Table 4

Results on the ST data

Subunit-Complex

Protein-Component

All


Prec.

Rec.

F

Prec.

Rec.

F

Prec.

Rec.

F


TEES

66.95

48.47

56.23

68.57

50.90

58.43

68.04

50.10

57.71

GETM

38.12

47.85

42.43

36.53

47.31

41.23

37.04

47.48

41.62


Hybrid

66.95

48.47

56.23

61.79

52.40

56.70

63.32

51.11

56.56


T ∩ H

75.25

46.63

57.58

71.56

48.80

58.03

72.70

48.09

57.89

T ∪ H

60.74

50.31

55.03

59.73

53.89

56.66

60.05

52.72

56.14


Performance on the ST'11 test set, measured by precision, recall and their harmonic mean, the F-score (F). The first few rows indicate the official results of the TEES (T) and GETM frameworks. Next, the performance of the hybrid (H) system is shown. Finally, the two last rows report on the performance of creating the intersection and the union of TEES and the hybrid system.

Van Landeghem et al. BMC Bioinformatics 2012 13(Suppl 11):S6   doi:10.1186/1471-2105-13-S11-S6

Open Data