Table 2

Comparison of the detected QTL with the simulated data.

QTLMAS

QTLMAP


Trait

Chr

Location

Effect

Location

Effect

Traits affected

Δ location


Ass

1

42.5

29.3

43.6

17

P0 to P530

1.2

Ass

2

4.6

7.1

3.7

8

P530

0.9

Ass

2

88.6

3.7

-

-

-

-

Ass

3

89.9

4.1

92.3

7

P132 to P530

2.4

Ass

4

70

3.3

65.3

8

P265 to P530

4.7

Ass

5

77.2

2.5

72.1

8

P397 to P530

5.1

Growth

1

87.7

23.4

-

-

-

-

Growth

2

48.9

4.8

42.7

9

P0 to P530

6.2

Growth

3

26.2

4.7

17.3

7

P0

8.9

Growth

4

9.6

5.9

9.3

-

P0 to P 132

0.3

Growth

4

86.4

6.6

-

-

-

-

Growth

5

31.5

4.6

-

-

-

-

Inf

1

54.3

32.3

-

-

-

-

Inf

2

33

3.5

-

-

-

-

Inf

3

6.9

3.5

1.3

-

P0 to P530

5.6

Inf

3

56.1

3.8

48.7

-

P265 to P530

7.4

Inf

4

36.5

3.2

-

-

-

-

Inf

5

59.7

3.7

-

-

-

-

FALSE

4

86.4

6.6

75.3

6

P0 to P132

11.1

FALSE

5

59.7

3.7

94.1

13

P0 to P265

16.9

FALSE

5

-

-

80

-

P132 to P530

-


Location = QTL location (in cM)

Effect = percentage of phenotypic variance explained

Traits affected = traits for which this QTL was detected by QTLMAP

Demeure et al. BMC Proceedings 2010 4(Suppl 1):S10   doi:10.1186/1753-6561-4-S1-S10

Open Data