Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology and BioMed Central.

This article is part of the supplement: 18th Scientific Symposium of the Austrian Pharmacological Society (APHAR)

Open Access Meeting abstract

Functional and physical interactions between P2Y receptors and ion channels

Hend Gafar, Giri K Chandaka and Stefan Boehm*

Author Affiliations

Department of Neurophysiology and Neuropharmacology, Center for Physiology and Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology 2012, 13(Suppl 1):A61  doi:10.1186/2050-6511-13-S1-A61


The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/2050-6511/13/S1/A61


Published:17 September 2012

© 2012 Gafar et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Background

Neuronal P2Y receptors, i.e. nucleotide-sensitive G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), are known to control various voltage-gated ion channels, in particular KV7 K+ and CaV2.2 Ca2+ channels. The differential modulation of these ion channels via GPCRs was shown to rely on the presence or absence of scaffolding proteins such as AKAP79/150 and NHERF-2. Since scaffold proteins are believed to bring GPCRs and ion channels in close proximity to guarantee efficient G protein-mediated modulation, this project evaluates whether a tight contact between P2Y receptors and ion channels is a prerequisite for their functional interaction.

Methods

P2Y1 or P2Y12 receptors with fluorescent tags (CFP or YFP) were expressed together with fluorescently labeled KV7.2/7.3 or CaV2.2 channels in tsA 201 cells and the channel modulation by nucleotides was determined by measuring the according currents. To evaluate the behavior of the receptors and channels in the membrane, fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) was determined by confocal laser microscopy.

Results

Activation of P2Y1 but not of P2Y12 receptors by ADP inhibited the K+ currents in a concentration-dependent manner by up to 20.5 ± 1.9%. Conversely, activation of both, P2Y1 and P2Y12 receptors, reduced the Ca2+ currents by up to 60.1 ± 7.4% and 76.3 ± 4.2%, respectively. In initial FRAP experiments, the YFP-labeled receptors showed similar half-times of around 80 seconds. Upon coexpression of the P2Y1 receptor with the KV7 channel the half-time increased significantly (p < 0.009) to 116 seconds compared to single expression of receptor or channel only. In the case of P2Y12, coexpression with KV7 showed no significant change compared to P2Y12 or KV7 alone.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that distinct ion channels are modulated by different P2Y receptors. KV7 currents are inhibited by P2Y1 whereas CaV2.2 currents are reduced by both P2Y1 and P2Y12. Additionally, FRAP data show that the presence of KV7 slows down the movement of P2Y1 in the membrane, but not that of P2Y12. This suggests that there is a physical interaction between P2Y1 and KV7 which is not present between P2Y12 and KV7. The influence on movement of P2Y1 and P2Y12 receptors in the membrane by the presence CaV2.2 remains to be elucidated.

Acknowledgements

This study is supported by the FWF-funded doctoral program CCHD (W1205).