Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Proceedings and BioMed Central.

This article is part of the supplement: IUFRO Tree Biotechnology Conference 2011: From Genomes to Integration and Delivery

Open Access Poster presentation

Local and systemic defense response in Aspen clones: contrasting defense response to biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens

Carl Gunnar Fossdal1*, Nadeem Yaqoob1, Halvor Solheim1, Jan Karlsson2 and Benedicte Riber Albrectsen2

Author Affiliations

1 The Norwegian Forest and Landscape Institute, Norway

2 Umeå Plant Science Centre, Sweden

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Proceedings 2011, 5(Suppl 7):P83  doi:10.1186/1753-6561-5-S7-P83

The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at:

Published:13 September 2011

© 2011 Fossdal et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Poster presentation

Trees are exposed to a variety of pathogenic fungi. The defense response toward a biotroph may require a different strategy that toward a necrotroph. To understand the key processes of defense responses toward pathogenic fungi in aspen (Populus tremulae) at the transcript level we inoculated clones of this species with a foliar rust on the leaves and a necrotroph in the bark. Leaf samples were collected from above the inoculation site to examine the long distance (systemic) defense responses and bark tissue around the site of inoculation examined for the local response as early as day1 post treatments. We performed microarray experiments on the biotrophic and necrotrophic interaction and between healthy controls of two SwAsp clones. Selected candidate genes were also examined in more detail by qRT-PCR and chemical analysis for phenols and tannins was also performed. We found that the two clones respond in a very different in fashion at the transcriptional level to both the biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogen. The more resistant clone responded systemically within 24 hours while little response at the transcriptional level was detected in the more susceptible clone in response to the biotroph, while indications of suppression in response to the necrotroph was found.