Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Proceedings and BioMed Central.

This article is part of the supplement: International Conference on Prevention & Infection Control (ICPIC 2011)

Open Access Poster presentation

Assessment of hand hygiene adherence using a web camera

H Kunishima1*, K Tokuda1, M Meguro2, T Kobayashi1, J Chiba2, T Aoyagi1, M Hatta1, M Kitagawa1, Y Honda2 and M Kaku1

  • * Corresponding author: H Kunishima

Author Affiliations

1 Infection Control and Laboratory Diagnostics, Tohuku University Graduate School, Sendai-city, Japan

2 Infection Control Team, Sendai Kosei Hospital, Sendai-city, Japan

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Proceedings 2011, 5(Suppl 6):P104  doi:10.1186/1753-6561-5-S6-P104

The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at:

Published:29 June 2011

© 2011 Kunishima et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Introduction / objectives

The most effective method of controlling nosocomial infection is hand hygiene. Hand hygiene has been monitored by trained nurses’ observation of hygiene practices and assessment of the amount of alcohol-based hand sanitizer used. This study used a web camera to examine hand hygiene adherence.


A web camera was installed in the ICU in September 2010, video from the camera was relayed to the Department of Infection Control via the hospital’s intranet, and that video was saved on a server for later observation. Starting in December 2010, personnel on both the day and night shifts were assessed for a total of 100 hours using the Observation Form of the WHO Patient Safety team.


Alcohol-based hand sanitizer were used 170L per 1,000 patients. Conventional observation by ward nurses indicated that compliance with hand hygiene before touching a patient was 77%. Direct observation with the web camera indicated that hand hygiene was required 11.6 times/hour for each patient. Adherence to hand hygiene was 22.5%. Compliance with hand hygiene was 25.3? before touching a patient, 25.2? before a clean/aseptic procedure, 14.0? after body fluid exposure risk, 30.6? after touching a patient, and 11.5? after touching patient surroundings. After improved education of and practices by health care practitioners, staff were again observed for 100 hours. Adherence to hand hygiene was found to have improved to 33.8% (P < 0.05).


Direct observation with a web camera allowed video to be recorded and saved for long periods and it allowed practices to be assessed. The saved video was circulated among the health care practitioners to allow a more objective intervention.

Disclosure of interest

None declared.