|
Resolution: standard / high Figure 2.
Exploring noise-filtering strategies. (A) Increasing the positive feedback improved the extent of polarization at higher noise
levels. 2D simulations were performed on the model in which the strength of the positive
feedback ranged from none (k1 = 0) to low (k1 = 10, h = 2) to high (k1 = 10, h = 8). For a given gradient (Lmid = 1, Lslp = 0.01 μm-1), higher positive feedback produced stronger polarization at higher levels of noise.
The time-average of the polarity variable a(ā) with respect to θ is plotted. (B) Adding a filtering module improved polarization. In the top row, there was a single
NPF (no-positive-feedback) module compared to two NPF modules in series. In the second
row, there was a single PF (positive feedback) module compared to a two-stage arrangement
of a NPF module followed by a PF module (NPF+PF). The extra stage resulted in improved
polarization. Dashed gray lines represent polarization in the absence of input noise
(1D simulations with Lslp = 0.01 μm-1, σ = 0.1). (C) Slower dynamics produced more accurate and effective polarization. In a two-stage
NPF+PF model, we scaled the parameters either 10-fold faster or 10-fold slower in
2D simulations (Lslp = 0.01 μm-1). We plotted the spatial distribution of the output of the second stage ā2 for two values of σ.
Chou et al. BMC Systems Biology 2011 5:196 doi:10.1186/1752-0509-5-196 |