Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
22 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
4 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Melissa Troester |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
4 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
11 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Christopher Wong |
11 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lance David Miller |
10 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Melissa Troester |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
10 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
12 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Christopher Wong |
25 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lance David Miller |
7 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Melissa Troester |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
7 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
20 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Melissa Troester |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
20 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
22 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Melissa Troester |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
22 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
28 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Melissa Troester |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
28 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
Publishing | ||
30 Jun 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
30 Jun 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1755-8794-4-54 |
You can find further information about peer review here.