Skip to main content
Download PDF

Clinical variables influencing the perception of fatigue in people with multiple sclerosis: a cross-sectional study using FSIQ-RMS

BMC Neurology volume 24, Article number: 138 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Physical fatigue is one of the most disabling symptoms in people with Multiple Sclerosis (PwMS). Several factors might influence the development of fatigue, such as gender, education, body mass index (BMI), Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), disease duration, working status (Ws), physiotherapy (Ph), and disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). Fatigue Symptoms and Impacts Questionnaire-Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis (FSIQ-RMS) is a patient-reported outcome (PRO) that allows one to define the impact of fatigue in PwMS clearly. This study aimed to assess fatigue impact on PwMS by using FSIQ-RMS.

Methods

The participants were enrolled from May to July 2021 in MS Centers of Sant’Andrea Hospital and Policlinico Umberto I Hospital in Rome. Fatigue was evaluated using the FSIQ-RMS, validated, and culturally adapted in Italian. Clinical and demographic data were collected at the same time.

Results

We enrolled 178 PwMS [Female 74.16%; RMS 82.58%, SPMS 17.52%]. FSIQ-RMS scores were significantly correlated with EDSS (p-value < 0.01). Analysis of variance between means showed a statistically significant difference between the BMI groups at the 24hours_FSIQ-RMS score and the 7days_FSIQ-RMS score (p < 0.01), with the lower BMI group having the highest scores. Furthermore, perceived fatigue significantly improved both in subjects performing Ph (p < 0.05) and in those who actively work (p < 0.01).

Conclusions

The use of FSIQ-RMS in a real-world setting confirmed that underweight and high levels of disability are closely related to fatigue. In addition, Ph and active Ws are strongly correlated with fatigue in PwMS.

Peer Review reports

Background

Fatigue is perhaps the most common complaint associated with Multiple Sclerosis (MS), with prevalence estimates ranging between 70 and 90% [1, 2]. Fatigue impacts the social and working lives of people with MS (PwMS), representing one of the main factors related to the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and a common reason for early retirement [3, 4]. Fatigue increases with age, and is more frequent in progressive MS [5]; however, its presence in the early stage of the disease, even at the time of the first episode suggestive of MS, is predictive of future disability [6, 7].

Given the subjective nature of fatigue, it is best evaluated via a patient-reported outcome (PRO) instrument. Although several available PRO instruments have been used so far in PwMS [8, 9], a review of their measurement properties suggests shortcomings in terms of current standards for PRO instrument development [10, 11]. Recently, to address limitations of existing MS-specific instruments, a new content-valid, concise PRO instrument to assess fatigue symptoms relevant to patients within the spectrum of MS, and in accordance with the Food and Drugs Administration (FDA) PRO guidance, has been developed. The instrument named the “Fatigue Symptoms and Impacts Questionnaire-Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis” (FSIQ-RMS) [12] has been proven to be a reliable PRO instrument that has demonstrated content and measurement validity for fatigue-related symptom and impact items. FSIQ-RMS examines two areas of fatigue’s physical, cognitive, and emotional impact. The first concerns the fatigue experienced in the previous 24 h. The second includes items that investigate the impact of fatigue in the previous 7 days. Its responsiveness and meaningful change of FSIQ-RMS have been analyzed in one international phase III trial, the Optimum Trial, which represents the first study to implement a validated disease-specific fatigue measure (PRO) as a prespecified endpoint [13]. Recently, FSIQ-RMS has been translated and validated for the Italian population [14]. The Italian version of the FSIQ-RMS showed excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha 0.92) and test-retest reliability (ICC 0.96) for both domains.

With the increasing numbers of multinational and multicultural studies, adequate translation, cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric testing are crucial when introducing questionnaires in new countries. Cross-cultural adaptation is a process that looks at both translational and cultural issues when a questionnaire is being prepared for use in another country [15].

Translation in Italian of the FSIQ-RMS was performed by PharmaQuest Group but, as far as we know, the assessment of the usefulness and intercultural adaptation has not yet been carried out. Thus, the aim of the study was to culturally adapt the Italian version of FSIQ-RMS.

Methods

PwMS were enrolled from May to July 2021 in two Italian MS Centers, S. Andrea Hospital and Policlinico Umberto I Hospital in Rome. The enrolment of the participants was carried out during the study of the Italian translation and validation of the FSIQ-RMS scale.

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the participating hospitals and was performed in accordance with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.

The inclusion criteria were: diagnosis of MS [both relapsing MS and progressive (PMS)], according to the 2017 McDonald’s criteria [16], age between 18 and 70 years and ability to participate in a 90-min face-to-face interview, medical record available for the previous 12 months or from the time of RMS diagnosis, and being fluent in Italian. Patients with the following characteristics were excluded: any condition that may cause energy-related or fatigue-related symptoms (different from MS); ongoing treatment for an autoimmune disease other than MS; history of suicide attempts and concomitant participation in trials with experimental drugs for any condition. Patients deemed by the treating neurologist to have clinically significant cognitive impairment were also excluded, as they may not have been able to comply with the study procedures [17]. .

Study subjects had to complete the FSIQ-RMS scale. This test aims to measure the level of perceived fatigue in our sample of PwMS, using its two components at 24 h (24hours_FSIQ-RMS) and 7days (7days_FSIQ-RMS). The former is the fatigue domain and includes 7 items regarding fatigue experienced in the preceding 24 h. The latter is the impact domain which encompasses 13 items assessing the physical, cognitive, emotional, and coping impacts of fatigue over the previous 7 days. The higher each score, the greater the perception and the impact of fatigue.

The total scores obtained at the 24hours_FSIQ-RMS and the 7days_FSIQ-RMS were then correlated independently with the clinical and demographic variables detected in our study group.

The variables potentially correlated with fatigue were gender, education, Body Mass Index (BMI), Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) [18], disease duration, working status (Ws), physiotherapy (Ph), and disease-modifying therapies (DMTs).

Some of these variables were subdivided into categories. The demographic variables that we decided to categorize are education, according to the five levels of the Italian school system, and the BMI, creating four groups, as defined by the international guidelines [19].

Regarding the clinical variables, we divided treatment with disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) into three categories. Based on the efficacy of the drugs, we distinguish the Moderate Efficacy Therapies (METs) and High Efficacy Therapies (HETs), adding a third category for currently untreated patients (W_DMTS) [20].

The software used for the statistical analyses was SPSS Statistics version 25. To compare categories, a Student’s t-test or analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed [21]. Independent Student’s t-test was used to compare dichotomized variables, given a sample size > 30 observations; while One-way ANOVA was used for categorized variables involving more than 2 independent groups. Parametric tests are based on assumptions about the distribution of the underlying population from which the sample was taken. The hypothesis is that, given the sample size exceeding 30 observations, the data are distributed approximately normally [22].

Finally, Pearson’s linear correlation analysis was carried out to correlate the continuous variables and the FSIQ-RMS scores [23]. Data were expressed as mean ± SD.

Results

We enrolled 178 PwMS [Female 74.16%; RMS 82.58%, SPMS 17.52%] aged 47.38 ± 12.34 years, with a median EDSS score of 3.07 ± 1.81 SD. The disease duration was 12.6 ± 9.5years.

Clinical and demographic findings are shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Clinical and demographic characteristics of the study sample. *sd = Standard Deviation; EDSS = Expanded Disability Status Scale; METs = Moderate Efficacy Therapies; HETs = High Efficacy Therapies; W = Wtihout; RMS = Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis; SPMS = Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis
Full size table

Regarding Ph, the differences between the two groups were not statistically significant in the 24hours_FSIQ-RMS score (p = 0.281). However, 7days_FSIQ-RMS score was significantly lower in the group performing Ph (p = 0.016) compared to the group not undergoing Ph, as shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Box plot for physiotherapy training during study (Ph) at 7days_FSIQ-RMS

Full size image

A similar remark regards Ws. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the 24hours_FSIQ-RMS score, while the groups differed significantly in the 7days_FSIQ-RMS score (p < 0.01), graphically shown by Fig. 2. Interestingly, the underweight patient group reported significantly higher levels of fatigue than the others, both at 24 h (Fig. 3) and at 7days_FSIQ-RMS scores (Fig. 4), p < 0.01 in both cases. Details of the analysis of variance between the means are given in Table 2.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Box plot for working status during study (Ws) at 7days_FSIQ-RMS

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Box plot for body mass index (BMI) at 24hours_FSIQ-RMS

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

Box plot for body mass index (BMI) at 7days_FSIQ-RMS

Full size image
Table 2 Student t-test and analysis of variance (ANOVA) between averages for categoric variables
Full size table

Pearson’s linear correlation analysis applied to continuous variables revealed a direct correlation between fatigue and the EDSS regarding the 24hours_FSIQ_RMS score with r value (r) = 0.213 (p < 0.01). The correlation was even greater for the 7days_FSIQ-RMS score (r = 0.417, p < 0.001) (Table 3).

Table 3 Correlation between fatigue and continuous variables
Full size table

Finally, we did not find significant correlations between fatigue and disease duration in our sample, considering neither the previous 24 h nor the previous 7 days.

Discussion

Cross-cultural adaptation of the FSIQ-RMS instrument on a sample of the Italian MS population showed that physical, cognitive, emotional, and coping impacts of fatigue are influenced by physiotherapy and work commitment, whereas BMI and disability affect the perception of fatigue experienced.

A higher level of fatigue was observed in more disabled and underweight patients. On the other hand, physiotherapy as well as a working state were related to a reduction of fatigue in PwMS.

Several previous studies focused on this topic using different PRO instruments. The relationship between fatigue and disability measured according to the EDSS score has been well-known for years [5, 24]. More recently, looking at the predictors of patients who reported fatigue symptoms in a large Swedish nationwide register-based MS cohort, Englund S et al. 2022 [25] showed that among MS-associated characteristics, higher disability level stood as the best predictor of fatigue. This was not an unexpected finding since brain atrophy in specific brain areas is related to MS fatigue and an increased EDSS score [26, 27].

Of particular interest is the correlation that we found between BMI and 24hours_FSIQ-RMS, which assesses each subject’s individual experience of fatigue, based on their BMI. In our sample, this correlation was not observed in overweight or obese subjects but only in underweight people, indicating a higher level of fatigue experienced by underweight PwMS. This correlation comes with a caveat: BMI values were not homogeneously distributed among our subjects, and only 6.18% were underweight. Recent studies showed that an interventional diet regime significantly reduces perceived fatigue and BMI. However, the significant reduction in perceived fatigue appears to be independent of changes in markers of metabolic health [28,29,30]. More studies are needed to investigate this specific issue.

Our work also aimed at analyzing how the adapted FSIQ-RMS tool could detect the extent to which the fatigue construct contributes to differences between individuals who underwent physiotherapy and those who did not. We found a statistically significant difference between the group attending Ph and the one that did not, in terms of perceived fatigue (7days_FSIQ-RMS). This finding is widely supported by systematic reviews supporting a beneficial contribution to fatigue through different types of interventions [31,32,33]. A variety of physical therapy techniques, including endurance exercise programs, resistance exercise programs [34, 35], vigorous cool room treadmill training [36], specific balance exercises [37] and intensive circuit class therapy [24] provided to be effective in alleviating MS fatigue.

Regarding working status, our work confirmed higher levels of perceived fatigue experienced among the unemployed. As already known from the literature on this topic, PwMS are more likely to be unemployed or limited in fitness to work [38]. Moreover, fatigue is often considered the single most disabling symptom of MS and may be the main driver for loss of employment. On the other hand, loss of occupation may also lead to greater physical inactivity and can cause depression, further influencing the perception of fatigue [39].

We did not find any correlations between fatigue and other variables such as gender, education level, disease duration, and use of DMTs. Despite previous data on these parameters being conflicting [10, 40] we have to consider that disease duration is not homogeneous among studies (i.e., disease duration was shorter in our sample). Furthermore, the heterogeneity of the DMTs used by our sample might considerably affect the final results.

Conclusion

As reported in our previous study, the FSIQ-RMS scale has proved to be a very reliable outcome measure of fatigue in MS. Furthermore, the assessment of three domains (physical impact, cognitive/emotional impact, and coping impact) as well as the simultaneous 24-hour and 7-day testing, allow for a more accurate QoL assessment [11]. The cultural adaptation of FSIQ-RMS in Italian PwMS shows the great efficacy of this instrument in capturing the positive effects of physiotherapy and employment status on the impacts of fatigue, as well as the significance of a lower disability status and maintaining a normal weight.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

PwMS:

People with Multiple Sclerosis

BMI:

Body Mass Index

EDSS:

Expanded Disability Status Scale

Ws:

working status

Ph:

physiotherapy

DMTs:

disease modifying therapies

FSIQ-RMS:

Fatigue Symptoms and Impacts Questionnaire-Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis

PRO:

Patient-Reported Outcome

MS:

Multiple Sclerosis

HRQoL:

health-related quality of life

FDA:

Food and Drugs Administration

METs:

Moderate Efficacy Therapies

HETs:

High Efficacy Therapies

References

  1. Krupp LB. Fatigue in multiple sclerosis: Definition, pathophysiology and treatment. CNS Drugs [Internet]. 2003 Aug 29 [cited 2023 Mar 4];17(4):225–34. https://link.springer.com/article/https://doi.org/10.2165/00023210-200317040-00002.

  2. Giovannoni G. Multiple sclerosis related fatigue. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2006;77(1):2–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Schwid SR, Covington M, Segal BM, Goodman AD. Fatigue in multiple sclerosis: current understanding and future directions. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2002;39(2):211–24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Greeke EE, Chua AS, Healy BC, Rintell DJ, Chitnis T, Glanz BI. Depression and fatigue in patients with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci. 2017;380:236–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Colosimo C, Millefiorini E, Grasso MG, Vinci F, Fiorelli M, Koudriavtseva T, et al. Fatigue in MS is associated with specific clinical features. Acta Neurol Scand. 2009;92(5):353–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. van den Dorpel JJA, Mescheriakova JY, Runia TF, Jafari N, Siepman TAM et al. Fatigue after a first attack of suspected multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler [Internet]. 2018 Jun 1 [cited 2023 Mar 4];24(7):974–81. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28532229/.

  7. Vaughn CB, Kavak KS, Dwyer MG, Bushra A, Nadeem M, Cookfair DL et al. Fatigue at enrollment predicts EDSS worsening in the New York State Multiple Sclerosis Consortium. Mult Scler J [Internet]. 2020 Jan 1 [cited 2023 Mar 4];26(1):99–108. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458518816619.

  8. Krupp LB, Larocca NG, Muir Nash J, Steinberg AD. The fatigue severity scale. Application to patients with multiple sclerosis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Arch Neurol [Internet]. 1989 [cited 2023 Jan 26];46(10):1121–3. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2803071/.

  9. Mills RJ, Young CA, Pallant JF, Tennant A. Development of a patient reported outcome scale for fatigue in multiple sclerosis: The Neurological Fatigue Index (NFI-MS). Health Qual Life Outcomes [Internet]. 2010 Feb 12 [cited 2023 Mar 4];8(1):1–10. https://link.springer.com/articles/https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-8-22.

  10. Lerdal A, Celius EG, Moum T. Fatigue and its association with sociodemographic variables among multiple sclerosis patients. Mult Scler J. 2003;9(5):509–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sellitto G, Morelli A, Bassano S, Conte A, Baione V, Galeoto G, et al. Outcome measures for physical fatigue in individuals with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2021;21(4):625–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hudgens S, Schüler R, Stokes J, Eremenco S, Hunsche E, Leist TP. Development and Validation of the FSIQ-RMS: A New Patient-Reported Questionnaire to Assess Symptoms and Impacts of Fatigue in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis. Value Heal [Internet]. 2019 Apr 1 [cited 2023 Mar 4];22(4):453–66. http://www.valueinhealthjournal.com/article/S1098301518363046/fulltext.

  13. Kappos L, Fox RJ, Burcklen M, Freedman MS, Havrdová EK, Hennessy B, et al. Ponesimod compared with teriflunomide in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis in the active-Comparator phase 3 OPTIMUM Study. JAMA Neurol. 2021;78(5):558.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ruotolo I, Sellitto G, Ianniello A, Petsas N, Castelli L, Galeoto G, et al. Italian translation and validation of fatigue symptoms and impacts questionnaire in relapsing multiple sclerosis (FSIQ-RMS). Neurol Sci. 2022;43(8):4925–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. BeatonDE BC, GuilleminF FMB. 2000. Guidelines for theprocessof cross-cultural adaptationof self-reportmeasures. Spine 25:3186–3191 - Cerca con Google [Internet]. [cited 2024 Feb 26]. https://www.google.com/search?q=BeatonDE%2C+Bombardier+C%2C+GuilleminF%2C+FerrazMB.+2000.+Guidelines+for+theprocessof+cross-cultural+adaptationof+self-reportmeasures.+Spine+25%3A3186–3191&oq=BeatonDE%2C+Bombardier+C%2C+GuilleminF%2C+FerrazMB.+2000.+Guidelines+for+theprocessof+cross-cultural+adaptationof+self-reportmeasures.+Spine+25%3A3186–3191&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyBggAEEUYOdIBCTE4MzVqMGoxNagCALACAA&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

  16. Polman CH, Reingold SC, Banwell B, Clanet M, Cohen JA, Filippi M et al. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 Revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann Neurol [Internet]. 2011 Feb 1 [cited 2023 Jan 26];69(2):292–302. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.22366.

  17. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. Mini-mental state: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12(3):189–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kurtzke JF. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis. Neurology [Internet]. 1983 Nov 1 [cited 2023 Jan 28];33(11):1444–1444. https://n.neurology.org/content/33/11/1444.

  19. A healthy lifestyle. - WHO recommendations [Internet]. [cited 2023 Feb 15]. https://www.who.int/europe/news-room/fact-sheets/item/a-healthy-lifestyle---who-recommendations.

  20. Samjoo IA, Worthington E, Drudge C, Zhao M, Cameron C, Häring DA et al. Efficacy classification of modern therapies in multiple sclerosis. J Comp Eff Res [Internet]. 2021 Apr 1 [cited 2023 Jan 26];10(6):495–507. https://www.futuremedicine.com/doi/https://doi.org/10.2217/cer-2020-0267.

  21. Sthle L, Wold S. Analysis of variance (ANOVA). Chemom Intell Lab Syst. 1989;6(4):259–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hopkins S, Dettori JR, Chapman JR, Parametric. and Nonparametric Tests in Spine Research: Why Do They Matter? Glob Spine J [Internet]. 2018 Sep 1 [cited 2024 Feb 26];8(6):652–4. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage.

  23. Sedgwick P. Pearson’s correlation coefficient. BMJ [Internet]. 2012 Jul 4 [cited 2023 Jan 26];345(7864). https://www.bmj.com/content/345/bmj.e4483.

  24. Kocica J, Kolcava J, Sladeckova M, Stourac P, Vlckova E, Dosbaba F et al. Intensive Circuit Class Therapy in Patients with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis. J Rehabil Med [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2023 Mar 4];54. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35174869/.

  25. Englund S, Kierkegaard M, Burman J, Fink K, Fogdell-Hahn A, Gunnarsson M, et al. Predictors of patient-reported fatigue symptom severity in a nationwide multiple sclerosis cohort. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2023;70:104481.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Preziosa P, Rocca MA, Pagani E, Valsasina P, Amato MP, Brichetto G et al. Structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging correlates of fatigue and dual-task performance in progressive multiple sclerosis. J Neurol [Internet]. 2022 Nov 27 [cited 2023 Mar 4]; https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/handle/10026.1/20405.

  27. Rocca MA, Comi G, Filippi M. The Role of T1-Weighted Derived Measures of Neurodegeneration for Assessing Disability Progression in Multiple Sclerosis. Front Neurol [Internet]. 2017 Sep 4 [cited 2023 Mar 4];8(SEP). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28928705/.

  28. Brenton JN, Banwell B, Christina Bergqvist AG, Lehner-Gulotta D, Gampper L, Leytham E et al. Pilot study of a ketogenic diet in relapsing-remitting MS. Neurol Neuroimmunol neuroinflammation [Internet]. 2019 Jul 1 [cited 2023 Mar 4];6(4). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31089482/.

  29. Yadav V, Marracci G, Kim E, Spain R, Cameron M, Overs S et al. Low-fat, plant-based diet in multiple sclerosis: A randomized controlled trial. Mult Scler Relat Disord [Internet]. 2016 Sep 1 [cited 2023 Mar 4];9:80–90. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27645350/.

  30. Villa AT, Tu BH, Titcomb TJ, Saxby SM, Shemirani F, Ten Eyck P, et al. Association between improved metabolic risk factors and perceived fatigue during dietary intervention trial in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a secondary analysis of the WAVES trial. Front Neurol. 2023;13:2990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Heine M, van de Port I, Rietberg MB, van Wegen EE, Kwakkel G. Exercise therapy for fatigue in multiple sclerosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;2015(9).

  32. Amatya B, Khan F, Galea M. Rehabilitation for people with multiple sclerosis: An overview of Cochrane Reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev [Internet]. 2019 Jan 14 [cited 2023 Mar 4];2019(1). https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012732.pub2/full.

  33. Proschinger S, Kuhwand P, Rademacher A, Walzik D, Warnke C, Zimmer P et al. Fitness, physical activity, and exercise in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review on current evidence for interactions with disease activity and progression. J Neurol [Internet]. 2022 Jun 1 [cited 2023 Feb 15];269(6):2922–40. https://link.springer.com/article/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-021-10935-6.

  34. Langeskov-Christensen M, Hvid LG, Jensen HB, Nielsen HH, Petersen T, Stenager E et al. Efficacy of high-intensity aerobic exercise on common multiple sclerosis symptoms. Acta Neurol Scand [Internet]. 2022 Feb 1 [cited 2023 Feb 15];145(2):229–38. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/https://doi.org/10.1111/ane.13540.

  35. Kerling A, Keweloh K, Tegtbur U, Kück M, Grams L, Horstmann H et al. Effects of a Short Physical Exercise Intervention on Patients with Multiple Sclerosis (MS). Int J Mol Sci. 2015, Vol 16, Pages 15761–15775 [Internet]. 2015 Jul 10 [cited 2023 Mar 4];16(7):15761–75. https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/16/7/15761/htm.

  36. Devasahayam AJ, Chaves AR, Lasisi WO, Curtis ME, Wadden KP, Kelly LP et al. Vigorous cool room treadmill training to improve walking ability in people with multiple sclerosis who use ambulatory assistive devices: a feasibility study. BMC Neurol [Internet]. 2020 Jan 22 [cited 2023 Mar 4];20(1). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31969132/.

  37. Kasser SL, Jacobs JV, Ford M, Tourville TW. Effects of balance-specific exercises on balance, physical activity and quality of life in adults with multiple sclerosis: a pilot investigation. https://doi.org/103109/0963828820151019008 [Internet]. 2015 Nov 20 [cited 2023 Mar 4];37(24):2238–49. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2015.1019008.

  38. Moccia M, Fontana L, Palladino R, Falco F, Finiello F, Fedele M et al. Determinants of early working impairments in multiple sclerosis. Front Neurol [Internet]. 2022 Dec 9 [cited 2023 Feb 15];13. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC9784221/.

  39. Coyne KS, Boscoe AN, Currie BM, Landrian AS, Wandstrat TL. Understanding Drivers of Employment Changes in a Multiple Sclerosis Population. Int J MS Care [Internet]. 2015 Sep 1 [cited 2023 Feb 15];17(5):245–52. https://meridian.allenpress.com/ijmsc/article/17/5/245/33231/Understanding-Drivers-of-Employment-Changes-in-a.

  40. Razazian N, Shokrian N, Bostani A, Moradian N, Tahmasebi S. Study of fatigue frequency and its association with sociodemographic and clinical variables in patients with multiple sclerosis. Neurosciences. 2014;19(1):38–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. MS Center, S. Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy

    Giovanni Sellitto, Ilaria Ruotolo, Antonio Ianniello, Federica Felicetti, Giorgia D’Ambrosi & Carlo Pozzilli

  2. IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, Italy

    Giovanni Galeoto & Antonella Conte

  3. Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy

    Giovanni Sellitto, Ilaria Ruotolo, Anna Berardi, Giovanni Galeoto, Antonella Conte & Carlo Pozzilli

Authors
  1. Giovanni Sellitto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ilaria Ruotolo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Antonio Ianniello
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Federica Felicetti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Giorgia D’Ambrosi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Anna Berardi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Giovanni Galeoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Antonella Conte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Carlo Pozzilli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

GS, IR and AB were responsible for designing the work and recruiting patients. FF and GD collected the data and compiled the database. GS, IR and AI were responsible for writing the paper. GG, AC performed statistical data analysis. CP contributed to the interpretation of the data as a matter of interest. All authors contributed read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giovanni Sellitto.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The questionnaire and methodology for this study were approved by Ethics Committee of Sant’Andrea Hospital performed in accordance with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s), and minor(s)’ legal guardian/next of kin based on local ethics committee recommendations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Carlo Pozzilli received consulting and lecture fees from Sanof-Aventis, Biogen Idec, Bayer Schering, Merck Serono, and Novartis. He also received research funding from Novartis, Sanof-Aventis, Merck Serono, and Bayer Schering. Other authors had no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sellitto, G., Ruotolo, I., Ianniello, A. et al. Clinical variables influencing the perception of fatigue in people with multiple sclerosis: a cross-sectional study using FSIQ-RMS. BMC Neurol 24, 138 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-024-03643-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-024-03643-x

Keywords

BMC Neurology

ISSN: 1471-2377

Contact us