Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
16 Oct 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
16 Oct 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Sek Won Kong |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
16 Oct 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
12 Dec 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Stephen Glatt |
18 Dec 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Laila Poisson |
21 Dec 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Pablo Minguez |
31 Jan 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ke Hao |
3 Feb 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Shiwei Duan |
4 Apr 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Sek Won Kong |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
4 Apr 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
5 Apr 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Stephen Glatt |
15 Apr 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Pablo Minguez |
20 Apr 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Laila Poisson |
22 Apr 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Shiwei Duan |
7 May 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ke Hao |
30 Jul 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Sek Won Kong |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
30 Jul 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
31 Jul 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Pablo Minguez |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
Publishing | ||
20 Sep 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
24 Sep 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1755-8794-6-34 |
You can find further information about peer review here.