Table 4

Comparison of QTL effect estimations

Chromosome

Chr1

Chr2

Chr2

Chr3

Chr3

Chr4

Chr5

Chr5


True effect1

12.

2.

2.

2.

2.

4.

1.272

1.273

GBLUP

Zeng

4.39

1.92

2.31

1.18

1.34

BayesB

Zeng

2.17

0.68

0.62

0.2

0.15

0.13

BayesC

Dashab

BayesCĎ€

Schurink

1.92

1.28

0.84

1.24

0.97

Zeng

7.01

0.69

0.66

1.18

0.24

LASSO1

Usai

2.22

0.71

0.48

1.43

0.15

0.2

0.12

LASSO2

Usai

2.09

1.39

2.18

1.67

0.38

0.23

1.42

LASSO3

Usai

2.22

1.01

0.56

1.58

0.29

0.01

0.67

MM single SNP

Dashab

4.19

2.1

2.71

0.65

1.31

MM Haplotype

Dashab

MM Phylogeny

Dashab

EMMAX

Fu

4.39

2.08

2.46


1 Apparent difference between homozygous in trait units

2 Only 63.6% of the homozygous individuals, which were also homozygous for the second interacting QTL, expressed the 2 trait unit effect of this 1st QTL

3Only 63.6% of the homozygous individuals, which were also homozygous for the first interacting QTL, expressed the 2 trait unit effect of this 2nd QTL

Demeure et al. BMC Proceedings 2012 6(Suppl 2):S2   doi:10.1186/1753-6561-6-S2-S2

Open Data