Table 2 |
||||
|
Quantitation of S. aureus genomic DNA (gDNA) by real time PCR |
||||
|
MDA |
S. aur gDNA |
Probe |
Average Ct |
SEM (±) |
|
|
||||
|
N |
100 ng |
proS |
17.8 |
0.03 |
|
N |
10 ng |
proS |
22.1 |
0.05 |
|
N |
1 ng |
proS |
24.6 |
0.03 |
|
N |
0.1 ng |
proS |
27.7 |
0.06 |
|
N |
0.01 ng |
proS |
31.7 |
0.26 |
|
N |
0 ng |
proS |
U |
U |
|
(N) |
0.01 ng |
proS |
35.4 |
0.85 |
|
(Y) |
0.01 ng |
proS |
16.9 |
0.05 |
|
|
||||
|
Triplicate samples of isolated S. aureus genomic DNA were assayed by qPCR; the calculated average threshold critical cycle (Ct) values are provided, as is the standard error. Each sample concentration gave a highly reproducible result; the data shown are using the proS probe, but equivalent results were obtained using lysS. Pre-treatment of S. aureus gDNA by MDA resulted in a massive reduction in Ct, indicating a massive amplification of template. In MDA control lacking the DNA polyermase, Ct actually slightly increased, due to dilution of the starting material. 0 ng of gDNA (negative control) gave no detectable signal (Ct undetermined, represented as "U" above). |
||||
|
Kathju et al. BMC Research Notes 2010 3:259 doi:10.1186/1756-0500-3-259 |
||||