Table 3

Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale scores for each study

Authors, year and reference


Factor

Arngrïmsson et al., 2004 [24]

Booth et al., 1997 [42]

Cotter et al., 2001 [25]

Duffield et al., 2010 [41]

Gonzalez-Alonso et al., 1999 [40]

Hasegawa et al., 2006 [43]

Ihsan et al., 2010 [16]

Kay et al., 1999 [28]

Quod et al., 2008 [27]

Ross et al., 2011 [17]

Siegel et al., 2010 [18]

Siegel et al., 2012 [19]

Ückert and Joch, 2007 [26]


Eligibility criteria were specified (not scored)

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Subjects were randomly allocated to groups

0

0

0

1

1

0

1

0

1

1

1

1

1

Allocation was concealed

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Groups were similar at baseline

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

Blinding of subjects

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Blinding of intervention administrators

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Blinding of assessors

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Outcome measure obtained from ≥ 85% subjects

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

All subjects received intervention/intention to treat analysis

1

1

0

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

Between group statistical comparisons reported

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

Between-group variability reported

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

PEDro score (out of 10)

5

5

4

6

6

5

6

5

6

6

6

6

6

Sample size calculation performed

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0


Jones et al. BMC Medicine 2012 10:166   doi:10.1186/1741-7015-10-166

Open Data