Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 8 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 28 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Claire Goodman |
| 7 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jane Sandall |
| 13 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Victoria Palmer |
| 7 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Tim Rapley |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 7 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 15 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Claire Goodman |
| 27 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jane Sandall |
| 2 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Victoria Palmer |
| 19 Jul 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Tim Rapley |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 19 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 18 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Tim Rapley |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 18 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 24 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Tim Rapley |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 24 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 25 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Tim Rapley |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 25 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 30 Sep 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 30 Sep 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6963-11-245 |
You can find further information about peer review here.