Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Proceedings and BioMed Central.

This article is part of the supplement: International Conference on Prevention & Infection Control (ICPIC 2011)

Open Access Oral presentation

Comparing the DebugIT dashboards to national surveillance systems

C Daniel1*, R Choquet2, A Assele2, F Enders3, P Daumke3 and M-C Jaulent2

  • * Corresponding author: C Daniel

Author Affiliations

1 INSERM-AP-HP-Paris Descartes University, Paris, France

2 UMRS 872 eq 20, INSERM, Paris, France

3 Averbis, Freiburg, Germany

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Proceedings 2011, 5(Suppl 6):O1  doi:10.1186/1753-6561-5-S6-O1

The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at:

Published:29 June 2011

© 2011 Daniel et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Introduction / objectives

An important limitation of existing large-scale surveillance systems of infectious diseases is that they use mostly manual data collection processes and therefore usually deliver trends on an annual basis. The DebugIT project, funded by the 7th EU Framework Programme, provides an access to heterogeneous clinical data sets of different European hospitals. We compared the DebugIT control capabilities to the process and results provided by the French surveillance system of infectious disease (Institut de Veille Sanitaire (InVS)) and the antimicrobial resistance surveillance study of the Paul-Ehrlich-Society (PEG).


InVS currently controls every year multidrug resistant bacteria in 930 French healthcare facilities and Nosocomial Infection in 176 Intensive Care Units. PEG collects 240 isolates from each of 20-30 microbiology laboratories every three years. The DebugIT platform provides a scalable solution for executing real-time clinical queries over European data repositories about antibiotic resistance and antibiotic consumption.


Despite different methods for aggregating data and calculate incidence rates and antibiotic consumption (e.g. per 1,000 patient-days), the trends observed by national surveillance programs are similar to those reported retrospectively by the DebugIt platform. The detailed comparison is still ongoing.


The use by European surveillance networks of platforms such as DebugIT platform is likely to enhance their ability for real-time identification of new trends in antibiotic resistance and/or antibiotic consumption. An interesting perspective is to connect DebugIT endpoints to general practitioner electronic medical records or private laboratory information systems in order to extend the surveillance to the community.

Disclosure of interest

None declared.