Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Bioinformatics and BioMed Central.

This article is part of the supplement: Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Research in Computational Molecular Biology (RECOMB) Satellite Workshop on Comparative Genomics

Open Access Proceedings

Compareads: comparing huge metagenomic experiments

Nicolas Maillet1*, Claire Lemaitre1, Rayan Chikhi2, Dominique Lavenier1 and Pierre Peterlongo1*

Author Affiliations

1 INRIA Rennes - Bretagne Atlantique/IRISA, EPI GenScale, Rennes, France

2 ENS Cachan/IRISA, EPI GenScale, Rennes, France

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Bioinformatics 2012, 13(Suppl 19):S10  doi:10.1186/1471-2105-13-S19-S10

Published: 19 December 2012

Additional files

Additional file 1:

Theoretical details for the false positive rate. Details about how theoretical false positive results were obtained. Theoretical details for the false positive rate. Details about how theoretical false positive results were obtained.

Format: PDF Size: 203KB Download file

This file can be viewed with: Adobe Acrobat Reader

Open Data

Additional file 2:

Empirical estimation of false positive rate. Details about how empirical false positive results were obtained. Empirical estimation of false positive rate. Details about how empirical false positive results were obtained.

Format: PDF Size: 79KB Download file

This file can be viewed with: Adobe Acrobat Reader

Open Data