Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Proceedings and BioMed Central.

This article is part of the supplement: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Animal Genomics for Animal Health (AGAH 2010)

Open Access Proceedings

Down-regulation of promoter methylation level of CD4 gene after MDV infection in MD-susceptible chicken line

Juan Luo1, Ying Yu13, Huanmin Zhang2, Fei Tian1, Shuang Chang2, Hans H Cheng2 and Jiuzhou Song1*

  • * Corresponding author: Jiuzhou Song songj88@umd.edu

  • † Equal contributors

Author Affiliations

1 Animal & Avian Sciences Department, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, 20740, USA

2 USDA, ARS, Avian Disease and Oncology Laboratory, East Lansing, MI 48823, USA

3 College of Animal Sciences, China Agricultural University, Haidian, Beijing, 100193, P.R. China

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Proceedings 2011, 5(Suppl 4):S7  doi:10.1186/1753-6561-5-S4-S7


The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1753-6561/5/S4/S7


Published:3 June 2011

© 2011 Luo et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background

Marek’s disease virus (MDV) is an oncovirus that induces lymphoid tumors in susceptible chickens, and may affect the epigenetic stability of the CD4 gene. The purpose of this study was to find the effect of MDV infection on DNA methylation status of the CD4 gene differed between MD-resistant (L63) and –susceptible (L72) chicken lines.

Methods

Chickens from each line were divided into two groups with one group infected by MDV and the other group as uninfected controls. Then, promoter DNA methylation levels of the CD4 gene were measured by Pyrosequencing; and gene expression analysis was performed by quantitative PCR.

Results

Promoter methylation of the CD4 gene was found to be down-regulated in L72 chickens only after MDV infection. The methylation down-regulation of the CD4 promoter is negatively correlated with up-regulation of CD4 gene expression in the L72 spleen at 21 dpi.

Conclusions

The methylation fluctuation and mRNA expression change of CD4 gene induced by MDV infection suggested a unique epigenetic mechanism existed in MD-susceptible chickens.

Background

CD4 encodes a glycoprotein, located on the surface of T helper (Th) cells and regulatory T cells. Through interaction with MHC class II molecules, CD4 directs the linage development of Th cells in immune organs and activates the CD4+ T cell maturation process [1]. Thus, the transcriptional level of CD4 is directly related to T cell development [2]. In mice, CD4 transcription is controlled by several cis-acting elements including enhancers, silencers and DNA methylation [3,4]. However, the epigenetic regulation of CD4 gene in chicken and its relationship with any virus infection are still unclear.⋯

Marek’s disease (MD), a T cell lymphoma of chickens caused by the Marek’s disease virus (MDV), is characterized by mononuclear cell-infiltration in various organs including peripheral nerves, skin, muscle, and visceral organs [5], and is a worldwide problem for the poultry industry. A complex MDV life cycle was found in susceptible chickens during MD progression, which includes an early cytolytic phase (2-7 days post infection, dpi), latent phase (7-10 dpi), late cytolytic phase (from 18 dpi) and transformation phase (28 dpi and onwards) [6].

Epigenetics is the study of alterations that result in inherited changes in phenotypes despite the lack of DNA sequence polymorphisms and include DNA methylation, histone modification and chromatin remodeling [7]. It is described as the interaction between genes and environmental factors. Aberrant CpG methylation levels of the gene promoter region contribute to oncogenesis [8]. Viruses are one of the environmental agents that can cause alterations of DNA methylation level in host genes [9].

The focus of this study was to better understand the expression control of CD4 by ascertaining the epigenetic status in the CD4 promoter and the CD4 expression in relation to MDV infection. Two inbred chicken lines, MD-resistant or –susceptible with the same MHC (major histocompatibility complex) haplotypes, from Avian Disease and Oncology laboratory (ADOL) were used [5]. We, therefore, measured the promoter methylation and transcription of the CD4 gene before and after MDV infection of both lines. We found methylation alterations in the CD4 promoter region after MDV infection differ between these two lines.

Methods

Animals, virus infection experiments and sample collection

USDA, Avian Disease and Oncology Laboratory (ADOL) chicken lines 6 (L63) and lines 7 (L72) chickens, which are MD-resistant and MD-susceptible, respectively, were obtained. For each line, the chickens were divided into two groups with 30 chickens infected by MDV and 30 uninfected controls. A very virulent plus strain of MDV (648A passage 40, VV+) was injected intra-abdominally on the fifth day after hatching with 500 plaque-forming units (PFU). Spleen samples were collected at 5 dpi, 10 dpi and 21 dpi, put in RNAlater (Qiagen, USA) immediately, and then stored at -80°C. All procedures followed the standard animal ethics and user guidelines.

DNA extraction, bisulfite treatment and pyrosequencing

DNA was extracted from 20-30 mg spleen by NucleoSpin® Tissue Kits (Macherey-Nagel, Germany). 500 ng DNA was treated with sodium bisulfite and purified by EZ DNA Methylation-Gold Kit™ (ZYMO Research, USA). Primers for pyrosequencing were designed by PSQ Assay Design software (Biotage, Swedan) (Table 1). For cost reduction, a universal primer (5’-GGGACACCGCTGATCGTTTA-3’) was used in the PCR assays [10]. DNA methylation level analysis was performed with Pyro Q-CpG system (PyroMark ID, Biotage, Sweden) as previously described [10,11].

Table 1. Primers used in Pyrosequencing and quantitative PCR

RNA extraction and quantitative real-time RT-PCR

RNA from 30-50mg spleen was extracted using the RNAeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, USA). Reverse transcription was carried out in 20 µl with 1 µg of total RNA by using SuperScript™ III Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen, USA) and oligo (dT)12-18 primers (Invitrogen, USA). Primers (Table 1) for quantitative real-time RT-PCR were designed by Primer3 online primer designer system (http://frodo.wi.mit.edu/ webcite). qPCR was performed on the iCycler iQ PCR system (Bio-Rad, USA) in a final volume of 20 µl using QuantiTect SYBR Green PCR Kit (Qiagen, USA) with the following procedure: denatured at 95°C for 15 min, followed by 40 cycles at 95 °C for 30 s, 60 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 30 s, then extended at 72 °C for 10 min. Each reaction was replicated twice. The housekeeping gene GAPDH (glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase) was used to normalize the assays.

Statistical analysis

Promoter methylation levels and gene expression before and after MDV infection were compared by Student’s t test. An exact F test was performed to distinguish different methylation patterns [10]. Correlation between CD4 DNA methylation and expression was tested by Pearson's correlation coefficient.

Results

CD4 promoter methylation analysis before and after MDV infection

To determine the promoter methylation level of the CD4 gene, a DNA sequence containing the CpG islands from the CD4 gene promoter region (sequence shown in Table 1) was downloaded from UCSC (http://genome.ucsc.edu webcite) and the methylation level was determined by pyrosequencing. The CpGs in the promoter of CD4 exhibits a high (>70%) methylation level in both L63 and L72 chickens before MDV infection. During MD progression, no significant methylation changes of CD4 promoter were detected in L63 chickens at 5, 10 and 21 dpi or in L72 chickens at 5 and 10 dpi (P>0.05, Figure 1, and Figure 1A and 1B); however, the significant down-regulation of CD4 promoter methylation level was observed at 21 dpi in L72 chickens (P< 0.05, Figure 1C). The result from the exact F test revealed that the CD4 promoter methylation pattern in L72 infected samples at 21 dpi was significantly different from any other groups (Figure 2).

thumbnailFigure 1. CD4 promoter methylation levels at 5 (A), 10 (B) and 21dpi (C). Pyrosequencing result of the promoter methylation level of CD4 gene before and after MDV infection at different time points. A decrease of promoter methylation level was observed only L72 chickens. 5dpi: 5 days post infection; 10dpi: 10 days post infection; 21dpi: 21 days post infection. L63.Non: noninfected control of L63 chicken; L63.Inf: infected L63 chicken; L72.Non: noninfected control of L63 chicken; L63.Inf: infected L63 chicken. n=4 for each line.

thumbnailFigure 2. Exact F test for DNA methylation patterns of CD4. The methylation level of each of the CpG site in the promoter region of CD4 gene was used to do an exact F test. P values matrix among L63 and L72 at 5, 10 and 21dpi. Color bar shows the significance level (P values with -log10(P). e.g., -log10(0.05) = 1.3; log10(0.01) = 2).

CD4 gene expression at 21 dpi

To ascertain if the CD4 gene transcription level is influenced by its promoter methylation changes at 21 dpi, we conducted quantitative PCR. We found a significantly higher expression of CD4 gene in L72 infected samples compared with noninfected control samples (P<0.05) (Figure 3), whereas no significant up or down-regulation of CD4 expression was detected in L63 chickens after MDV infection (P>0.05). Hereinafter, further correlation analysis showed that methylation level of all the detected CpG sites existed a negatively relationship with CD4 gene expression in L72 chicken at 21dpi (Figure 4).

thumbnailFigure 3. Relative mRNA expression of CD4 gene at 21dpi. Real-time quantitative PCR was used to detect the mRNA expression level of CD4 gene in different chicken lines with or without MDV infection at 21dpi. The relative expression level of CD4 gene was normalized to a house keeping gene GAPDH. Non.: noninfected control samples; Inf.: infected samples. n=4 for each line and treatment.

thumbnailFigure 4. Correlation between CD4 promoter methylation and relative gene expression in L72 spleen at 21dpi. Correlation analysis of the relationship between methylation and CD4 gene mRNA expression level. R represents for the correlation coefficient. M1: CpG site 1; M2: CpG site 2; M3: CpG site3; M4: CpG site 4. n=4 for each line and treatment.

Discussion

The CD4 gene and its regulatory sequences are conserved [12]. In human and mouse, multiple protein or transcription factor binding sites, including the Myb binding site, Elf-1 binding site, and Ikaros binding site, were found in the promoter region of CD4, which is involved in the on/off switching of CD4 gene expression [4]. These regulatory sites were also found in the chicken CD4 promoter with potential functions in its expression [12]. It is well known that epigenetic factors such as DNA methylation and histone modifications play important roles in transcriptional regulation in mammals [7]. For example. the methylation change in at least one CpG site of CD4 gene in mouse is related to CD4+ T cell differentiation [3]. In this study, we thus examined the methylation status in the promoter region of CD4 gene in chickens related to MDV infection.

MDV is an oncovirus using CD4+ T cell as a target for latent infection and transformation, which may have interactions with the CD4 gene at the epigenetic level [13]. In our previously study, two mutations (CG→TG) were identified in the DNMT3b gene between L63 and L72 chickens [10], which implied that the DNA methylation machinery may be different in the two lines in response to MDV infection. In this study, the methylation levels on the promoter region of the CD4 gene were fluctuated over different time points of MDV infection in MD-susceptible chickens, especially during the late cytolytic phase. The quantitative PCR results confirmed that CD4 expression in L72 chicken during the late stages of MDV infection was upregulated while the CD4 promoter methylation was down-regulation. Since the expression of CD4 is essential for CD4+ T cell development and activation, it may suggest that there are different epigenetic machineries of activation of CD4+ T cells by MDV infection through regulation of CD4 methylation levels between MD-resistant and susceptible chicken lines. From previous studies, it was found that the number of infected CD4+ T cells were similar during the early phase (cytolytic phase) of MDV infection between MD-resistant and –susceptible chicken lines, but was increased during cytolytic phase in MD-susceptible chicken line and decreased in MD-resistant chicken line [14]. Additionally, in MD-resistant chicken line, CD4+ T cell is latently infected, but cannot be transformed, whereas in MD-susceptible chicken lines the infected CD4+ T cell can be transformed after the latent phase [5,15]. Taken together, the methylation change of CD4 gene gives us an important clue that epigenetic alteration could associate with MD etiology. Therefore, future efforts will disclose the epigenetic landscapes, including genome-wide DNA methyltion and histone modifications, in immune organs and specific cell types, such as the CD4+ T cell, which will supply rich information to explore the epigenetic machinery related to chemical and physiological mechanisms of MD resistance or susceptibility.

Conclusions

In conclusion, the methylation fluctuation and mRNA expression of CD4 gene induced by MDV infection suggested a unique epigenetic mechanism existed in MD-susceptible chickens.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

JL performed the experiments and prepare the manuscript. YY and FT performed the experiments. HMZ and SC designed and performed the viral challenge experiment. JZS designed and wrote the paper.

Acknowledgements

The study was grant-supported by NIFA 2008-35204-04660

This article has been published as part of BMC Proceedings Volume 5 Supplement 4, 2011: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Animal Genomics for Animal Health (AGAH 2010). The full contents of the supplement are available online at http://www.biomedcentral.com/1753-6561/5?issue=S4.

References

  1. Huang Z, Xie H, Ioannidis V, Held W, Clevers H, Sadim MS, Sun Z: Transcriptional regulation of CD4 gene expression by T cell factor-1/beta-catenin pathway.

    J Immunol 2006, 176(8):4880-4887. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  2. Paillard F, Sterkers G, Vaquero C: Transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulation of TcR, CD4 and CD8 gene expression during activation of normal human T lymphocytes.

    Embo J 1990, 9(6):1867-1872. PubMed Abstract | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  3. Tutt Landolfi MM, Scollay R, Parnes JR: Specific demethylation of the CD4 gene during CD4 T lymphocyte differentiation.

    Mol Immunol 1997, 34(1):53-61. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  4. Ellmeier W, Sawada S, Littman DR: The regulation of CD4 and CD8 coreceptor gene expression during T cell development.

    Annu Rev Immunol 1999, 17:523-524. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  5. Davison F, Nair V: Marek's Disease: An Evolving Problem. Oxford: Elsevier Academic Press; 2004.

  6. Calnek BW: Pathogenesis of Marek's disease virus infection.

    Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 2001, 255:25-55. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  7. Allis CD, Jenuwein T, Reinberg D, Caparros M-L: Epigenetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2006.

  8. Herman JG, Baylin SB: Gene silencing in cancer in association with promoter hypermethylation.

    N Engl J Med 2003, 349(21):2042-2054. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  9. Amara K, Trimeche M, Ziadi S, Laatiri A, Hachana M, Sriha B, Mokni M, Korbi S: Presence of simian virus 40 DNA sequences in diffuse large B-cell lymphomas in Tunisia correlates with aberrant promoter hypermethylation of multiple tumor suppressor genes.

    Int J Cancer 2007, 121(12):2693-2702. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  10. Yu Y, Zhang H, Tian F, Zhang W, Fang H, Song J: An integrated epigenetic and genetic analysis of DNA methyltransferase genes (DNMTs) in tumor resistant and susceptible chicken lines.

    PLoS ONE 2008, 3(7):e2672. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  11. Colella S, Shen L, Baggerly KA, Issa JP, Krahe R: Sensitive and quantitative universal Pyrosequencing methylation analysis of CpG sites.

    Biotechniques 2003, 35(1):146-150. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  12. Koskinen R, Salomonsen J, Tregaskes CA, Young JR, Goodchild M, Bumstead N, Vainio O: The chicken CD4 gene has remained conserved in evolution.

    Immunogenetics 2002, 54(7):520-525. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  13. Rouse BT, Wells RJ, Warner NL: Proportion of T and B lymphocytes in lesions of Marek's disease: theoretical implications for pathogenesis.

    J Immunol 1973, 110(2):534-539. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  14. Burgess SC, Basaran BH, Davison TF: Resistance to Marek's disease herpesvirus-induced lymphoma is multiphasic and dependent on host genotype.

    Vet Pathol 2001, 38(2):129-142. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  15. Burgess SC, Davison TF: Identification of the neoplastically transformed cells in Marek's disease herpesvirus-induced lymphomas: recognition by the monoclonal antibody AV37.

    J Virol 2002, 76(14):7276-7292. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL