Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Health Services Research and BioMed Central.

Open Access Research article

Evaluating complex interventions and health technologies using normalization process theory: development of a simplified approach and web-enabled toolkit

Carl R May1, Tracy Finch2, Luciana Ballini3, Anne MacFarlane4, Frances Mair5, Elizabeth Murray6, Shaun Treweek7 and Tim Rapley2*

Author Affiliations

1 Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, UK

2 Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, UK

3 Agenzia Sanitaria e Sociale Regionale, Bologna, Italy

4 Discipline of General Practice, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland

5 Academic Unit of General Practice and Primary Care, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, UK

6 Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, UK

7 Quality, Safety & Informatics Research Group, University of Dundee, UK

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Health Services Research 2011, 11:245  doi:10.1186/1472-6963-11-245

Published: 30 September 2011

Abstract

Background

Normalization Process Theory (NPT) can be used to explain implementation processes in health care relating to new technologies and complex interventions. This paper describes the processes by which we developed a simplified version of NPT for use by clinicians, managers, and policy makers, and which could be embedded in a web-enabled toolkit and on-line users manual.

Methods

Between 2006 and 2010 we undertook four tasks. (i) We presented NPT to potential and actual users in multiple workshops, seminars, and presentations. (ii) Using what we discovered from these meetings, we decided to create a simplified set of statements and explanations expressing core constructs of the theory (iii) We circulated these statements to a criterion sample of 60 researchers, clinicians and others, using SurveyMonkey to collect qualitative textual data about their criticisms of the statements. (iv) We then reconstructed the statements and explanations to meet users' criticisms, embedded them in a web-enabled toolkit, and beta tested this 'in the wild'.

Results

On-line data collection was effective: over a four week period 50/60 participants responded using SurveyMonkey (40/60) or direct phone and email contact (10/60). An additional nine responses were received from people who had been sent the SurveyMonkey form by other respondents. Beta testing of the web enabled toolkit produced 13 responses, from 327 visits to http://www.normalizationprocess.org webcite. Qualitative analysis of both sets of responses showed a high level of support for the statements but also showed that some statements poorly expressed their underlying constructs or overlapped with others. These were rewritten to take account of users' criticisms and then embedded in a web-enabled toolkit. As a result we were able translate the core constructs into a simplified set of statements that could be utilized by non-experts.

Conclusion

Normalization Process Theory has been developed through transparent procedures at each stage of its life. The theory has been shown to be sufficiently robust to merit formal testing. This project has provided a user friendly version of NPT that can be embedded in a web-enabled toolkit and used as a heuristic device to think through implementation and integration problems.