This article is part of the supplement: Selected papers from the Seventh Asia-Pacific Bioinformatics Conference (APBC 2009) .ModuleDigger: an itemset mining framework for the detection of cis-regulatory modules1Department of Electrical Engineering, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg 10, 3001 Leuven, Belgium 2Department of Engineering Mathematics, university of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK 3Department of Microbial and Molecular systems, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg 20, 3001 Leuven, Belgium 4Laboratory for experimental medicine and endocrinology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
BMC Bioinformatics 2009, 10(Suppl 1):S30doi:10.1186/1471-2105-10-S1-S30
AbstractBackgroundThe detection of cis-regulatory modules (CRMs) that mediate transcriptional responses in eukaryotes remains a key challenge in the postgenomic era. A CRM is characterized by a set of co-occurring transcription factor binding sites (TFBS). In silico methods have been developed to search for CRMs by determining the combination of TFBS that are statistically overrepresented in a certain geneset. Most of these methods solve this combinatorial problem by relying on computational intensive optimization methods. As a result their usage is limited to finding CRMs in small datasets (containing a few genes only) and using binding sites for a restricted number of transcription factors (TFs) out of which the optimal module will be selected. ResultsWe present an itemset mining based strategy for computationally detecting cis-regulatory modules (CRMs) in a set of genes. We tested our method by applying it on a large benchmark data set, derived from a ChIP-Chip analysis and compared its performance with other well known cis-regulatory module detection tools. ConclusionWe show that by exploiting the computational efficiency of an itemset mining approach and combining it with a well-designed statistical scoring scheme, we were able to prioritize the biologically valid CRMs in a large set of coregulated genes using binding sites for a large number of potential TFs as input. |



on Google Scholar








author email
corresponding author email