Strengthening organizational performance through accreditation research-a framework for twelve interrelated studies: the ACCREDIT project study protocol
1 University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia
2 Australian Council on Healthcare Standards, 5 Macarthur Street, Ultimo NSW 2007, Australia
3 Quality in Practice/Australian General Practice Accreditation Limited, PO Box 2058, Milton QLD 4064, Australia
4 Aged Care Accreditation Agency Limited, PO Box 773, Parramatta NSW 2124, Australia
5 Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care, GPO Box 5480, Sydney NSW 2001, Australia
6 Clinical Excellence Commission, GPO Box 1614, Sydney, NSW 2001, Australia
7 University of Technology, 15 Broadway, Ultimo NSW 2007, Australia
8 Karolinska Institute, Fakturor, Box 23 109, SE-104 35 Stockholm, Sweden
9 University of Southampton, University Road, Southampton SO17 1BJ UK
10 Avedis Donabedian University Institute, Autonomous University of Barcelona, CIBER Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Spain
11 European Society for Quality in Healthcare, St Camillus Hospital, Shelbourne Road, Limerick, Ireland
BMC Research Notes 2011, 4:390 doi:10.1186/1756-0500-4-390Published: 9 October 2011
Service accreditation is a structured process of recognising and promoting performance and adherence to standards. Typically, accreditation agencies either receive standards from an authorized body or develop new and upgrade existing standards through research and expert views. They then apply standards, criteria and performance indicators, testing their effects, and monitoring compliance with them. The accreditation process has been widely adopted. The international investments in accreditation are considerable. However, reliable evidence of its efficiency or effectiveness in achieving organizational improvements is sparse and the value of accreditation in cost-benefit terms has yet to be demonstrated. Although some evidence suggests that accreditation promotes the improvement and standardization of care, there have been calls to strengthen its research base.
In response, the ACCREDIT (Accreditation Collaborative for the Conduct of Research, Evaluation and Designated Investigations through Teamwork) project has been established to evaluate the effectiveness of Australian accreditation in achieving its goals. ACCREDIT is a partnership of key researchers, policymakers and agencies.
We present the framework for our studies in accreditation. Four specific aims of the ACCREDIT project, which will direct our findings, are to: (i) evaluate current accreditation processes; (ii) analyse the costs and benefits of accreditation; (iii) improve future accreditation via evidence; and (iv) develop and apply new standards of consumer involvement in accreditation. These will be addressed through 12 interrelated studies designed to examine specific issues identified as a high priority. Novel techniques, a mix of qualitative and quantitative methods, and randomized designs relevant for health-care research have been developed. These methods allow us to circumvent the fragmented and incommensurate findings that can be generated in small-scale, project-based studies. The overall approach for our research is a multi-level, multi-study design.
The ACCREDIT project will examine the utility, reliability, relevance and cost effectiveness of differing forms of accreditation, focused on general practice, aged care and acute care settings in Australia. Empirically, there are potential research gains to be made by understanding accreditation and extending existing knowledge; theoretically, this design will facilitate a systems view of accreditation of benefit to the partnership, international research communities, and future accreditation designers.
"Accreditation of health-care organisations is a multimillion dollar industry which shapes care in many countries. Recent reviews of research show little evidence that accreditation increases safety or improves quality. It's time we knew about the cost and value of accreditation and about its future direction." [Professor John Øvretveit, Karolinska Institute, Sweden, 7 October 2009]