut microbiome and certain metabolic pathways, which in turn improved immune responses in colorectal cancer models [38]. Similarly, Dahuang Fuzi Baijiang Decoction (DFBD) showed efficacy in enhancing CD8+ T cell infiltration and reducing exhaustion markers like PD-1 in tumor microenvironments, although it did not exhibit a synergistic effect with ICIs [39]. Qingfei Jiedu Decoction (QFJDD) acted on lung cancer cells by downregulating PD-L1 expression and affecting key signaling pathways involved in the PD-1/PD-L1 axis [40]. Finally, YIV-906, a standardized botanical drug inspired by TCM, in combination with anti-PD1, eradicated Hepa 1–6 tumors in mice and was proposed to work by enhancing both adaptive and innate immunity, reducing immune tolerance, and influencing macrophage polarization [41]. These findings suggest that TCM decoctions could be valuable adjuncts to ICI therapy by targeting multiple facets of the immune response in cancer.

HLJD Decoction is a well-known prescription of TCM with the ability to regulate inflammation and oxidative stress [42]. HLJD may block hepatocellular carcinoma progression [22] and thus has potential as a new complementary agent for cancer treatment. In this study, the melanoma tumor-bearing mice treated with HLJD and ICIs resulted in a significant reduction in tumor volume and an increased survival rate compared to mice treated with ICIs alone or HLJD alone, suggesting that HLJD could enhance the therapeutic benefits of ICIs in the treatment of melanoma.

We initially tried a low dose of HLJD (4.5 g/kg), which did not enhance the efficacy of ICIs (data not shown). Then we increased the dose of HLJD to 13.5 g/kg, which reached the expected effect. This data suggests that the administration dose should be optimized to produce an improved therapeutic effect in future studies. As there are seven major components in HLJD, including epiberberine, berberine, palmatine, coptisine, phellodendrine chloride, baicalin, and gardenoside, further study is necessary to identify the bioactive components in HLJD that improve ICI response.

At the end of the experiment, the tumor tissues were removed and isolated for flow cytometry analysis. The tumor infiltrating DCs, CD4+T and CD8+T cells were substantially increased after HLJD and ICIs co-treatment. However, our current analysis focused solely on quantifying immune cell numbers. Future investigations assessing the subtypes and functions of these immune cells, including in vivo CD8+T depletion experiments, would provide a more comprehensive understanding of their roles in tumor suppression. TLR 7/8 agonists have been investigated as potential vaccine adjuvants because they can activate APCs and enhance both cellular and humoral immune responses [43]. Activation of TLR7 triggers a cascade of events through a pathway that relies on MyD88, leading to the secretion of inflammatory cytokines like TNF-α, IFN-α, IFN-β, and IL-12, which enhance T cell immunity [44]. Intratumoral injection of TLR7/8 agonists provides superior antigen presentation and co-stimulatory activity [45]. Imiquimod, a famous TLR7 agonist, is approved for the topical treatment of superficial basal cell carcinoma [46]. When used in combination with chemotherapeutic agents, a phase II clinical trial found imiquimod to be effective in treating treatment-refractory breast cancer chest wall metastases [47]. Many TLR7/8 agonists combined with nanoparticles have been studied in cancer immunotherapy and photothermal therapy [48, 49]. In this study, we found that HLJD significantly upregulated the expression of TLR7 and TLR8 and activated IFN-Is signaling in melanoma tissues, acting in part as a safe and cost-effective TLR agonist. Interferon Regulatory Factors (IRFs) are transcription factors that are important in controlling gene networks for coordinating appropriate and effective immune responses [50]. The IRF gene family consists of 9 members, among them, IRF3 and IRF7 are highly homologous and the major regulators in the IFN-I signaling [51]. We also found the expressions of IRF7 and IFNα were markedly increased in the HLJD and ICIs treated group.

Activation of TLR pathways and oxidative stress can mutually affect each other [36]. Imiquimod, a classic TLR7 agonist induces ROS production, disrupting the balance of mitochondrial dynamics [52]. The ROS may enhance DC-mediated anti-tumor immune responses through the promotion of STING [53]. In this study, we found that HLJD markedly increased the production of ROS in melanoma. Several drugs and phototherapy enhance the antitumor response of ICIs by increasing ROS [54, 55]. Future studies, including in vitro analyses, are essential to ascertain whether ROS scavengers can reverse HLJD-induced ICI sensitization and to delineate the direct molecular effects of HLJD on melanoma cells. It has been reported that berberine, one of the major components in HLJD, could upregulate intracellular ROS level in cancer cells [56], which support that berberine might be one of the potentially bioactive substances in HLJD for sensitizing ICIs. Since HLJD has been used for hundreds of years with good safety, it might be a promising candidate drug as an ICI sensitizer.

Conclusion

HLJD enhanced the therapeutic benefits of ICIs in melanoma. Mechanistically, HLJD activated DCs and T cells by increasing ROS, activating the TLR7/8 pathways, and inducing IFN-Is signaling (Fig. 7).

Fig. 7
figure 7

Schematic diagram of mechanisms about enhancement of therapeutic benefits of ICIs in melanoma using HLJD. HLJD = Huang Lian Jie Du Decoction, ICIs = anti-PD-1 + anti-CTLA-4

Full size image

Data availability

In this study, datasets are available in online repositories. The repository/repositories and accession numbers are listed below: Sequence Read Archive (SRA), PRJNA822503.

Abbreviations

ICIs:

immune checkpoint inhibitors

HLJDD:

Huang Lian Jie Du Decoction

IFN-Is:

Type I interferons

FDA:

Food and Drug Administration

i.g.:

intragastrically

i.p.:

intraperitoneally

PRRs:

Pattern-recognition receptors

PAMPs:

Pathogen-associated molecular patterns

LPS:

Lipopolysaccharides

TLRs:

Toll-like receptors

ssRNA:

Single-stranded RNA

APCs:

antigen presenting cells

TCM:

Traditional Chinese Medicine

ROS:

Reactive oxygen species

DCs:

Dendritic cells

IRFs:

Interferon regulatory factors

References

  1. Davis LE, Shalin SC, Tackett AJ. Current state of melanoma diagnosis and treatment. Cancer Biol Ther. 2019;20:1366–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Weiss SA, Wolchok JD, Sznol M. Immunotherapy of Melanoma: facts and hopes. Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25:5191–201.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Christodoulou E, Rashid M, Pacini C, Droop A, Robertson H, van Groningen T, et al. Analysis of CRISPR-Cas9 screens identifies genetic dependencies in melanoma. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2021;34:122–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Robert C, Schachter J, Long GV, Arance A, Grob JJ, Mortier L, et al. Pembrolizumab versus Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:2521–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Noman MZ, Hasmim M, Lequeux A, Xiao M, Duhem C, Chouaib S, et al. Improving Cancer Immunotherapy by targeting the hypoxic Tumor Microenvironment: New opportunities and challenges. Cells. 2019;8:1083.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Ribas A, Wolchok JD. Cancer immunotherapy using checkpoint blockade. Science. 2018;359:1350–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Vesely MD, Kershaw MH, Schreiber RD, Smyth MJ. Natural innate and adaptive immunity to Cancer. Annu Rev Immunol. 2011;29:235–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mertowski S, Grywalska E, Gosik K, Smarz-Widelska I, Hymos A, Dworacki G, et al. TLR2 expression on select lymphocyte subsets as a new marker in Glomerulonephritis. J Clin Med. 2020;9:541.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Park H-J, Ko HL, Won D-H, Hwang D-B, Shin Y-S, Kwak H-W, et al. Comprehensive Analysis of the Safety Profile of a single-stranded RNA Nano-structure adjuvant. Pharmaceutics. 2019;11:464.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Schnare M, Barton GM, Holt AC, Takeda K, Akira S, Medzhitov R. Toll-like receptors control activation of adaptive immune responses. Nat Immunol. 2001;2:947–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Delgado MA, Elmaoued RA, Davis AS, Kyei G, Deretic V. Toll-like receptors control autophagy. EMBO J. 2008;27:1110–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Smits ELJM, Ponsaerts P, Berneman ZN, Van Tendeloo VFI. The Use of TLR7 and TLR8 ligands for the enhancement of Cancer Immunotherapy. Oncologist. 2008;13:859–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kobold S, Wiedemann G, Rothenfußer S, Endres S. Modes of action of TLR7 agonists in cancer therapy. Immunotherapy. 2014;6:1085–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang W, Liu Z, Niu J, Yang H, Long Q, Liu H, et al. Feibi recipe reduced Pulmonary Fibrosis Induced by Bleomycin in mice by regulating BRP39/IL-17 and TGFβ1/Smad3 Signal pathways. Evidence-Based Complement Altern Med. 2020;2020:1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hou C, Zhou D-H, Wu Y-J, Dai X-J, Wang Q-Y, Wu Y-Q, et al. In Vitro and in vivo inhibitory effect of Gujin Xiaoliu Tang in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer. Evidence-Based Complement Altern Med. 2018;2018:1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Efferth T. From ancient herb to modern drug: Artemisia annua and artemisinin for cancer therapy. Sem Cancer Biol. 2017;46:65–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Li YJ, Zhou JH, Du XX, Jia DX, Wu CL, Huang P, et al. Dihydroartemisinin Accentuates the Anti-Tumor Effects of Photodynamic Therapy via Inactivation of NF-&#954;B in Eca109 and Ec9706 Esophageal Cancer Cells. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2014;33:1527–36.

  18. Wang S-J, Gao Y, Chen H, Kong R, Jiang H-C, Pan S-H, et al. Dihydroartemisinin inactivates NF-κB and potentiates the anti-tumor effect of gemcitabine on pancreatic cancer both in vitro and in vivo. Cancer Lett. 2010;293:99–108.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kim SJ, Kim MS, Lee JW, Lee CH, Yoo H, Shin SH, et al. Dihydroartemisinin enhances radiosensitivity of human glioma cells in vitro. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2006;132:129–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Li X, Ba Q, Liu Y, Yue Q, Chen P, Li J, et al. Dihydroartemisinin selectively inhibits PDGFRα-positive ovarian cancer growth and metastasis through inducing degradation of PDGFRα protein. Cell Discov. 2017;3:17042.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Lin L-T, Wu S-J, Lin C-C. The Anticancer properties and apoptosis-inducing mechanisms of Cinnamaldehyde and the Herbal prescription Huang-Lian-Jie-Du-Tang (黃連解毒湯 Huáng Lián Jiě Dú Tang) in human hepatoma cells. J Traditional Complement Med. 2013;3:227–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang N, Feng Y, Tan H-Y, Cheung F, Hong M, Lao L, et al. Inhibition of eukaryotic elongation factor-2 confers to tumor suppression by a herbal formulation Huanglian-Jiedu decoction in human hepatocellular carcinoma. J Ethnopharmacol. 2015;164:309–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang H, Fu P, Ke B, Wang S, Li M, Han L, et al. Metabolomic analysis of biochemical changes in the plasma and urine of collagen-induced arthritis in rats after treatment with Huang-Lian-Jie-Du-Tang. J Ethnopharmacol. 2014;154:55–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang P-R, Wang J-S, Zhang C, Song X-F, Tian N, Kong L-Y. Huang-Lian-Jie-Du-Decotion induced protective autophagy against the injury of cerebral ischemia/reperfusion via MAPK-mTOR signaling pathway. J Ethnopharmacol. 2013;149:270–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang Q, Bian H, Li Y, Guo L, Tang Y, Zhu H. Preconditioning with the traditional Chinese medicine Huang-Lian-Jie-Du-Tang initiates HIF-1α-dependent neuroprotection against cerebral ischemia in rats. J Ethnopharmacol. 2014;154:443–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Yi Q, He X-E, Luo K-F, Zhang G-S, Liu Y-H, Xue Q, et al. Protection of Long-Term Treatment with Huang-Lian-Jie-Du-Tang on vascular endothelium in rats with type 2 diabetes Mellitus. Curr Therapeutic Res. 2012;73:174–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang X-J, Deng Y-X, Shi Q-Z, He M-Y, Chen B, Qiu X-M. Hypolipidemic effect of the Chinese polyherbal Huanglian Jiedu decoction in type 2 diabetic rats and its possible mechanism. Phytomedicine. 2014;21:615–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Chen Y, Xian Y, Lai Z, Loo S, Chan WY, Lin Z-X. Anti-inflammatory and anti-allergic effects and underlying mechanisms of Huang-Lian-Jie-Du extract: implication for atopic dermatitis treatment. J Ethnopharmacol. 2016;185:41–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ren W, Zuo R, Wang Y-N, Wang H-J, Yang J, Xin S-K, et al. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis on inflammation rat model after oral administration of Huang Lian Jie Du Decoction. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0156256.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Liu S, Yang Q, Dong B, Qi C, Yang T, Li M, et al. Gypenosides Attenuate Pulmonary Fibrosis by inhibiting the AKT/mTOR/c-Myc pathway. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:806312.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. He S, Wang S, Liu S, Li Z, Liu X, Wu J. Baicalein Potentiated M1 Macrophage polarization in Cancer through Targeting PI3Kγ/ NF-κB signaling. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:743837.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Li Q, Sun J, Cao Y, Liu B, Li L, Mohammadtursun N, et al. Bu-Shen-Fang-Chuan formula attenuates T-lymphocytes recruitment in the lung of rats with COPD through suppressing CXCL9/CXCL10/CXCL11-CXCR3 axis. Biomed Pharmacother. 2020;123:109735.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Bejarano L, Jordāo MJC, Joyce JA. Therapeutic targeting of the Tumor Microenvironment. Cancer Discov. 2021;11:933–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Asano T, Boisson B, Onodi F, Matuozzo D, Moncada-Velez M, Maglorius Renkilaraj MRL, et al. X-linked recessive TLR7 deficiency in ~ 1% of men under 60 years old with life-threatening COVID-19. Sci Immunol. 2021;6:eabl4348.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Murayama G, Furusawa N, Chiba A, Yamaji K, Tamura N, Miyake S. Enhanced IFN-α production is associated with increased TLR7 retention in the lysosomes of palasmacytoid dendritic cells in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Res Ther. 2017;19:234.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Dai J-P, Wang Q-W, Su Y, Gu L-M, Zhao Y, Chen X-X, et al. Emodin Inhibition of Influenza A Virus replication and influenza viral pneumonia via the Nrf2, TLR4, p38/JNK and NF-kappaB pathways. Molecules. 2017;22:1754.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Jablonowska E, Wojcik K, Nocun M. The influence of treatment with Pegylated Interferon-Alfa and Ribavirin on Neutrophil function and death in patients with HIV/HCV Coinfection. Viral Immunol. 2012;25:166–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Lv J, Jia Y, Li J, Kuai W, Li Y, Guo F, et al. Gegen Qinlian decoction enhances the effect of PD-1 blockade in colorectal cancer with microsatellite stability by remodelling the gut microbiota and the tumour microenvironment. Cell Death Dis. 2019;10:415.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Xu Y, Wang H, Wang T, Chen C, Sun R, Yao W, et al. Dahuang Fuzi Baijiang decoction restricts progenitor to terminally exhausted T cell differentiation in colorectal cancer. Cancer Sci. 2022;113:1739–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Pan J, Yang H, Zhu L, Lou Y, Jin B. Qingfei Jiedu decoction inhibits PD-L1 expression in lung adenocarcinoma based on network pharmacology analysis, molecular docking and experimental verification. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:897966.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Yang X, Lam W, Jiang Z, Guan F, Han X, Hu R, et al. YIV-906 potentiated anti-PD1 action against hepatocellular carcinoma by enhancing adaptive and innate immunity in the tumor microenvironment. Sci Rep. 2021;11:13482.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Li H, Lv T, Wang B, Li M, Liu J, Wang C, et al. Integrating Network Pharmacology and Experimental models to investigate the mechanism of Huanglian Jiedu Decoction on Inflammatory Injury Induced by Cerebral Ischemia. Evidence-Based Complement Altern Med. 2021;2021:1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Varshney D, Qiu SY, Graf TP, McHugh KJ. Employing drug delivery strategies to Overcome challenges using TLR7/8 agonists for Cancer Immunotherapy. AAPS J. 2021;23:90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Sevimli S, Knight FC, Gilchuk P, Joyce S, Wilson JT. Fatty acid-mimetic Micelles for Dual Delivery of antigens and Imidazoquinoline Adjuvants. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2017;3:179–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Rolig AS, Rose DC, McGee GH, Rubas W, Kivimäe S, Redmond WL. Combining bempegaldesleukin (CD122-preferential IL-2 pathway agonist) and NKTR-262 (TLR7/8 agonist) improves systemic antitumor CD8+ T cell cytotoxicity over BEMPEG + RT. J Immunother Cancer. 2022;10:e004218.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Papakostas D, Stockfleth E. Topical treatment of basal cell carcinoma with the immune response modifier imiquimod. Future Oncol. 2015;11:2985–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Salazar LG, Lu H, Reichow JL, Childs JS, Coveler AL, Higgins DM, et al. Topical Imiquimod Plus Nab-paclitaxel for breast Cancer cutaneous metastases. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3:969.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Song H, Su Q, Shi W, Huang P, Zhang C, Zhang C, et al. Antigen epitope-TLR7/8a conjugate as self-assembled carrier-free nanovaccine for personalized immunotherapy. Acta Biomater. 2022;141:398–407.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Xia H, Qin M, Wang Z, Wang Y, Chen B, Wan F, et al. A pH-/Enzyme-Responsive nanoparticle selectively targets endosomal toll-like receptors to Potentiate Robust Cancer Vaccination. Nano Lett. 2022;22:2978–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Honda K, Taniguchi T. IRFs: master regulators of signalling by toll-like receptors and cytosolic pattern-recognition receptors. Nat Rev Immunol. 2006;6:644–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Angeletti M, Hsu W-LN, Majo N, Moriyama H, Moriyama EN, Zhang L. Adaptations of Interferon Regulatory Factor 3 with transition from terrestrial to aquatic life. Sci Rep. 2020;10:4508.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Chuang K-C, Chang C-R, Chang S-H, Huang S-W, Chuang S-M, Li Z-Y, et al. Imiquimod-induced ROS production disrupts the balance of mitochondrial dynamics and increases mitophagy in skin cancer cells. J Dermatol Sci. 2020;98:152–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Hu Z, Teng X-L, Zhang T, Yu X, Ding R, Yi J, et al. SENP3 senses oxidative stress to facilitate STING-dependent dendritic cell antitumor function. Mol Cell. 2021;81:940–e9525.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Liu H, Hu Y, Sun Y, Wan C, Zhang Z, Dai X, et al. Co-delivery of Bee Venom Melittin and a photosensitizer with an Organic–Inorganic Hybrid Nanocarrier for photodynamic therapy and immunotherapy. ACS Nano. 2019;13:12638–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Li Q, Zhong X, Yao W, Yu J, Wang C, Li Z, et al. Inhibitor of glutamine metabolism V9302 promotes ROS-induced autophagic degradation of B7H3 to enhance antitumor immunity. J Biol Chem. 2022;298:101753.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Li W, Li D, Kuang H, Feng X, Ai W, Wang Y, et al. Berberine increases glucose uptake and intracellular ROS levels by promoting Sirtuin 3 ubiquitination. Biomed Pharmacother. 2020;121:109563.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our gratitude to Dr. Qing Kong for her valuable language revisions and suggestions on the manuscript.

Funding

The present study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81973582, 82174109), State Key Laboratory of Medical Immunology (2021KFY0008), and the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (19140903601).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Suqing Liu, Yaohua Zhang and Xiaohua Zhu contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Dermatology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200040, China

    Suqing Liu, Yaohua Zhang, Xiaohua Zhu, Shan He, Xiao Liu & Jinfeng Wu

  2. Worldwide Medical Center, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200040, China

    Yaohua Zhang

  3. Department of Oncology, Shanghai Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 200071, China

    Xiang Lv

  4. Department of Dermatology, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China

    Fuguo Zuo

Authors
  1. Suqing Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yaohua Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xiaohua Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shan He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xiao Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Xiang Lv
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Fuguo Zuo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Jinfeng Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

In this study, SL, YZ, and XZ performed the experiments, analyzed the data, and drafted the manuscript. The data collection was assisted by SH and XL. The manuscript preparation was assisted by SH and XL. JW and FZ organized experiments, supervised experiments, and helped analyze data. The manuscript was read and approved by all authors.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Fuguo Zuo or Jinfeng Wu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study has been conducted and reported in alignment with the ARRIVE guidelines. Fudan University’s animal ethics committee reviewed and approved all animal experiments (202012035 S) on 03-12-2020. All animal care complied with the Directive 2010/63/EU in Europe guidelines. This study’s collection and handling of plant materials strictly followed relevant guidelines, with all requisite permits secured. Voucher specimens have been cataloged and deposited at Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, detailed within the manuscript.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1: Figure S1

Supplementary Material 2: Table S1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, S., Zhang, Y., Zhu, X. et al. Huang Lian Jie Du Decoction enhances the anti-tumor efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors by activating TLR7/8 signalling in melanoma. BMC Complement Med Ther 24, 156 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-024-04444-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-024-04444-y

Keywords

BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies

ISSN: 2662-7671

Contact us