Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Proceedings and BioMed Central.

This article is part of the supplement: International Conference on Prevention & Infection Control (ICPIC 2011)

Open Access Oral presentation

MRSA: the transmission paradigm investigated

G Moore1*, B Cookson2, R Jackson1, A Kearns2, J Singleton3, D Smyth1 and APR Wilson1

  • * Corresponding author: G Moore

Author Affiliations

1 University College London Hospitals, London, UK

2 Health Protection Agency, London, UK

3 Royal Free Hampstead NHS Trust, London, UK

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Proceedings 2011, 5(Suppl 6):O86  doi:10.1186/1753-6561-5-S6-O86

The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at:

Published:29 June 2011

© 2011 Moore et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Introduction / objectives

Variability in MRSA policies and procedures reflects a need for more information regarding the relative contribution and clinical importance of the different modes of MRSA transmission.


A prospective 1 year study was conducted within the ICU of two UK hospitals. Conventional sampling techniques were used to recover MRSA from the air and from high contact sites located within the ward environment. All patients were screened for MRSA on admission and weekly during their stays. Samples from other sites were cultured when clinically indicated. MRSA was considered nosocomially acquired if detected more than 48 h after admission. Possible transmission routes from donor to recipient via the hands of staff, the air or environmental surfaces were identified. Focused molecular typing via PFGE was used to explore these pathway hypotheses.


There were 2654 admissions. 175 patients were positive for MRSA on admission whilst 78 acquired MRSA during their stay. MRSA was isolated from 208 of 18,596 surfaces, from 56 of 859 air samples and from the hands of staff on 59 of 4191 sampling occasions. 28 acquisition events occurred in ICU A. Only those involving an unusual PFGE pulsotype (i.e. one not recognised as being common and widespread within the UK hospital environment) were selected for further study. The likely source of 9 colonizations was identified and of the tested hypotheses, 7 implicated poor hand hygiene, 4 inadequate cleaning and 1 airborne transmission. In ICU B a higher level of endogenous and/or endemic MRSA meant evidence for patient-patient cross-transmission was more limited.


To help minimise the spread of MRSA within an ICU, hand hygiene must be coupled with effective routine environmental cleaning.

Disclosure of interest

None declared.