Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Proceedings and BioMed Central.

This article is part of the supplement: 6th International Symposium on the Intraductal Approach to Breast Cancer

Open Access Meeting abstract

A direct comparative study of methylation-specific PCR in ductal lavage fluid, breast cancer tissue, normal breast parenchyma and plasma in women with early breast cancer

GPH Gui1*, D Twelves13, A Nerurkar2, P Osin2, A Ward1, T Crook3 and CM Isacke3

Author Affiliations

1 Academic Surgery (Breast Unit), Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK

2 Department of Histopathology, Royal Marsden NHS Trust, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK

3 Breakthrough Breast Cancer, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Proceedings 2009, 3(Suppl 5):S20  doi:10.1186/1753-6561-3-S5-S20

The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at:

Published:24 July 2009

© 2009 Gui et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.


Breast duct lavage for analysis by methylation-specific PCR is a novel but established method for detecting the presence of cancer and may contribute additional information about prognosis and response to treatment. The aim of this consecutive series of breast cancer patients was a case-control study to evaluate qualitative methylation of five published tumour suppressor genes1 in breast cancer tissue, adjacent normal breast parenchyma, duct lavage fluid and plasma.


Breast cancer tissue and adjacent normal parenchymal tissue was obtained at the time of surgery in 24 women. Normal breast tissue from 22 patients undergoing breast surgery without breast cancer were used as controls. In all patients, tissue cores, matched plasma, ipsilateral and contralateral duct lavage fluid were obtained for methylation-specific PCR. DNA was purified from microdissected tissue, plasma and breast duct biofluids using the QUIAGEN DNeasy kit. Purified DNA was then modified (EZ Zymo methylation kit) for detection of methylated regions in five genes: HIN-1, RIL, RASSF1A, CDH13 and RARβ2, by optimised specific-PCR. Proportional data with binomial errors were used to compare cancer vs control samples.


Methylated DNA products were qualitatively scored and a positive correlation identified between tumour tissue and ipsilateral duct lavage in the breast cancer group (n = 24): HIN-1 (58 and 50%), RIL (63 and 42%), RASSF1A (71 and 54%), CDH13 (42 and 33%) and RARβ2 (38 and 25%. Methylation was significantly higher in tumour and ipsilateral duct lavage fluid when compared with adjacent normal tissue and contralateral duct lavage. (See Table 1.)

Methylation was less when scored as accumulated methylation events in benign breast tissue and duct lavage of 22 non-cancer patients: HIN (4% and 4%), RIL (8% and 0%), RASSF1A (13 and 0%), CDH13 (13 and 4%), RARβ2 (0%). No difference was found in plasma methylation of cancer patients versus controls. (a1-sided = 5%; power = 90%)


Our data demonstrates the feasibility to modify purified DNA from cellular breast duct fluid for detection of methylated products by methylation-specific PCR, with a significant difference in rates of DNA methylation in duct lavage of cancer patients versus controls. These differences were unrelated to plasma methylation profiles, limiting blood testing as a biomarker of breast cancer progression. The inclusion of other tumour suppressor genes in future studies may increase the sensitivity and specificity of breast-specific biofluids in subclinical cancer.