Open Access Highly Accessed Research article

Modeling RNA interference in mammalian cells

Giulia Cuccato, Athanasios Polynikis, Velia Siciliano, Mafalda Graziano, Mario di Bernardo and Diego di Bernardo*

BMC Systems Biology 2011, 5:19  doi:10.1186/1752-0509-5-19

PubMed Commons is an experimental system of commenting on PubMed abstracts, introduced in October 2013. Comments are displayed on the abstract page, but during the initial closed pilot, only registered users can read or post comments. Any researcher who is listed as an author of an article indexed by PubMed is entitled to participate in the pilot. If you would like to participate and need an invitation, please email info@biomedcentral.com, giving the PubMed ID of an article on which you are an author. For more information, see the PubMed Commons FAQ.

This paper provides proof that the Hill type equation describes the RNA interfence

Raya Khanin   (2011-05-25 15:38)  Bioinformatics Core, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center email

In this paper, the authors performed in vitro experiments in human and hamster cell lines measuring levels of mRNAs and proteins for a large range of concentrations of siRNA oligomers. They demonstrate the the Hill type equation is the most efficient way to model RNA interference. It would have been a nice study had the authors were not carried away by suddenly referring to the Hill model as theirs. They continue by saying that their "model has a simple mathematical form, amenable to analytical investigations and a small set of parameters with an intuitive physical meaning, that makes it a unique and reliable mathematical tool".

Indeed, the Hill model was introduced by Archibald Hill in 1910, and has since been applied to numerous biological processes, from enzyme reactions to microRNA-mediated gene regulation. In my view, the author's claim in the abstract's conclusion that it is "their" model puts an unnecessary shadow on their own work, warrants questions of mis-representation (hopefully unintentional) and asks for a general debate on model's ownership and how seriously scientific community should consider it.

Competing interests

None declared

top

Post a comment