Table 2

Performance comparison

Training Data Set (by five-fold cross-validation)


Method

tp

tn

fp

fn

Sens

Spec

Acc

MCC


PSLNuc

2,317

2,030

576

525

0.815

0.779

0.797

0.595

NUCLEO

2,157

1,924

682

685

0.759

0.760

0.749

0.497


Independent Test Data Set


tp

tn

fp

fn

Sens

Spec

Acc

MCC


PSLNuc

452

258

140

112

0.805

0.646

0.739

0.457

NUCLEO

430

246

152

134

0.760

0.620

0.700

0.380

PredictNLS

153

369

29

411

0.270

0.930

0.540

0.250

NucPred

376

233

165

188

0.670

0.590

0.630

0.250


Performance comparison of different nuclear localization predictors.

Su et al. BMC Bioinformatics 2012 13(Suppl 17):S13   doi:10.1186/1471-2105-13-S17-S13

Open Data