Skip to main content

Predictive value of the systemic immune-inflammation index on one-year mortality in geriatric hip fractures

Abstract

Background

Geriatric hip fractures are associated with a high incidence of mortality. This study examines the predictive value of the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) on one-year mortality in elderly hip fracture patients.

Methods

A single-center retrospective study was conducted between February 2017 and October 2020. Three hundred and eleven surgically treated consecutive hip fracture patients were included in the study. Admission, postoperative first day, and postoperative fifth-day SII values were calculated. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to calculate the cut-off values, and patients were divided into high and low groups according to these cut-off values. After univariate Cox regression analysis, significant factors were included in the multivariate Cox proportional hazards model to adjust the effect of covariates and explore independent predictive factors associated with mortality. Further subgroup analysis was performed to evaluate the accuracy of the results for different clinical and biological characteristics.

Results

The mean age was 80.7 ± 8.0 years, and women made up the majority (67.8%) of the patients. The one-year mortality rate was 28.0%. After univariate and multivariate analyses, high postoperative fifth-day SII remained an independent predictor of one-year mortality (adjusted HR 2.16, 95% CI 1.38–3.38, p = 0.001). Older age, male gender, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) ≥ 2, and hypoalbuminemia were found to be other independent predictors. The optimal cut-off value of the postoperative fifth-day SII was calculated at 1751.9 units (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

The postoperative fifth-day SII is a simple and useful inflammatory biomarker for predicting one-year mortality in patients with hip fracture.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Since the human life span has increased in recent years, there has been an increase in the elderly population, and geriatric hip fractures have become a global public health problem. Despite the fact that one-year mortality rates for hip fractures have been reduced in the last six decades [1], the expected global number of hip fractures is expected to reach 4.5 million by the year 2050 [2]. Therefore, it is important to reveal the predictive factors for mortality.

Several prediction models have been developed to predict mortality after hip fractures, such as the Orthopaedic Physiological and Operative Severity Score (O-POSSUM), the Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress (E-PASS), and the Nottingham Hip Fracture Score (NFMS) [3, 4]. Nevertheless, none of the existing models provided excellent discrimination [5, 6].

Several recent studies have focused on inflammatory biomarkers that may predict mortality in geriatric hip fractures. In rat models, systemic inflammation has been shown to be aggravated by hip fracture in aged animals [7]. Consistently, clinical studies have also demonstrated that inflammatory biomarkers such as TNF-α, IL-6, IL-10, and CRP may play an important role in postoperative mortality in elderly hip fracture patients [8, 9].

Systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) is a simply available inflammatory biomarker that can be easily calculated using the formula plateletxneutrophil/lymphocyte counts. This marker has been found to be associated with the prognosis of many malignancies, cardiac diseases, and cerebrovascular events [10,11,12]. Furthermore, another study reported an increased osteoporotic fracture risk in postmenopausal osteoporosis patients with high SII [13]. Additionally, a recent study found a relationship between high admission SII and low survival rates in hip fracture patients [14]. However, in that study, the effect of SII on mortality was evaluated only preoperatively. The current study aims to examine the prognostic value of the SII not only immediately after hospital admission but also in the postoperative first and fifth days to evaluate the effects of persisting inflammation.

Materials and methods

A total of 443 hip fracture patients who applied to a state hospital between February 2017 and October 2020 were evaluated retrospectively. The inclusion criteria were being over 65 years of age and having been operated on for a hip fracture. Because we investigated an inflammatory biomarker, we excluded conditions that could disrupt the inflammatory status of the patient such as active infection or malignancy. Additionally, as this study focuses on geriatric hip fractures, we excluded some fracture types and several factors to decrease heterogeneity. Therefore, patients with subtrochanteric fracture, not fresh fracture (≥ 3 weeks), polytrauma, active infection, malignancy, pathological fracture, missing data, and conservatively treated patients were excluded. In addition, two patients who died before the fifth day were excluded from this study. A chart of inclusions is shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Patient flow chart diagram

The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee (IRB number: 2021/136), and written informed consent was obtained from patients or their immediate family members.

Data collection

Patient characteristics were collected from the hospital database, including age, gender, admission date, operation date, American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) score, comorbidities, fracture type (femur neck or intertrochanteric fracture), treatment details (arthroplasty or internal fixation), blood transfusion, anesthesia type (general or spinal), duration of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU), albumin value, hematological markers from the complete blood count, and differential counts of leukocytes. Blood samples were analyzed using an automated blood cell counter (Mindray BC-6800, Shenzhen, China). The survival status and death dates of the patients were obtained from the national death notification system. Causes of death were not available.

Admission (SII0), postoperative first day (SII1), and postoperative fifth day SII (SII5) values were calculated using the formula neutrophilxplatelet/lymphocyte counts as defined previously and expressed as x 109/L [15]. Anemia was defined as < 13.0 g/dL in men and < 12.0 g/dL in women, according to World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. The reference range of albumin was between 3.5 and 5.5 g/dL. Albumin levels were classified as < 3.5 g/dL (hypoalbuminemia) and ≥ 3.5 g/dL (normal albumin). No patient exceeded the upper albumin limit (> 5.5). The comorbidities of the patients were assessed using the CCI (Charlson Comorbidity Index), which includes 17 comorbid conditions and assigns 1 to 6 points for each comorbidity according to its impact on mortality [16]. Based on previous studies, CCI was categorized as none (CCI = 0), low (CCI = 1), and high (CCI ≥ 2) [17].

Perioperative care

A perioperative dose of cefazolin was administered to the patients 30–60 min before surgery and 2 g throughout the 48 h postoperatively. Subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin (4000 IU, 1 × 1) was given 12 h before surgery and throughout the postoperative 4 weeks. Patients were mobilized on the first postoperative day with the aid of a walker under the guidance of a physiotherapist.

Statistical analysis

The data were included in a database created by the Excel 2007 program by Microsoft (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, Washington, USA). Statistical analysis was performed using PASW statistics for Windows (version 18, USA). The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to evaluate normal distribution. Continuous variables were expressed as means ± standard deviation (SD) or median and interquartile range (IQR) according to the distribution. Differences between the groups were evaluated using the Student’s t test for normally distributed variables and the Mann-Whitney U test for the variables not distributed normally. Categorical variables were described as frequencies and compared using the chi-square test. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was generated to determine the cut-off values for the SII0, SII1, and SII5; then patients were divided into high and low groups for each variable. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the survival rates, and the log rank test was used to evaluate the differences between groups. After adjusting for significant variables identified by the univariate Cox regression analysis, a further multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was generated to identify the independent risk factors for mortality. Because of the collinearity with the variable CCI, the ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) score was not introduced in the Cox regression model. Subgroup analyses were also performed for each stratified group to further investigate whether the predictive value of SII was consistent among different populations. A p value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Of the 443 patients treated for hip fractures, 311 were evaluated in the study according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1. The mean age was 80.7 ± 8.0 years, and women constituted the majority (67.8%) of the patients. The method of anesthesia was spinal anesthesia for 94.2% of patients. The proportions of none (CCI = 0), low (CCI = 1), and high (CCI ≥ 2) comorbidity were 14.8%, 26.4%, and 58.8%, respectively. The majority (76.2%) of the patients were treated with arthroplasty. Laboratory data showed that the median values of SII0, SII1, and SII5 were 1557.7, 1767.1, and 1558.1 units, respectively. The mean hospitalization duration was 11.3 ± 8.1 days. After one year of follow-up, 87 (28.0%) of the patients died.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics and outcomes of the study patients

According to the ROC analysis, the optimal cut-off value for predicting one-year mortality was calculated as 1572.7 units for SII0, 1794.1 units for SII1, and 1751.9 units for SII5. The area under the curve (AUC) of SII5 (AUC 0.66, 95% CI 0.58–0.73, sensitivity 62.1, specificity 67.4, p < 0.001) was larger than SII0 (AUC 0.54, 95% CI 0.46–0.61) and SII1 (AUC 0.58, 95% CI 0.50–0.65) (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves of systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) for predicting one-year survival. Area under curve (AUC) of postoperative fifth day SII curve (AUC 0.66, 95% CI 0.58–0.73) was higher than that of admission (AUC 0.54, 95%CI 0.46–0.61) and postoperative first day (AUC 0.58, 95% CI 0.50–0.65) values

In univariate analysis, older age, male gender, CCI ≥ 2, delay to surgery, hypoalbuminemia, and high (≥ 1751.9) SII5 levels were significantly associated with one-year mortality (Table 2). The log-rank test of the Kaplan-Meier curves indicated that the patients with high SII5 levels had worse one-year survival (p < 0.001) (Fig. 3).

Table 2 Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis of risk factors associated with one-year mortality
Fig. 3
figure 3

Kaplan Meier survival analyses of admission, postoperative first day and postoperative fifth day systemic immune-inflammation index (SII). Hazard ratio (HR) was estimated using Cox regression analysis. P value was calculated using log-rank test

After inclusion of significant factors in the multivariate analysis to adjust the effects of covariates, high SII5 (adjusted HR 2.16, 95% CI 1.38–3.38) remained an independent prognostic factor for predicting mortality (p = 0.001). In addition, older age (HR 1.07, 95% CI 1.04–1.11, p < 0.001), male gender (HR 1.68, 95% CI 1.08–2.61, p = 0.020), CCI ≥ 2 (HR 3.15, 95% CI 1.25–7.91, p = 0.015), and hypoalbuminemia (HR 1.71, 95% CI 1.11–2.64, p = 0.016) were also independent risk factors for one year mortality (Table 2).

Further subgroup analysis was performed based on different patient characteristics. In most stratified groups, consistent with the main analysis, SII5 was significantly associated with one-year mortality except for only one subgroup, including patients with CCI = 0 (p = 0.223) (Table 3).

Table 3 Subgroup analysis estimating the association between the postoperative fifth day systemic immune-inflammation index and one-year mortality based on different stratified groups

Discussion

The most important finding of the current study was that postoperative fifth-day SII was an independent predictive factor for mortality in geriatric hip fracture patients (p = 0.001). A cut-off value of ≥ 1751.9 SII5 was calculated with a 2.16-fold increased risk in the multivariate Cox proportional hazards model (p = 0.001). Recently, a study reported that admission SII may be a good predictive factor for elderly hip fractures [14]. However, the limitation of that study was the absence of postoperative SII evaluations. Moreover, the study reported a 9% one-year mortality rate, which is extremely low compared to the contemporary literature. In the current study cohort, ROC analyses were performed for SII0, SII1, and SII5. It was observed that the prognostic value of the SII was clearly more prominent days after surgery, and the highest area under curve was observed in the SII5 curve. In addition, in univariate and multivariate analyses, SII5 was found to be an independent risk factor rather than SII0 and SII1.

A more recent study evaluated the predictive value of preoperative and postoperative SII on mortality in hip hemiarthroplasty patients [18]. The multivariate analysis of the study showed borderline significance for SII5 (p = 0.055). Although the study couldn’t find a discriminatory ability for the laboratory parameters investigated, it was concluded that these parameters could help develop early therapeutic interventions to improve patient outcomes. The reason why the study failed to find a significant predictive effect for SII5 may be because of the small sample size. In addition, consistent with our study, the study found no significant predictive value of admission SII on one-year mortality rates [18].

In a previous registry study, a one-year mortality rate of 30.7% was reported in patients who underwent surgery following a fracture of the hip [19]. The one-year mortality rate of the current study was 28.0%, which is consistent with the previous literature. High CCI has previously been reported as a risk factor for poor survival in elderly hip fractures [14, 20]. In the current study, high CCI (≥ 2) was found to be associated with a 3.15-fold higher one-year mortality rate in the multivariate analysis (p = 0.015). Older age and male gender have also been reported as associated with increased mortality in patients with hip fractures [20]. In the current patient cohort, each 1-year increase in age increased the risk of one-year mortality by 7% (p < 0.001). In addition, male gender was found to be associated with a 1.68-fold higher one-year mortality rate (p = 0.020).

Hypoalbuminemia has also been shown to be a risk factor for poor survival in geriatric hip fractures [21]. In the current study, hypoalbuminemia was observed to be associated with a 1.71-fold increase in one-year mortality (p = 0.016). Early surgery within the first 48 h has been shown to be associated with lower mortality rates in patients with hip fractures [22]. In the current study, consistent with the literature, a > 48-hour delay to surgery was associated with a higher mortality risk in the univariate analysis (HR: 1.76, p = 0.018). However, delay to surgery lost statistical significance in the multivariate analysis, but there was a trend toward significance (p = 0.087).

Early identification of risk factors and implementation of preventive measures may be beneficial in reducing postoperative mortality rates after hip fracture surgery. According to our results, older age, male gender, high CCI, hypoalbuminemia, and high postoperative fifth-day SII seem to be reliable predictors of postoperative mortality in these patients. These parameters can be used for individualized perioperative management and to stratify the risk of postoperative mortality. Monitoring postoperative fifth-day SII, proper management of comorbidities perioperatively, and prevention of hypoalbuminemia with appropriate nutritional support are strategies that might be applied in order to optimize their outcomes.

Various predictive models have previously been developed that can predict mortality after hip fractures. However, a recent meta-analysis reported strong evidence that O-POSSUM and P-POSSUM cannot accurately predict postoperative mortality among such patients [4]. Another study from Sweden reported that the POSSUM score and NHFS showed poor discrimination in hip fracture patients, and mortality was largely dependent on parameters not included in these scores [6]. Furthermore, one study evaluated six different prediction models, including CCI, O-POSSUM, E-PASS, and NHFS. Despite these methods combined a variety of parameters ranging from six to nineteen parameters, none of them contained SII, and none of them provided excellent discrimination [5]. In our study, postoperative fifth-day SII alone provided moderate discrimination without being combined with any other parameters. Since SII5 is a biomarker that can be calculated relatively easily, it can be performed quickly in clinical practice. In addition, this biomarker can be combined with other predictive models to increase its discriminative ability in clinical practice. Future predictive models might combine SII5 with different models or patient characteristics.

This study has several limitations. First, the current study used data obtained from retrospective screening, and some variables were not obtained that could affect survival and inflammatory markers, such as body mass index, risk of fall assessment, injury hospitalization interval, and smoking. Second, due to the fact that many surgeons performed the surgeries, potentially there may be some performance bias in the study. Third, some of the subgroups had relatively small patient numbers, which limited statistical analysis in these subgroups. Fourth, the study was based on a single-center retrospective design, which might limit the generalizability of the findings. Lastly, although a higher AUC was observed in SII5 than in SII0 and SII1, the AUC value was lower than the threshold value of 0.70, indicating moderate discriminatory ability. However, Kaplan-Meier survival curves, log rank tests, and the multivariate models demonstrated the ability of SII5 to predict one-year mortality. Considering the retrospective nature of the analysis, the results need to be validated by prospective cohort studies.

In conclusion, elevated (≥ 1751.9 units) postoperative fifth-day SII is associated with increased one-year mortality in patients with hip fractures. As SII is a simple and economical marker that can be calculated from a routine blood test, it can be easily performed in usual clinical practice for risk stratification of mortality in this patient population.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Haleem S, Choudri MJ, Kainth GS, Parker MJ. Mortality following hip fracture: Trends and geographical variations over the last SIXTY years. Injury. 2023;54(2):620–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cooper C, Campion G, Melton LJ 3rd. Hip fractures in the elderly: a world-wide projection. Osteoporos Int. 1992;2(6):285–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Marufu TC, Mannings A, Moppett IK. Risk scoring models for predicting peri-operative morbidity and mortality in people with fragility hip fractures: qualitative systematic review. Injury. 2015;46(12):2325–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yang G, Cui G, Liu Y, Guo J, Yue C, O-POSSUM. P-POSSUM as predictors of morbidity and mortality in older patients after hip fracture surgery: a meta-analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023;143(11):6837–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Karres J, Heesakkers NA, Ultee JM, Vrouenraets BC. Predicting 30-day mortality following hip fracture surgery: evaluation of six risk prediction models. Injury. 2015;46(2):371–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jonsson MH, Bentzer P, Turkiewicz A, Hommel A. Accuracy of the physiological and operative severity score for the enUmeration of mortality and morbidity score and the Nottingham risk score in hip fracture patients in Sweden - A prospective observational study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2018;62(8):1057–63.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Hao Z, Tiansheng S, Zhi L, Jianzheng Z, Xiaowei W, Jia L. Hip fracture aggravates systemic inflammation and lung injury in aged chronic cigarette smoke exposed rats. J Orthop Res. 2014;32(1):24–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sun T, Wang X, Liu Z, Chen X, Zhang J. Plasma concentrations of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines and outcome prediction in elderly hip fracture patients. Injury. 2011;42(7):707–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen BK, Liu YC, Chen CC, Chen YP, Kuo YJ, Huang SW. Correlation between C-reactive protein and postoperative mortality in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2023;18(1):182.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Yang R, Chang Q, Meng X, Gao N, Wang W. Prognostic value of systemic immune-inflammation index in cancer: a meta-analysis. J Cancer. 2018;9(18):3295–302.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Yang YL, Wu CH, Hsu PF, Chen SC, Huang SS, Chan WL, et al. Systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) predicted clinical outcome in patients with coronary artery disease. Eur J Clin Invest. 2020;50(5):e13230.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Huang YW, Yin XS, Li ZP. Association of the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) and clinical outcomes in patients with stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Immunol. 2022;13:1090305.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Fang H, Zhang H, Wang Z, Zhou Z, Li Y, Lu L. Systemic immune-inflammation index acts as a novel diagnostic biomarker for postmenopausal osteoporosis and could predict the risk of osteoporotic fracture. J Clin Lab Anal. 2020;34(1):e23016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang ZC, Jiang W, Chen X, Yang L, Wang H, Liu YH. Systemic immune-inflammation index independently predicts poor survival of older adults with hip fracture: a prospective cohort study. BMC Geriatr. 2021;21(1):155.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Hu B, Yang XR, Xu Y, Sun YF, Sun C, Guo W, et al. Systemic immune-inflammation index predicts prognosis of patients after curative resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20(23):6212–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Charlson M, Szatrowski TP, Peterson J, Gold J. Validation of a combined comorbidity index. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994;47(11):1245–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Beaupre LA, Khong H, Smith C, Kang S, Evens L, Jaiswal PK et al. The impact of time to surgery after hip fracture on mortality at 30- and 90-days: Does a single benchmark apply to all? Injury. 2019;50(4):950-5.

  18. Bala MM. The benefit of dynamic neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and systemic immune-inflammation index in predicting survival in patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2022;26(11):3878–85.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Johnston AT, Barnsdale L, Smith R, Duncan K, Hutchison JD. Change in long-term mortality associated with fractures of the hip: evidence from the Scottish hip fracture audit. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92(7):989–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Miettinen SSA, Savolainen S, Kröger H. Charlson comorbidity index predicts the 10-year survivorship of the operatively treated hip fracture patients. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023;33(4):1141–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bohl DD, Shen MR, Hannon CP, Fillingham YA, Darrith B, Della Valle CJ. Serum albumin predicts survival and postoperative course following surgery for geriatric hip fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017;99(24):2110–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Klestil T, Röder C, Stotter C, Winkler B, Nehrer S, Lutz M, et al. Impact of timing of surgery in elderly hip fracture patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):13933.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for conducting this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The author confirms sole responsibility for the following: study conception and design, data collection, analysis and interpretation of results, and manuscript preparation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zekeriya Ersin Çelen.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This research has been approved by the Yalova University Human Research Ethics Committee (2021/136). Informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Çelen, Z.E. Predictive value of the systemic immune-inflammation index on one-year mortality in geriatric hip fractures. BMC Geriatr 24, 340 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-04916-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-04916-3

Keywords