Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Proceedings and BioMed Central.

This article is part of the supplement: IUFRO Tree Biotechnology Conference 2011: From Genomes to Integration and Delivery

Open Access Open Badges Poster presentation

Analysis of expression patterns of candidate genes for bud set and cold tolerance in scots pine (Pinus sylvestris l.)

Komlan Avia1*, Kärkkäinen Katri2 and Outi Savolainen1

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Biology, University of Oulu, PO Box 3000, FI-90014 Oulu, Finland

2 Finnish Forest Research Institute, FI-91500 Muhos, Finland

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Proceedings 2011, 5(Suppl 7):P3  doi:10.1186/1753-6561-5-S7-P3

The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at:

Published:13 September 2011

© 2011 Avia et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Poster presentation

Conifers, like other perennial plants adapt their growth rhythm to seasonal changes in the environment. Growth cessation and bud set are among the main adaptations used by the plants to prepare for winter. These adaptive traits are mainly controlled by photoperiod, temperature and light quality and show a clinal variation in different species including Scots pine. In conifers, efforts have been made to understand the genetic basis of these traits. In Norway spruce for instance, a Flowering Locus T homolog (PaFT4) has been shown to be implicated in the control of growth rhythm.

We previously evaluated genetic variation for timing of bud set and cold tolerance in a large association population of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) from Punkaharju, Southern Finland, along with five other populations used as control for clinal variation. To correlate this genetic variation with the expression pattern of some candidate genes already described in other species including conifers as involved in the control of bud set (e.g. FT4, PRR1, Gi, Myb) and cold tolerance (e.g. Aba responsive, DHN3, ERD, LEA), the Punkaharju population was used together with two others from Kolari (Northern Finland) and Poland. For photoperiod treatments, seedlings of eight families from each population were grown in a greenhouse under natural photoperiod conditions and in growth chambers under constant light for three months before transfer to three different photoperiod conditions (20 h/4 h, 17 h/7 h and 8 h/16 h light/dark). For cold treatments, the same families were grown in growth chambers under constant light for two and a half months and divided into two parts. The first part was directly submitted to the cold treatments (+4°C for one week followed by -5°C for 48 hours) while for the second part, seedlings were allowed to set buds under short day conditions (8 h light/16 h dark) before treatments. The results of this expression study will be described in relation to the phenotypic variance already observed.