Table 3 |
|||
|
Prediction coverage on three clustering groups. Table 3 shows the prediction coverage of three clustering groups under different distance threshold. |
|||
|
Distance Threshold |
Excellent |
Good |
Fair |
|
|
|||
|
550 |
0.14% |
0.09% |
0.20% |
|
600 |
0.38% |
0.27% |
0.53% |
|
650 |
0.78% |
0.61% |
1.09% |
|
700 |
1.37% |
1.16% |
1.95% |
|
750 |
2.21% |
1.99% |
3.26% |
|
800 |
3.26% |
3.15% |
5.05% |
|
850 |
4.45% |
4.64% |
7.46% |
|
900 |
5.79% |
6.51% |
10.53% |
|
950 |
7.19% |
8.73% |
14.35% |
|
1000 |
8.61% |
11.19% |
18.83% |
|
1050 |
10.05% |
13.82% |
23.80% |
|
1100 |
11.46% |
16.54% |
29.08% |
|
1150 |
12.77% |
19.25% |
34.45% |
|
1200 |
13.95% |
21.80% |
39.58% |
|
1250 |
14.99% |
24.03% |
44.12% |
|
1300 |
15.83% |
25.88% |
47.73% |
|
|
|||
|
Chen and Johnson BMC Bioinformatics 2009 10(Suppl 11):S15 doi:10.1186/1471-2105-10-S11-S15 |
|||
