Skip to main content
Download PDF

Effect of intravitreal injections due to neovascular age-related macular degeneration on retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and minimum rim width: a cross sectional study

BMC Ophthalmology volume 24, Article number: 185 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Purpose

The present study tested the hypothesis that repeated anti-VEGF injections are associated with reduced retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and minimum rim width (MRW) of the optic nerve head.

Patients and methods

Sixty-six patients with a history of intravitreal injections due to neovascular age-related macular degeneration were included. RNFL and MRW were measured using optical coherence tomography (Spectralis OCT, Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany).

Results

Mean global RNFL was 90.62 μm and both RNFL as well as MRW significantly decreased with advanced age (p = 0.005 and p = 0.019, respectively). Correlating for the number of injections, no significant impact on RNFL was found globally (p = 0.642) or in any of the sectors. In contrast, however, global MRW was significantly reduced with increasing numbers of intravitreal injections (p = 0.012). The same holds true when adjusted for the confounding factor age (RNFL p = 0.566 and MRW p = 0.023).

Conclusion

Our study shows that repeated intravitreal injections due to choroidal neovascularization seem to have a deleterious effect on MRW but not on RNFL. This suggests that MRW is a more sensitive marker than RNFL for evaluating the effect of frequent intravitreal injections on the optic nerve head since it seems to be the first structure affected.

Peer Review reports

Background

Around 15 years ago, the introduction and utilization of intravitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) antibodies has tremendously enhanced the treatment options and visual outcome for several eye diseases associated with macular edema, such as neovascular age-related macular degeneration (n-AMD), retinal vein occlusion, and diabetic retinopathy [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. In general, anti-VEGF injections are considered safe and the benefits outweigh by far the possible ocular complications [10]. However, unlike laser therapy, patients usually have to undergo frequent reinjections each year to remain visually and morphologically stable. Subsequently, the risk of adverse events may be increased by the continuous long-term. As one would assume, the loading of additional fluid into the eyeball can raise intraocular pressure (IOP). Therefore, several studies were conducted investigating IOP following anti-VEGF injections [11,12,13]. A meta-analysis of 46 studies on this topic showed that IOP was significantly increased for all measured time-intervals of the day of injection, but slightly decreased on the day after injection and returned to normal thereafter [14]. These IOP fluctuations along with possible fluctuations in blood perfusion of the optic nerve head may lead to glaucoma over time.

The introduction of Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) made it possible to detect early structural changes and at the same time deliver objective parameters in contrast to perimetry. In addition to a thinning of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFL), another OCT parameter, i.e. Bruch’s membrane opening minimum rim width (MRW) has been established more recently for the assessment of optic discs. Hence, the present study tested the hypothesis that repeated anti-VEGF injections are associated with reduced RNFL and MRW of the optic nerve head.

Materials and methods

This cross sectional study was conducted after approval from the Ethics Committee of the City of Vienna had been obtained (EK 20-352-VK) and adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. Due to the retrospective character of the study, informed consent was waived in agreement with the positive vote of the above-mentioned Ethics Committee. Patients with a history of intravitreal injections due to neovascular AMD were included. Intravitreal injections with anti-VEGF were applied without paracentesis and according to the pro-re-nata regimen. RNFL and MRW were measured using optical coherence tomography (Spectralis OCT, Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany) and analyzed using the build in software (Heyex 2, Figs. 1 and 2) with included age-matched reference values. If necessary, manual corrections of retinal nerve fiber layer segmentation and Bruch’s membrane opening were undertaken by a trained physician. Exclusion criteria were presence of uncontrolled elevated IOP over 21mmHg prior to injections, a history of ischemic opticus atrophy, diagnosis of glaucoma prior to anti-VEGF treatment as well as presence of a clinically significant epiretinal membrane and high myopia. Statistical analysis and linear regression models were carried out in R (version 4.0.3, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Exemplary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) measurement

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

Exemplary minimum rim width (MRW) measurement

Full size image

Results

Sixty-six eyes of patients with CNV and a mean age of 83.4 years and an average of 12.58 prior injections were included (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Age distribution and number of eyes

Full size image

Mean global RNFL was 90.62 μm and significantly decreased with advanced age (p = 0.005, Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Global retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) by age. Green dots represent right eyes, red dots represent left eyes; p = 0.005

Full size image

Similarly, RNFL of the nasal-superior (p = 0.025), temporal-superior (p < 0.001), temporal-inferior (p = 0.004) sectors highly significantly correlated with age as well, whereas this did not hold true for the nasal (p = 0.237), the temporal (p = 0.216), and the nasal-inferior (p = 0.862) sector. Advanced age was also significantly associated with lower global MRW (p = 0.019, Fig. 5), nasal-superior (p = 0.020), temporal-superior (p = 0.014), temporal (p = 0.004), and temporal-inferior (p = 0.019) MRW, but not with nasal (p = 0.272) and nasal-inferior (p = 0.103) MRW.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Global minimum rim width (MRW) by age. Green dots represent right eyes, red dots represent left eyes; p = 0.019

Full size image

Correlating for the number of injections, no significant impact on RNFL was found globally (p = 0.642, Fig. 6) or in any of the sectors.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Global retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) by total number of intravitreal injections; p = 0.642

Full size image

In contrast, however, global MRW was significantly reduced with increasing number of intravitreal injections (p = 0.012, Fig. 7).

Fig. 7
figure 7

Global minimum rim width (MRW) by total number of intravitreal injections; p = 0.012

Full size image

Adjusting for the confounding factor age, the level of significance neither changed for RNFL (p = 0.566, Fig. 8) nor for MRW (p = 0.023, Fig. 9).

Fig. 8
figure 8

Global retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) adjusted for age (residuals) and grouped by total number of intravitreal injections; p = 0.566

Full size image
Fig. 9
figure 9

Global minimum rim width (MRW) adjusted for age (residuals) and grouped by total number of intravitreal injections; p = 0.023

Full size image

Looking at the MRW sectors individually, the temporal (p = 0.011), and the temporal-inferior (p = 0.044) sector also significantly correlated with number of injections, whereas the other sectors did not (nasal p = 0.079; nasal-superior p = 0.099; temporal-superior p = 0.065; nasal-inferior p = 0.141).

Discussion

Our study shows that repeated intravitreal injections due to choroidal neovascularization seem to have a deleterious effect on MRW but not on RNFL. The latter is in accordance with the majority of previous studies conducted on this topic [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22]. However, two studies by Parlak et al. and Martinez-de-la-Casa et al. found a significant thinning of RNFL after administration of ranibizumab in patients with CNV [23, 24]. The former study found a significant reduction in RNFL in both, the treatment arm as well as the untreated control arm with dry AMD at follow up, but no significant difference between both groups which questions the hypothesis that anti-VEGF injections caused this effect. The latter study only included treatment naïve patients, and as such they showed increased macular thickness, especially in the nasal quadrant, which was significantly reduced after treatment. One can speculate that the reduction of fluid in the nasal macula may also have an impact on RNFL measurements especially given that most reduction happened in the temporal sector of the optic nerve head as well as at first follow-up at 3 months and did not significantly change thereafter over the course of 12 months [24]. This effect may also explain the findings of another study that associated a thickening on the temporal RNFL quadrant to repeated anti-VEGF injections [25].

Limitations of our own study are the lack of axial eye length measurements which may have an effect on MRW analysis. We tried to minimize this by excluding patients with high myopia.

The lack of effect on RNFL in our study may be attributed to the average number of injections of 12.58 prior to inclusion, and RNFL thinning possibly presents itself just after a longer period of treatment which may also explain the results of the afore mentioned studies mainly in treatment naïve patients. Whether this can only be seen after a higher number of injections (> 30 and more) as suggested by a cross-sectional paper [26] remains to be seen in further studies.

To the best of our knowledge, only one other study investigated the effect of repeated intravitreal injections on other biomarkers of the optic nerve head, such as Bruch’s membrane opening (BMO) [27]. In the study conducted in 29 patients with CNV, diabetic edema, and retinal vein occlusion, a significant increase in BMO was found immediately, i.e. 5 min after each of the first 3 anti-VEGF injections, but this effect did not seem to persist after 12 months. In accordance with our paper, they found no negative effect on RNFL.

The mechanisms underlying the different response of MRW and RNFL to anti-VEGF injections are not clearly understood. However, recent papers have suggested that the rate of change in MRW is significantly greater than RNFL in patients with glaucoma over the course of disease and thus per se a more sensitive biomarker [28, 29].

Since IOP fluctuations after intravitreal injections are only temporary, one also needs to take other potential pathways of optic nerve head damage into account. As such, blood perfusion has been shown to play a critical role in the pathogenesis of glaucoma [30]. VEGF can induce the release of nitric oxide [31] and thereby improve blood flow. Another mechanism may be that VEGF seems to have a neuroprotective effect [32, 33]. Therefore, VEGF inhibition potentially leads to both lower perfusion of the optic nerve had and to limited neuroprotection.

Conclusion

In conclusion, our study suggests that MRW is a more sensitive marker than RNFL for evaluating the effect of frequent intravitreal injections on the optic nerve head since it seems to be the first structure affected. However, further longitudinal studies are warranted to widen our understanding of the potential role of anti-VEGF injections in the pathogenesis of glaucoma.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Rosenfeld PJ, Brown DM, Heier JS, et al. Ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(14):1419–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Brown DM, Kaiser PK, Michels M, et al. Ranibizumab versus Verteporfin for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(14):1432–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. CATT Research Group, Martin DF, Maguire MG, et al. Ranibizumab and Bevacizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(20):1897–908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Heier JS, Brown DM, Chong V et al. Intravitreal aflibercept (VEGF trap-eye) in wet age-related macular degeneration [published correction appears in Ophthalmology. 2013;120(1):209– 10]. Ophthalmology. 2012;119(12):2537–2548.

  5. Kornhauser T, Schwartz R, Goldstein M, Neudorfer M, Loewenstein A, Barak A. Bevacizumab treatment of macular edema in CRVO and BRVO: long-term follow-up. (BERVOLT study: Bevacizumab for RVO long-term follow-up). Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016;254(5):835–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tadayoni R, Waldstein SM, Boscia F, et al. Individualized stabilization criteria-driven ranibizumab versus laser in Branch Retinal vein occlusion: six-Month results of BRIGHTER. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(6):1332–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nguyen QD, Brown DM, Marcus DM, et al. Ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema: results from 2 phase III randomized trials: RISE and RIDE. Ophthalmology. 2012;119(4):789–801.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Clark WL, Boyer DS, Heier JS, et al. Intravitreal Aflibercept for Macular Edema following branch retinal vein occlusion: 52-Week results of the VIBRANT study. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(2):330–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Schmidt-Erfurth U, Garcia-Arumi J, Bandello F, et al. Guidelines for the management of Diabetic Macular Edema by the European Society of Retina Specialists (EURETINA). Ophthalmologica. 2017;237(4):185–222.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Falavarjani KG, Nguyen QD. Adverse events and complications associated with intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF agents: a review of literature. Eye (Lond). 2013;27(7):787–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hollands H, Wong J, Bruen R, Campbell RJ, Sharma S, Gale J. Short-term intraocular pressure changes after intravitreal injection of bevacizumab. Can J Ophthalmol. 2007;42(6):807–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lemos V, Cabugueira A, Noronha M, et al. Intraocular pressure in eyes receiving Intravitreal Antivascular endothelial growth factor injections. Ophthalmologica. 2015;233(3–4):162–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee JW, Park H, Choi JH, et al. Short-term changes of intraocular pressure and ocular perfusion pressure after intravitreal injection of bevacizumab or ranibizumab. BMC Ophthalmol. 2016;16:69. Published 2016 May 31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. de Vries VA, Bassil FL, Ramdas WD. The effects of intravitreal injections on intraocular pressure and retinal nerve fiber layer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):13248. Published 2020 Aug 6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Demirel S, Batioğlu F, Özmert E, Erenler F. The effect of multiple injections of ranibizumab on retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in patients with age-related macular degeneration. Curr Eye Res. 2015;40(1):87–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Valverde-Megías A, Ruiz-Calvo A, Murciano-Cespedosa A, Hernández-Ruiz S, Martínez-de-la-Casa JM, García-Feijoo J. Long-term effect of intravitreal ranibizumab therapy on retinal nerve fiber layer in eyes with exudative age-related macular degeneration. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019;257(7):1459–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sobacı G, Güngör R, Ozge G. Effects of multiple intravitreal anti-VEGF injections on retinal nerve fiber layer and intraocular pressure: a comparative clinical study. Int J Ophthalmol. 2013;6(2):211–5. Published 2013 Apr 18.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Shin HJ, Shin KC, Chung H, Kim HC. Change of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in various retinal diseases treated with multiple intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55(4):2403–11. Published 2014 Apr 15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ahn J, Jang K, Sohn J, Park JI, Hwang DD. Effect of intravitreal ranibizumab and aflibercept injections on retinal nerve fiber layer thickness. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):5010. Published 2021 Mar 3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Zivkovic M, Radosavljevic A, Zlatanovic M, et al. Influence of multiple Anti-VEGF injections on retinal nerve Fiber layer and Ganglion Cell-Inner Plexiform Layer Thickness in patients with exudative age-related Macular Degeneration. Med (Kaunas). 2023;59(1):138. Published 2023 Jan 10.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jun SY, Hwang DD. Short-term effect of intravitreal brolucizumab injections in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration on retinal nerve fiber layer thickness. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):6685. Published 2023 Apr 24. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-32024-6.

  22. Wichrowska M, Goździewska E, Kocięcki J. The safety of Anti-VEGF treatment, in the context of the retinal nerve Fibre Layer, in patients with wet age-related Macular Degeneration: a review. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 2023;28(9):222.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Parlak M, Oner FH, Saatci AO. The long-term effect of intravitreal ranibizumab on retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in exudative age-related macular degeneration. Int Ophthalmol. 2015;35(4):473–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Ruiz-Calvo A, Saenz-Frances F, et al. Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness changes in patients with age-related macular degeneration treated with intravitreal ranibizumab. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53(10):6214–8. Published 2012 Sep 14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Yau GL, Campbell RJ, Li C, Sharma S. Peripapillary RNFL thickness in nonexudative versus chronically treated exudative age-related macular degeneration. Can J Ophthalmol. 2015;50(5):345–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang L, Swaminathan SS, Yang J, et al. Dose-response relationship between Intravitreal injections and retinal nerve Fiber layer thinning in Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Ophthalmol Retina. 2021;5(7):648–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gómez-Mariscal M, Puerto B, Muñoz-Negrete FJ, de Juan V, Rebolleda G. Acute and chronic optic nerve head biomechanics and intraocular pressure changes in patients receiving multiple intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019;257(10):2221–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Cho HK, Kee C. Rate of change in Bruch’s membrane opening-minimum Rim Width and Peripapillary RNFL in early normal tension Glaucoma. J Clin Med. 2020;9(8):2321.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Choi HS, Joo CW, Park SP, Na KI. A decrease in Bruch’s membrane opening-minimum Rim Area precedes decreased retinal nerve Fiber layer thickness and visual field loss in Glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2021;30(12):1033–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Flammer J, Orgül S, Costa VP, et al. The impact of ocular blood flow in glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2002;21(4):359–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hood JD, Meininger CJ, Ziche M, Granger HJ. VEGF upregulates ecNOS message, protein, and NO production in human endothelial cells. Am J Physiol. 1998;274(3):H1054–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Nishijima K, Ng YS, Zhong L, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor-A is a survival factor for retinal neurons and a critical neuroprotectant during the adaptive response to ischemic injury. Am J Pathol. 2007;171(1):53–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Zachary I. Neuroprotective role of vascular endothelial growth factor: signalling mechanisms, biological function, and therapeutic potential. Neurosignals. 2005;14(5):207–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ophthalmology, Hietzing Hospital, Wolkersbergenstraße 1, Vienna, 1130, Austria

    Agnes Boltz, Tanja Spöttl, Birgit Weingessel & Veronika Pia Vécsei-Marlovits

  2. Karl-Landsteiner Institute for Process Optimization and Quality Management in Cataract Surgery, Vienna, Austria

    Agnes Boltz, Tanja Spöttl, Birgit Weingessel & Veronika Pia Vécsei-Marlovits

  3. Department of Laboratory Medicine, Hietzing Hospital, Vienna, Austria

    Wolfgang Huf

  4. Karl Landsteiner Institute for Clinical Risk Management, Vienna, Austria

    Wolfgang Huf

Authors
  1. Agnes Boltz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tanja Spöttl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wolfgang Huf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Birgit Weingessel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Veronika Pia Vécsei-Marlovits
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

A.B. was primary responsible for the study design, protocol and manuscript.T.S. was responsible for protocol and manuscript.W.H. was responsible for statistical analysis and figures.B.W. and V.V. provided general supervision and feedback and reviewed the manuscript.All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Agnes Boltz.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This cross sectional study was conducted after approval from the Ethics Committee of the City of Vienna had been obtained (EK 20-352-VK) and adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. Due to the retrospective character of the study, informed consent was waived in agreement with the positive vote of the above-mentioned Ethics Committee.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Boltz, A., Spöttl, T., Huf, W. et al. Effect of intravitreal injections due to neovascular age-related macular degeneration on retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and minimum rim width: a cross sectional study. BMC Ophthalmol 24, 185 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-024-03453-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-024-03453-2

Keywords

BMC Ophthalmology

ISSN: 1471-2415

Contact us