Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Proceedings and BioMed Central.

This article is part of the supplement: IUFRO Tree Biotechnology Conference 2011: From Genomes to Integration and Delivery

Open Access Oral presentation

Lodgepole pine, jack pine, and their hybrids: molecular markers reveal mountain pine beetle host-range expansion into jack pine of the boreal forest

Catherine Cullingham1, Sophie Dang1, Corey Davis1, Barry Cooke2, David Coltman1 and Janice Cooke1*

Author Affiliations

1 University of Alberta, Canada

2 Northern Forestry Centre, Canadian Forest Service, Natural Resources Canada

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Proceedings 2011, 5(Suppl 7):O3  doi:10.1186/1753-6561-5-S7-O3

The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1753-6561/5/S7/O3


Published:13 September 2011

© 2011 Cullingham et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Background

Lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Dougl. ex Loud. var. latifolia) is found in western North America, extending from the Yukon into British Columbia and Washington, and along the Rocky Mountains and eastern slopes to Colorado [1]. Jack pine (Pinus banksiana Lamb.) is a closely related species found east of the Rockies, mainly in Canada’s boreal forest from the Northwest Territories to Quebec [1]. Lodgepole and jack pine ranges overlap in northern Alberta and the Northwest Territories, where these species hybridize (Fig. 1). In the absence of reliable molecular markers, morphological characteristics are commonly used to distinguish lodgepole pine, jack pine and hybrids. However, hybrids and pure species can be difficult to visually distinguish, particularly at the presumed periphery of the hybrid zone, which is poorly described.

thumbnailFigure 1. Canadian data for A. pine distribution, B. historical MPB range, C. extent of the current MPB outbreak prior to 2006, D. extent of the current MPB outbreak following dispersal into northern Alberta. MPB data are overlaid on classic lodgepole and jack pine ranges [1]. Pine volume and MPB attack data courtesy of the Canadian Forest Service.

Mountain pine beetle (MPB; Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins) is indigenous to western North America. In the current MPB outbreak, more than 14 million hectares of mainly lodgepole pine forests have sustained MPB-caused mortality in British Columbia alone [2]. Following MPB long range dispersal into northwestern Alberta in 2006, MPB has continued its apparently unprecedented eastward spread into the lodgepole x jack pine hybrid zone of Alberta (Fig. 1).

To better define this hybrid zone, we developed microsatellite and SNP markers that distinguish the pure species from hybrids. We then used the microsatellite markers to test the hypothesis that the MPB epidemic has spread into jack pine.

Materials and methods

Foliage was collected from 678 trees representing 25 localities in British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Ontario, and Minnesota in 2007, 2008 and 2010, including 154 MPB-attacked trees from British Columbia and Alberta.

Eleven microsatellite markers amplifying both lodgepole and jack pine were developed from published loci [3] and loci isolated from a microsatellite enriched (GTn/CTn) lodgepole pine library. Genotyping and scoring was carried out as described [4]. There were less than 2% missing data, with a 0.8% genotyping error rate. Loci met Hardy-Weinburg equilibrium criteria; pairs of loci in linkage disequilibrium were negligible. Genetic diversity measures were calculated in GENEPOP [5], GenAlEx [6] and HP-RARE [7]. Assignment tests were conducted in NEWHYBRIDS [8] and STRUCTURE [9].

In silico species-discriminating SNP detection was carried out using CLC Genomics with lodgepole and jack pine cDNA 454 sequence data, and validated with PCR.

Results and discussion

Genetic diversity was high among localities, and was higher in lodgepole than jack pine. Differentiation among localities (FST = 0.125) and between species (FST = 0.133) was high. Within species, differentiation among localities was generally low (FSTlodgepole = 0.033, FSTjack = 0.016).

The efficacy of the microsatellite loci to distinguish pure species and hybrids was tested by assignment of individuals to their correct class with NEWHYBRIDS and STRUCTURE, using five simulated datasets (ten iterations each) containing multiple levels of admixture generated with known pure lodgepole and jack pine as benchmarks. Using QT greater than or equal to 0.9 to assign pure species and QT less than 0.9 to designate hybrids, we achieved accurate resolution of first and second generation hybrids in simulated datasets using both NEWHYBRIDS and STRUCTURE, but encountered diminishing power with advanced generations. There was very high agreement between NEWHYBRIDS and STRUCTURE; a decision tree was developed to resolve the small number of disagreements. Assignment of the 678 genotyped individuals suggests that the intersection of the ranges classically described for lodgepole and jack pine [1] underestimates the distribution of hybrids. Pure lodgepole and jack pine were identified within the lodgepole x jack pine hybrid zone, with lodgepole pine often occupying higher elevations.

Eight of 154 MPB-attacked trees genotyped with the microsatellite loci were identified as jack pine. This first evidence of MPB mass-attack and reproduction on jack pine in natural stands was presented to key forest managers and decision makers via the National Forest Pest Strategy – a Canadian Forest Service initiative coordinating federal and provincial forest management and policy development – and led to accelerated development of a consensus inter-jurisdictional strategic plan.

We have developed 9 nuclear, 12 chloroplast, and 3 mitochondrial SNP markers that distinguish lodgepole pine, jack pine, and hybrids. These markers are being used to further delineate the hybrid zone, investigate gene flow and introgression, and continue monitoring MPB invasion of the boreal forest.

Conclusion

Microsatellite markers reliably distinguishing lodgepole pine, jack pine and their hybrids were used to better delineate Alberta’s lodgepole pine x jack pine hybrid zone and to conclusively demonstrate that MPB has undergone host range expansion into jack pine of the boreal forest, a new habitat for this devastating forest pest.

References

  1. Critchfield WB, Little EL: Geographic distribution of the pines of the world. USDA Misc. Pub. 991; 1966.

  2. Nealis V, Peter B: Risk assessment of the threat of mountain pine beetle to Canada’s boreal and eastern pine forests. Report BC-X-417, Canadian Forest Service; 2008.

  3. Auckland LD, Bui T, Zhou Y, Shepard M, Williams CG: Conifer microsatellite handbook. Corporate Press, Raleigh, N.C.; 2002.

  4. Cullingham CI, Cooke JEK, Dang S, Davis CS, Cooke BJ, Coltman DW: Mountain pine beetle host-range expansion threatens the boreal forest.

    Mol. Ecol. 2011, 20:2157-2171. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  5. Raymond M, Rousset F: Genepop (Version-1.2) – population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism.

    J Heredity 1995, 86:248-249. OpenURL

  6. Peakall R, Smouse PE: GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research.

    Mol Ecol Notes 2006, 6:288-295. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  7. Kalinowski ST: hp-rare 1.0: a computer program for performing rarefaction on measures of allelic richness.

    Mol Ecol Notes 2005, 5:187-189. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  8. Anderson E, Thompson EA: A model-based method for identifying species hybrids using multilocus genetic data.

    Genetics 2002, 160:1217-1229. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  9. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P: Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data.

    Genetics 2000, 155:945-959. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL