Table 1 |
|||||||||
|
Influence of cluster thinning (CT) on yield component and berry composition at harvest. |
|||||||||
|
Yield/ vine (kg) |
Cluster/ vine (n) |
Cluster weight (g) |
Berry weight (g) |
Leaf area/ vine (m2) |
Leaf area/ yield (m2/kg) |
°Brix |
TA (g/L) |
pH |
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
C |
6.3 a |
16 a |
386 |
2.37 |
3.84 |
0.6 b |
20.8 b |
7.6 a |
3.4 b |
|
|
|||||||||
|
CT |
2.9 b |
8 b |
353 |
2.24 |
3.43 |
1.2 a |
22.7 a |
6.8 b |
3.5 a |
|
|
|||||||||
|
Significancezy |
* |
* |
ns |
ns |
ns |
* |
* |
* |
* |
|
|
|||||||||
|
z Means separated within columns by the Student-Newman-Keuls test (n = 12 except for Brix, TA and pH were n = 3). y *, significant at p ≤ 0.05; ns, not significant. |
|||||||||
|
Pastore et al. BMC Genomics 2011 12:631 doi:10.1186/1471-2164-12-631 |
|||||||||
