Table 1 |
||||
|
Results of supertree analyses of two empirical data sets. Note that a bolded number represents the best found score for each measurement in a data set. |
||||
|
Data Set |
Method |
Triplet-similarity |
MAST-similarity |
Pars. Score |
|
|
||||
|
Marsupial [21] 158 input trees 267 taxa |
MMC |
51.73 % |
54.20 % |
3901 |
|
|
||||
|
MXC |
≈ 96 % |
≈ 66 % |
N/A |
|
|
|
||||
|
MRP |
98.29 % |
71.70 % |
2274 |
|
|
|
||||
|
TH(SPR) |
98.99 % |
70.50 % |
2317 |
|
|
|
||||
|
TH(TBR) |
98.99 % |
70.70 % |
2317 |
|
|
|
||||
|
Cetartiodactyla [22] 201 input trees 290 taxa |
MMC |
70.03 % |
54.20 % |
4929 |
|
|
||||
|
MRP |
95.84 % |
65.40 % |
2603 |
|
|
|
||||
|
TH(SPR) |
97.28 % |
63.40 % |
2754 |
|
|
|
||||
|
TH(TBR) |
97.28 % |
63.50 % |
2754 |
|
|
|
||||
|
Lin et al. BMC Bioinformatics 2009 10(Suppl 1):S8 doi:10.1186/1471-2105-10-S1-S8 |
||||
